![]() |
A Personal Plee From Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales
Maybe they should start charging if its becoming to expensive to maintain WIKI
Google might have close to a million servers. Yahoo has something like 13,000 staff. We have 400 servers and fewer than 100 staff worldwide. Wikipedia is the #5 site on the web and serves 454 million different people every month ? with billions of page views. Commerce is fine. Advertising is not evil. But it doesn't belong here. Not in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is something special. It is like a library or a public park. It is like a temple for the mind. It is a place we can all go to think, to learn, to share our knowledge with others. When I founded Wikipedia, I could have made it into a for-profit company with advertising banners, but I decided to do something different. We?ve worked hard over the years to keep it lean and tight. We fulfil our mission, and leave waste to others. If everyone reading this could give just £3 a month, we would only have to fundraise for one day a year. But not everyone can or will donate. And that's fine. Each year just enough people decide to give. https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/in...ki%2FMain_Page |
Adapt or die...
|
Google co-founder Sergey Brin donates $500,000 toward Wikipedia's $28M budget
Quote:
ADG |
I think he should turn it into a tube
|
Can someone give him some money so the beggars face will go away?
|
I donate every month to Wikipedia. I use Wikipedia daily, so I think it's worth it.
In fact, I would pay to use it. |
Quote:
|
If they did go the ad supported route I doubt they'd make money anyway if they placed ads like Wikia does.
|
He's an idiot for not monetizing it. :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
That sites full of user uploaded content.
|
Quote:
|
Wikitube is not available :Oh crap
|
Quote:
|
If I remember to I'll donate a few bucks. I've got some use from wikipedia.
|
if your in the uk, i think he (or one of the founders) is on bbc1 question time next thursday.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
It is easy and free to look things up on Wikipedia, so people tend to use it. I know that, for anything I am very informed about, I can tell that Wikipedia is egregiously inaccurate. Their crowd-sourcing system eliminates the accountability which might make it more accurate. No knowledge source is perfect, but that one is particularly bad. Certainly, for anything about currently living people and present day brands, I think the site is an abomination. If people want to pay for quality research, there are better options. For a free one, it sometimes seems more worthwhile than, ya know, nothing.
|
how long until they have ads
|
advertise then and stop bitching and moaning
|
I think he should take the Godaddy route and put some hot bitches on there instead of his sorry looking face. :2 cents:
|
Quote:
I just hope his ads appear as cleanly as they do on Google. Pop-up ads are fucking bullshit, and even Youtube's advertising is annoying as hell. |
a 600x400 banner on every page asking for a donation is a frickin AD!
the frickin cocksucker, put them in the footer, who gives a fuck run by idiot editors |
Quote:
|
I guess i'm the only one to ever work with Wikia. O_o
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
If he stops with blocking real information and quits surfing as a extreme left wing propaganda media i will donate for the good cause.
|
Quote:
|
I vote for ads.. Don't I get a vote?
|
Quote:
|
wikipedia has been used in court.
|
Quote:
But, I'm a fool who still believes people do things out of the kindness of their hearts at times without a desire to profit. I admit, it's a downfall and a personality trait I sometimes wish I could do away with. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
if they wont get much donations to cover the hostings and other costs then imho, they should put ads only to cover those., like put ads on for few days / month, and they ll get enough cash to cover the costs., but gee they have 400 servers.,.,.,.,sooner or later they gonna stick ads no matter what, there are very less % of peeple who donates to wiki / for knowledge.
hope they sort it out., |
I am going to start donating to wikipedia. Great project.
|
Why not just shove ads on it to cover the costs, and encourage the use of an add blocking plugin?
Everyones happy :) |
I won't ever forget how they were ranked #1 on just about every term on google several years ago.
|
I like plee ...
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
I am only using it because it is free.
|
There will be ads on there
|
I hate wikipedia's edit-nazis. I go in and try to correct something that is obviously wrong, I even cite my credible references and sources... them fuckers change it back and ban me instantly. All the time. I go in and add "and she was a proud lesbian" on a famous straight actress's wiki page and it stays there for a long time.
|
I donated.
If you see something inaccurate, change it. I've seen wrong stuff in the printed encyclopedia britannica, and it wasn't nearly as convenient to edit :P The donation stats are online, btw |
just donated :)
|
All they would have to do is throw affiliate links to shit they use in the footer.
Domain Registration Provided By: GoDaddy.com Web Hosting/Servers Provided By: etc... not really advertising if you're only promoting shit you actually use and are happy with. I do this on a few sites and make referrals and with their page views a few footer text links wouldn't kill anyone and would probably do quite well. Waiting on my 10% consulting fee. |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123