GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Colin Powell endorses Obama... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1086757)

bronco67 10-25-2012 06:02 AM

Colin Powell endorses Obama...
 
Who wants to bet some Republitard will make a race thing out of this?

Brujah 10-25-2012 06:05 AM

He isn't the only one.
http://republicansforobama.org/

DudeRick 10-25-2012 06:13 AM

This is my shocked face...

http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o...BEE25058AC.jpg

HushMoney 10-25-2012 07:02 AM

"I No Longer Recognize My Party

As a registered Republican I fear I must confess that I no longer recognize the party that I grew up with in Oregon. I voted for Mark Hatfield, Tom McCall and other Republicans who found enough common ground with Democrats to govern. Now I watch in dismay as those in my party boast that their primary objective is to defeat the President. Not to govern. Not to bring together a sense of responsibility and willingness to compromise to solve problems we face. Such as the budget. Such as bridges, roads and our electric grid that need maintenance and upgrading, which actually costs money."

-Mike Judd


Exactly this.

SpeedoDave 10-25-2012 07:15 AM

No biggy, he did last election as well.

I like it that 98% of blacks voted for Obama last election but that isn't racist.


Dave

bronco67 10-25-2012 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HushMoney (Post 19273603)
"I No Longer Recognize My Party

As a registered Republican I fear I must confess that I no longer recognize the party that I grew up with in Oregon. I voted for Mark Hatfield, Tom McCall and other Republicans who found enough common ground with Democrats to govern. Now I watch in dismay as those in my party boast that their primary objective is to defeat the President. Not to govern. Not to bring together a sense of responsibility and willingness to compromise to solve problems we face. Such as the budget. Such as bridges, roads and our electric grid that need maintenance and upgrading, which actually costs money."

-Mike Judd


Exactly this.

It takes Republicans AND Democrats closer to center to get things done in government. Two extremes in the opposite direction is just a stalemate. Finally someone makes some sense.

ilnjscb 10-25-2012 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedoDave (Post 19273643)
No biggy, he did last election as well.

I like it that 98% of blacks voted for Obama last election but that isn't racist.


Dave

This - ask yourself, if Obama weren't black would Powell have endorsed him?

Barry-xlovecam 10-25-2012 08:36 AM

Quote:

[A]s for the U.S. budget, he added: "It's essentially, let's cut taxes and compensate for that with other things, but that compensation does not cover all the cuts intended or the expenses associated with defense."

Powell has been critical of Romney's foreign policy advisers and has taken issue with the former business executive's stance on countries such as Russia.

A moderate Republican, Powell served under President George W. Bush. Some of Romney's advisers are more conservative veterans of the Bush administration.

"There's some very, very strong neo-conservative views that are presented by the governor that I have some trouble with," Powell said on CBS. ...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/s...,2212188.story
He would know -- Powell does seem repetitive for his missdeeds when he was the Secretary of State in the Bush Administration. Maybe, his claim of being missled on the facts is true?

blackmonsters 10-25-2012 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedoDave (Post 19273643)
No biggy, he did last election as well.

I like it that 98% of blacks voted for Obama last election but that isn't racist.


Dave

It was 95% and it's always 90-95% democratic vote for blacks. This is the norm.
The Republican party spent the 60's and 70's fighting integration and "bussing".
Then 80-90's attacking "Affirmative Action" and "welfare blame".
Then 2000's, Katrina, Iraq, etc...

Republican policies push blacks into the other party bro.

Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton both got that same percentage of black votes as Obama.

So is there some racism in pointing out the norm as if it's not normal and calling it racist?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...mes_Republican
Quote:

The South becomes Republican

For nearly a century after Reconstruction, the white South identified with the Democratic Party. The Democrats' lock on power was so strong the region was called the Solid South, although the Republicans controlled parts of the Appalachian mountains and they competed for statewide office in the border states. Before 1948, southern Democrats believed that their party, with its respect for states' rights and appreciation of traditional southern values, was the defender of the southern way of life. Southern Democrats warned against aggressive designs on the part of Northern liberals and Republicans and civil rights activists whom they denounced as "outside agitators."

The adoption of the strong civil rights plank by the 1948 convention and the integration of the armed forces by President Harry S. Truman's Executive Order 9981, which provided for equal treatment and opportunity for African-American servicemen, drove a wedge between the northern and southern branches of the party.

With the presidency of John F. Kennedy the Democratic Party began to embrace the civil rights movement, and its lock on the South was irretrievably broken. Upon signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson prophesied, "We have lost the South for a generation."[48]

Modernization had brought factories, national businesses, and larger, more cosmopolitan cities such as Atlanta, Dallas, Charlotte, and Houston to the South, as well as millions of migrants from the North and more opportunities for higher education. Meanwhile, the cotton and tobacco economy of the traditional rural South faded away, as former farmers commuted to factory jobs. As the South became more like the rest of the nation, it could not stand apart in terms of racial segregation.

Integration and the civil rights movement caused enormous controversy in the white South, with many attacking it as a violation of states' rights. When segregation was outlawed by court order and by the Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965, a die-hard element resisted integration, led by Democratic governors Orval Faubus of Arkansas, Lester Maddox of Georgia, and, especially George Wallace of Alabama. These populist governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds favored the Democratic Party, but opposed desegregation. After 1965 most Southerners accepted integration (with the exception of public schools).

Believing themselves betrayed by the Democratic Party, traditional white southerners joined the new middle-class and the Northern transplants in moving toward the Republican Party. Meanwhile, newly enfranchised Black voters began supporting Democratic candidates at the 80-90-percent levels, producing Democratic leaders such as Julian Bond and John Lewis of Georgia, and Barbara Jordan of Texas. Just as Martin Luther King had promised, integration had brought about a new day in Southern politics. The Republican Party's southern strategy further alienated black voters from the party.

In addition to its white middle-class base, Republicans attracted strong majorities among evangelical Christians, who prior to the 1980s were largely apolitical. Exit polls in the 2004 presidential election showed that Bush led Kerry by 70?30% among Southern whites, who comprised 71% of the voters. Kerry had a 90?9 lead among the 18% of Southern voters who were black. One-third of the Southern voters said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80?20.[49]

HelmutKohl 10-25-2012 01:38 PM

What!!!!, the top Republican supporting Obama not me ? I feel like a Mor(M)on ...

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slides...?1351018956000

Barry-xlovecam 10-25-2012 01:58 PM

damn spell checker
 
repetitive = repentant

Robbie 10-25-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedoDave (Post 19273643)
No biggy, he did last election as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 19273842)
This - ask yourself, if Obama weren't black would Powell have endorsed him?

Can't blame him. If I were black I'd be proud to finally have a black president too. It's just human nature.

JP-pornshooter 10-25-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19274535)
Can't blame him. If I were black I'd be proud to finally have a black president too. It's just human nature.

Obama is half white so you should be half proud.

StickyGreen 10-25-2012 03:04 PM

An establishment shill endorses an establishment shill?? Shocking....

brassmonkey 10-25-2012 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19273494)
Who wants to bet some Republitard will make a race thing out of this?

so wtf was it b4 obama?? :helpme :helpme

Dvae 10-25-2012 04:40 PM

Just another RINO - Good riddance!

CyberHustler 10-25-2012 04:47 PM

I'm voting for Obama too.

2012 10-25-2012 05:17 PM

congrats to the weiners, i need a vacation

ColBigBalls 10-25-2012 06:12 PM

What will GFY be like after the elections?

CyberHustler 10-25-2012 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColBigBalls (Post 19274932)
What will GFY be like after the elections?

The same

acctman 10-25-2012 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedoDave (Post 19273643)
No biggy, he did last election as well.

I like it that 98% of blacks voted for Obama last election but that isn't racist.


Dave

Is this racist?
http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...2020121013.gif

bronco67 10-26-2012 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19273494)
Who wants to bet some Republitard will make a race thing out of this?

Quoted myself, because we have a winner...

http://www.wbay.com/story/19922608/s...f-his-own-race

cashcows 10-26-2012 06:20 AM

I have been a Republican my entire life. But I also feel the same way. I would have preferred Ron Paul but the Republicans fucked that up.

I really think they are all puppets, but I think Obama might actually try to do some good and rebel a little in his second term. The Republicans want to dictate morals, lifestyle, and have lost compassion for others for the most part and have no respect for the Environment.

I just can't stand to even be associated with them anymore and some of the absolute fear based stupidity they put out is mind blowing. And when Obama won their top Agenda was to make sure he failed... That's not ethical and it's not in the best interest of this country.

I do think Romney winning would bring some wealth off the sidelines into the economy but at what cost? A war, destruction of the environment, a repeal of abortion (but I think that's unlikely to happen)

My only concern of Obama is him instituting a draft or mandatory civil service and I'm not happy with him appointing a Monsanto Lobbyist to head the FDA!

BFT3K 10-26-2012 10:36 AM

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...73615824_n.jpg

brassmonkey 10-26-2012 01:29 PM

what a bunch of bullshit! :1orglaugh he voted for a white man all his other times. if he votes for obama its because he's black no other reason. its c-o-n spiracy

http://tucsoncitizen.com/hispanic-po...n-foil-hat.jpg

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 10-26-2012 01:48 PM

A 2012 Presidential Election Analogy In Music...

The Boss (Springsteen) has Obama's back:

http://cdn.stereogum.com/files/2008/...obama-ohio.jpg



And Mitt has...well, Meatloaf:



http://resources2.news.com.au/images...ses-romney.jpg

http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f2...psaecbfcd1.jpg

:)

ADG

bronco67 10-26-2012 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19276589)

Shitloaf.

crockett 10-26-2012 09:50 PM

It's a shame Colin Powell laid down with the Bush admin dogs, to sell the war in Iraq. Prior to him going TV and outright lying to the American people & the world about Iraq's WMD capabilities he was likely one of the few Republicans, I would have voted for.

He was the only sensible public figure in the Bush admin and he threw that away when he lied to support the war dogs.

brassmonkey 10-26-2012 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19277175)
It's a shame Colin Powell laid down with the Bush admin dogs, to sell the war in Iraq. Prior to him going TV and outright lying to the American people & the world about Iraq's WMD capabilities he was likely one of the few Republicans, I would have voted for.

He was the only sensible public figure in the Bush admin and he threw that away when he lied to support the war dogs.

it was his job he does what he's been told to do.

Theo 10-27-2012 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashcows (Post 19275617)
I have been a Republican my entire life. But I also feel the same way. I would have preferred Ron Paul but the Republicans fucked that up.

I really think they are all puppets, but I think Obama might actually try to do some good and rebel a little in his second term. The Republicans want to dictate morals, lifestyle, and have lost compassion for others for the most part and have no respect for the Environment.

I just can't stand to even be associated with them anymore and some of the absolute fear based stupidity they put out is mind blowing. And when Obama won their top Agenda was to make sure he failed... That's not ethical and it's not in the best interest of this country.

I do think Romney winning would bring some wealth off the sidelines into the economy but at what cost? A war, destruction of the environment, a repeal of abortion (but I think that's unlikely to happen)

My only concern of Obama is him instituting a draft or mandatory civil service and I'm not happy with him appointing a Monsanto Lobbyist to head the FDA!

Good post, did he really do that with FDA? Unreal!

onwebcam 10-27-2012 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVN Theo (Post 19277372)
Good post, did he really do that with FDA? Unreal!

Sure he did just like his appointment of John Holder.

Obama's Science Czar Considered Forced Abortions, Sterilization as Population Growth Solutions

"President Obama's "science czar," John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, "compulsory sterilization," and the creation of a "Planetary Regime" that would oversee human population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet -- controversial ideas his critics say should have been brought up in his Senate confirmation hearings."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...#ixzz2AUcNCidn


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123