Rochard here's your proof. - GoFuckYourself.com

onwebcam · 10-16-2017, 07:21 PM

Fake Investigation

Comey Drafted Statement Ending Clinton Email Investigation Months Before Interviewing Her, FBI Confirms

CaptainHowdy · 10-16-2017, 07:55 PM

Rochard · 10-16-2017, 08:05 PM

LOL - Proof of what?

The FBI knew from the very start that there was no wrong doing. The FBI knew this before they interviewed the first person. It just isn't a crime for the Secretary State to send classified email via a private server. There is no law that states the Secretary of State cannot send classified information via email, US Mail, fax, telephone, or carrier pigeon. In fact, all of the laws about the handling of classified information was written well before email was commonly used.

The only reason the FBI investigated any of this was because members of our Congress were demanding it. This was nothing more than a political witch hunt.

It was more of the same with Benghazi. There was no indication of any crime being committed yet we had six or seven investigations about it.

The FBI knew earlier on that this was a witch hunt, was obligated to do an investigation, and quickly discovered there was no wrong doing. At a certain point the FBI was obligated to complete it's investigation but was already drafting a public statement with their findings.

There is no doubt in my mind the FBI already has drafts for public release about the results of their investigation into how the Russians influenced our election.

I am surely not a Hillary supporter; Frankly I can't stand her. But I would much rather have Hillary then trump; Clearly anyone would be better than trump including my pet dog. This is proof of nothing other than the FBI knew in advance that there was no wrong doing.

crockett · 10-16-2017, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Fake Investigation

Comey Drafted Statement Ending Clinton Email Investigation Months Before Interviewing Her, FBI Confirms

Funny how anything that supports what you want to hear is 100% legit with you but anything you don't want to hear is fake news..

Since you are now "believing" mainstream media what is your excuse for this? We now have proof that the Russian lawyer who met with Chump Jr & Jarred was working as a agent of Moscow.

Veselnitskaya memo from Trump Tower Russia meeting - Business Insider

onwebcam · 10-16-2017, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

LOL - Proof of what?

The FBI knew from the very start that there was no wrong doing. The FBI knew this before they interviewed the first person. It just isn't a crime for the Secretary State to send classified email via a private server. There is no law that states the Secretary of State cannot send classified information via email, US Mail, fax, telephone, or carrier pigeon. In fact, all of the laws about the handling of classified information was written well before email was commonly used.

The only reason the FBI investigated any of this was because members of our Congress were demanding it. This was nothing more than a political witch hunt.

It was more of the same with Benghazi. There was no indication of any crime being committed yet we had six or seven investigations about it.

The FBI knew earlier on that this was a witch hunt, was obligated to do an investigation, and quickly discovered there was no wrong doing. At a certain point the FBI was obligated to complete it's investigation but was already drafting a public statement with their findings.

There is no doubt in my mind the FBI already has drafts for public release about the results of their investigation into how the Russians influenced our election.

I am surely not a Hillary supporter; Frankly I can't stand her. But I would much rather have Hillary then trump; Clearly anyone would be better than trump including my pet dog. This is proof of nothing other than the FBI knew in advance that there was no wrong doing.

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—

The term “unauthorized person” means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798

onwebcam · 10-16-2017, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Funny how anything that supports what you want to hear is 100% legit with you but anything you don't want to hear is fake news..

Since you are now "believing" mainstream media what is your excuse for this? We now have proof that the Russian lawyer who met with Chump Jr & Jarred was working as a agent of Moscow.

Veselnitskaya memo from Trump Tower Russia meeting - Business Insider

It's very well established that the Russian lawyer is a Democrat operative who worked for the same company that produced the fake dossier. I guess we will have to wait for the admission on that one as well.

crockett · 10-16-2017, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

It's very well established that the Russian lawyer is a Democrat operative who worked for the same company that produced the fake dossier. I guess we will have to wait for the admission on that one as well.

Jesus Christ you live in a fairyland...

crockett · 10-16-2017, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information?

The term ?unauthorized person? means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798

So you admit Trump & his people are fucked....

onwebcam · 10-16-2017, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Jesus Christ you live in a fairyland...

You live in denial.

Inside the link between the Russian lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr. and the Trump dossier

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.8f405cc63521

2MuchMark · 10-16-2017, 08:49 PM

Trump is an ass.

oppoten · 10-16-2017, 09:16 PM

The institutions aren't worthy of your reverance, even if you've served in them. Marines, FBI, CNN. All-American = Israel-first.

"Russians" = 'damn, whitey can still think for himself after decades of indoctrination'.

Rochard · 10-16-2017, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information?

The term ?unauthorized person? means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798

Anyone can cut and paste, but the combination of reading and understanding eludes you. Either you did not read what you just copied and pasted, or you didn't understand it.

When it says "head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities", who exactly do you think they are talking about? I'll give you a hint - It's not the Secretary of Education.

The head of such agencies are pretty much allowed to read in anyone they wish. In fact, the list people who get to decide who is allowed to see classified information include the Secretary, the Deputy Secretaries, the Under Secretaries, Assistant Secretaries, and some Executive Level IV officials and their deputies; Chiefs of Mission, Charges d?affaires, and U.S. Representatives to various international organizations.

This is why Clinton was never charged - Everything she did was legal. This is why the FBI wrote this draft before the investigation was done.... They knew no laws were broken. The only thing this proves is that the FBI clearly knew this was nothing more than a witch hunt.

onwebcam · 10-16-2017, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Anyone can cut and paste, but the combination of reading and understanding eludes you. Either you did not read what you just copied and pasted, or you didn't understand it.

When it says "head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities", who exactly do you think they are talking about? I'll give you a hint - It's not the Secretary of Education.

The head of such agencies are pretty much allowed to read in anyone they wish. In fact, the list people who get to decide who is allowed to see classified information include the Secretary, the Deputy Secretaries, the Under Secretaries, Assistant Secretaries, and some Executive Level IV officials and their deputies; Chiefs of Mission, Charges d’affaires, and U.S. Representatives to various international organizations.

This is why Clinton was never charged - Everything she did was legal. This is why the FBI wrote this draft before the investigation was done.... They knew no laws were broken. The only thing this proves is that the FBI clearly knew this was nothing more than a witch hunt.

Wrong.. You have to have clearance. I'm pretty sure her maid didn't have clearance. What would be the point of classifications if she could hand it out to just anyone? Quite a few were top secret. Meaning top secret clearance eyes only.. And that's what we've seen. Not the 33,000+ tampon run emails she deleted after subpoena.

Wikileaks is about to dump more emails. I have a feeling he's been holding these back for a reason. As in they could contain some of that top secret shit Hillary was handing out like candy.

BlackCrayon · 10-17-2017, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Wrong.. You have to have clearance. I'm pretty sure her maid didn't have clearance. What would be the point of classifications if she could hand it out to just anyone? Quite a few were top secret. Meaning top secret clearance eyes only.. And that's what we've seen. Not the 33,000+ tampon run emails she deleted after subpoena.

Wikileaks is about to dump more emails. I have a feeling he's been holding these back for a reason. As in they could contain some of that top secret shit Hillary was handing out like candy.

wikileaks has a clear political bias. not sure they can't just release everything and have no bias.

astronaut x · 10-17-2017, 07:07 AM

Are we seriously talking about those damn emails again?

Rochard · 10-17-2017, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Wrong.. You have to have clearance. I'm pretty sure her maid didn't have clearance.

LOL, this is new. Her maid? Really? It took all of thirty seconds to discover that was false.

It seems Marina was not a maid, and did not have access to classified information:
Hillary Clinton Regularly Had Her Maid Print Classified Documents

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

What would be the point of classifications if she could hand it out to just anyone? Quite a few were top secret. Meaning top secret clearance eyes only..

Once again, there is a long list of people who decide who gets access to classified information. In fact, the list I gave you earlier is only a partial list. There are also entire departments in each agency who decide what information requires what level of access, and who can or should have access to that information. In some cases when classified information is discussed, people who do not have a certain level of security clearance are asked to leave the room. At the same time, if certain people (meaning the head of an agency, such as the Secretary of State) decides someone needs to be read in they are read in.

Meaning.... If there is a crisis in, say, Benghazi, and a classified operation comes to light... High ranking State Department officials and their aides are read in right there on the spot - they don't stop the government response to a current event and wait forty-two or seventy-four hours until someone below the Secretary of State decides a high ranking State Department can or cannot have access to certain information. If the Secretary of State decides someone needs to be brought in on a developing situation that is a decision the Secretary of State is allowed to make - on the spot, and without question.

This is why there was no charges after a dozen investigations. No laws were broken.

mineistaken · 10-17-2017, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Trump is based patriot.

Well said

NatalieK · 10-17-2017, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x

Are we seriously talking about those damn emails again?

I know right...

Hillary was on British TV the other day & speaking so much sense. The only BS is Trump, his brain, his way of thinking, his comments...

Hillary dealt with the emails a year ago, but still they were bought up again and again and it´s BS

10-16-2017, 07:21 PM	#1
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 26,764	Rochard here's your proof. Fake Investigation Comey Drafted Statement Ending Clinton Email Investigation Months Before Interviewing Her, FBI Confirms __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

10-16-2017, 07:55 PM	#2
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 91,409	__________________ Get Your Free Backlinks Today 149 URLs to pick from - Go To The Thread here! Join the SWAG Affiliate Asian Live Cam Program Non-Saturated Models and Exclusive Content.

10-16-2017, 08:05 PM	#3
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 70,163	LOL - Proof of what? The FBI knew from the very start that there was no wrong doing. The FBI knew this before they interviewed the first person. It just isn't a crime for the Secretary State to send classified email via a private server. There is no law that states the Secretary of State cannot send classified information via email, US Mail, fax, telephone, or carrier pigeon. In fact, all of the laws about the handling of classified information was written well before email was commonly used. The only reason the FBI investigated any of this was because members of our Congress were demanding it. This was nothing more than a political witch hunt. It was more of the same with Benghazi. There was no indication of any crime being committed yet we had six or seven investigations about it. The FBI knew earlier on that this was a witch hunt, was obligated to do an investigation, and quickly discovered there was no wrong doing. At a certain point the FBI was obligated to complete it's investigation but was already drafting a public statement with their findings. There is no doubt in my mind the FBI already has drafts for public release about the results of their investigation into how the Russians influenced our election. I am surely not a Hillary supporter; Frankly I can't stand her. But I would much rather have Hillary then trump; Clearly anyone would be better than trump including my pet dog. This is proof of nothing other than the FBI knew in advance that there was no wrong doing. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

10-16-2017, 08:49 PM	#10
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 45,738	Trump is an ass. __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

10-16-2017, 09:16 PM	#11
oppoten NAME THE JEW Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 4,793	The institutions aren't worthy of your reverance, even if you've served in them. Marines, FBI, CNN. All-American = Israel-first. "Russians" = 'damn, whitey can still think for himself after decades of indoctrination'.

10-17-2017, 07:07 AM	#15
astronaut x Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2011 Location: From this www and beyond! Posts: 4,844	Are we seriously talking about those damn emails again?