GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Question About SEO & Chaturbate White Label Site (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1149206)

Famemonster 09-03-2014 07:36 AM

Question About SEO & Chaturbate White Label Site
 
Whats up guys and girls, I have a question about SEO for Chaturbate & all White label sites. I added a new chaturbate white label website to google webmaster tools last week, and I could not fetch as google and when I looked at the robots.txt it says disallow. I just looked today and see that it is on the top with health issues. Is this normal for White Label websites that google cannot crawl them or is this for Chaturbate white lablels? Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

lezinterracial 09-03-2014 08:20 AM

Chaturbate white labels are the only ones I see doing this. Hosted tubes and AEBN white labels don't do this. You shouldn't depend on crawling those individual pages anyways, Because Google is burning white labels for duplicate content.

3xmedia 09-03-2014 08:31 AM

as fas as I know just CB does it, they are probably protecting their main site by doing it. also, they have stated that their WLs were never meant to rank in SEs.

Famemonster 09-03-2014 02:06 PM

Thank you guys. I am going to make a webcam wiz one and a AEBN but waiting on the logos. Would you recommend removing it from GWT?

seeric 09-03-2014 02:58 PM

You're ultimately going to catch thin content penalties and flags from Google. They are hard core after WL's of other sites right now. The only way around that is to build your own sites. They're going to see the URLs to the source servers. Well, that and about a million other things that are going to tell them that you're basically just syndicating content. They don't see any value in that content for a surfer. Makes sense though. The content is available on the source site, and that site has a much higher authority for those pages and content.

Fat Panda 09-03-2014 03:12 PM

google hates wl's

Famemonster 09-03-2014 04:15 PM

Thanks guys, I think I am going to pull it from GWT. Google has gotten ridiculous. Now my next task is to figure out where the best traffic is. There is way too much fake bot traffic out there, I used 7search and they are horrible. I started an account with juicy ads and plugrush so far but havent put any money toward it yet.

timmyc38 09-03-2014 04:21 PM

chaturbate white labels also use the canonical setting, and your site will get nowhere on google.

I URGE you to try our WL's -- hit me on skype or ICQ - or just join up, the WL tool is super easy

VforVendetta 09-03-2014 04:26 PM

Every chaturbate white label online is a push of their main site in the serp :thumbsup

Then there are online site like this http://www.cam7.com totally customize without any block...and if you ask to the support they say are made with API, but with their actual api in the webmaster tools it's impossible building site like that.

I have a white label online with them but i'm thinking to put it offline, ridicolous support, and it's not possible receive any traffic on the serp

DBS.US 09-03-2014 04:30 PM

Think outside the box my son,,,,outside the box:2 cents:

timmyc38 09-03-2014 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VforVendetta (Post 20214957)
Every chaturbate white label online is a push of their main site in the serp :thumbsup

Then there are online site like this http://www.cam7.com totally customize without any block...and if you ask to the support they say are made with API, but with their actual api in the webmaster tools it's impossible building site like that.

I have a white label online with them but i'm thinking to put it offline, ridicolous support, and it's not possible receive any traffic on the serp

Im telling you guys , it's that 'canonical' setting - do a view source - again, we do not do that ..

And I would like to think I offer top notch support.. Let me add, we are not against giving % increases for performance

Tim

VforVendetta 09-03-2014 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmyc38 (Post 20214967)
Im telling you guys , it's that 'canonical' setting - do a view source - again, we do not do that ..

And I would like to think I offer top notch support.. Let me add, we are not against giving % increases for performance

Tim

i searched a white label in the "free cam niche" so chaturbate or bongacams :warning i saw your site, it's very good, but it's not what i want

megapower 09-03-2014 04:53 PM

nothing is impossible :-)

you will see one to two CB WL listed on th 1st Google result page for near all popular search combinations...

but as long the site is not listed on the 1st or 2nd position this brings only small 20k visits a day from organic search, so this is over rated...

adultmobile 09-03-2014 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by megapower (Post 20214992)
you will see one to two CB WL listed on th 1st Google result page for near all popular search combinations...

This is not normal WL, is made with API or by scrape and re-build, by hand.

megapower 09-03-2014 05:09 PM

you're right, both are not the "WL" out-of-the box :-)

Arnox 09-03-2014 08:42 PM

White Labels suck with SEO in 2014, sorry.

seeric 09-03-2014 09:20 PM

Every whitelabel is a waste of time period, IF you are looking for a long term strategy. If you want to smash and grab you can do that all day long and cook domains for a few weeks/months, rank them, and watch them die. Do not use white labels if you are trying to rank in SEs for cam terms. Period.

seeric 09-03-2014 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile (Post 20214998)
This is not normal WL, is made with API or by scrape and re-build, by hand.

API or not, you are still syndicating content. The source URLs are easily tied to the original site.

megapower 09-04-2014 02:00 AM

I don't think this, when you search for cam related keywords you will see some cam sites (API, WL ...) appear on 1st search result page. But yes they found a way that Google like them.

Andreweb 09-04-2014 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox (Post 20215130)
White Labels suck with SEO in 2014, sorry.

Totally agreed ! Build your own content , content is still the king !

mopek1 09-04-2014 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric (Post 20214858)
You're ultimately going to catch thin content penalties and flags from Google. They are hard core after WL's of other sites right now. The only way around that is to build your own sites. They're going to see the URLs to the source servers. Well, that and about a million other things that are going to tell them that you're basically just syndicating content. They don't see any value in that content for a surfer. Makes sense though. The content is available on the source site, and that site has a much higher authority for those pages and content.

What about other types of ads hosted by programs? Flash banners geo-targetted thumbs etc... In that case what about adsense itself?

I always wonder if using any of these will negatively impact one's SEO even though they are not the content.

adultmobile 09-04-2014 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric (Post 20215140)
API or not, you are still syndicating content. The source URLs are easily tied to the original site.

Not easily because google been fooled by cam7 and the such. At least now - google changes algo every few days, and so the ranking. For long term, original sites is the solution.

CamTraffic 09-04-2014 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VforVendetta (Post 20214957)
Every chaturbate white label online is a push of their main site in the serp :thumbsup

Then there are online site like this http://www.cam7.com totally customize without any block...and if you ask to the support they say are made with API, but with their actual api in the webmaster tools it's impossible building site like that.

I have a white label online with them but i'm thinking to put it offline, ridicolous support, and it's not possible receive any traffic on the serp

Bingo! I was told "NO" on the couple mods I wanted to on my Chaturbate WL SEO.
No problem, I'll just move the traffic to a cam Program that gives a shit :winkwink:

megapower 09-04-2014 10:25 AM

@adultmobile
google is not fooled and my site appears since months good positioned on google.
anyway I'm preparing actually to be that what you named "original" site.

Famemonster 09-04-2014 10:35 AM

I agree with the majority of what you guys have said. I have my own sites, besides the owns in the signature. While I am new to seo in the Adult Internet marketing, I have several years experiance with online gaming reviews and sports news, and rank well for competitive keywords/phrases.

I am not relying on SEO for white labels, however it would be nice. I use seperate hosting plans with dedicated IP's and have gotten a co-branded online gaming review page (eqivillent to white label IMO) indexed and ranked. It is not impossible if you strategically build links within your own network. I am just trying to get used to the adult seo versus other.

For instance it seems that in the adult niches sidebar links sitewide still work, while they do not in the majority of other niches. I have tested this with LinkResearchTools.com to see if it comes up as toxic links, and they do. The question for me is how to learn what works with adult versus other niches.

3xmedia 09-04-2014 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by megapower (Post 20215731)
@adultmobile
google is not fooled and my site appears since months good positioned on google.
anyway I'm preparing actually to be that what you named "original" site.

your site has exactly same content like CB main site and hundreds/tousands CB WLs, the only difference between your site and CB WL is that you use custom teplate and host it yourself... so there is no reason to rank your site while CB WLs are being penalized due to the duplicate content.

megapower 09-04-2014 11:40 AM

@3xmedia
your technical proposition is not correct this way but this is not the point here. everyone who knows how can build the same, as CB provide all what you need. and google decided that there is a reason to rank my site and a few more who have do it the right way.

as already told I will change the website soon, to be fully unique...

3xmedia 09-04-2014 11:54 AM

Google just didn't catch you yet.

all CB WLs are hosted on same IP (block) and use same template so it quite easy to flag them.

megapower 09-04-2014 12:36 PM

there is no reason for google to catch my site or one of the others who decided to make it this way as the content is not fully identical.
this is same as if google would go and penalize every news site that publish news from reuters....

3xmedia 09-04-2014 12:44 PM

whatever you use, their WL or their XML/API, it's still the same/duplicate content. it's only a matter of time before Google finds out.

seeric 09-04-2014 12:46 PM

We will see you in a short period of time asking why your unique site got kicked from the SERPS. You won't outsmart the big G here. Sorry.

Adult SEOS need to stop with the sense of entitlement that Google owes you some free traffic. Once you get past that fucked up mentality only then will you create sites with unique content that has value to the end user and rank on page 1.

megapower 09-04-2014 01:17 PM

no I will not have a reason to ask why, this website is just a "play" site. my only investment was one domain name that was not used anyway and I spend 2 working hours nothing more.

it brings a few thousands a month nothing more, means as is it's not of interest for me. as I see near 25k uniques a day I decide to update it and to start with own content and some new features I don't see anywhere before and probably it will bring some more bucks to be actively promoted and not only a "works as is product anymore" and if not i will laugh about it :-)

DBS.US 09-04-2014 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by megapower (Post 20215989)
this website is just a "play" site and I spend 2 working hours nothing more.

it brings a few thousands a month nothing more,

Just think how much you could make if you worked on it 40 hours a week:thumbsup

rabbit 09-04-2014 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile (Post 20214998)
This is not normal WL, is made with API or by scrape and re-build, by hand.

wrong. it is a normal wl, but without the canonical pointing to cb and robots.txt allowed. I think its cb own white labels. that's the reason they allowed such exceptions.

Andreweb 09-05-2014 01:31 AM

Sooner or later those WLs will get kick by google it's a matter of time ! Mine it's on first page for a lots of keywords and it's a classic CB wL (hosted by them , with canonical and robots.txt block) I just done a simple trick , I get more than 6k uv from google at day but I know that in few weeks or days will dissapear forever from SERPS and same will happen with the others !

CamTraffic 09-05-2014 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabbit (Post 20216265)
wrong. it is a normal wl, but without the canonical pointing to cb and robots.txt allowed. I think its cb own white labels. that's the reason they allowed such exceptions.

Kinda risky if you ask me :helpme at least cam5.com uses other colors :1orglaugh

http://i.imgur.com/JUxIl4U.png

Barry-xlovecam 09-05-2014 06:57 AM

If you want a real cam site start one and bring a fat bank account with you.

If you want to refer as an affiliate have some real content of your own that is relevant to your sponsors' content. That is what real SEO is about.

Proper use of a white label profitably is by directing your own network traffic or buying paid traffic to it to convert sales. Any SEO to a white label is short lived usually notwithstanding a great domain name, and only sometimes.

megapower 09-05-2014 04:34 PM

@CamTraffic
The right one is a clone :-)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123