Do you shoot with HDR?
 

HDR seems to be the way things are going.

Yes, why not? I have it active by default on my iphone and works pretty good with contrast shots.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

I thought HDR had been laughed off the planet (except for real estate photography) a couple years ago as it went from a new technique to horribly overused in about six months. IMHO, it works well for real estate and building interiors, but portraits, nudes, landscapes, etc., look both shitty and cliched. Amateur photographers glommed onto HDR as (for some reason) it was thought of as being arty, in the same way that amateur photographers tend to think that any black and white image is art because it's black and white.

People have used HDR in porn? hah oh jeez

I like doing HDRI with matte paintings manually or as a sky/reflections in 3ds Max/Maya, but those HDR filters would make porn look bad..
I mean, it works for some things, but more art than porn..

I just shoot H cause I cunt a4d the DR... :(

HDR TV's are to become a standard format.

Isn't UHD a little bit different than HDRI, though?..

We've shot with HDR on using our Panasoniz FZ1000. It can work great in high lit areas, but as soon as the lights are low level or just not enough lighting, the film in HDR takes a double exposure look & becomes several photos overlapping on the one :2 cents:

I don't feel like clicking links and reading, not sure if you're agreeing with me or not.
They made up UHD so that people wouldn't get it confused with HDR..

I used to shoot HDR but a little penicillin cleared that right up.

Not sure about that, but with HDR, our camera takes lots of photos all in a milli second & puts them all together to get the "perfect" photo.

But, as said, when using with just a little less light than perfect, the image tends to blur more, like taking a photo with a slower shutter speed :2 cents:

Yeah I was a little off, but they did make UHD to prevent abuse of the term HDR. :upsidedow

UHD is touching base with 4K & definitely gives a better quality of image to the TV, but still no need for the HDR on video & photo tbh.

Loving this camera we use & still not using it for the 4K imagery from it as the standard management is fast with the digital focus brilliant for both video & photos, giving a high quality photo without HDR on :thumbsup

I experimented awhile with HDR - but I started seeing too many people over-using it and it began looking like clown vomit. Too much of a good thing isn't necessarily good. Much of it doesn't look realistic.

amen to that. it's the "cross-processing" of our time. cool at first, then completely overused, to the point of absurdity.

anyone old enough to remember cross processing in the 90's knows. youngsters can google it.

I tried cross-processing a lot of different subjects, but only liked the way it looked with landscapes... all shot on Kodak VS100 slide film, with a Hasselblad XPan panoramic camera... the volcanic crater image was published in a Hasselblad magazine:


http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/ls01.jpg


http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/ls03.jpg

http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/ls04.jpg

http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/ls05.jpg

http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/ls11.jpg

http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/ls02.jpg