![]() |
9/11 Conspiracy Theorists... Please Answer
Yeah yeah yeah, another "9-11" thread, but I'm curious to find WHY people keep posting them. If it was an inside job, why?
I know there is a lot of evidence everywhere that can prove both sides are correct, but in either case, one thing I never understood was if this was an inside deal, why and how could this happen? From the conspiracy theorists view, I understand why the pentagon was hit... trying to hide some 2.3 trillion in paperwork, blah blah blah. But why the towers? What did they have in store worth $1 trillion or more to go down? Same with WTC 7. Likewise, why did the flight in PA go down? I heard from someone this weekend while in AC that it was shot down by NORAD and she swore up and down. Obviously drunk and probably full of BS but said her brother worked for NORAD and told her. Uh huh... Lastly, how did all these people get involved on an inside job and how is it possible that not one person leaked the "truth" yet? Its not just the government, but also news stations to local agencies. |
they did it for the lulz.....
. |
|
Quote:
and it starts from there :upsidedow |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In their own words they explain why :thumbsup http://www.scribd.com/doc/9651/Rebui...-Defenses-PNAC |
At the end of the day, this is my question too. Why?
Did someone want to invade Afghanistan? Afghanistan is a land locked country with no oil. They mention a pipeline they were planning, but the truth is because of the invasion this pipeline will never be built. Ten years later and it's still not built. And at any rate, it's irrelevant: The pipeline was just that - a pipeline - it was just a way to ship the same oil to the same eventual destination. Someone above mentioned war profiteering? How does that work? You mean to tell me they were willing to risk getting caught killing thousands of innocent Americans and billions of dollars hoping they could profit off of us invading another country? I also heard asbestos the other day, which was new to me. I'm pretty confident the owners of the WTC had insurance for this type of thing - in the event they declared the WTC uninhabitable, it would have been covered by insurance. Besides, the WTC was owned by a government organization. That's like saying the local school district decided to blow up a school killing hundreds of students because of asbestos. At the end of the day, there is no logical reason for anyone in the US to want this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For those who prefer here's a brief YouTube look at the same document highlighting key paragraphs. What they don't tell you, is that these US forces who are to be spread around the globe, will eventually be transformed into UN forces. When we eventually reach the stage where no country has it's own army and no civilians have weapons, and every country is governed by the UN (via the continental unions), that is when we have reached your New World Order; with the Bankers in complete control. It's incredibly difficult to back out of that stage once it is reached "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years." "It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller Internationalist billionaire, CFR kingpin, founder of the Trilateralist Commission, World Order Godfather |
Quote:
|
the wars the US are about having footprints in strategic countries in the world for future conflicts.
Quote:
|
Many believe that it has to do with being able to strip rights from the American people under the guise of security. Look how much international travel has changed since that day, and no one squawks about scanning and pat downs etc.
|
Quote:
I think this day and age, something like this to pull off as an inside job would be hear impossible. Think of all the people in 2001 versus 2011 that have camera phones and able to capture that. There would of been probably 10x the amount of videos. A little while ago I heard that the only video of the first plane was 100% fake. NYC did not have anyone scheduled to be at that location investing any man hole cover and other footage of security cameras, etc., where thrown out. Whatever, hard to believe either side but more hard to believe that a countries own gov't would turn on them to make money. |
Quote:
Another krazy konspiracy kook: |
|
Quote:
I will admit, however, if you look at Iran.... Seems they are surrounded by US forces. Is it possible that, in the name of protecting Israel, the United States intentionally caused 9/11 to happen so we could invade Afghanistan knowing that it would be easy for us to create a reason to invade Iraq (again), which would leave Iran surrounded (and thus pretty much pissing in their pants?). I don't believe in conspiracy theories at all. But from a strategic military stand point, this makes sense. If Iran so much as blinks, we are in perfect position. |
the US has known for a long time that there will be a conflict with china.
Quote:
|
Anyone that thinks this was an inside job is a moron.
|
Quote:
|
war is good business, whether there's oil there or not. it's just a numbers game.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:upsidedow :error |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123