Paris Hilton Sex Tape Sharers Wanted For Pirate Russian Roulette
 

Way to go XPays :thumbsup

source: http://torrentfreak.com/paris-hilton...ulette-110312/

That's why you order you internet/cable service online with a fake name. The internet /cable services don't care what name you use, they just want the money.:2 cents:

should be interesting

Go git 'em!

:)

somebody will pay the full price

Say I'm on the list but I own a few actual copies of the DVD.

How would something like that play out? I typically buy my DVDs and Blurays, but keep them in the package and download copies from the web to my Media Server.

In all these torrent suits against ip addresses and not actual people that have been discussed here, I've often wondered this but have never raised the question.

And thinking that a $500 settlement for something that one can buy for $50 or less in the stores is fair is pretty entertaining in and of itself. Other's might get on board with this tactic if it wasn't such a straight out money grab.

Unless you are paying with fake credit cards from a fake house in a fake world; using
a fake name isn't going to hide you.


:1orglaugh

I believe the issue with bittorrent is that you are effectively distributing the content at the same time you are downloading it, so it doesn't really matter if you own a copy yourself.... you are still making it available to others to freely download.

Right they run your social sec #....lol too funny.

that an example of using a new technology to perform a old fair use (format shifting)
clueless copyright holders are trying to prevent that

i would agree to pay the $500 only if xpay agreed to pay me back $1000 for every dollar they asked for if the court recognized my actions to be fair use.

if they truely believed that the courts would NEVER grant such an extension then they would have no problem accepting hell the MP insurance of their lawyers would cover it completely.


re read cablevision timeshifting ruling, cacheing fair use statutes should apply
in fact given that you never give anyone a complete working copy only pieces it actually stronger.

this is another teenrevenue botch job again

with the supreme court ruling, clear examples of fair use uses (see above) and the fact that the company trying to protect their content is an "evil" pornographer this is going to turn out as bad as when teen revenue tried to argue that fair use was anti competitive.

I translated it .....


.

I used to think you had something to contribute, but it's pretty clear that you don't.


!

Not when it comes to Guideon.


.

He answered a valid question with a more than valid answer. You just chose to be a douche for the sake of being a douche.

Why shit up this thread because you don't care to hear what he has to say? What makes you think we care what you have to say?

Now if only they'd have put this much effort into making the video itself.. then it may actually be worth paying for. Not that I'm condoning the actions of the pirates, because I'm not... I just find it ironic.

I'm in two minds about this. I believe that rights should be pursued, but how do you know that the person associated with the IP address (ie, the account holder's name) is the infringer? Are you going to name John Doe Sr. because his son Johnny got horny one night?

yea that's it .......


.

you might want to read it again, there is no way shape or form you can ever claim what i said argued everything should be free

this was a case where someone BOUGHT the content, and simply used the new technology to format shift what he BOUGHT

if were half as smart as you thought you were, you would have realized the solution a long time ago.

sales are waning because it's old and it sucks.