Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia
 

Interesting article.. :winkwink:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/01...ald-trump.html

since Rochard is sleeping.

I can't believe you posted an article from that source...errmmaagahwd
Mustang,.i was in the Marines..heff..playboy

how did i do?

Yep, the libsters are constantly whining about the source. Clinton biased NYTimes was one of their favourites so they can't whine about the source now... it's gonna be very funny (and a bit pathetic) what desperate argument they come up with this time :1orglaugh

did anyone think there was a realistic link with trump and russia? it was surprising they even investigated it.

Yes I'm waiting for another "17 national security agencies" to confirm that. HRC full of crap again? Who would have believed.

There has been a dude from the DNC camp blaming the FBI investigation on KGB recently on CNN or some other gem of a TV news program.

Too bad that KGB doesn't exist for 25 years already, appears they had to exhume some cold war tactics but didn't update the abbreviations. Panic mode on.

Funny how nobody ever addresses the corruption evidence itself, instead it's always the fact "that somebody dares to address the corruption evidence".

"So far" OP those are key words. Just like Benghazi and Hillary emails we will need to keep checking on Trump's Russian ties for some time, perhaps a few investigations. Clearly this was not a very deep investigation. After all it took 8 years for Trump's people to figure out Obama wasn't born in Kenya and you think the FBI has really looked through all Trump's email in a month or two?

Nice try OP.. really..

?Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets.? Donald Trump Jr.

"The F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia", anonymous sources, The New York Times

Yes actually, lots of people think there is a very real link with Trumpy and Putin.

In fact those very smart chaps at Homeland Security have repeatedly said so.

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow?the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/...ector-national

Yea, obviously the FBI director has been paid off by Trump.. He was probably cheap too a few ladyboy hookers..

There is absolutely no link to Trump at all in this piece of text you posted.... wow. Can you even read? You completely contradict yourself in 1 post :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Looks like Trump Jr knows more about daddies ties to Russia than the NYT anonymous source.

Trumo: I do have a relationship with Vladamir Putin
 

Can I even read ?

No you got me there. I cannot read.

Common sense, op.

To be fair, it's not as if the New York Times is some Pro-trump propaganda outfit. They do have a relatively good reputation of "Not making shit up."

True. Their story is completely anonymous sources & goes against what Trump Jr & Trump himself have already stated publicly on television about Trumps relationship with Putin & Russians making up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of their assets.

Also https://thinkprogress.org/the-new-yo...a86#.6r70rt2hm

I guess that leaves us with a question. "Who's more full of shit? the New York Times or Donald Trump?" Personally, I'm going take the Times word for it and continue assuming Russia has no influence over Trump until proven otherwise.

Edit: (Of course left-wing propaganda outfit thinkprogress takes issue with an apparently unbiased piece of journalism.)