![]() |
To all the Sports & Trendy Fanatics, Who Refuse to Integrate Reality:
Here's a Crash Course in Civics using an Analogy you may Comprehend:
http://i.imgur.com/ZBQh305.jpg . |
not a good analogy. the winner of the world series isn't based on votes.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
if scoring more total points doesn't make you a winner in baseball, why do people think getting more total votes should make you a winner in presidential elections? a winner in baseball is one that wins majority of the games, likewise winner in presidential elections is one that wins majority of the states*... *it's a bit more complicated than that, but that's the generally how it works... |
Spot on op
|
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
- convincing voters to vote for you, is just like scoring a point in baseball so for example, in FL: Clinton scored 4,485,745 "points" Trump scored 4,605,515 "points" so Trump won that "game" - you then play the same "game" in each state - team that wins majority of "games" wins it all I don't see where the flaw in the analogy is? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123