Ron Paul Running for president in 2012 - GoFuckYourself.com

u-Bob · 10-13-2010, 03:38 PM

"Ron Paul has indicated that he will embark on a bid to become President in 2012 if the economic crisis worsens"

Ethersync · 10-13-2010, 03:39 PM

Most excellent!

DWB · 10-13-2010, 03:41 PM

And he will have my vote.

Not because I think he will win, he will never win. But because he will be the best man running worthy of my vote, even if he is a little kooky, he's usually on point.

BestXXXPorn · 10-13-2010, 03:43 PM

He's got my vote, especially being a Libertarian ;) Not to mention the man KNOWS his shit. Ask him the same question 20 times and he'll give you 20 different explanations according to the context in which it was asked.

With most politicians it's always some kind of parley into their prepared speech on the topic.

BestXXXPorn · 10-13-2010, 03:50 PM

Keynes had it all wrong but politicians love his economic philosophy because it preaches market interference and perfectly suits the power mongers...

Austrian Economics is where it's at and anyone that says differently, IMO, does not fully understand economics, what a free market is, and just how random the habits of every individual participating in a market are...

and just for fun:

Serge Litehead · 10-13-2010, 04:04 PM

good thing, although doubtful he can change much if ever gets elected, he will be swimming against the stream

minicivan · 10-13-2010, 04:06 PM

haha "if it worsens" - meaning what? If we survive a nuclear war?

Well, when i finally eating out of dumpsters, i'll vote for him for sure.

PornMD · 10-13-2010, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minicivan

haha "if it worsens" - meaning what? If we survive a nuclear war?

Well, when i finally eating out of dumpsters, i'll vote for him for sure.

Yea, that was a little odd. In other words, if at the point of the next election it's obvious that a 2 year old could do a better job than Obama, he'll run? I like the man though and would vote for him if he ran, assuming he doesn't go McCain-senile before then.

IllTestYourGirls · 10-13-2010, 04:14 PM

Well, if he chooses to run he will have an exploratory committee formed in Jan 2011 and announce in March 2011. So it does look like he will be running, since shit isnt getting better now.

Sausage · 10-13-2010, 04:21 PM

He can't possibly win.

None of the big bankers will back him, and they will actually try to rip him down so he is dead in the water from the start. Presidents are put in place by the bankers through the media and other outlets.

IllTestYourGirls · 10-13-2010, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage

He can't possibly win.

None of the big bankers will back him, and they will actually try to rip him down so he is dead in the water from the start. Presidents are put in place by the bankers through the media and other outlets.

Sometimes it is not about winning.

sologirlcontent · 10-13-2010, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage

He can't possibly win.

None of the big bankers will back him, and they will actually try to rip him down so he is dead in the water from the start. Presidents are put in place by the bankers through the media and other outlets.

arock10 · 10-13-2010, 05:34 PM

Running to a casket maybe that guy is ancient

D Ghost · 10-13-2010, 05:49 PM

+1 for Ron Paul

kane · 10-13-2010, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage

He can't possibly win.

None of the big bankers will back him, and they will actually try to rip him down so he is dead in the water from the start. Presidents are put in place by the bankers through the media and other outlets.

So you are saying that the vote of the people doesn't matter? That it is all set up so no matter how you vote the end is already determined? Or are you saying that these people in power make sure that both candidates are their choice so that no matter who wins they get the person they wanted?

The reality is that Ron Paul won't win because he doesn't want to win. It is very easy to sit where he is and call for action. It is a lot harder to actually get the job and be expected to carry out that action. You can tell he isn't serious about winning because he won't take any money from big business. While this might be honorable, it isn't realistic in the modern world. It takes several hundred million to run a winning campaign. With this being the reality you need big donors and to allow yourself to enter into the machine so you can never raise that kind of cash. Paul knows this. He runs, he gets his message out there and then he conveniently publishes a new book that all the paul fans run out and buy. You might say Paul is just using his donor's money to market his books right back to those same donors.

If he were serious he would admit that he has to give into the system to some degree then win the election and once he is president he does as he pleases. Of course he knows it doesn't work that way and even if he won chances are very few of his policies would ever get implemented. So he sells a pipe dream and a book and happily goes about being the guy everyone loves and listens to, but who is never expected to actually carry out these plans.

Sausage · 10-13-2010, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

So you are saying that the vote of the people doesn't matter? That it is all set up so no matter how you vote the end is already determined? Or are you saying that these people in power make sure that both candidates are their choice so that no matter who wins they get the person they wanted?

If you look at the history of the US especially over the last 100 or so years the bankers have had their hands in determining the president almost constantly. Regan was probably the worst example, and he followed orders well. In some cases both candidates will play ball, some cases one candidate won't so the other is supported .. but the bankers usually get their own way.

Heres a nice vid .. its pretty long but gives you an insight into the bankers roll in wars, politics and well .. everything, and also breaks down some basic banking info. https://youtube.com/watch?v=D22Tl...layer_embedded

PornMD · 10-13-2010, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

So you are saying that the vote of the people doesn't matter? That it is all set up so no matter how you vote the end is already determined? Or are you saying that these people in power make sure that both candidates are their choice so that no matter who wins they get the person they wanted?

The reality is that Ron Paul won't win because he doesn't want to win. It is very easy to sit where he is and call for action. It is a lot harder to actually get the job and be expected to carry out that action. You can tell he isn't serious about winning because he won't take any money from big business. While this might be honorable, it isn't realistic in the modern world. It takes several hundred million to run a winning campaign. With this being the reality you need big donors and to allow yourself to enter into the machine so you can never raise that kind of cash. Paul knows this. He runs, he gets his message out there and then he conveniently publishes a new book that all the paul fans run out and buy. You might say Paul is just using his donor's money to market his books right back to those same donors.

If he were serious he would admit that he has to give into the system to some degree then win the election and once he is president he does as he pleases. Of course he knows it doesn't work that way and even if he won chances are very few of his policies would ever get implemented. So he sells a pipe dream and a book and happily goes about being the guy everyone loves and listens to, but who is never expected to actually carry out these plans.

He is saying that most people are fucking stupid and can be swayed by media and empty promises, and most elections prove that to be the truth.

mozadek · 10-13-2010, 07:00 PM

Run for President, lol, Ron Paul is a loon and will have no serious effect on the primaries.

DWB · 10-13-2010, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mozadek

Run for President, lol, Ron Paul is a loon and will have no serious effect on the primaries.

That's where you're wrong. He'll get a good number of votes, and while he won't win, he will have taken votes from someone else that could shift the race in either direction. It's not just about winning and losing, there is strategy that goes into all of this.

But who knows, I also didn't think I'd see a black president in my lifetime either. Ron Paul just may be the kook to put things back where they need to go.

IllTestYourGirls · 10-13-2010, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mozadek

Run for President, lol, Ron Paul is a loon and will have no serious effect on the primaries.

Who started thd tea parties? He has already had a huge effect.

kane · 10-13-2010, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

He is saying that most people are fucking stupid and can be swayed by media and empty promises, and most elections prove that to be the truth.

I can agree with that 100%. When you consider that about 40-50% (depending on the election) of the people who are eligible to vote in this country can't even be bothered to get off their asses and vote every couple of years it is no wonder we are in shambles. It makes it easy for special interests to get their way. For years the republican battle cry put forth by Carl Rove was: fire up the culture war, pander to the base and get them active, move just enough to the middle to get a few of the right leaning independents then hope for rain.

He knew the base (in this case the religous zealots) would turn out and vote and if he could get enough culture war stuff going he knew those who were against abortion or welfare or teaching sex ed in schools would also turn out. If it rains you have a low turnout and that benefits them because they know their base is going to show up rain or shine. How people choose a candidate and decide who they are voting for is a fascinating subject to me. There is no rhyme nor reason to a lot of it.

xholly · 10-13-2010, 07:49 PM

If I didn't visit adult webmaster forums id have never heard of the guy

Socks · 10-13-2010, 09:08 PM

I think he's making a mistake by running as a Republican instead of starting a movement towards a third party. Even if it's just the first step to get the ball rolling, someone needs to do it.

I so wish he was 35-40 years old.

uno · 10-13-2010, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls

Who started thd tea parties? He has already had a huge effect.

It's too bad he quickly lost them to billionaires, washington insiders and various astroturf groups, run and funded by those billionaires and washington insiders to steal/distort/manipulate the original intent.

uno · 10-13-2010, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks

I think he's making a mistake by running as a Republican instead of starting a movement towards a third party. Even if it's just the first step to get the ball rolling, someone needs to do it.

I so wish he was 35-40 years old.

Too bad Rand Paul is a poor facsimile of his father. It's a real shame.

Dcat · 10-13-2010, 09:30 PM

"if the economic crisis worsens"

..it's a sure bet then!

Dcat · 10-13-2010, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage

He can't possibly win.

None of the big bankers will back him, and they will actually try to rip him down so he is dead in the water from the start. Presidents are put in place by the bankers through the media and other outlets.

Most likely, and if all else fails they'll just resort to electronic vote fraud.

alessergod · 10-13-2010, 10:08 PM

He isn't in the Faux News stable so he ain't got a snowball's chance in hell.

Cyandin · 10-13-2010, 10:38 PM

He is one hell of an intelligent man, and a strict Constitutionalist, which I really admire. I would absolutely love to see him in the Oval Office, if it were possible given the circumstances in this country.

Barry-xlovecam · 10-13-2010, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage

[H]eres a nice vid .. its pretty long but gives you an insight into the bankers roll in wars, politics and well .. everything, and also breaks down some basic banking info. https://youtube.com/watch?v=D22Tl...layer_embedded...

Long vid but interesting ...

CYF · 10-13-2010, 10:42 PM

Ron Paul has my vote

10-13-2010, 03:38 PM	#1
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	Ron Paul Running for president in 2012 "Ron Paul has indicated that he will embark on a bid to become President in 2012 if the economic crisis worsens"

10-13-2010, 03:39 PM	#2
Ethersync Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, Saint-Tropez, Bermuda, Moscow Posts: 5,289	Most excellent! __________________ The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY

10-13-2010, 03:43 PM	#4
BestXXXPorn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asheville, NC Posts: 2,277	He's got my vote, especially being a Libertarian ;) Not to mention the man KNOWS his shit. Ask him the same question 20 times and he'll give you 20 different explanations according to the context in which it was asked. With most politicians it's always some kind of parley into their prepared speech on the topic. __________________ ICQ: 258-202-811 \| Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com

10-13-2010, 03:50 PM	#5
BestXXXPorn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asheville, NC Posts: 2,277	Keynes had it all wrong but politicians love his economic philosophy because it preaches market interference and perfectly suits the power mongers... Austrian Economics is where it's at and anyone that says differently, IMO, does not fully understand economics, what a free market is, and just how random the habits of every individual participating in a market are... and just for fun: __________________ ICQ: 258-202-811 \| Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com Last edited by BestXXXPorn; 10-13-2010 at 03:53 PM..

10-13-2010, 04:04 PM	#6
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	good thing, although doubtful he can change much if ever gets elected, he will be swimming against the stream __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

10-13-2010, 03:41 PM	#3
DWB Giggity Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: S.E. Asia Posts: 31,779	And he will have my vote. Not because I think he will win, he will never win. But because he will be the best man running worthy of my vote, even if he is a little kooky, he's usually on point.

10-13-2010, 04:06 PM	#7
minicivan Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 943	haha "if it worsens" - meaning what? If we survive a nuclear war? Well, when i finally eating out of dumpsters, i'll vote for him for sure.

10-13-2010, 04:14 PM	#9
IllTestYourGirls Ah My Balls Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421 Posts: 14,311	Well, if he chooses to run he will have an exploratory committee formed in Jan 2011 and announce in March 2011. So it does look like he will be running, since shit isnt getting better now. __________________

10-13-2010, 04:21 PM	#10
Sausage Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 3,012	He can't possibly win. None of the big bankers will back him, and they will actually try to rip him down so he is dead in the water from the start. Presidents are put in place by the bankers through the media and other outlets. __________________ IW Skype : blance8888 Icq : 15567120

10-13-2010, 05:34 PM	#13
arock10 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 6,218	Running to a casket maybe that guy is ancient __________________ Sup

10-13-2010, 05:49 PM	#14
D Ghost null Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,820	+1 for Ron Paul

10-13-2010, 07:00 PM	#18
mozadek Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,325	Run for President, lol, Ron Paul is a loon and will have no serious effect on the primaries.

10-13-2010, 07:49 PM	#22
xholly Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 817	If I didn't visit adult webmaster forums id have never heard of the guy

10-13-2010, 09:08 PM	#23
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,478	I think he's making a mistake by running as a Republican instead of starting a movement towards a third party. Even if it's just the first step to get the ball rolling, someone needs to do it. I so wish he was 35-40 years old.

10-13-2010, 09:30 PM	#26
Dcat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mexico Posts: 1,607	"if the economic crisis worsens" ..it's a sure bet then!

10-13-2010, 10:08 PM	#28
alessergod Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Where you won't find me. Posts: 229	He isn't in the Faux News stable so he ain't got a snowball's chance in hell. __________________ Have you ever seen a "Harley" parked in front of a Physchiatrists Office?

10-13-2010, 10:38 PM	#29
Cyandin Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,723	He is one hell of an intelligent man, and a strict Constitutionalist, which I really admire. I would absolutely love to see him in the Oval Office, if it were possible given the circumstances in this country.

10-13-2010, 10:42 PM	#31
CYF Coupon Guru Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 10,973	Ron Paul has my vote __________________ Webmaster Coupons Coupons and discounts for hosting, domains, SSL Certs, and more! AmeriNOC Coupons \| Certified Hosting Coupons \| Hosting Coupons \| Domain Name Coupons