GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Four out of nine Colorado Electoral College members agree: Revolt is necessary (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1231519)

wehateporn 11-29-2016 07:23 AM

Four out of nine Colorado Electoral College members agree: Revolt is necessary
 

Polly Baca, a former state senator from Colorado, has been involved in every presidential race since 1960. As one of nine members of the Electoral College from Colorado who is required by state law to vote for Hillary Clinton, she is involved in this one, too. But the longtime Democratic activist is considering writing in the name of a Republican instead.

Doing so, she says, might be the only way to keep Donald Trump from the White House.

?He is not the president-elect,? Baca told The Colorado Independent Monday. ?He is the not president-elect until the Electoral College meets. And as an elector I?m hopeful that we can come up with an alternative.?

Over the weekend, Baca hosted four of the nine national electors from Colorado at her home in Denver. There they discussed how they might reach out to other national electors across the country as part of a plan to keep Trump from the Oval Office.

Continued Four out of 9 Colorado Electoral College members agree: Revolt is necessary | The Colorado Independent

Barry-xlovecam 11-29-2016 08:07 AM

Bump the Trump 2016

But who?

Bladewire 11-29-2016 08:18 AM

The Electoral College was created to keep people like Trump out of office. This isn't a partisan issue. He has conflicts of interests that will enrich him in many countries and he's mixing family/business & white house transitioning. Corrupt.

So the Electoral College should through it to Clinton and force congress to vote Trump in, that way each elected Republican will be held personally accountable for their vote and the American people can vote each one out in 2 years :thumbsup

Barry-xlovecam 11-29-2016 10:18 AM

The House would have a choice;

3 or 4 candidates. Theoretically they could vote for any of them. Theoretically, some "hereto unknown" candidate with 7 - 12 votes could walk away with the prize. It's very doubtful this scenario will happen.

Magnetron 11-29-2016 02:07 PM

wehateporn is revolting.



More than usual.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123