Vaccine expert tells his story
 

At least he's honest I suppose. It's convenient how we all get injected with this crap then eventually get sick, the people who benefit most from us getting sick are the same companies who want us injected with it. If vaccines really stopped us from getting sick it would be madness for the Pharms to push them (from a Business perspective)

Maurice Hilleman has saved more people in the 20th century due to his "evil" vaccines than any other scientist in the 20th century.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Hilleman

something is wrong with you.

You didn't have time to watch it and listen to him. I suspect the vaccines have knocked out your attention span :winkwink:

There is a difference between what they tell us for marketing puposes and what they tell the scientific community

yeah fuck vaccines, I like those polio kids, they're always a good laugh :thumbsup

http://www.poliofreeindia.org/faq_files/polio-child.jpg

Thanks for this Slappin Fish, it's interesting to see more and more of you aware of the crap that's going on :thumbsup

Before modern times polio was a mild disease which would rarely result in paralysis. Like you suggest, vaccines are the main cause of Polio in the world.

------------------------
"Jonas Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate subcommittee that nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine."
------------------------
"Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection" - Dr. Sabin, developer of Polio vaccine.
-------------------------
"Provocation polio. That is the truth about those outbreaks of polio. And I offer a well considered personal opinion that polio is a man made disease." -Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.
--------------------------
"Poliomyelitis trends in Pondicherry, south India, 1989-91" (Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health [London], vol. 51, no. 4, August 1997, pages 443-48): About 54 percent of children lamed as a result of poliomyelitis had received three doses of oral polio vaccine before the onset of paralysis.

god are you stupid.

Maurice was one of the early vaccine pioneers to warn about the possibility that simian viruses might contaminate vaccines.[7] The best-known of these viruses became SV40, a viral contaminant of the polio vaccine, whose discovery led to the recall of Salk's vaccine in 1961 and its replacement with Albert Sabin's oral vaccine. The contamination actually occurred in both vaccines at very low levels, and, because they were ingested rather than injected, did not result in infections or any harm.

Far more intelligent to sponge all the propaganda than to research :thumbsup

Clearly written for public consumption, look into it some time

very creepy

What is this place, conspiracy nut central ?

good one :thumbsup

Very strange interview. They're talking about how the early vaccines caused cancer and laughing about it.

You have been here 8 years and just noticed that?

Look it up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

Yep, the threadstarter is a serious wack job.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1005296

sad when fatfoo's bot is more logical than you.

Nutcases can still get degrees that allow them to call themselves doctors.

You must always remember that when an "expert" says something to the contrary of their peers.

Some of you are so stupid is just amazes me. Carry on, and please, don't vaccinate your children. SOme bloodlines should die off.

life was so much better in the pre-vaccine world. it was almost a paradise.

I fucked your mom... Its called vaccination.

I love this demonstration. Even an idiot should be able to understand it. That was a fantastic show.

Was? Did they cancel it? :Oh crap

Ye sir, they unfortunately did. I think it was more a contract negotiation issue though. They have new show coming up called, I believe, "To Tell A Lie" or something like that. It's going to be a different format though and on a different network.

i dont say vacine does not protect you, but what else they add to your body we dont know... that is the fucking point!

What is being said is true, the Polio vaccine did have serious problems, and it was altered at one stage although the original was still being used up until 1999. The new drug to reduce cervical cancer in young girls is extremely controversial and a number of deaths have occurred in possible connection with its use.
However, naturally occurring Polio has almost been eliminated in the developed world, although there are some people that have been affected by side effects it is miniscule in comparison.
To use that information in the video out of context in order to make a mute point overall is fairly disingenuous. Do a bit of research before jumping to unfounded conclusions.

Not seen that before. Really good illustration :thumbsup

What else they add? What are you afraid they are adding? Microchips?

did you kill the Kennedy's?





.

:1orglaugh

No, but I know who did.

Netflix has it:2 cents:

This is a very good point seeandsee, most people put their faith in vaccines, it is like a religion to them, they do not like people questioning. They choose to ignore the fact that the Pharms are a business, they appear to believe they are not for profit charity. If you look through the replies above we see people who replied without even watching the video. They are not interested in listening to what this vaccine expert had to say, despite the fact he knows infinitely more than they do on the topic, they've made their minds up despite only hearing one side of the story. To have a balanced view they have to first research the other side of the story with an open mind, then we can come to a fair conclusion.

I only post stuff like this out of duty, I know that we have to chip away at these myths and propaganda. There will always be ridicule, this is actually a sign that you're getting somewhere.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860)

I lost a sister through a vaccine, I've also seen 2 other very close people go down close to death after vaccines. I used to believe in the myth of vaccines too, but after extensive research on the topic I now know that there's another agenda behind it.

There are some pretty obvious ones going on right now like Swine Flu Vaccine Sterilizations (using Polysorbate 80 to damage developing ovaries), the Cervical Cancer vaccine is also fertility reduction. it's also well known that UNICEF/WHO/UN go around 3rd world countries sterilizing with so-called vaccines. If we look at a map of the vaccination points in Africa we see that these are all the areas with the highest rates of HIV. The idea with Africa is to grab and profit from the resources, but it can be complicated when there is a village located there, hence the HIV injections.

Henry Kissinger, 1978:

?U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation?

For anyone who would like to at least consider the other side of the argument, Gary Null makes some excellent points in the video below (Part 1 of 3)

i don't have kids but if i did i certainly would not roll the dice with their lives by irresponsibly stopping their vaccinations based on youtube videos.

All bullshit passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident by those lacking critical thinking
dyna mo
gfy philosopher

Strange how we all managed to survive the pre-vaccine era though don't you think

In fact, Mumps, Measles etc leave us immune to various cancer, they toughen up our immune systems. Vaccines leave us with couch-potato immune systems.

Vaccination- The Hidden Truth - Chapter 7 Are Childhood diseases dangerous
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=0752DA...F40B104A322319

Perhaps you don't know how much is paid out in vaccine damage each year. That side isn't marketed, it's all kept quiet.

They don't trace how many people go down with auto-immune diseases after vaccination e.g. diabetes, MS, muscle-wasting diseases etc. They don't trace it as it's not good for business. Since the heavy vaccination schedule was introduced we now have 6 times as many people going down with diabetes type 1

There's a lot of BS that goes around in the mainstream media. The biggest mistake people make is by not realizing that media is an important arm of government. Everything we hear or read we should question "What was the purpose of telling me that" rather than believing it with blind faith.

If the powers of the world want the population down, they're not going to ask us, they're going to come up with a plan and market it to us in a way that will provoke the necessary response. How do they get us to let our daughters receive sterilizing injections? Tell us there's a Pandemic for a new type of flu, make us believe it's in their best interests to receive an "untested" injection which has a statement in the insert saying it has "unknown effects on fertility" (that way they're covered if we ever find out)

i totally agree and until that is done and vaccines are proven to cause diabetes, auto-immune diseases, ms, etc., i would think sticking with vaccines is the smarter way to go than not.

just like the scare with vaccines and thimiswtfeveritis, false alarm.

i will add this, i do have a pet dog and i have chosen to NOT continue with his vaccines after his 1st year and he is 4 years old now.


and i've read about the combination vaccines and it is best to administer vaccines one at a time but the roi on vaccines is proven while the damage you mention is still in the rumor mill as best i can tell.

you give both the government and the media too much credit. neither one could plan/strategize their way out of a paper bag, let alone conspire on all the things you think they do. but carry on, i do think y'all will get a conspiracy right at some point.

There are certain things that won't be "proven", this is because of what's known as "cheque-book research". You pay for research and you expect a certain result, generally one that will help you market and sell the product, whilst minimizing any downside. If the researcher does not produce the desired results you bin their research and don't use them again, if it's on a big scale you withdraw their funding. Most researchers will produce what they are asked to produce.

You make very good point at the end. For those who really believe in vaccines there are 3 things that can help protect you:-

1. NEVER receive more than 1 vaccine at a time (like dyna mo says). Unfortunately official policy is to give more than 1 vaccine at a time as it's good for business; they don't know if you'll come back in 2 weeks time.

2. NEVER get vaccinated when you have a fever

3. NEVER get vaccinated when malnourished.

If the three rules above were kept to we'd have a lot less people with auto-immune disorders and in Special schools.

For those who don't want to look any further into vaccines, it won't hurt you to take those 3 points above onboard for the future.

In media companies people generally know which direction their stories have to point in. There are some stories where it doesn't matter, there are others where you know you risk assassination (e.g. Goldman Sachs, Secret Services etc), there are other times when the goverment steps like (like with the BBC) and tells them the precise rules and story they have to follow.

It is also known that various journalists have links with the secret services, they will produce certain types of stories (propaganda) when they are asked to. E.g the West is soon going to attack a certain country, so they write stories about how women are treated like dirt in that country.

Then there is advertising, if a particular Newspaper or Channel has receives money from the Pharms (they pay very well), they're not going to say anything bad about their products. The Pharms also donate very heavily to the main parties, so their rules will always be put in place e.g. you have to receive 20 or so vaccines just to go to school

hmm, your premise is based on the assumption that the entire scientific research community is corrupt & in on it.
so we are at the government + the media + the scientific research industry + + + = vaccine/flouride/9/11/vapor trails/etc. programs


on the other hand.......

It's more about funding:-

He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation. - James A. Garfield

Whoever controls the Federal Reserve controls America.

For example, let's say you wanted to get women out to work in a particular nation. You want to do this to eventually get close to twice the workforce, which also enables you to tax twice as many people and has the effect of bringing down the average salary. What's a good way to go about this without telling women you want them working for you too. You fund women's liberation, tell them they've been held down by men. By giving huge funding to these people you eventually make it into a very powerful movement.

Here's a former buddy of Nick Rockefeller (the family behind the Federal Reserve) repeating what he was told by Nick about Women's Lib

We didn't. Tons of people died as a result of there being no vaccine available. :2 cents:

The ones who die are generally the malnourished

Here's a vaccine researcher telling his story, after what he's seen he would move State rather than have his own child vaccinated

"No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. "

http://www.thinktwice.com/fraud2.htm

Complete ignorance.