Democrats want you to sign permission before having sex
 

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-C...-Sex-on-Campus

A newly amended bill from a California lawmaker would require college students to stop in the heat of passion and establish verbal or written consent before having sex anywhere on campus, reports L.A. Weekly.
SB 967, amended last week by state Sen. Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles), would mandate that college students obtain "an affirmative, unambiguous, and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity."


According to the language of the bill, "consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual encounter, and can be revoked at any time. The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent."



Wonder how long it will be before it's used by a pissed off ex to put a guy in Jail?

Article written by this guy:
http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...-dnussbaum.png

Also I thought Breitfart was dead. They should have let the domain expire.

So now I have to find a loophole

Probably going to need a notary next. Liability papers in case of condom's breaking, anal will require a different set of papers.

Yes I'm sure all Democrats want this....

Idiot California Senator Wants Sex Waiver Law on Campus
 

True, I thought I would add a little balance to all the hate for republicans. Living in California you know about the idiots all too well.

sex is extremely dangerous... just ask osha and ahf :2 cents:

Surprised no-one's pushed this sooner.

How would this have help Bristol Palin?

:1orglaugh

How is that any differant than what my girlfriend makes me do every night?

I have a notary public and a court reporter with me at all times so any sex I have is on the official record and notarized.

:)

the rabble jump on topics like this that will never happen and go into heated discussions about such non-topics with the rabble that supports the other team.

Meanwhile, the true leaders rub their hands together in glee, for succesfully maintaining the blinkers on these supporters of fictional teams these leaders invented only for propaganda purposes.

Divide & conquer on a national level and people still fall for it.

California... LoL California!!

sad state of affairs :Oh crap

So you're ok with the new law when it goes thru, what a fucking moron!

Lol! Great source of information you've got there, Jeb!

I call it Granola, if it isn't a fruit or a flake, it's a nut

But I love living here, just wish California wasn't filled with Liberal Idiots in politics

We have more sanctuary than any other state I think and hence have more illegal aliens. That's something I would like to see change. It's a serious drain on the economy.
California pays more in welfare too, so we have a lot of that going on as well.

Someone should make a Phone app with electronic signature:winkwink:

yes, i'm sure it will go through :1orglaugh stop getting your panties in a bunch by stupid nonsense. Things like this will never see the light of day, the only reason media reports it is to rile the idiots up. They're pretty successful in your case. Congrats, you just got played by the media.

only moral lessons are good, everything else is bad hmmkay ?

For every one weird-ass thing a democrat does, there's 100 other things Republicans are constantly in the news for. Nice try.

But this guy really is a fuck-up...

He is also an anti-gun , but ....

Meanwhile, for my 3 weeks next year in florida, I will have my Ipad ready ( with check box such as : anal sex, fisting, golden showers, etc ... ) and will record a video of the consent ..... :1orglaugh

Clearly the extreme fringe of both parties is equally insane. The difference here is that one those parties actually needs the approval of it's brain dead fringe in order to nominate a presidential candidate.

Nuff said?

It is not because you agree the first time that it means that you always agree, so i guess that you have to sign this kind of mutal agreement each time it happens

Pretty sure I saw or heard of one at some point.

Huh?

You're not serious are you?

Consensuality isn't all that hard to decipher.

Yes: because it is logical.
No: because i'm more ironic

Legal Question: If consent is revoked by the guy, how long does the girl get to extricate herself off his member before it's considered rape?