GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   yay hilary wins!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1185103)

Joshua G 02-20-2016 03:54 PM

yay hilary wins!!!
 
one step closer to president trump.

:thumbsup

blogspot 02-20-2016 04:06 PM

hell yeah!

noshit 02-20-2016 04:08 PM

One for the books in the Clinton Crime Library ...where everything is theatrical..!

The more she wins the harder she will fall :thumbsup

mikesouth 02-20-2016 04:15 PM

The pure spectacle of a Trump Clinton debate is solid gold on so many levels....

I predict the first one will rival the super bowl audience if its on one of the big three networks

420 02-20-2016 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 20734165)
The pure spectacle of a Trump Clinton debate is solid gold on so many levels....

I predict the first one will rival the super bowl audience if its on one of the big three networks

I'll watch if they can get beyonce to perform.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noshit (Post 20734158)
One for the books in the Clinton Crime Library ...where everything is theatrical..!

The more she wins the harder she will fall :thumbsup

Let's hope!

Coup 02-20-2016 04:37 PM

http://i.imgur.com/eRVuARK.jpg

bronco67 02-20-2016 05:39 PM

Honestly, the Republican race is so much more interesting. Not saying they're good candidates...it's just more fun to track what's going on with that shit show.

MetaMan 02-20-2016 05:46 PM

Congrats to president Trump!

LAJ 02-20-2016 07:06 PM

Cmon... do you really think for a second that Hillary would lose to Trump?

MetaMan 02-20-2016 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 20734341)
Cmon... do you really think for a second that Hillary would lose to Trump?

Do you really think Americans are that stupid to allow him to lose to Hillary?

That may end up being rhetorical.

fitzmulti 02-20-2016 07:39 PM

It's gonna get interesting...even MORE interesting from here on out, that's for sure.

Rochard 02-20-2016 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 20734341)
Cmon... do you really think for a second that Hillary would lose to Trump?

I want to say no, but.... A few points to consider here.

First off, Hillary is not the nominee yet. Sanders is nipping at her heels. He might have a chance of beating Clinton.

Second.... Clinton has some baggage. I don't even remotely begin to understand what she wrong with Benghazi but Republicans seem to believe she is fault for something. Then there is the email thing, even though no charges have filed, you can argue for years if any laws were broken, and if they were they would be minor - It's not like she is gong to go to prison for this. In the end, this information was safer on her servers than the White House servers, which were hacked.

I think all this discussion about email is pretty silly. If we go after Clinton for this, we need to start looking into all others in Congress who used their own servers, as well as others in our government who have access to classified information. I am positive we'll have violations all over the place.

LAJ 02-20-2016 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20734357)
Do you really think Americans are that stupid to allow him to lose to Hillary?

Mathematically he can't win. He won't get any significant totals in minority, millennial or female votes. The only way he could possibly win is if the GOP plays shenanigans again in a few swing states.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 20734341)
Cmon... do you really think for a second that Hillary would lose to Trump?

I'd vote for Trump to make sure Hillary doesn't become Potus.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734395)
I'd vote for Trump to make sure Hillary doesn't become Potus.

Aaaaand there you have it. These characters hate Hillary so much they see it as a personal thing. They claim politics, policy, positions but it is all bullshit. They just don't like a person they never met and know nothing about.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 20734402)
Aaaaand there you have it. These characters hate Hillary so much they see it as a personal thing. They claim politics, policy, positions but it is all bullshit. They just don't like a person they never met and know nothing about.

You have no fucking idea what my reasoning is for my choice for Potus and you are yapping bullshit out of your punk ass. Keep dreaming you can think up here at my level.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734403)
You have no fucking idea what my reasoning is for my choice for Potus and you are yapping bullshit out of your punk ass. Keep dreaming you can think up here at my level.

Your level? You don't have a level. You just wrote what your simplistic fool ass "reasoning" is and I commented on it. If you're too much of a bitch to have your posts commented on, then stop making them.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 09:01 PM

You're a fucking elitist joke. I don't have a problem with discussion. I have a problem with dumbfuckwad cuntlips like you that suck Hillary cock while thinking you know why I prefer Trump over Hillary all while expecting me to spell that out for you.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734410)
You're a fucking elitist joke. I don't have a problem with discussion. I have a problem with dumbfuckwad cuntlips like you that suck Hillary cock while thinking you know why I prefer Trump over Hillary all while expecting me to spell that out for you.

You can read the drivel you just wrote and imagine that you have any intelligence? How delusional. You should go back to the white meth, cause the prison yellow shit is starting to affect you.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 09:08 PM

You know you lost the fucking political argument when you have to show off your knowledge of methamphetamines.

Dumbfuckwad.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734416)
You know you lost the fucking political argument when you have to show off your knowledge of methamphetamines.

Dumbfuckwad.

I'm just trying to speak a language you'll potentially understand. Politics clearly isn't in that language.

MetaMan 02-20-2016 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 20734387)
Mathematically he can't win. He won't get any significant totals in minority, millennial or female votes. The only way he could possibly win is if the GOP plays shenanigans again in a few swing states.

"Mathematically" there is no exact equation to determine the exact outcome of an election. The outcome it not pre-determined and even current polling numbers are guesstimates which have proven to be off countless times. They wouldn't even bother having an election if your line of thinking was true.

You're making it sound like their is some magical equation to determine peoples exact behavior between now and election day. You're completely wrong and in fact makes you sound like you lack basic intelligence or understanding.

Mathematically he CAN win. That's the entire point.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 20734418)
I'm just trying to speak a language you'll potentially understand. Politics clearly isn't in that language.

No. You're simply a dumbfuckwad who is in over his head making sweeping assumptions about what motivates others and when they tell you youre a dumbfuckwad for doing so you say oh yeah, well you're on meth.


That's what dumbfuckwad cuntlips sucking Hillary cock do. Well done.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20734419)
"Mathematically" there is no exact equation to determine the exact outcome of an election. The outcome it not pre-determined and even current polling numbers are guesstimates which have proven to be off countless times. They wouldn't even bother having an election if your line of thinking was true.

You're making it sound like their is some magical equation to determine peoples exact behavior between now and election day. You're completely wrong and in fact makes you sound like you lack basic intelligence or understanding.

Mathematically he CAN win. That's the entire point.

Of course he can. It will probably be an epic battle, if he wins the nomination. It is likely, though, women will come back to Hillary as the "first woman" narrative becomes more attractive. Further, the media is desperate to keep Bernie in the race, because they generate 1/3rd of their income from political advertising. When he is out, they'll stop the relentless anti-Hillary coverage and switch to pro-Hillary coverage. It seems to me, anecdotally and personally, that about 25% of Americans just do whatever the media says. Other than Breitbart, does Trump have a media backer? The cranks who watch too many YouTube videos aren't really a big part of the electorate, so all the conspiracists won't really count.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734423)
No. You're simply a dumbfuckwad who is in over his head making sweeping assumptions about what motivates others and when they tell you youre a dumbfuckwad for doing so you say oh yeah, well you're on meth.


That's what dumbfuckwad cuntlips sucking Hillary cock do. Well done.

Look at your posts - just embarrassing. You need help.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 09:34 PM

Dumbfuckwad cuntlip. I'm not the one making up shit about why people vote for who they vote for and then when those people point out how fucking elitist and fucking stupid that is, say they're on meth.

Again, you're a fucking joke that sucks Hillary cock.

ilnjscb 02-20-2016 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734432)
Dumbfuckwad cuntlip. I'm not the one making up shit about why people vote for who they vote for and the when those people point out how fucking elitist and fucking stupid that is, say they're on meth.

Again, you're a fucking joke that sucks Hillary cock.

Look, I sympathize. Some people get looks, or intelligence, or success, or purpose. You got none of those, and it seems to you like it isn't fair. That doesn't mean you have to pursue this useless, pointless path you've been on. I'm not sure what use you could be, with no intelligence or skills, but you seem to be able to repeat gibberish over and over again. Perhaps there is some way you could turn that into something better than the embarrassing existence you have now? Maybe stop posting so much? At least then you could hide your lack of intelligence.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 09:44 PM

Right. Says the cuntlip that assumes he knows why I prefer Trump over Hillary while I have a Sanders avatar and am otr for Sanders bring my guy.

Again, you = joke + dumbfuckwad + cuntlip + elitist.

LAJ 02-20-2016 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20734419)
"Mathematically" there is no exact equation to determine the exact outcome of an election. The outcome it not pre-determined and even current polling numbers are guesstimates which have proven to be off countless times. They wouldn't even bother having an election if your line of thinking was true.

You're making it sound like their is some magical equation to determine peoples exact behavior between now and election day. You're completely wrong and in fact makes you sound like you lack basic intelligence or understanding.

Mathematically he CAN win. That's the entire point.

I'm not "making it sound" like anything. Simple logical comment dealing with the multitudes of people who simply will not vote for Trump, and you are making it personal. If you honestly think that "They wouldn't even bother having an election" if the winner was pretty obvious all along... (many elections are like this)... regardless of what level the election is or who is running, then you've pretty much removed all rationalization from this discussion.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 09:48 PM

This would have been a whole lot nicer if the elitist dumbfuckwad cuntlip had simply asked me why I would vote for Trump to keep Hillary out of the WH.

mineistaken 02-20-2016 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 20734406)
Your level? You don't have a level. You just wrote what your simplistic fool ass "reasoning" is and I commented on it. If you're too much of a bitch to have your posts commented on, then stop making them.

You just invented what his reasoning supposedly was and then bash him on "his" reasoning :thumbsup

dyna mo 02-20-2016 10:11 PM

Ftr, here's why a Hillary Potus scares me more than a Trump Potus.

1. Hillary is hawkish on Isis when in fact she hugely helped foster Isis.

2. Hillary voted for the war in Iraq. Period.

3. Hillary is truly an established and entrenched politician with the full nefarious support of the DNC.

4. Hillary's top campaign funding is from Wall Street fat cats while she talks against Wall Street fat cats to John q. Public.

5. Hillary thinks dodd-frank goes far enough when it not only does NOT go far enough, it goes in the wrong direction. This economy will face another crisis under the next president and Hillary will bail banks out yet again, this time for even bigger amounts and while we are at zero interest rates. Trump will not kowtow to Wall Street.

GoFUCKyourself ilnjbc

NickBaer 02-20-2016 10:12 PM

I went to my (Las Vegas) Caucus today.

My Pct is heavily UNLV students, but even so, we were 7 delegates for Hillary, and 9 for Bern.

The rest of the County did much better, and propped-up her win.

NickBaer 02-20-2016 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20734468)
Ftr, here's why a Hillary Potus scares me more than a Trump Potus.

1. Hillary is hawkish on Isis when in fact she hugely helped foster Isis.

2. Hillary voted for the war in Iraq. Period.

3. Hillary is truly an established and entrenched politician with the full nefarious support of the DNC.

4. Hillary's top campaign funding is from Wall Street fat cats while she talks against Wall Street fat cats to John q. Public.

5. Hillary thinks dodd-frank goes far enough when it not only does NOT go far enough, it goes in the wrong direction. This economy will face another crisis under the next president and Hillary will bail banks out yet again, this time for even bigger amounts and while we are at zero interest rates. Trump will not kowtow to Wall Street.

GoFUCKyourself ilnjbc

Calling BS on all of that.

mce 02-20-2016 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20734467)
You just invented what his reasoning supposedly was and then bash him on "his" reasoning :thumbsup

Here's an illustration of the tactic used

http://i.imgur.com/GCErMVs.jpg

mineistaken 02-20-2016 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickBaer (Post 20734470)
Calling BS on all of that.

And I am adding one of my own: Hilary is welcoming illegal immigrants (= criminals breaking US laws). That makes her a traitor of the US.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickBaer (Post 20734470)
Calling BS on all of that.

Dumbfuck, those are my reason for my choice of Potus you elitist piece of shit.

Besides, ypu stupid fuckwad, You may want to at least use Google. + if you are not aware Hillary voted for the warbin Iraq, then you really need to get the fuck out, you're in way over your head.

dyna mo 02-20-2016 10:28 PM

That's why I just go straight to pointing out the dumbfuckwaddery of Hillary cock suckers. I take the time to articulate MY fucking view on my cjoice for potus only to have a Hillary cocksucker tell me my personal view is bullshit.

Its like that cuntlip Madeleine Albright trying to shame female voters into voting for Hillary by saying there's a special place in hell for them if they don't vote for her.


Fucking rejects.

Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

dyna mo 02-20-2016 10:41 PM

If there were a personal reason I'm against Hillary it would be the liberal shitheads that toe the line for her.

I'd rather be labeled a socialist than a Hillary cock sucking liberal.

Acepimp 02-20-2016 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickBaer (Post 20734470)
Calling BS on all of that.

NickBaer, what the hell do you mean? Those 5 points are all fact. Like, common knowledge, all of it. What's the bullshit exactly?

MetaMan 02-21-2016 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 20734442)
I'm not "making it sound" like anything. Simple logical comment dealing with the multitudes of people who simply will not vote for Trump, and you are making it personal. If you honestly think that "They wouldn't even bother having an election" if the winner was pretty obvious all along... (many elections are like this)... regardless of what level the election is or who is running, then you've pretty much removed all rationalization from this discussion.

"removed all rationalization" like claiming that "mathematically" he cannot win? Just admit you're wrong and move on.

You're also twisting words, I never said "pretty obvious" (which you did not claim). I said PRE-DETERMINED which you did claim since you said MATHEMATICALLY can't win (your words not mine). Which you are 100% wrong on both cases.

Logic is not claiming 100% MATH behind something that is not and cannot be proven as a fact.

TheSquealer 02-21-2016 10:10 AM

to follow the logic of all the Liberal idiots on this board, its worth pointing out that in accordance to all past stances and statements, if Trump says "i will protect porn", then he magically becomes the ideal candidate for President of the USA... and then the same old argument gets used again and again "how could you be in this business and not support Trump"

http://img.ifcdn.com/images/0bc3add4...1aa6f1b2_1.jpg

Joshua G 02-21-2016 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 20734387)
Mathematically he can't win. He won't get any significant totals in minority, millennial or female votes. The only way he could possibly win is if the GOP plays shenanigans again in a few swing states.

you are not stating fact, only a leftward leaning opinion, & frankly a rather racist one i might add. where do you come off knowing that identity politics will determine the outcome of the election?

should wall street tank in the fall, or ISIS kill more americans in america, hilary/sanders has no snowballs chance in hell of winning. none, they will probably lose even if neither of those things happen given how mad the voters are at ESTABLISHMENT candidates in BOTH parties.

maybe you are not aware of the huge number of people who are independent voters that do not auto-vote democrats just because they fit a PC box. Thats hilarys line of thinking, why she offers nothing of substance, only "vote for me cause im a woman" something she specifically stated when she said "how can i be the establishment candidate when i am the woman candidate?" she can deny she is running on her gender all she wants but bottom line is thats the entire democrat election strategy - identity politics.

thats a loser strategy when the economy & corruption & security are the big issues, not having a "woman" president.

:2 cents:

SuckOnThis 02-21-2016 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20734765)
you are not stating fact, only a leftward leaning opinion, & frankly a rather racist one i might add. where do you come off knowing that identity politics will determine the outcome of the election?

should wall street tank in the fall, or ISIS kill more americans in america, hilary/sanders has no snowballs chance in hell of winning. none, they will probably lose even if neither of those things happen given how mad the voters are at ESTABLISHMENT candidates in BOTH parties.

maybe you are not aware of the huge number of people who are independent voters that do not auto-vote democrats just because they fit a PC box. Thats hilarys line of thinking, why she offers nothing of substance, only "vote for me cause im a woman" something she specifically stated when she said "how can i be the establishment candidate when i am the woman candidate?" she can deny she is running on her gender all she wants but bottom line is thats the entire democrat election strategy - identity politics.

thats a loser strategy when the economy & corruption & security are the big issues, not having a "woman" president.

:2 cents:


Who's this Hilary you keep harping on about? Are you so stupid you don't know how to spell her name?

Joshua G 02-21-2016 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 20734774)
Who's this Hilary you keep harping on about? Are you so stupid you don't know how to spell her name?

HAHA thats your best troll?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

MetaMan 02-21-2016 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20734778)
HAHA thats your best troll?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

He's basically admitting he was to stupid to comprehend the meaning of the post because a single "l" was missing.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

SuckOnThis 02-21-2016 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20734778)
HAHA thats your best troll?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


I'm just wondering what kind of moron could be so illiterate.

SuckOnThis 02-21-2016 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20734780)
He's basically admitting he was to stupid to comprehend the meaning of the post because a single "l" was missing.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


Tell us more about your pretend truck.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Joshua G 02-21-2016 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20734780)
He's basically admitting he was to stupid to comprehend the meaning of the post because a single "l" was missing.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

sometimes when he writes more than a sentence, he gives hints that he actually has a brain. But a cursory review of his posts shows he rarely uses it. my guess is he's on drugs.

:2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123