GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   A Personal Plee From Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1046412)

halfpint 11-18-2011 05:12 PM

A Personal Plee From Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales
 
Maybe they should start charging if its becoming to expensive to maintain WIKI

Google might have close to a million servers. Yahoo has something like 13,000 staff. We have 400 servers and fewer than 100 staff worldwide.

Wikipedia is the #5 site on the web and serves 454 million different people every month ? with billions of page views.

Commerce is fine. Advertising is not evil. But it doesn't belong here. Not in Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is something special. It is like a library or a public park. It is like a temple for the mind. It is a place we can all go to think, to learn, to share our knowledge with others.

When I founded Wikipedia, I could have made it into a for-profit company with advertising banners, but I decided to do something different. We?ve worked hard over the years to keep it lean and tight. We fulfil our mission, and leave waste to others.

If everyone reading this could give just £3 a month, we would only have to fundraise for one day a year. But not everyone can or will donate. And that's fine. Each year just enough people decide to give.

https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/in...ki%2FMain_Page

CyberHustler 11-18-2011 05:17 PM

Adapt or die...

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 11-18-2011 05:26 PM

Google co-founder Sergey Brin donates $500,000 toward Wikipedia's $28M budget
 
Quote:

The foundation created by Google co-founder Sergey Brin and his wife, Anne Wojcicki, has given a $500,000 grant to help Wikipedia fund its $28.3 million annual budget. Wikipedia holds an annual fundraiser instead of accepting advertising?you may have seen "A personal appeal from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales" if you've used the online encyclopedia this week.

The $500,000 grant comes from the Brin Wojcicki Foundation and goes to the Wikimedia Foundation, which began its annual fundraiser two days ago to support Wikipedia and sister sites. Wojcicki, who married Brin in May 2007, is the founder of personal genomics company 23andme. (Google has also given millions to Wikimedia in the past.)

While the donation is a serious one (though the Stanton Foundation recently gave $3.5 million), it's far from enough to take care of all Wikipedia's annual expenses. The Wikimedia Foundation's total planned spending is $28.3 million in the 2011-12 fiscal year. Last year's campaign raised $16 million toward the foundation's $20 million budget. The latest fundraiser will extend through January.

"If everyone reading this donated $5, our fundraiser would be over today," a message on Wikipedia said, while noting that the site had raised $657,000 toward its "Friday goal" of $1 million. Wales, who founded Wikipedia in 2001, likens the user-created encyclopedia to "a library or a public park ? a temple for the mind."

"Google might have close to a million servers," Wales writes. "Yahoo has something like 13,000 staff. We have 679 servers and 95 staff. Wikipedia is the #5 site on the web and serves 450 million different people every month?with billions of page views. Commerce is fine. Advertising is not evil. But it doesn't belong here. Not in Wikipedia."
http://www.gtfo.ro/wp-content/upload...mwikipedia.jpg

ADG

halfpint 11-18-2011 05:28 PM

I think he should turn it into a tube

AzteK 11-18-2011 05:36 PM

Can someone give him some money so the beggars face will go away?

Rochard 11-18-2011 05:42 PM

I donate every month to Wikipedia. I use Wikipedia daily, so I think it's worth it.

In fact, I would pay to use it.

V_RocKs 11-18-2011 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 18570289)

Chuckle...

uno 11-18-2011 06:04 PM

If they did go the ad supported route I doubt they'd make money anyway if they placed ads like Wikia does.

vsex 11-18-2011 06:11 PM

He's an idiot for not monetizing it. :2 cents:

Failed 11-18-2011 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vsex (Post 18570395)
He's an idiot for not monetizing it. :2 cents:

It's not about money for everyone. Some people truly wish to give other people a service out of kindness and a willingness to help. To call him an idiot for doing such a thing is, well, idiotic.

L-Pink 11-18-2011 06:34 PM

That sites full of user uploaded content.

marlboroack 11-18-2011 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 18570292)
I think he should turn it into a tube

LMAO:1orglaugh

Helix 11-18-2011 06:38 PM

Wikitube is not available :Oh crap

AdultTraffic.info 11-18-2011 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 18570292)
I think he should turn it into a tube

hahaha :1orglaugh

raymor 11-18-2011 06:47 PM

If I remember to I'll donate a few bucks. I've got some use from wikipedia.

DVTimes 11-18-2011 06:48 PM

if your in the uk, i think he (or one of the founders) is on bbc1 question time next thursday.

baddog 11-18-2011 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18570319)
I donate every month to Wikipedia. I use Wikipedia daily, so I think it's worth it.

In fact, I would pay to use it.

:1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Failed (Post 18570399)
It's not about money for everyone. Some people truly wish to give other people a service out of kindness and a willingness to help. To call him an idiot for doing such a thing is, well, idiotic.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 18570436)
That sites full of user uploaded content.

werd

AmeliaG 11-18-2011 06:52 PM

It is easy and free to look things up on Wikipedia, so people tend to use it. I know that, for anything I am very informed about, I can tell that Wikipedia is egregiously inaccurate. Their crowd-sourcing system eliminates the accountability which might make it more accurate. No knowledge source is perfect, but that one is particularly bad. Certainly, for anything about currently living people and present day brands, I think the site is an abomination. If people want to pay for quality research, there are better options. For a free one, it sometimes seems more worthwhile than, ya know, nothing.

fris 11-18-2011 06:54 PM

how long until they have ads

AllAboutCams 11-18-2011 07:05 PM

advertise then and stop bitching and moaning

mayabong 11-18-2011 08:35 PM

I think he should take the Godaddy route and put some hot bitches on there instead of his sorry looking face. :2 cents:

2MuchMark 11-18-2011 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxupdate (Post 18570506)
advertise then and stop bitching and moaning

Yes really....sell advertising! Or at least throw up Google Adsense. Wikipedia is long past its "too cool for ads" stage. Ads work, its ok, we get it. Go for it!

I just hope his ads appear as cleanly as they do on Google. Pop-up ads are fucking bullshit, and even Youtube's advertising is annoying as hell.

cam_girls 11-18-2011 10:01 PM

a 600x400 banner on every page asking for a donation is a frickin AD!

the frickin cocksucker,

put them in the footer, who gives a fuck

run by idiot editors

baddog 11-18-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 18570481)
It is easy and free to look things up on Wikipedia, so people tend to use it. I know that, for anything I am very informed about, I can tell that Wikipedia is egregiously inaccurate. Their crowd-sourcing system eliminates the accountability which might make it more accurate. No knowledge source is perfect, but that one is particularly bad. Certainly, for anything about currently living people and present day brands, I think the site is an abomination. If people want to pay for quality research, there are better options. For a free one, it sometimes seems more worthwhile than, ya know, nothing.

Well said.

uno 11-18-2011 10:14 PM

I guess i'm the only one to ever work with Wikia. O_o

RyuLion 11-18-2011 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler (Post 18570243)
Adapt or die...

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

lagcam 11-18-2011 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Failed (Post 18570399)
It's not about money for everyone. Some people truly wish to give other people a service out of kindness and a willingness to help. To call him an idiot for doing such a thing is, well, idiotic.

You missed his point. He may have started out doing it as a "kindness and out of a willingness to help" but he passed that point when he started asking for donations, and when your costs get up to $28 million dollars a year, I doubt you can even see the original point with the Hubble telescope. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope ) :)


Quote:

Originally Posted by cam_girls (Post 18570697)
a 600x400 banner on every page asking for a donation is a frickin AD!

I agree. It's just professional begging. Personally I think it's all strategy and that they will do a facebook, and quickly go from not wanting ads to existing mainly for ads. All this is just whipping up a nice demand for when they start........

Frank21 11-18-2011 10:15 PM

If he stops with blocking real information and quits surfing as a extreme left wing propaganda media i will donate for the good cause.

Frank21 11-18-2011 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 18570652)

I just hope his ads appear as cleanly as they do on Google. Pop-up ads are fucking bullshit, and even Youtube's advertising is annoying as hell.

The advertisements on my Samsung Galaxy android OS is fucking anoying and intrusive as well.

BIGTYMER 11-18-2011 11:14 PM

I vote for ads.. Don't I get a vote?

uno 11-18-2011 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cam_girls (Post 18570697)
a 600x400 banner on every page asking for a donation is a frickin AD!

the frickin cocksucker,

put them in the footer, who gives a fuck

run by idiot editors

Totally, take the advice of the PS who thinks he's the subject of USA satellites' targeted psyonic something or other and the star of the a movie(that spawned it's own mental illness[!!!])'s word. He's totally grounded in reality.

Fletch XXX 11-18-2011 11:39 PM

wikipedia has been used in court.

Failed 11-19-2011 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagcam (Post 18570714)
You missed his point. He may have started out doing it as a "kindness and out of a willingness to help" but he passed that point when he started asking for donations, and when your costs get up to $28 million dollars a year, I doubt you can even see the original point with the Hubble telescope.

I don't think asking for donations to support a free service is passing the point of kindness and a willingness to help. I take it as a man who's trying to keep a service he truly believes in free, and ad/intrusiveness free.

But, I'm a fool who still believes people do things out of the kindness of their hearts at times without a desire to profit. I admit, it's a downfall and a personality trait I sometimes wish I could do away with.

uno 11-19-2011 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Failed (Post 18570787)
I don't think asking for donations to support a free service is passing the point of kindness and a willingness to help. I take it as a man who's trying to keep a service he truly believes in free, and ad/intrusiveness free.

But, I'm a fool who still believes people do things out of the kindness of their hearts at times without a desire to profit. I admit, it's a downfall and a personality trait I sometimes wish I could do away with.

rofflemeow.

Captain Kawaii 11-19-2011 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 18570481)
It is easy and free to look things up on Wikipedia, so people tend to use it. I know that, for anything I am very informed about, I can tell that Wikipedia is egregiously inaccurate. Their crowd-sourcing system eliminates the accountability which might make it more accurate. No knowledge source is perfect, but that one is particularly bad. Certainly, for anything about currently living people and present day brands, I think the site is an abomination. If people want to pay for quality research, there are better options. For a free one, it sometimes seems more worthwhile than, ya know, nothing.

Wiki is a ref for knuckle-draggers. Its really a gamble if the info on it is accurate by any sense of the word.

ottopottomouse 11-19-2011 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21 (Post 18570718)
The advertisements on my Samsung Galaxy android OS is fucking anoying and intrusive as well.

https://market.android.com/details?i...d.adfree&hl=en

cooldude7 11-19-2011 05:20 AM

if they wont get much donations to cover the hostings and other costs then imho, they should put ads only to cover those., like put ads on for few days / month, and they ll get enough cash to cover the costs., but gee they have 400 servers.,.,.,.,sooner or later they gonna stick ads no matter what, there are very less % of peeple who donates to wiki / for knowledge.
hope they sort it out.,

Odin 11-19-2011 05:25 AM

I am going to start donating to wikipedia. Great project.

CurrentlySober 11-19-2011 05:36 AM

Why not just shove ads on it to cover the costs, and encourage the use of an add blocking plugin?

Everyones happy :)

GetSCORECash 11-19-2011 05:37 AM

I won't ever forget how they were ranked #1 on just about every term on google several years ago.

CaptainHowdy 11-19-2011 05:39 AM

I like plee ...

vsex 11-19-2011 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 18570466)
:2 cents: is all you have.

That site would never have worked as a commercial site.

so it wouldn't now? with all that traffic? I guess my :2 cents: is about a 1000 times more than what you have. :2 cents:

:1orglaugh

MrCain 11-19-2011 08:17 AM

I am only using it because it is free.

GAMEFINEST 11-19-2011 08:25 AM

There will be ads on there

CyberHustler 11-19-2011 10:38 AM

I hate wikipedia's edit-nazis. I go in and try to correct something that is obviously wrong, I even cite my credible references and sources... them fuckers change it back and ban me instantly. All the time. I go in and add "and she was a proud lesbian" on a famous straight actress's wiki page and it stays there for a long time.

Hentaikid 11-19-2011 04:43 PM

I donated.

If you see something inaccurate, change it. I've seen wrong stuff in the printed encyclopedia britannica, and it wasn't nearly as convenient to edit :P

The donation stats are online, btw

Paul&John 11-19-2011 04:56 PM

just donated :)

ErectMedia 11-19-2011 08:29 PM

All they would have to do is throw affiliate links to shit they use in the footer.

Domain Registration Provided By: GoDaddy.com

Web Hosting/Servers Provided By:

etc...

not really advertising if you're only promoting shit you actually use and are happy with. I do this on a few sites and make referrals and with their page views a few footer text links wouldn't kill anyone and would probably do quite well. Waiting on my 10% consulting fee.

Jarmusch 11-19-2011 08:57 PM

http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/22120000...43f9a73afa.jpg

Jarmusch 11-19-2011 09:02 PM

50 donations.


http://cdn.uproxx.com/wp-content/upl...ilingjimmy.gif


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123