WTF is up with netanyahu?
 

has the guy lost his marbles?

& why do we expect muslims to fight their extremism problem when jewish extremists are allowed to speak in our congress?

:helpme

Donno but as long as Brittany keeps on jumping the world can do what ever it wants!

1st amendment

another way to ask the question-

What's up with BO so much that netyahayu thinks he needs to go around BO and address our Congress directlky in an unprecedented speech claiming BO's actions are allowing for Iran to move faster towards nuclear weapons?

thanks Obama.

He didn't go around Obama by choice, Obama decided not to be Israel's bitch, but instead Republicans in Congress opted to bend over and be his bitch instead trying to make yet another thing a political right vs left ploy.

There's a reason for that. That reason is very simple-- do you trust IRan to honor BO's nuclear agreement or not?

BO thinks they are trustworthy, netanyahu and those of us that live in reality know otherwise.

I bet the guys from the USS Liberty have a few things to say about who to trust...
Considering that MOSSAD is at odds with Nutanyahoo and his clan of khazars...

The Israel Prize scandal is an eye opener even for the blind.

WTF is wrong with all of you guys? Iran should have nuclear bombs, they can be trusted!

don't throw me in that group! :1orglaugh

BO is drunk with power:

President Barack Obama would veto a bill recently introduced in the U.S. Senate allowing Congress to weigh in on any deal the United States and other negotiating countries reach with Iran on its nuclear capabilities, the White House said on Saturday.

Obama to veto bill letting Congress weigh in on Iran deal | Reuters

that's bullfuckingshit right there.

thanks obama.

Another argument for B Hussein O being a muslim :)

nice to see so many gfy'ers are in the loop about what's really going on. What are your sources? Mainstream media? Great success!

Yea it's totally Amazing that Iran doesn't trust us.. I mean fuck we over through their govt, shot down one of their civilian airliners and have had sanctions on them for who knows how long.. Fuck I'd want nukes too if I were them.. Perhaps Obama is doing the first sensible thing in years.. By ignoring right wing war mongers and giving iseral no special treatment because they are as much to blame as everyone else for the instability in the MI.

Meanwhile Isreal spies on us, attacked one of our ships, pretty much ignores our requests, but hey guys they are our bestest buds.. Funny thing though, is half of republicans hate Jews as much as they hate blacks, but long as Boeing and General Dynamics are getting contracts out of them and they can Blame Obama for something it's all A ok.

Israel and Iran ... I don't trust either one. But if I had to make a choice, it's pretty obvious.

Neither???

China and Russia should just donate a few nukes to Iran and put an end to this nonsense once and for all. We should arm the Palestinians to the teeth as well, to even the field. Then MAYBE there will be peace - or maybe the end of the Middle East... either way.... peace.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

I don't know, but isn't USA built by religious nuts? So being religious wacko is OK?

I use whatever media that says what I want to hear.

He's speaking to congress to make sure they know that he's the real president of the united states.

:2 cents:

white powah!

:1orglaugh

Oh it's much easier than that... If Putin would just start writing campain checks to certain members of Congress He would have no problems.. Perhaps if Iran would buy some new US made Hummers, tanks and fighter jets, they too would soon be on the friendly list..

Try as you might you just can't teach some people and countries good business sense..

we are all insiders on this forum :winkwink:

is it impossible to read between lines ?

lol, hahah

You've got that wrong. You should be thanking CryBaby TanMan, Boehner. Even republicans thinks he's the worlds biggest asshole now.

No. Cheney was drunk with power (Dubya didn't know what was going on). Obama has saved your asses number of times. Time to accept the truth.

no dude. there were some puritan douches who burned some witches. but the founding fathers were guided by the enlightenment teachings of locke. they did not want any religious tyrannies like they had in europe. shit the christian people that came to america were fleeing the christian nutjobs in europe. the state of rhode island was founded of the premise of religious freedom, hence the capitol of the state, providence. all that judeo christian nation stuff is a pile of shit.

but yeah, as congress is run by christian wackos, it makes sense that the jewish & christian wackos both think its OK to undercut obamas presidency. you know obama being the secular muslim kenyan potsmoker.

:(

Well, USA (not yet USA at the time) got religious refugees, like the puritans you mentioned. But there wasn't religious tyrannies in Europe at that time, kinda opposite; that why more extremist religious folks run away (they were persecuted). At the time of Columbus there were inquisition in Spain, but that didn't reflect much to North America, or that much into South America either.

To sum it up; religious differentiality wasn't popular in Europe. You know, if you were different you got harassed. But Martin Luther had already made religion as less nuts in big parts of Europe, especially where I live.

I should be thanking boehner for netanyahu going around the PUSA re: Iran honoring a nuclear arms deal?

things are not mutually exclusive. It doesn't matter who in the bushie admin was drunk with power. BO has saved my ass? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh that's very silly thing to write.

no religious tyrannies? tell that to galilleo.

but yes your right some of the people that came over were looking for freedom to be puritan, such as the pilgrims. others came over looking to find things to trade. the first colonial millionaires sold tobacco to europe. george washington was born rich, to a tobacco family. most of the founding fathers were the one-percenters of their time.

so its not correct to say the founders were religious nuts, they were truly enlightened when your think about the effect of the church on the state today.

:)