Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
 

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/mas...html?hpt=hp_t2


Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing -- a practice known as "upskirting" -- prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law.

The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude.

"A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is 'partially nude,' no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing," wrote Justice Margot Botsford of the state Supreme Judicial Court.

It's still a creepy and disgusting thing to do. If I ever caught somebody doing that to my wife or kids, I'd fucking snap their fucking neck right then and there. Anybody that supports this ruling should have their kneecaps snapped.

My guess is that the case was presented wrong.

http://www.blog.joelx.com/wp-content...an-upskirt.gif

http://winningateverything.com/files...arelations.jpg

:stoned

ADG

im sure there will be a new law that fixes this :2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

I think it's perfectly fine to shoot up some whores skirt. If they don't like it then wear fucking pants bitches!

Why don't you just go have some more little boys piss on you, faggot. :1orglaugh

Yes, they are already moving to close the loophole in the language to match other states. I believe even in the ruling, it was suggested that it be fixed.

How well could you provide for them from prison?

Why don't you give it a go and we'll find out. :2 cents:

What is the sound of Japanese producers packing for Boston? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

damn its on now!!

that's some good PR in that pic.

Ridership should go up now, although it will be 80% male :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :thumbsup

You mean like this faggot?

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8...kbvlo1_500.gif

Oh noes!!11!!1

harmon gonna kill meh!!11!1!1!!!

Guy who filmed this needs to go to jail

freaking freaks can do this now with law protecting them, nice

I agree with you.
The problem today is society is too civilized and the assholes are walking all over us.

Man, sometimes I think you account was stolen and you are not aware. Or you share it with someone. Or you you have two person live in one body. :troll

It's interesting that the judge was a woman.

going out on a lynching limb here, but I've never understood the hoopla behind upskirts from both sides:

1) From the voyeur's side - why is looking up a skirt any more thrilling that walking down a beach in summer? You see the same thing right?

For #2, I have to admit, I'm male so I wouldn't understand... but:
2) Why do women detest being spied up the skirt, yet walk down a beach in the skimpiest of bikinis possible?

I'm using the beach/bikini scenario as my sole example of no real difference in what is seen, with the caveat that yes, lingerie isn't the same as a bikini (but not far from) and you don't have ST wings sticking out from bikini bottoms...
But that aside, I don't get it, from both perspectives. Certainly not to the limit of "breaking someone's neck" :error

The upskirt pervert is a mentally a little boy doing something naughty. The trip is therefore 50% infantile curioisities about zizis and bumsies. The other 50% is the possibility that he will be caught.

As for the rest,
I do not advocate breaking a neck for non-consentual upskirt looking. But I think it would be ok to shove that cell phone/camera in their eye socket. Or perhaps break a finger or two to stop them clicking. It is less for the punishement of the perpetrator and more to send a message to other perverts considering doing the same.

Because it is free will show off on the beach against someone sneaking under girl skirt (when she is hiding her legs).

I officially like you.

Agreed!!

You should be committed.