People who listen to soundbites vs people who listen to the whole speech
 

It's amazing to me

People who listen to 5-10 second sound bites of Trump will run around saying he is racist and that he offers no solutions. Paul Markham has said this about a thousand times so far

But people who listen to Trump's whole speeches or go to his website will realize he is the farthest thing from a racist and he has offered MANY solutions.

Amazing the disconnect

What is amazing was CNN's coverage of Trumps Arizona rally. Over an hour of straight live coverage of the pre-speech protesters and road blocks. Then 3-5 minutes into Trumps speech CNN breaks to pre-recorded interviews of various people criticizing Trump.

No attempt to allow viewers to actually listen to Trump state his positions.

Yea the worst is that fat bob beckel who has so many missing teeth on the bottom

It's so fucking pathetic and not based on reality...

So if someone says something ignorant and bigoted in a 30 second blurb, listening to the other hour of stream of consciousness rambling will make it appear tolerant?

I read Trump's interview with the Washington Post editors and I noticed he has a major talent for talking people in circles. He just rambles on and on for what should be simple answer and tires out the people who are trying to get him to be concise about a particular point.

Guy is a retard.

The guy is brilliant. He doesn't answer loaded questions. All the media does is ask loaded questions, so you don't answer directly

Where has he said something ignorant or bigoted? I made a thread about this and not a single person provided any information or examples.

Don't all politicians do the same ?:2 cents:

Just thought I'd bump this thread because millions agreed with it!