GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who actually feels the United States was behind the towers colapse (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1037324)

onedree 09-08-2011 01:30 PM

Who actually feels the United States was behind the towers colapse
 
The United States was actually behind this ?

http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/imag...1-collapse.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...04_634x631.jpg

Deej 09-08-2011 01:33 PM

the US was under the collapse

Wilsy 09-08-2011 01:34 PM

Here we go again :-(

EddyTheDog 09-08-2011 01:35 PM

I gave up caring about 10 years ago....

Its the BS that followed I worry about now.

mafia_man 09-08-2011 01:37 PM

It wasn't an inside job.

They were just incompetent with the intelligence, which was possibly deliberate.

Scott McD 09-08-2011 01:38 PM

Seriously, this again ??

EddyTheDog 09-08-2011 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 18412579)
Seriously, this again ??

Happy aniversary....

JamesGw 09-08-2011 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafia_man (Post 18412572)
It wasn't an inside job.

They were just incompetent with the intelligence, which was possibly deliberate.

This I can believe.

A controlled demolition? Give me a fucking break.

Go away.

Double trouble 09-08-2011 02:10 PM

Steel Buildings Don't Collapse From Fire!

crappy99 09-08-2011 02:14 PM

your all a bunch of idiots because i am pornostar69 and i type in big letters so i must be right

onedree 09-08-2011 02:16 PM

My Hubby says hiye ... :P

http://i.imgur.com/OHKk6.jpg

Wilsy 09-08-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onedree (Post 18412667)
My Hubby says hiye ... :P

http://i.imgur.com/OHKk6.jpg


He looks old :Oh crap

AAB 09-08-2011 02:23 PM

At this point, one would have to be a sheep of epic proportions to still believe the official story. But then again, take a look at Obama zombies. Thinking that they could exhibit any form of common sense is even more foolish than thinking that 911 was a terrorist attack...

Emil 09-08-2011 02:27 PM



I believe that building 7 was so sad that his friends collapsed that he collapsed out of sympathy.

The Demon 09-08-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AAB (Post 18412681)
At this point, one would have to be a sheep of epic proportions to still believe the official story. But then again, take a look at Obama zombies. Thinking that they could exhibit any form of common sense is even more foolish than thinking that 911 was a terrorist attack...

Wow, the incredible stupidity of the conspiracy theory sheep is astounding.

2MuchMark 09-08-2011 02:31 PM

fucktards everywhere.

thickcash_amo 09-08-2011 02:31 PM

Ugh why people have to be so in your face with their crazy conspiracy theories is beyond me

garce 09-08-2011 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafia_man (Post 18412572)
It wasn't an inside job.

They were just incompetent with the intelligence, which was possibly deliberate.

I doubt it was deliberate, it was more like par for the course. Fifty thousand different tragedies could befall the United States, and there are probably thousands of pages of documents warning about every imagineable scenario. Maybe the American beauracracy was (and still is) too big to be effective, or pro-active, in specific situations. It does not diminish the impact of this tragedy one iota.

And I feel sorry for anyone who gave up caring because of the "bullshit" that has ensued over the last ten years. A lot of good lives were erased, changed, and destroyed that day. To so cavalierly shrug off 9/11 and its victims due to the opinions and actions of others is, frankly, sickening.

onedree 09-08-2011 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrew.r (Post 18412670)
He looks old :Oh crap

Most full bird colonels are ... Maybe one day you will be lucky enough for
him to show you his eagle emblem out in the parking lot ... :) _
(The winner purchases me my next glass of Chardonnay :P )

V_RocKs 09-08-2011 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crappy99 (Post 18412664)
your all a bunch of idiots because i am pornostar69 and i type in big letters so i must be right

If you are going to use a fake nick, at least know which one you are posting under before using a larger font.

wehateporn 09-08-2011 02:55 PM

We're at a stage now where we can see a group of very loyal people who take Authority As Truth. That's a nice thing, it's good to have people who trust you, who stay loyal. We also have a group of people who see Truth as The Authority. These people will seek out what they believe is the truth even if it may prove something bad about their own country or even their own family.

The two groups of people will not agree with each other unless the Authorities give a story that appears to be the truth. :2 cents:

L-Pink 09-08-2011 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onedree (Post 18412753)
:P )


Back off on personal information, just saying.

.

Overload 09-08-2011 03:11 PM

well, what really nags me ... is the details ...

remember the witnesses? "we heard explosions (2ndary and more)"
the firemen? "two brief fires - only two crews needed to put them out"
the janitor? "there were explosions in the basement - i saw ppl with broken legs and other severe injuries"

facts: burning kerosine can NOT liquify steel and yet the cellars of the towers were FILLED with molten steel (still burning firemen boots WEEKS after the collapse!)

how come tiny fragments of bones have been found 100s of feet away from the towers on the roof of the deutsche bank? rubble, weighing hundreds of metric kilos were thrown into other buildings (didnt the officials claim the towers IMPLODED? then anything wud have been kept inside!) ...

wtc7: hmm, what happened to all the stock exchange documents? and the charges of fraud addressed to worldcom and others? - up in smoke! and hey, wasnt wtc7 the HQ for the towers? with its own BUNKER, power supply and such - and yet the major does NOT use it, but is walking around talking about the buildings are going to blow up? odd, not? besides, HOW wtc7 went down is more than suspicious ... ehm, and NEVER BEFORE IN HISTORY did a fire tear down a steel building and yet it happened THRICE on THAT DAY?! c'mon, the windsor tower burnt like hell for TWENTY HOURS and didnt go down!

silverstein: rented the towers for 14million bucks and insured them ... and made a whopping 14 BILLION bucks profit! (remember, several HUGE parts of the towers were no longer making any profit -- not to forget how much it wud have cost to renew the armor of the steel - asbest, remember?)

also, three weeks before the "attack" there were power-outs, evacuation trainings and some ppl who worked in the towers reported things like dust in their bureaus and "strange" noise of heavy machinery like steam hammers ... and five days before the shit hit the fan, the bomb sniffer dogs were put off duty (WHY? !!!)

sorry, but anyone eating the official story doesnt ask the right questions ... no, I DONT EAT THE OFFICIAL STORY!

wehateporn 09-08-2011 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AAB (Post 18412681)
At this point, one would have to be a sheep of epic proportions to still believe the official story. But then again, take a look at Obama zombies. Thinking that they could exhibit any form of common sense is even more foolish than thinking that 911 was a terrorist attack...

I would say there are a lot of people, especially from the older generations who don't use the Internet or only search through the mainstream news; they get most their news from newpapers/TV. They will have only received one version of the story so will most likely believe it. It's important for more people to hear both sides and then make up their own minds :2 cents:

As for those who have received both sides of the story, we can clearly see that people have different ways of processing information. I suspect it's a right/left brain thing; those who are right brain dominant are better with certain types of task, and those with left are better with others. I often wonder what it is that makes some of us see a lie/scam where another does not. I know people who can be tricked very easily, time and time again, but they can be very intelligent in other ways. Since I was a youngster I've always had an instinct for a lie, I can hear it, I can feel it, I have often warned others who didn't always listen. The instinct is very complex, but most the time it has observed and flagged illogical behaviour

campimp 09-08-2011 04:12 PM

the whole thing is a bit fishy... but i seriously doubt bush and his team were behind anything, however it would definitely not surprise me to learn that there were americans involved in the planning and preparation of the attacks

huey 09-08-2011 04:26 PM

Pull it.

raymor 09-08-2011 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double trouble (Post 18412655)
Steel Buildings Don't Collapse From Fire!

Having the papers on people's desks burning is EXACTLY the same thing as 50,000 gallons of jet fuel, after being rammed
by a half million pound jet.

Have you never seen a fire ring or bbq grill that's a few years old?
Just a small wood fire makes the steel sag and warp. If a couple pieces of wood makes steel warp and sag, what makes you think 50,000 gallons of jet fuel is harmless? Never mind that the building was hit by a huge fucking airplane going a couple hundred miles an hour!

AdultKing 09-08-2011 04:34 PM

Onedree. Ahh, if it wasn't for people as stupid as her the world would be a better place.

Seriously what a stupid minge she is. In the same league is SallyRand. A complete raving lunatic middle aged housewife with no life or purpose in life. Ugly as fuck as well.

Vjo 09-08-2011 04:41 PM

There is no way the first tower (that collapsed) could collapse on it's own so quickly after being hit. It was the last hit (by the 2nd plane) and the first to go.

Steel doesnt melt till around 2800+ degrees. There is no way the steel frame heated that quickly throughout the building.

Steel frame structures do not pancake like a house of cards (or exactly like one under demolition).

Steel structures have burned for many hours and never once fell before. One in Japan was engulfed for over 18 hours and never fell. (as the vid above prob tells, did not view it, no need) This one burned for 45 mins (approx) and collapsed.

Acetylene torches are used to melt and cut hardened, high carbon steel (like frames in buildings) at over 2800 degrees, (blue-white flame, acetylene cutting torch, remember shop class?)

Normal fire like the one from Jet fuel burns around 1200 degrees.

These are all facts.

mikesouth 09-08-2011 05:05 PM

I think only an idiot would take the governments explanation as truth, I dont know that the government was "behind" it but I am certain the government has lied about it....a LOT!

My Pimp 09-08-2011 05:10 PM

I do not think so .

Jey p 09-08-2011 05:21 PM

not at all

bronco67 09-08-2011 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AAB (Post 18412681)
At this point, one would have to be a sheep of epic proportions to still believe the official story. But then again, take a look at Obama zombies. Thinking that they could exhibit any form of common sense is even more foolish than thinking that 911 was a terrorist attack...

One would have to be an idiot to think that 13 million square feet of office space(Twin Towers) could be prepared for controlled demolition, in the busiest section of New York -- when the largest controlled demo for a building ever recorded is 2.2 million square feet -- and that took 3 months with an empty building and an army of engineers to complete.

So some commandos snuck in during workers lunch breaks and threw some timed explosives behind a few desks? Where is the miles of wiring, drilling equipment, etc? Where are the US demolition engineers evil enough to go through with the plan, and also keep quiet about it?

Chew on that.

Freaky_Akula 09-08-2011 05:38 PM

I do not think the government was behind it, but I do think they let it happen. They have done it before at Pearl Harbor.

Overload 09-08-2011 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18413250)
Having the papers on people's desks burning is EXACTLY the same thing as 50,000 gallons of jet fuel, after being rammed
by a half million pound jet.

Have you never seen a fire ring or bbq grill that's a few years old?
Just a small wood fire makes the steel sag and warp. If a couple pieces of wood makes steel warp and sag, what makes you think 50,000 gallons of jet fuel is harmless? Never mind that the building was hit by a huge fucking airplane going a couple hundred miles an hour!

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh! wrong in more than one way ... who said they were FULLY fueled? dont planes carry just ENUFF TO MAKE IT TO THEIR DERSTINATION?! hmm?

oh, a grill ... yeah sure ... i have one YEARS old ... and guees what? i mis/ab-used it in many ways and it never MELTS!

the towers were build like a mosquito net (the ones you have on the doors) and the plane was just like a pen penetrating it ...

steel buildings DO NOT fall from fire! (serious, one of the towers had been burning for several hours in the 70s and yet it stood intact - and 25 years later its such a piece of shit regarding craftmanship and collapses from a fire not even burning alight? rubbish!)

ruff 09-08-2011 06:28 PM

I've been saying this all along. It was the same fucks that killed Kennedy.

Vjo 09-08-2011 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 18413394)
One would have to be an idiot to think that 13 million square feet of office space(Twin Towers) could be prepared for controlled demolition, in the busiest section of New York -- when the largest controlled demo for a building ever recorded is 2.2 million square feet -- and that took 3 months with an empty building and an army of engineers to complete.

So some commandos snuck in during workers lunch breaks and threw some timed explosives behind a few desks? Where is the miles of wiring, drilling equipment, etc? Where are the US demolition engineers evil enough to go through with the plan, and also keep quiet about it?

Chew on that.

There were reports I heard of guys running around months before in dark clothing.

The building is so huge that if the powers that be knew about it and a couple under them, then noone would notice.

Wasnt building 7 occupied before the admitted demolition. (not sure) But that was wired and noone seen that.

Also the old grill is hardly high carbon steel that is used in frames in buildings. The Grill is more like clothes hanger which is not the same as a high rise building frame would be. Different metal composition.

Correct, the frame was designed with redundencies like a mosquito net so that it could not free fall (without demolition) IF a plane hit. That is why they built it that way.. for planes. Original engineers already said that was so.

Vjo 09-08-2011 06:44 PM

How many billions did certain parties save because the twin towers were set for major updates costing billions? The Port Authority had said many updates needed to be made. Costing at least $500 Billion.

Follow the money. They killed 3000 Americans to save BIG money.

They collected on the insurance in 2005. Made BIG money instead of lost BIG money.

Big money is always behind everything evil. Prob a trillion dollar swing was the motive.

How they got the Arabs involved I dont know but I believe BIG money (savings and then earnings) killed 3000 Americans.

I may be wrong. Time will tell.

MediaGuy 09-08-2011 06:50 PM

Remember also that the Twin Towers were shut down completely for a week two weeks prior to the event, after which the bomb-sniffing dogs were pulled.

So many little coincidences... so many quastions, it seems the only people who believe the official story are those who don't know the official story's "details".

.

bronco67 09-08-2011 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MediaGuy (Post 18413531)
Remember also that the Twin Towers were shut down completely for a week two weeks prior to the event, after which the bomb-sniffing dogs were pulled.

So many little coincidences... so many quastions, it seems the only people who believe the official story are those who don't know the official story's "details".

.

Read my post above.

An empty, gutted building of 2.2 million square feet took 3 months to prepare. ONE of the Twin Towers was 6 million square feet.

Think about how ridiculous the concept of being able to rig that in 1-2 weeks, even with the building "closed". Controlled demo requires unfettered access. Even a closed World Trade Center would be fettered, to say the least.

Anyway it's not that I don't believe the government wouldn't do it...but they couldn't. It's not logistically possible, at least for anyone that has even a layman's knowledge of what's involved with controlled demolition. It's a major endeavor that needs to take place in an uninhabited building. That means no people, exposed walls, no furniture -- freedom and access to every beam in the place.

Why the fuck am I even trying to explain simple shit like this? Fuck it.

Here's where you go..."but the building was closed..."

you have to sit and think about what is possible. Is that even an option for you people that want so badly to believe the US government destroyed a New York landmark full of Americans? It must suck to be so disillusioned. Why not move to Canada? Oh, but you're already there, never mind.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123