Hillary Clinton: ?If I?m President, We Will Attack Iran?
 

On Friday, presidential aspirant Hillary Clinton addressed a hand-picked audience at a Dartmouth College campaign event. She lied calling Iran an ?existential threat to Israel? I hope we are able to get a deal next week that puts a lid on (its) nuclear weapons program.?

Even if we do get such a deal, we will still have major problems from Iran. They are the world?s chief sponsor of terrorism.

They use proxies like Hezbollah to sow discord and create insurgencies to destabilize governments. They are taking more and more control of a number of nations in the region and they pose an existential threat to Israel.

We?have turn our attention to working with our partners to try to reign in and prevent this continuing Iranian aggressiveness.

Continued Hillary Clinton: ?If I?m President, We Will Attack Iran? | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

The US going to war? That never happens...

i see you are stepping up your troll by starting pro-iranian propaganda threads.

a democrat mongering war? lies

She is dangerous .... I think Jeb would be less of a war monger ... too bad he is so religious freak.

You know who won't be less of a war monger? Iran. Iran, who is not only the worlds largest state sponsor of terrorism, but that is also involved in every single conflict in the region to further expand their influence.

Thats strategy to get more votes on her side

I call bullshit, "discord" is not a real word, right?

The quote is from 2008.

Saudi is the source of most terror groups, yet US are in bed with them making oil deals. Iran got nothing on Saudi in terms of sponsoring terror.

I am glad I don't live in Iran ...

It may be better if everyone reads what she actually said and how she said it before posting any more idiocy based on how one site interpreted what they think she said.

Clinton says U.S. could totally obliterate Iran | Reuters


And it's from 2008. (like Qbert said)

The problem now is that ISIS cannot be fought without the support of Iran and both it's proxy Shiite militias in Iraq and the (Iranian funded) Hezbollah in Syria.

Assad's regular Syrian army is on it's last legs and the official Iraqi "army" is now - and has always been - worse than useless.

The Kurds are effective fighters too, but they'll only fight for Kurdish inhabited regions.

It's a real fucking mess :(

3 or 4 at best...1? hardly.

+1 :2 cents:

Obama is either a Christian or Muslim.
Either way you most likely voted for him, didn't seem to bother you at all. Or did I miss that thread?

:2 cents::2 cents:

(will probably be the only time in my life)

Obama is Christian, but not far right. Middle of the road, like most.

Time to print more imaginary money. :2 cents:

just wow .... Iran has not started a war in over 200 years ... can"t say as much of the USA....

I am Canadian and for the US taxes a non-resident alien ( no jokes ... )

I didn't say they started a war. Nice deflection. Their support of terrorism and terrorist groups and involvement in all the conflicts in the area is not in dispute either. I'm sure you were also one of the ones arguing "so what if Iran wants nuclear power?!?!" as well, years back. How'd that work out for you now that the west is scrambling to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon?

:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Pakistan has nuclear weapons ..... so does Israel ... And your point is ?

The point was Iran. One the worlds largest state sponsor of terrorism trying to go nuclear - and where every developed nation in the world, thinks this is a huge threat. Another weak attempt at deflection.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_a...ored_terrorism

United empire of the world doing what they do best, brainwashes people and making everyone appeared at enemy when they got something to gain. What surprising is that method never gets old lol

Interesting.

I decided to do a little checking on this website. Sounds pretty authoritarian, however,
here is what Wikipedia says about the site globalresearch.ca:

Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11,[5] vaccines,[6] genetic modification,[7] Zionism,[8][9] HAARP,[10] global warming,[11][12] Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails,[14] and David Kelly.[15]

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi,[16] reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.