C-SPAN Does NOT Like Building 7 Callers
|
I'm not surprised.
Its all very boring. What I'd like to hear is what you think anyone had to gain by having a controlled explosion in WT7 ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dont be ridiculous. You are actually saying that the conspirators decided to destroy a third building (that was not struck by a commercial airliner) which would then undermine the whole conspiracy ? They ruined their own plan ??? Everything looking good, 2 planes 2 towers. The whole world suckered into decades of foreign wars. But then they thought lets involve hundreds more people in our plan, lets make the whole thing even more complex, lets bring down a third building with explosives that has not been hit by a plane ? Fuck off you silly prick !!!:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh The same goes for the silly nonsense about Thermite and controlled exposions in the main towers. Apparently the conspirators thought that flying 4 planes into nationally important building including the White House and the Pentagon would not be enough to deliver their pesky scheme. Do you really think that it made any difference if the Towers were not completely destroyed ? Do you really think that the conspiracy fails in its aims if the Towers dont collapse completely and they thought "better fill them with exposives as well as fly planes into them". Fucking idiots. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
WTC7 was meant to be hit by a plane, but the plane got delayed in airport congestion. Difficulty then is that the building was already rigged for demolition like the other two, they took it down as we know, but it was a big mistake as it's blown the whole scam wide open
|
Quote:
And you know about the extra plane and the airport congestion how exactly ? Yes - you made it up didn't you ? |
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93 |
Quote:
And the evidence that this plane was supposed to fly into WT7 ? Let me guess - there is none. :1orglaugh |
Only the ignorant insist that the building could not have come down with out the use of explosives. It is completely explained, with proof, why the building came down. It was not fire that brought the building down although it may have contributed to further weakening of the building. It was the giant gash running almost the entire height of the building that ultimately brought it down and it is the reason the firefighters were "pulled" from the building. All of this is evidenced via video, pictures, and recorded conversations by the fireman inside the building as well as the order to "pull" them from the building when they were ordered to leave the building. There is not any mystery involved about building WTC 7.
|
Quote:
There's no way they would have been dumb enough to plan to demo WTC7 without a plane in it, it's now got 1000's of architects and engineers on their case and the 9/11 Truth movement is going exponential, causing around 40% of the population to have no trust in the mainstream media and TPTB |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Port Authority declined the controlled demolitions ? You have evidence of this ? Documents or witness statements ? And our conspirators were so brilliant they filled a building with incriminating evidence ? So they were able to carry out a conspiracy involving years of planning and hundreds of people, and part of the plan was to place every single piece of evidence regarding their dastardly deeds into WT7 and cunningly dispose of it during their crime ??? Fuck me thats amazing. You couldn't make it up ! :thumbsup |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc