It should be illegal to call porn immoral.
 

People can't go around at a mall and tell people they see, that they are ugly. People shouldn't be able to call porn stars, adult webmasters or porn production Immoral.

They want us to feel guilt and be ashamed of who we are and what we believe in.

The only difference between porn and sex, is that porn is for people to watch (as entertainment).

Religous nuts and others against porn should get a harsh fucking time, because they are simply bigots. Not free in their mind.

I'm thinking about starting a online support newsletter for this. These fuckers/bigots shouldn't be able to have their say. I want to build an army.

Would anybody be interested in joining??

The transgresive part of pornography is part of its charm ...

God bless you

Nah. I don't agree. I would rather have porn more mainstream than mainstream it self. But that's just me.

Let's all Join this HOT new Movement

Fuck this!!! This is what is so wrong with the world ESP the US today. "Oh I don't like you saying that so we must make it illegal."

We need less laws not more. :2 cents:

People come up to me and call me fat and ugly on a daily basis.... :(

Sure you can, it's a crappy thing to do since most ugly people don't have the ability to change.

I somehow agree on this. I may have gone too far with my headline. My intentions would be to make porn more mainstream, though. And fight bigotry.

No law. I agree. :thumbsup

Porn is way more mainstream than it ever has been. I don't see things changing till the baby boomers are gone. Gen Xers have less of a problem with porn. Also with what OASHA is trying to do will only make more porn relocating outside of the USA and that will be a negative effect to going mainstream.

What is this all about?? I googled, but couldn't find anything on it.

The religious nuts aren't relevant enough. It's the new web-based morality you should be concerned about.

...

What's that all about then? Where can I read about that??

that isn't actually illegal, at least not in any jurisdiction with which I'm familiar. indicative of poor character and low self esteem, pathetic and hateful and worthy of a few licks, sure, but not against the law

Instead of trying to hide from/silence that sort of speech/those types of ideas why not just refute them when they arise? Religious wackjobs and sex-negative peeps are easy as hell to knock over, as those perspectives tend to be based on ideology and fear, not logic and reason.

lol at 'immoral' though. love that the religious/social conservative peeps are more offended by naked bodies than the inhumane working conditions of those who suffer to create to build the electronic devices upon which said nudity is viewed.

but yeah, not sure what cause is served by silencing alternate povs, no matter how ignorant they may be

oops it's osha without the extra A

oasha porn - Google Search

basically they are trying to make everyone in the scene wear googles and condoms for ALL types of sex even oral sex etc etc..

And if it passes in Cali then it could be passed federally for all USA without a fight.

Yeah. I've read about this before. Didn't know the name though (oasha). But goggles?? Honestly??

You need better taste in countries.

Well said :thumbsup

It's often been my experience that those yelling the loudest about how evil porn is are the ones privately watching it the most.

Jerry Falwell anyone?

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

You have to be a bit of an ''outlaw'' to be in the porn business :2 cents:

Yes. But only a bit.

(I guess, that depends, like with everything)

You should tell that to Porno Dan from Immoral Productions.... :1orglaugh

Or getting weird in men's rooms like half the Republicans in Congress :1orglaugh

Really? Cause I do it all the time and it's not illegal.

The thing with this mentality, although I agree with it, is that if you have two sides facing each other, and one side wants to criminalize the shit out of the other, and the other side wants to just live and let live, only one side is going to win.

Maybe we shouldn't turn anti-porn speech into illegal 'hate speech', but we should have porn enshrined as a fundamental right.

And no, trying to include porn as part of a vague definition of a constitutional right to 'freedom of speech' isn't enough. The EU has a supposed 'right to freedom of expression' in its charter of citizen's rights, it doesn't stop any number of 'hate speech' and censorship laws making such a right meaningless in practice.

I'm all for freedom of speech. I don't really know what I was thinking, but sometimes you need to take a stance and fight back knuckles against knuckles. That Oasha too is jut a b.s. way to bring more rules and re-strict things in a micro management way. And suppress people who wants an open society. And this is just the way that things are going. At least here in Europe.

There are many on earth. Who thinks they are the light of the universe. But they are easily offended and in-secure. And think, that the more laws the better.

Sorry, about the headline by the way. It's actaully the opposite I'm looking for, meaning less laws and more freedom.

I was offended - steve hughes - YouTube

I'm proud to own Immoral Productions, and that's exactly what we are!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

& like wise, I always orgasm in my movies, it's all about the G spot :thumbsup