GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   are you in the 1% (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1160172)

Grapesoda 01-31-2015 07:53 PM

are you in the 1%
 
Map of How Much You'd Have to Make to be Among the 1% in Your State

http://1wdojq181if3tdg01yomaof86.wpe...e-01-23-14.png

slapass 01-31-2015 07:59 PM

wow. Nope. I am surprised.

L-Pink 01-31-2015 08:06 PM

Wow, those figures seem low.

bronco67 01-31-2015 08:08 PM

Apparently, I live in the richest state.

mineistaken 01-31-2015 08:14 PM

No, pretty high.

mineistaken 01-31-2015 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20377215)
Apparently, I live in the richest state.

Not necessary.

Lets say A state has a number of 400K, B state 450K. But the rest 99% in A state earns on average 70K, in B state 50K. Not saying that it is very likely, but something to consider.

Or alternatively, same numbers A 400K, B 450K. But what about the structure of that 1%? It can be that average salary of those in A state is higher than in B state.
Example, 5 people (represents all of the 1%, just for shorter example of what I mean) of the state A 1000K, 1000K, 900K, 700K, 400K. And 5 people of B 700K, 600K, 500K, 470K, 450K.

Last one is lower for A, but actually A is richer.

So last person of those 1% in A state being less does not necessary mean B is richer. Depends on the structure of the 1%.

mineistaken 01-31-2015 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20377212)
Wow, those figures seem low.

Would be if that was average salary of the 1%, but that is the single lowest salary of all the people in 1% Every one is higher and higher.. So not low.

iamBoogieman 01-31-2015 09:37 PM

Very low salary. High taxes. Fuckin government

mineistaken 01-31-2015 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamBoogieman (Post 20377282)
Very low salary. High taxes. Fuckin government

jealousy tax - you earn more, you get ripped of more. Think they would encourage people to generate more value to the country, but no, they punish you for that.

epitome 01-31-2015 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20377306)
jealousy tax - you earn more, you get ripped of more. Think they would encourage people to generate more value to the country, but no, they punish you for that.

Jealousy tax?

Most of Congress (same people passing laws affecting tax rates) is very firmly in the top 1%. Some are even in the top 1/10th of 1%.

People in Congress make $174k salary and most have a lot more money coming in through other avenues.

baddog 01-31-2015 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20377215)
Apparently, I live in the richest state.

I thought CT has been the richest per capita for a long, long time. Sure was with the chicks I dated.

romeo22 02-01-2015 02:24 AM

Way high..not even close

Cherry7 02-01-2015 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20377306)
jealousy tax - you earn more, you get ripped of more. Think they would encourage people to generate more value to the country, but no, they punish you for that.

The more money taken by one individual pushes many more into poverty reducing their ability to produce wealth.

Bankers helping themselves to money they handle takes money out of the system and has to be supported by lower paid workers who produce real things.

Grapesoda 02-01-2015 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20377425)
The more money taken by one individual pushes many more into poverty reducing their ability to produce wealth.

boy am I glad you pointed this out to me... I'm going slow way the fuck down and not earn as much and cut all the people that work for loose..... that will help all!!! :1orglaugh

Forest 02-01-2015 06:21 AM

i wonder if this is pre or post tax

Dirty D 02-01-2015 07:18 AM

Yes I am :)

Barry-xlovecam 02-01-2015 07:48 AM

the source of the chart ...

So, what was this all about again?

The Increasingly Unequal States of America: Income Inequality by State, 1917 to 2012 | Economic Policy Institute

@Forrest "Adjusted gross income (Yi)" AGI after deductions ...

Those would include writing off the interest on your McMansion ...

Freax 02-01-2015 07:52 AM

I'm not in. I living offshore

Grapesoda 02-01-2015 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest (Post 20377528)
i wonder if this is pre or post tax

I'm thinking pre-tax net

L-Pink 02-01-2015 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20377425)
The more money taken by one individual pushes many more into poverty reducing their ability to produce wealth.

:1orglaugh What?

Niktamer 02-01-2015 08:53 AM

The Richest And Poorest States In 2014 - Forbes

interesting data

Mutt 02-01-2015 09:06 AM

The wealth disparity in Canada is considerably lower in Canada than the US.

Like somebody above me said those income amounts are the average of the top 1%, the mean average income would be lower than the average, you have super wealthy people in the US. I know in Canada to make the top 1% of annual incomes you only need to make about $190K, that would be the bottom people of the top 1% group and I think in the US the figure I saw was around $300K to make the very bottom of the top 1% - so in both countries that would be a lot of professionals - doctors, lawyers, accountants etc - and small business owners.

Maybe I'm wrong about the 'mean' being lower than the average - I really do suck at math. :Oh crap

JJ Gold 02-01-2015 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20377425)
The more money taken by one individual pushes many more into poverty reducing their ability to produce wealth.

Bankers helping themselves to money they handle takes money out of the system and has to be supported by lower paid workers who produce real things.

It is not a zero sum game. Have luck Commie.

Mutt 02-01-2015 09:14 AM

yep i suck - i meant the 'median' average versus the 'mean' average and in a country like the US where the wealth is very top heavy even in the top 1% the median probably will work out to be lower than the mean.

amirite? :helpme

TheSquealer 02-01-2015 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20377425)
The more money taken by one individual pushes many more into poverty reducing their ability to produce wealth.

Bankers helping themselves to money they handle takes money out of the system and has to be supported by lower paid workers who produce real things.

You should lecture on economics.
:2 cents:

http://i.imgur.com/MzOvQMw.png

bronco67 02-01-2015 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20377227)
Not necessary.

Lets say A state has a number of 400K, B state 450K. But the rest 99% in A state earns on average 70K, in B state 50K. Not saying that it is very likely, but something to consider.

Or alternatively, same numbers A 400K, B 450K. But what about the structure of that 1%? It can be that average salary of those in A state is higher than in B state.
Example, 5 people (represents all of the 1%, just for shorter example of what I mean) of the state A 1000K, 1000K, 900K, 700K, 400K. And 5 people of B 700K, 600K, 500K, 470K, 450K.

Last one is lower for A, but actually A is richer.

So last person of those 1% in A state being less does not necessary mean B is richer. Depends on the structure of the 1%.

I appreciate the breakdown, but there a lot of rich motherfuckers in CT.

AmeliaG 02-01-2015 11:08 AM

That is less income disparity than has been being reported. If the average household income is approx $55k, then having 1% be only a couple to few hundred k ...

Well, where does that benchmark folks making many millions? Maybe 1% is a misnomer. People in this range are people who work for a living and produce value.

Robbie 02-01-2015 11:10 AM

Yes! Yes! Yes!
:)

ITraffic 02-01-2015 11:22 AM

anyone who makes that is still a joke in the eyes of the truly wealthy.

The Porn Nerd 02-01-2015 11:25 AM

Yes I am in the 1% - of people who do not give a shit apparently. :D

Cherry7 02-01-2015 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Gold (Post 20377641)
It is not a zero sum game. Have luck Commie.

You are confusing money with wealth. making money does not always produce real wealth.

Porn is a good example , making thousands of men wank does not increase the wealth of society directly. Maybe the release is sexual tension improves productivity and deserves some financial reward, but the problem is people taking far more money and power from the system then the wealth they create.

SekobA 02-01-2015 12:47 PM

Very big average sum

L-Pink 02-01-2015 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20377796)
You are confusing money with wealth. making money does not always produce real wealth.

Porn is a good example , making thousands of men wank does not increase the wealth of society directly. Maybe the release is sexual tension improves productivity and deserves some financial reward, but the problem is people taking far more money and power from the system then the wealth they create.

That's the second dumbest post in this thread.

JJ Gold 02-01-2015 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20377864)
That's the second dumbest post in this thread.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

fappingJack 02-02-2015 12:29 AM

average. not bad

altmman 02-02-2015 01:29 AM

How is California, which is super duper expensive, $438k, but Texas which is super cheap $423? I live in Dallas its cheap to live here

Cherry7 02-02-2015 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20377864)
That's the second dumbest post in this thread.

And yet too difficult for you to refute.

Yo Adrian 02-02-2015 10:55 AM

According to this chart I'm a 1%er in my state, but far from in my metro area. Thanks Scottsdale!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123