About North Korea. My prediction - GoFuckYourself.com

Steve Rupe · 01-17-2018, 08:47 PM

is this. The U.S. will attack North Korea in early to mid Spring. I draw this conclusion based upon multiple sources of information, some of which is public, some which isn't and some from my own military knowledge.

I also predict that the military engagement will be swift, less than a month, very possibly just days, and if things go well the loss of life will be relatively minor but it could, admittedly, become a massive loss of both North and South Korean lives.

The United States is not, I repeat, is not going to allow North Korea the ability to strike America with a nuke delivered via an ICBM...period.

magneto664 · 01-17-2018, 09:00 PM

what do you think about the next power-ball draw?
what is your prediction about number 8 and 12?

Look Chang · 01-17-2018, 09:13 PM

mineistaken · 01-17-2018, 09:15 PM

I have no knowledge about it, but lets do $20 paypal bet for fun (sounds weird saying it in terms of war bet)?

ilnjscb · 01-17-2018, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

is this. The U.S. will attack North Korea in early to mid Spring. I draw this conclusion based upon multiple sources of information, some of which is public, some which isn't and some from my own military knowledge.

I also predict that the military engagement will be swift, less than a month, very possibly just days, and if things go well the loss of life will be relatively minor but it could, admittedly, become a massive loss of both North and South Korean lives.

The United States is not, I repeat, is not going to allow North Korea the ability to strike America with a nuke delivered via an ICBM...period.

I agree but extend the time frame to include summer. Let's see if we're correct.

Steve Rupe · 01-17-2018, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken

I have no knowledge about it, but lets do $20 paypal bet for fun (sounds weird saying it in terms of war bet)?

I do not use paypal and will never use paypal ever again. No to a bet.

mineistaken · 01-17-2018, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

I agree but extend the time frame to include summer. Let's see if we're correct.

Somebody remember to bump it, lol.

shake · 01-17-2018, 10:30 PM

Which cryptos should I buy? That's what i want to know...

AdultKing · 01-17-2018, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

The U.S. will attack North Korea in early to mid Spring.

The US won't attack North Korea unless Trump goes completely mad.

The ship has sailed on military action to prevent North Korea having nukes.

It's now down to two things. Diplomacy and containment.

crockett · 01-18-2018, 01:04 AM

North Korea is a done deal, the cat is out of the bag. If you notice, soon as they announced they had weaponized their nuke, meaning made one that fits on a warhead, they suddenly started acting nice..

What I means is they have hit their end goal, which was to produce a nuclear armed missile. The reason they wanted that missile was to be safe from attack. Now that they have the missile, they feel safe from attack so now they are willing to start talks.

Paul Markham · 01-18-2018, 01:39 AM

America should wait for Kim to use a weapon on any of its allies. Kim is just playing the big man, with nothing to back it up, to his own people. Who I think will get sick of being exploited and rebel.

pimpmaster9000 · 01-18-2018, 02:22 AM

I have no doubt that daquans gangsters and trump are dumb enough to invade...they will "gulf of tonkin" it IMO...you can always count on an under hand move by the US gov and USIS...

I predict massive losses...90% of all koreans dead in nuke strikes...the entire region a nuclear wasteland...bacteria too...china and russia pissed off...europe in shock...global anti USA outrage...

the USA will eventually get ostracized...a perfect storm is brewing and I hope invaders take maximum political damage...

US foreign policy is the cancer of the world...

crockett · 01-18-2018, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

America should wait for Kim to use a weapon on any of its allies. Kim is just playing the big man, with nothing to back it up, to his own people. Who I think will get sick of being exploited and rebel.

Kim isnt dumb, a bit power mad most likely but not dumb. He went to school in the West and is aware of our culture. He's playing the role that is expected of him, other wise he'd be removed from power by a coup.

Sarn · 01-18-2018, 03:40 AM

>The U.S. will attack North Korea
I don't think so

>I think will get sick of being exploited and rebel
>removed from power by a coup
It does not happen too

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

North Korea is a done deal, the cat is out of the bag. If you notice, soon as they announced they had weaponized their nuke, meaning made one that fits on a warhead, they suddenly started acting nice..

What I means is they have hit their end goal, which was to produce a nuclear armed missile. The reason they wanted that missile was to be safe from attack. Now that they have the missile, they feel safe from attack so now they are willing to start talks.

Even if they have made a nuke that will fit on a warhead that is not the end game. They still have to be able to survive re-entry and that will take more time and tests.

I will repeat the U.S. will not allow NK to have a nuke that is deliverable by an ICBM...period.

druid66 · 01-18-2018, 06:37 AM

never rly understood this danger from NK to US, maybe someone would be that nice and explain it to me?

i understand that NK already managed to made missile with nuclear warhead, thats correct?

if so: is it one missile/3 missiles or maybe 30?

i assume (perhaps i'm wrong) that those missiles are few?
now pls explain: how the fuck can few missiles be danger to US with their anti-nuclear shield? they can destroy all kim's missiles sent to US in few minutes, or am i wrong again?
where's danger to US here?

what am i not seeing here? whats the cacth?

peace,
D.

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing

The US won't attack North Korea unless Trump goes completely mad.

The ship has sailed on military action to prevent North Korea having nukes.

It's now down to two things. Diplomacy and containment.

The ship has not sailed. North Korea cannot hit the U.S. with a Nuclear Armed ICBM and the U.S. is not going to allow North Korea to have this type of weapon in its arsenal...period.

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druid66

never rly understood this danger from NK to US, maybe someone would be that nice and explain it to me?

i understand that NK already managed to made missile with nuclear warhead, thats correct?

if so: is it one missile/3 missiles or maybe 30?

i assume (perhaps i'm wrong) that those missiles are few?
now pls explain: how the fuck can few missiles be danger to US with their anti-nuclear shield? they can destroy all kim's missiles sent to US in few minutes, or am i wrong again?
where's danger to US here?

what am i not seeing here? whats the cacth?

peace,
D.

You are wrong. North Korea has zero ICBM's armed with Nukes that can strike any target anywhere. The U.S. is not going to allow them to have one, ever.

seeandsee · 01-18-2018, 06:59 AM

they will ride north korea

Sarn · 01-18-2018, 07:34 AM

>The U.S. is not going to allow them to have one

just a punk · 01-18-2018, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

is this. The U.S. will attack North Korea in early to mid Spring.

Will not. The States have no balls for that. All NK military objects are underground so they can't be bombed out from air. The only way to attack is a ground operation. How many thousands (actually it will be about a million) of American soldiers are ready to die there? I bet no one...

P.S. If China will deliver a military help, the loses of the USA will be irrecoverable. BTW, do you know that Koreans are ethnic Chinese?

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Will not. It has no balls for that.

You can think that it will not but to state that the U.S. "has no balls for that" is a ridiculous statement since the U.S. has repeatedly used its military force since the end of the Second World war, including in Korea.

Your number of American losses may be your dream but that is all it is, a dream. There will not even be as many as the last engagement with NK/Chinese forces.

In addition there will be no massive frontal assault. Those days are over with. There are multiple ways to conquer underground facilities.

just a punk · 01-18-2018, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

You can think that it will not

Yes. It will not. Remember my words.

MFCT · 01-18-2018, 08:52 AM

If war breaks out, regardless of which side instigates, of course it will be a very brief war with NK getting pummeled into a literal shithole. We know that. Kim knows that.

As for their ICBMs, they still can't quite reach the continental USA from NK. We know that. Kim knows that.

What I'd be more concerned about is the nukes they'd be launching from their submarines near the shores of the continental USA. I suppose if they have the same capability of the ICBMs tested from NK (which leads one to assume that's where they'd be launched from), any target in the USA would be well-within range.

Or they could just launch them in a general up direction and explode them. The EMP would essentially destroy the electrical grid and every electronic device in the country. No computers, no banking, no bitcoins, no working vehicles or transport of food to stores, no oil refining or gasoline production, etc.

Welcome to your new Little-House-on-the-Prairie rest of your life. How is your farming skills lately? You do own a big plot of land to grow crops, right? You do have enough food to live on until harvest season next fall, right?

So yeah, we'd technically "win" the war. But in the end, I doubt any side would really come out on top.

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFCT

If war breaks out, regardless of which side instigates, of course it will be a very brief war with NK getting pummeled into a literal shithole. We know that. Kim knows that.

As for their ICBMs, they still can't quite reach the continental USA from NK. We know that. Kim knows that.

What I'd be more concerned about is the nukes they'd be launching from their submarines near the shores of the continental USA. I suppose if they have the same capability of the ICBMs tested from NK (which leads one to assume that's where they'd be launched from), any target in the USA would be well-within range.

Or they could just launch them in a general up direction and explode them. The EMP would essentially destroy the electrical grid and every electronic device in the country. No computers, no banking, no bitcoins, no working vehicles or transport of food to stores, no oil refining or gasoline production, etc.

Welcome to your new Little-House-on-the-Prairie rest of your life. How is your farming skills lately? You do own a big plot of land to grow crops, right? You do have enough food to live on until harvest season next fall, right?

So yeah, we'd technically "win" the war. But in the end, I doubt any side would really come out on top.

They do not have the ability to lunch an ICBM with a nuke warhead and hit a target anywhere as they have yet to develop the capability for a warhead to survive reentry. They do not have the ability to launch from a submarine and in addition they do not have the ability to hide their subs from detection.

The U.S. is not going to allow them to have that ability, ever.

Sarn · 01-18-2018, 09:24 AM

But they have ICBM and Nuke warheads

New missile test shows North Korea capable of hitting all of US mainland
New missile test shows North Korea capable of hitting all of US mainland - CNNPolitics

North had "up to 60 nuclear weapons" in its arsenal
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/09/nort...-missiles.html

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

But they have ICBM and Nuke warheads

New missile test shows North Korea capable of hitting all of US mainland
New missile test shows North Korea capable of hitting all of US mainland - CNNPolitics

North had "up to 60 nuclear weapons" in its arsenal
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/09/nort...-missiles.html

They have ICBM's and they have nukes but they cannot deliver the nukes via ICBM as they have yet to overcome the survive-ability of a war head during reentry. So at this point they cannot deliver a nuke via ICBM anywhere on this planet. We are not going to allow them to obtain that goal...period.

Since survive-ability of the warhead is their last obstacle to overcome that is why we will attack them. If they are continued to be allowed to test ICBM's they will overcome the survive-ability factor in a rather short period of time.

Their only option is to stop testing or we will attack them, period.

nico-t · 01-18-2018, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druid66

never rly understood this danger from NK to US, maybe someone would be that nice and explain it to me?

i understand that NK already managed to made missile with nuclear warhead, thats correct?

if so: is it one missile/3 missiles or maybe 30?

i assume (perhaps i'm wrong) that those missiles are few?
now pls explain: how the fuck can few missiles be danger to US with their anti-nuclear shield? they can destroy all kim's missiles sent to US in few minutes, or am i wrong again?
where's danger to US here?

what am i not seeing here? whats the cacth?

peace,
D.

They were never a danger. It's a tiny insignificant country still living in the 1930s. Many people do not realize this but it's population is only about 1.5 times larger than in my really small country of the Netherlands.... It's preposterous to think they have any power whatsoever. This 'threat' of NK is the same as if the Netherlands would 'threat' it's neighbor Germany... They'd laugh their asses off, and if they wanted to, could wipe a small country like that out in a week.

It's just a convenient scapegoat / fake enemy to take the attention off from things that really matter. It's laughable at this point. Every time the government of the US needs something to play with they start about North Korea, the media starts reporting about them, etc. Always with years of silence in between from all parties until it's time to deflect again. NK is only a threat when it suits them. Other than that nobody gives a shit about that country.

Whenever the US decides to aim their crosshair at NK again, little Kim reacts like he is stung by a bee. The US knows this and that's why they do it. Little Kim is working on missiles and trying to prove his cock is big BECAUSE of the US constantly provoking him. If all leaders were as easy to provoke as naive little Kim, the US establishment would be salivating because it makes it really easy to come up with excuses to invade countries for resources and power that isn't yours.

Acepimp · 01-18-2018, 09:43 AM

So Bill Clinton gave north korea nukes, Obama gave Iran nukes, Hillary gave Russia our uranium, but clueless libs think Trump is going to start a nuclear war?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA

I suppose you guys think Kim J is the leader of NK? Haha haha you still haven't figured out who the puppet master is.

GAMEFINEST · 01-18-2018, 09:53 AM

You getting played son

druid66 · 01-18-2018, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

They were never a danger. It's a tiny insignificant country still living in the 1930s. Many people do not realize this but it's population is only about 1.5 times larger than in my really small country of the Netherlands.... It's preposterous to think they have any power whatsoever. This 'threat' of NK is the same as if the Netherlands would 'threat' it's neighbor Germany... They'd laugh their asses off, and if they wanted to, could wipe a small country like that out in a week.

It's just a convenient scapegoat / fake enemy to take the attention off from things that really matter. It's laughable at this point. Every time the government of the US needs something to play with they start about North Korea, the media starts reporting about them, etc. Always with years of silence in between from all parties until it's time to deflect again. NK is only a threat when it suits them. Other than that nobody gives a shit about that country.

Whenever the US decides to aim their crosshair at NK again, little Kim reacts like he is stung by a bee. The US knows this and that's why they do it. Little Kim is working on missiles and trying to prove his cock is big BECAUSE of the US constantly provoking him. If all leaders were as easy to provoke as naive little Kim, the US establishment would be salivating because it makes it really easy to come up with excuses to invade countries for resources and power that isn't yours.

i like this.
but i understand that it's easy to like smth that suits your own pov.
would love to hear others.
but i like it mr.Netherland

AdultKing · 01-18-2018, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

since the U.S. has repeatedly used its military force since the end of the Second World war, including in Korea.

And lost every war.

Sarn · 01-18-2018, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

They have ICBM's and they have nukes but they cannot deliver the nukes via ICBM as they have yet to overcome the survive-ability of a war head during reentry. So at this point they cannot deliver a nuke via ICBM anywhere on this planet. We are not going to allow them to obtain that goal...period.

Since survive-ability of the warhead is their last obstacle to overcome that is why we will attack them. If they are continued to be allowed to test ICBM's they will overcome the survive-ability factor in a rather short period of time.

Their only option is to stop testing or we will attack them, period.

But if they have such technology?

Sarn · 01-18-2018, 10:49 AM

And if Trump Russian spy - it the good time to start the war?

bronco67 · 01-18-2018, 11:20 AM

North Korea is not close to striking the US with a nuclear missile. A few marginally successful and outright failed tests do not equal the ability to deliver a nuclear equipped intercontinental ballistic missile into the atmosphere and allow it to survive re-entry, strike a target and initiate nuclear fission. They're so fucking far away from being able to do that.

Sarn · 01-18-2018, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

North Korea is not close to striking the US with a nuclear missile. A few marginally successful and outright failed tests do not equal the ability to deliver a nuclear equipped intercontinental ballistic missile into the atmosphere and allow it to survive re-entry, strike a target and initiate nuclear fission. They're so fucking far away from being able to do that.

if someone had gifted them this system?

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing

And lost every war.

The U.S. has not ever lost a war. End of story.

druid66 · 01-18-2018, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing

And lost every war.

are they really?
would you bet on this?
their war machine technology is booming like no other country, they are way advanced than any other, they didn't lost any war, they just stopped fighting and go back home after emptied warehouses filled with old armaments.
now they are ready with fresh equipment and looking for new targets.

Steve Rupe · 01-18-2018, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druid66

are they really?
would you bet on this?
their war machine technology is booming like no other country, they are way advanced than any other, they didn't lost any war, they just stopped fighting and go back home after emptied warehouses filled with old armaments.
now they are ready with fresh equipment and looking for new targets.

Some overall truth in your statements.

AdultKing · 01-18-2018, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

The U.S. has not ever lost a war. End of story.

Korea - Draw 0 - 0 - Border remains the same
Vietnam Fail - USA Decisively handed it's arse on a plate.
Iraq 1 & 2 - Met stated objectives but remain quagmires
Afghanistan - Met some of the stated objectives however have not secured the nation.

Vietnam was lost so badly the last remaining Americans had to be helicoptered out of the Embassy grounds to offshore ships.

The US has not won a war since World War II and only then with help from the UK, Australia and other allies.

druid66 · 01-19-2018, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing

Korea - Draw 0 - 0 - Border remains the same
Vietnam Fail - USA Decisively handed it's arse on a plate.
Iraq 1 & 2 - Met stated objectives but remain quagmires
Afghanistan - Met some of the stated objectives however have not secured the nation.

Vietnam was lost so badly the last remaining Americans had to be helicoptered out of the Embassy grounds to offshore ships.

The US has not won a war since World War II and only then with help from the UK, Australia and other allies.

again: you're not seeing bigger picture.

pimpmaster9000 · 01-19-2018, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by druid66

again: you're not seeing bigger picture.

yes the bigger picture is the military industrial lobby making bank whilst selling the protection racket...

Steve Rupe · 01-19-2018, 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing

Korea - Draw 0 - 0 - Border remains the same
Vietnam Fail - USA Decisively handed it's arse on a plate.
Iraq 1 & 2 - Met stated objectives but remain quagmires
Afghanistan - Met some of the stated objectives however have not secured the nation.

Vietnam was lost so badly the last remaining Americans had to be helicoptered out of the Embassy grounds to offshore ships.

The US has not won a war since World War II and only then with help from the UK, Australia and other allies.

I of course knew that you would come back with this same tired BS. The military was ordered to hold at the 38th Parallel and that is exactly what they did. General MacArthur had originally exceeded his authority, crossed the 38th Parallel and took our military to the border of China. When China entered the battle he was told to retreat back to the 38th Parallel and hold there. It was never the intention of President Truman to take and hold North Korea.

In Vietnam our Military was ordered by President Nixon to leave Vietnam because of civilian pressure to do so and our military was withdrawn from Vietnam in 1973 and two years later in 1975 the NVA conquered South Vietnam's forces.

All of these were/are military engagements and not war. The U.S. last declared War in 1941.

In addition you left off around 40 or so other military engagements in the 20th Century other than Korea and Vietnam.

In the 21st century the U.S. has engaged in more than 100 or so in as many countries, many of which are ongoing.

Educate yourself before you speak.

INever · 01-19-2018, 03:23 AM

Is anyone making a "North" Korean babes paysite?

pimpmaster9000 · 01-19-2018, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

I of course knew that you would come back with this same tired BS. The military was ordered to hold at the 38th Parallel and that is exactly what they did. General MacArthur had originally exceeded his authority, crossed the 38th Parallel and took our military to the border of China. When China entered the battle he was told to retreat back to the 38th Parallel and hold there. It was never the intention of President Truman to take and hold North Korea.

clear victory LOL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

In Vietnam our Military was ordered by President Nixon to leave Vietnam because of civilian pressure to do so and our military was withdrawn from Vietnam in 1973 and two years later in 1975 the NVA conquered South Vietnam's forces.

clear victory after 20 years LOL

druid66 · 01-19-2018, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INever

Is anyone making a "North" Korean babes paysite?

i know ure joking but when comes to korean porn i was doing some research when i was more active in asian niche and i found only amateur, real and pure amateur content + some of vintage erotic koreans photos on old scans.

we used to talk about it on asian boards and Faxxaff "blamed" korea (south ofc) being to much catholic (fighting catholic) also it's kind of rich country so not many girls are looking there opportunity in porn (not like in countries which are not so well economically) (don't bring here japan - that's totally different topic, japan is rich country but porn business there is some kind of tradition and no treated like smth you should be ashamed of (well, parents may disagree :D)), all of this leads to no real professional porn industry in SK, only amateur couples taking photos and movies.

now we can go back to NK.
anyway i'm happy that someone on this esteemed adult board bring topic of NK babes not only war and politics :D

oh and i believe there is no NK babes erotic photos anywhere...

just a punk · 01-19-2018, 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

You can think that it will not but to state that the U.S. "has no balls for that" is a ridiculous statement since the U.S. has repeatedly used its military force since the end of the Second World war, including in Korea.

The US forces were used against stone aged farmers and they lost that war like another war they lost to Vietnamese farmers. Now NK is a highly militarized country of fanatics. Why do you think this time the luck will be on your side?

pimpmaster9000 · 01-19-2018, 05:18 AM

anthrax-antibodies-detected-blood-north-korean-defector

thanks USA!

just a punk · 01-19-2018, 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

anthrax-antibodies-detected-blood-north-korean-defector

The best thing that was made is Ebolapox - a genetic mix of Anthrax and Ebola: Biopreparat - Wikipedia

Don't know if NK has it...

BaldBastard · 01-19-2018, 05:48 AM

NK is only a thorn in the side of the real war coming.. China Vs USA and that is inevitable as the rising of the sun, its just a matter of when the shooting action starts, because the war has most certainly already started.

Simply based on populations, ie: you can't fight it, USA is going to fall from number one earning country in the next 15 years, then to 3rd or 4th in the following 15. China will be 1, India 2 and Indonesia and USA can fight out for 3rd and with less than 400 million population, America will just slide more from there.

I can't see America or Americans adjusting to that new world order.

Scary thing is even if there's war.. it still happens.

---

We know that twice in the past week, there's been civilian nuclear threat warnings in Japan and Hawaii, I'd guess the military on both sides would have the same error margin. The USA is certainly putting blind faith in hoping NK can detect a real attack from a fake one.

Whole scenario is a clusterfuck waiting to happen.

BTW why the fuck ya worried about Anthrax and Ebola when Kims got VX and used it? Its not a matter of if he has..

01-17-2018, 08:47 PM	#1
Steve Rupe Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 2,829	About North Korea. My prediction is this. The U.S. will attack North Korea in early to mid Spring. I draw this conclusion based upon multiple sources of information, some of which is public, some which isn't and some from my own military knowledge. I also predict that the military engagement will be swift, less than a month, very possibly just days, and if things go well the loss of life will be relatively minor but it could, admittedly, become a massive loss of both North and South Korean lives. The United States is not, I repeat, is not going to allow North Korea the ability to strike America with a nuke delivered via an ICBM...period.

01-17-2018, 09:00 PM	#2
magneto664 God Bless You Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Glasgow, $cotland Posts: 1,467	what do you think about the next power-ball draw? what is your prediction about number 8 and 12? __________________ magneto664 📧 gmail.com Adult Backlinks 💘Best Website Stats 💘 Best CDN for Adult Content My Fav: 👍Chaturbate 👍 Stripchat 👍 Dateprofits 👍 AdultFriendFinder

01-17-2018, 09:13 PM	#3
Look Chang Sex Tourist Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: On the beach Posts: 13,182	__________________ Bests Hot & Juicy Asian Adult Sites : SEDUCTION -> FELLATION -> CONCLUSION

01-17-2018, 10:30 PM	#8
shake frc Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bitcoin wallet Posts: 4,663	Which cryptos should I buy? That's what i want to know... __________________ Crazy fast VPS for $10 a month. Try with $20 free credit

01-18-2018, 01:04 AM	#10
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 74,343	North Korea is a done deal, the cat is out of the bag. If you notice, soon as they announced they had weaponized their nuke, meaning made one that fits on a warhead, they suddenly started acting nice.. What I means is they have hit their end goal, which was to produce a nuclear armed missile. The reason they wanted that missile was to be safe from attack. Now that they have the missile, they feel safe from attack so now they are willing to start talks. __________________ "If Israelis don't want to be accused of being like the Nazis, they simply need to stop behaving like Nazis." - Norman Finkelstein

01-17-2018, 09:15 PM	#4
mineistaken See signature :) Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: ICQ 363 097 773 Posts: 29,656	I have no knowledge about it, but lets do $20 paypal bet for fun (sounds weird saying it in terms of war bet)?

01-18-2018, 01:39 AM	#11
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	America should wait for Kim to use a weapon on any of its allies. Kim is just playing the big man, with nothing to back it up, to his own people. Who I think will get sick of being exploited and rebel. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

01-18-2018, 02:22 AM	#12
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	I have no doubt that daquans gangsters and trump are dumb enough to invade...they will "gulf of tonkin" it IMO...you can always count on an under hand move by the US gov and USIS... I predict massive losses...90% of all koreans dead in nuke strikes...the entire region a nuclear wasteland...bacteria too...china and russia pissed off...europe in shock...global anti USA outrage... the USA will eventually get ostracized...a perfect storm is brewing and I hope invaders take maximum political damage... US foreign policy is the cancer of the world... __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

01-18-2018, 03:40 AM	#14
Sarn Say for inflation - YES! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 9,855	>The U.S. will attack North Korea I don't think so >I think will get sick of being exploited and rebel >removed from power by a coup It does not happen too

01-18-2018, 06:37 AM	#16
druid66 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 994	never rly understood this danger from NK to US, maybe someone would be that nice and explain it to me? i understand that NK already managed to made missile with nuclear warhead, thats correct? if so: is it one missile/3 missiles or maybe 30? i assume (perhaps i'm wrong) that those missiles are few? now pls explain: how the fuck can few missiles be danger to US with their anti-nuclear shield? they can destroy all kim's missiles sent to US in few minutes, or am i wrong again? where's danger to US here? what am i not seeing here? whats the cacth? peace, D. __________________ Pure Japan japanese babes blog

01-18-2018, 06:59 AM	#19
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	they will ride north korea __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

01-18-2018, 07:34 AM	#20
Sarn Say for inflation - YES! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 9,855	>The U.S. is not going to allow them to have one

01-18-2018, 08:52 AM	#24
MFCT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 1,489	If war breaks out, regardless of which side instigates, of course it will be a very brief war with NK getting pummeled into a literal shithole. We know that. Kim knows that. As for their ICBMs, they still can't quite reach the continental USA from NK. We know that. Kim knows that. What I'd be more concerned about is the nukes they'd be launching from their submarines near the shores of the continental USA. I suppose if they have the same capability of the ICBMs tested from NK (which leads one to assume that's where they'd be launched from), any target in the USA would be well-within range. Or they could just launch them in a general up direction and explode them. The EMP would essentially destroy the electrical grid and every electronic device in the country. No computers, no banking, no bitcoins, no working vehicles or transport of food to stores, no oil refining or gasoline production, etc. Welcome to your new Little-House-on-the-Prairie rest of your life. How is your farming skills lately? You do own a big plot of land to grow crops, right? You do have enough food to live on until harvest season next fall, right? So yeah, we'd technically "win" the war. But in the end, I doubt any side would really come out on top. __________________ Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed. Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

01-18-2018, 09:24 AM	#26
Sarn Say for inflation - YES! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 9,855	But they have ICBM and Nuke warheads New missile test shows North Korea capable of hitting all of US mainland New missile test shows North Korea capable of hitting all of US mainland - CNNPolitics North had "up to 60 nuclear weapons" in its arsenal https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/09/nort...-missiles.html

01-18-2018, 09:43 AM	#29
Acepimp All Facts Matter Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: East Coast Posts: 16,512	So Bill Clinton gave north korea nukes, Obama gave Iran nukes, Hillary gave Russia our uranium, but clueless libs think Trump is going to start a nuclear war? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA I suppose you guys think Kim J is the leader of NK? Haha haha you still haven't figured out who the puppet master is. __________________ Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams \| CrakRevenue \| Dream Cash Like Hot Sluts? >> DaniDanielsPorn.com Just Surfing? Chat with Streamate Camgirls

01-18-2018, 09:53 AM	#30
GAMEFINEST Make STACK$ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: sexy time Posts: 14,352	You getting played son __________________ Compound interest.

01-18-2018, 10:49 AM	#34
Sarn Say for inflation - YES! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 9,855	And if Trump Russian spy - it the good time to start the war?

01-18-2018, 11:20 AM	#35
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	North Korea is not close to striking the US with a nuclear missile. A few marginally successful and outright failed tests do not equal the ability to deliver a nuclear equipped intercontinental ballistic missile into the atmosphere and allow it to survive re-entry, strike a target and initiate nuclear fission. They're so fucking far away from being able to do that. __________________

01-19-2018, 03:23 AM	#44
INever Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: .......in a niche, in orbit...... Posts: 3,266	Is anyone making a "North" Korean babes paysite? __________________ Investment advisory sponsor:50% comm. Minimum $788 payout/join. I love Camdough

01-19-2018, 05:18 AM	#48
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	anthrax-antibodies-detected-blood-north-korean-defector thanks USA! __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

01-19-2018, 05:48 AM	#50
BaldBastard Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Sydney Posts: 14,477	NK is only a thorn in the side of the real war coming.. China Vs USA and that is inevitable as the rising of the sun, its just a matter of when the shooting action starts, because the war has most certainly already started. Simply based on populations, ie: you can't fight it, USA is going to fall from number one earning country in the next 15 years, then to 3rd or 4th in the following 15. China will be 1, India 2 and Indonesia and USA can fight out for 3rd and with less than 400 million population, America will just slide more from there. I can't see America or Americans adjusting to that new world order. Scary thing is even if there's war.. it still happens. --- We know that twice in the past week, there's been civilian nuclear threat warnings in Japan and Hawaii, I'd guess the military on both sides would have the same error margin. The USA is certainly putting blind faith in hoping NK can detect a real attack from a fake one. Whole scenario is a clusterfuck waiting to happen. BTW why the fuck ya worried about Anthrax and Ebola when Kims got VX and used it? Its not a matter of if he has..