GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   This Angry Rant Is Excellent! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1033588)

BFT3K 08-10-2011 07:34 AM

This Angry Rant Is Excellent!
 
And it is NOT partisan...



https://youtube.com/watch?v=gIcqb9hHQ3E

The Duck 08-10-2011 07:41 AM

He really went to town and is probably right too..

Nikki_Licks 08-10-2011 08:01 AM

Love it!!

Would be a great idea to round up all the scum in congress (strip them of any power they may have), and toss them in the street :thumbsup

2MuchMark 08-10-2011 08:08 AM

Smart guy.

I would love to see him tear into Boehner. If you think he cried like a baby in the past...

mountainmiester 08-10-2011 08:38 AM

Two words...

TERM LIMITS

vsex 08-10-2011 08:52 AM

I'm a new fan. :thumbsup

scuba steve 08-10-2011 09:32 AM

kinda ballsy move, and he seems to really call out obama and everyone else.

BFT3K 08-10-2011 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scuba steve (Post 18344622)
kinda ballsy move, and he seems to really call out obama and everyone else.

Yes, it was a non-partisan rant.

No spin - just angry reality....

u-Bob 08-10-2011 10:07 AM

So he's basically calling for a dictatorship :(

He's angry at a lot of the right things, but his so called solution is just more of the same...

Joshua G 08-10-2011 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 18344685)
Yes, it was a non-partisan rant.

No spin - just angry reality....

no. he was disguising his message in a non-partisan trojan horse. what he was saying was that democrats are spending america into ruin. then he went into a tangent on banking & trade, just so his liberal MSNBC bosses dont fire him.

BFT3K 08-10-2011 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18344715)
no. he was disguising his message in a non-partisan trojan horse. what he was saying was that democrats are spending america into ruin. then he went into a tangent on banking & trade, just so his liberal MSNBC bosses dont fire him.

He placed the responsibility on Obama, and basically called him out as a weak leader.

Not sure what you just watched, or how your biased mind decided to spin it for yourself.

Will MSNBC ditch him for calling out Obama? Maybe, and if so, then THAT WOULD be biased.

BFT3K 08-10-2011 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 18344707)
So he's basically calling for a dictatorship :(

He's angry at a lot of the right things, but his so called solution is just more of the same...

"More of the same" is perpetuated by dismissive remarks like yours.

No matter what anyone says, even if it bucks the system, is never good enough for some, who would rather just complain about the system, than face the facts and try to change it.

A "dictatorship"... seriously?

Joshua G 08-10-2011 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 18344730)
He placed the responsibility on Obama, and basically called him out as a weak leader.

Not sure what you just watched, or how your biased mind decided to spin it for yourself.

Will MSNBC ditch him for calling out Obama? Maybe, and if so, then THAT WOULD be biased.

false. replay the first 10 seconds of the clip, as he attacks the democrats for kicking the can to 2017. then, realizing his mistake, launches into his nonpartisan spin, bringing banks & republicans into his rant. He was attacking you & your idealogy & your values & everything you stand for. Everything.

adultchatpay 08-10-2011 10:37 AM

He got some points!

CaptainHowdy 08-10-2011 10:39 AM

Feel the ... impotence.

BFT3K 08-10-2011 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18344764)
false. replay the first 10 seconds of the clip, as he attacks the democrats for kicking the can to 2017. then, realizing his mistake, launches into his nonpartisan spin, bringing banks & republicans into his rant. He was attacking you & your idealogy & your values & everything you stand for. Everything.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RE3ztP12gW...255B1%255D.jpg

Dcat 08-10-2011 11:17 AM

Good rant. He even managed to TEE UP the "next" Bankster scam now in the pipeline..

You might find this interesting..

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com...xt-budget.html

u-Bob 08-10-2011 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 18344739)
A "dictatorship"... seriously?

The way I understood it he was calling for the president to take over the powers that have been delegated to congress. That's calling for the end of the devision of power and thus calling for the accumulation of powers into the hands of 1 man: the president. Historically that's what a dictatorship has always entailed.

Dvae 08-10-2011 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18344746)
Yup, saw that yesterday and wondered why someone didn't interrupt him and say that the country is a democracy and not a dictatorship. As he screams about corruptions he sure fails silent when the Gov/Banks injects money into the markets via Quantitative easing.

Wrong!!
The United States is a Representative Republic

According to Merriam-Webster:

Democracy ? Government by the people; government in which the supreme power is retained by the people and exercised either directly (Ablsolute, or pure), or indirectly (representative).

Republic ? A state in which the sovereign power resides in a certain body of the people (the electorate), and is exercised by representatives elected by, and responsible to, them.

Failed 08-10-2011 04:14 PM

It becomes easier and easier to pick out the tea party supporters in threads. Bat shit crazy seems to grow in its intensity on a daily basis.

Tempest 08-11-2011 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mountainmiester (Post 18344476)
Two words...

TERM LIMITS

Why? Seriously... You don't want to kick someone out of their job if they're excellent at it just because of some time limit... The real problem is the money that is dumped into politicians campaigns by corporations etc... If that was removed from the equation, campaigns funded by taxpayer money and/or capped individual contributions, then soooooo many of the problems would go away. Politicians would stop campaigning all the time to raise money. Stop doing what big money lobbyists want in order to get campaign contributions.. They would focus more on actually doing their job. Prime example.. What's Obama doing for the next few weeks? On the road to fund raise and campaign for an election over a year away instead of doing his job.

Captain Kawaii 08-11-2011 02:25 AM

REMOVE ALL LOBBYISTS/BANKERS AND SHOOT THE ONES WHO WONT GO...
The system is a CANCER on the WORLD...

u-Bob 08-11-2011 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18346682)
The real problem is the money that is dumped into politicians campaigns by corporations etc... If that was removed from the equation, campaigns funded by taxpayer money and/or capped individual contributions, then soooooo many of the problems would go away. Politicians would stop campaigning all the time to raise money.

They tried that in most EU countries and the result is that politicians do even more shady stuff to hang on to power to get more tax euros.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123