"In an in-depth interview, Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom discusses the investigation against his now-defunct file-storage site, his possible extradition to the US, the future of Internet freedoms and his latest project Mega with RT’s Andrew Blake."
"The United States government says that Dotcom, a German millionaire formerly known as Kim Schmitz, masterminded a vast criminal conspiracy by operating the file-storage site Megaupload. Dotcom, on the other hand, begs to differ. One year after the high-profile raid of his home and the shut-down and seizure of one of the most popular sites on the Web, Dotcom hosted a launch party for his latest endeavor, simply called Mega. On the anniversary of the end of Megaupload, Dotcom discusses the year since his arrest and what the future holds in regards to both his court case and the Internet alike. Speaking with RT’s Andrew Blake from his Coatesville, New Zealand mansion, Dotcom weighs in on the US justice system, the death of Aaron Swartz, the growing surveillance state, his own cooperation with the feds and much more."
'haHollywood is a very important contributor to Obama'
RT: You’ve blamed President Obama and the Obama administration for colluding with movie companies in order to orchestrate this giant arrest here in New Zealand. Is this kind of give-and-take relationship between Washington and Hollywood all that you say it is? Or are you just the exception? Does this really exist?
Kim Dotcom: You have to look at the players behind this case, okay? The driving force, of course, is Chris Dodd, the chairman of the MPAA [Motion Picture Association of America]. And he was senator for a long time and he is — according to [US Vice President] Joe Biden — Joe Biden’s best friend. And the state attorney that is in charge of this case has been Joe Biden’s personal counsel, Neil MacBride, and [he] also worked as an anti-piracy manager for the BSA, the Business Software Association, which is basically like the MPAA but for software companies.
And also, the timing is very interesting, you know? Election time. The fundraisers in Hollywood set for February, March [and] April. There had to have some sort of Plan B, an alternative for SOPA [the Stop Online Piracy Act], because the president certainly was aware — and his team at the White House was aware — that if they don’t have anything to give at those fundraisers, to those guys in Hollywood who are eager to have more control over the Internet, they wouldn’t have probably raised too much. And Hollywood is a very important contributor to Obama’s campaign. Not just with money, but also with media support. They control a lot of media: celebrity endorsements and all that.
So I’m sure the election plays an important role. The relationships of the people that are in charge of this case play an important role and, of course, we have facts that we want to present at our extradition hearing that will show some more detail about this and that this is not just some conspiracy theory but that this actually happened.
'Operation Takedown'
RT: The US Justice Department wants to extradite you, a German citizen living in New Zealand operating a business in Hong Kong. They want to extradite you to the US. Is that even possible?
KD: That is a very interesting question because the extradition law, the extradition treaty in New Zealand, doesn’t really allow extradition for copyright. So what they did, they threw some extra charges on top and one of them is racketeering, where they basically say we are a mafia organization and we set up our Internet business to basically be an organized crime network that was set up and structured the way it was just to do criminal copyright infringement. And anyone who has every used Megaupload and has any idea about how that website worked knows immediately that it was total nonsense. But they needed to chop that on in order to have even a chance for extradition. But in our opinion, you see, all of that was secondary. The primary goal was to take down Megaupload and destroy it completely. That was their mission and that’s why the whole thing in Hong Kong, for example, they called it Operation Takedown. And I think everything that’s happening now, they are trying on the fly to doctor it around, and found a way to find a case. They probably came here and thought, “We will find something; that these guys have done something wrong.” In the indictment, if you actually read that, it’s more like a press release. There’s nothing in there that has any merits."
RT: When the raid happened one year ago today, it got a lot of people talking both about the Internet and about this character, Kim Dotcom. But it was a lot of talking and not so much action, because here it is one year later and this case is still happening. Back up earlier this month, and we saw Aaron Swartz — an online information activist — pass away, and only in his mid-20s. And it got a lot of people talking, so much so that members of Congress have actually asked for changes to federal computer laws so that this doesn’t happen again. What is it actually going to take to get people to stop just talking and to actually start acting?
KD: Our case is going to be the one that will have much more attention down the road because it is a crucial case for Internet freedom. And I think more and more people realize that and the government is quite exposed here because they really went in with completely prosecutorial abuse and overreach and ignoring due process, ignoring our rights, spying on us, illegal search warrants, illegal restraining orders, illegal spying. The whole picture, when you look at it, shows that this was an urgent mission, done on a rush. “Take them down, I want them to go.” And it was a political decision to do that. And the execution was extremely poor, and the case is extremely poor, because that is something they thought that they could worry about later. It was all about the takedown. “Let’s send a strong message to Hollywood that we are on their side.”
RT:And now it’s been a year and nothing has progressed. At least for them. It seems like the case is falling apart day by day.
KD: Let me give you one example of how crazy this is. We have a judge here who said, “Please show us your evidence about your racketeering allegations. Show us that these guys were setting up some sort of organized crime network,” because that’s what the extradition will focus on primarily. They are using the organized crime treaty to get us extradited. So the US appealed that and said, “We don’t want to show you what we have.” And then they appealed to the high court and the high court then said, “We want to see it.” And they just keep appealing it, all the way to the court of appeals and to the Supreme Court. And what does that tell you? If you don’t even want to show us your cards — show us what you have! If you have such a strong case and are seriously interested about getting someone extradited, why waste all this time? Just show your hand. And they don’t have anything because we haven’t done anything wrong. We were law abiding. We were a good corporate citizen. And they knew that the time they came here to do this. They just wanted to take us down.
'I want to reestablish a balance between a person and the state'
RT :The new program, Mega, is fully encrypted, and you’re touting it as an encrypted program so that people will want to use it. Do you think this is even necessary, right now, that people need encryption on the Internet?
KD: I think it’s important for the Internet that there is more encryption. Because what I have learned since I got dragged into this case is a lot about privacy abuses, about the government spying on people. You know, the US government invests a lot of money in spy clouds: massive data centers with hundreds of thousands of hard drives storing data. And what they are storing is basically any communication that traverses through US networks. And what that means they are not spying on individuals based on a warrant anymore. They just spy on everybody, permanently, all the time. And what that means for you and for anybody is that if you are ever a target of any kind of investigation, or someone has a political agenda against you, or a prosecutor doesn’t like you, or the police wants to interpret something in a way to get you in trouble — they can use all that data, go through it with a comb and find things even though we think we have nothing to hide and have done nothing wrong. They will find something that they can nail you with and that’s why it’s wrong to have these kinds of privacy abuses, and I decided to create a solution that overtime will encrypt more and more of the internet. So we start with files, we will then move to emails, and then move to Voice-Over-IP communication. And our API [Application Programming Interface] is available to any third-party developer to also create their own tools. And my goal is, within the next five years, I want to encrypt half of the Internet. Just reestablish a balance between a person — an individual — and the state. Because right now, we are living very close to this vision of George Orwell and I think it’s not the right way. It’s the wrong path that the government is on, thinking that they can spy on everybody.
Someone needs to encrypt half the food to end Kim Jong Com from eating it all.
wehateporn
01-25-2013 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coup
(Post 19443189)
Someone needs to encrypt half the food to end Kim Jong Com from eating it all.
:1orglaugh
johnnyloadproductions
01-25-2013 02:52 AM
Watch from 9:00 to 9:30 on the youtube video
topsiteking
01-25-2013 02:55 AM
At this point you have to respect the man.
Harmon
01-25-2013 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by topsiteking
(Post 19443201)
At this point you have to respect the man.
No we don't, Idiot. :2 cents:
L-Pink
01-25-2013 03:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by topsiteking
(Post 19443201)
At this point you have to respect the man.
For what?
lucas131
01-25-2013 04:13 AM
what a self loving ego dickhead lol. thinking he is some pioneer, oh man he is a total faggot
NewNick
01-25-2013 04:33 AM
So his accusation is that the companies whose products were being ripped of lobbied the government to do something about it ?
Is that it - the great conspiracy between Hollywood and Obama.
If my stuff gets nicked I call the authorities as well. Is that a conspiracy between me and the police to catch the peeps nicking my stuff ?
.
seeandsee
01-25-2013 05:15 AM
this mega shit is scary
notinmybackyard
01-25-2013 05:44 AM
I heard that this guy is super generous.
perhaps he could pay me for my DVDs that got ripped and uploaded to his site?
And while he is at it, perhaps he could even kick back some money to the gypsies that downloaded them and sold them on the streets in spain.
Having said that,
no encryption that he can create will ever come close to defeating anything that any gouvernement puts in place. So if you want privacy this is what you do.
Use a pen, paper, envelope and a stamp to send a letter. (need a court issued writ to open someone's mail)
Use an old fashion land line telephone to call another land line telephone. (need a court issued writ to tap an old phone system)
Use a fax system to send documents. (again protected because of old laws protecting land lines)
kane
01-25-2013 05:53 AM
I have said it before and will say it again.When you look into this guy's live pretty much every business he has ever been involved with has ended with him getting arrested. Why anyone would do business with him or look up to him is beyond me. He is a career criminal who is good at getting out of trouble.
If the extradition goes through and he is forced to stand trial here in the US it will all come down to whether or not the FBI really has emails that show Kim and his buddies not only knew about, but encouraged copyright infringement. They say they have such emails.If they do Kim is likely screwed because I won't be shocked to see one of his buddies roll over on him and testify against him to avoid jail. If they don't really have these emails then it will be harder to convict him. Either way, I wouldn't want to be him. Once the US government decides they want a piece of you, they don't just stop and leave you alone.
BlackCrayon
01-25-2013 06:05 AM
he might have some credibility if his crew didn't hire people to upload a ton of shit and looked the other way fully knowing that megaupload had more infringing material than just about any other file locker out there.
just a punk
01-25-2013 07:02 AM
Anyways it was an interesting interview.
Barry-xlovecam
01-25-2013 09:02 AM
Reminds me of Gaddafi with the "all female body guard"... Lunatic ...
pornguy
01-25-2013 09:57 AM
Love where he says to ask an ISP how much of the BW is used for piracy and when they say that its less then 50% then they are lying. But the Majority of Mega users were NOT using his site for piracy.
just a punk
01-25-2013 10:01 AM
BTW, have to admit that RT delivers very good interviews from time to time :2 cents:
bronco67
01-25-2013 10:03 AM
He's trying desperately to stay relevant.
Dirty Dane
01-25-2013 11:02 AM
Looks like he pirated Gaddafis bodyguards.
epitome
01-25-2013 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornguy
(Post 19443703)
Love where he says to ask an ISP how much of the BW is used for piracy and when they say that its less then 50% then they are lying. But the Majority of Mega users were NOT using his site for piracy.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
shimmy2
01-25-2013 02:38 PM
he looks like the boss guy from the sonic hedgehog