GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   C-SPAN Does NOT Like Building 7 Callers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1271722)

wehateporn 07-17-2017 03:33 AM

C-SPAN Does NOT Like Building 7 Callers
 

NewNick 07-17-2017 03:42 AM

I'm not surprised.

Its all very boring.

What I'd like to hear is what you think anyone had to gain by having a controlled explosion in WT7 ?

wehateporn 07-17-2017 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21894208)

What I'd like to hear is what you think anyone had to gain by having a controlled explosion in WT7 ?

Excuse for war :2 cents:

NewNick 07-17-2017 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21894229)
Excuse for war :2 cents:

So - the twin towers was not enough ???

Dont be ridiculous.

You are actually saying that the conspirators decided to destroy a third building (that was not struck by a commercial airliner) which would then undermine the whole conspiracy ?

They ruined their own plan ???

Everything looking good, 2 planes 2 towers. The whole world suckered into decades of foreign wars. But then they thought lets involve hundreds more people in our plan, lets make the whole thing even more complex, lets bring down a third building with explosives that has not been hit by a plane ?

Fuck off you silly prick !!!:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The same goes for the silly nonsense about Thermite and controlled exposions in the main towers. Apparently the conspirators thought that flying 4 planes into nationally important building including the White House and the Pentagon would not be enough to deliver their pesky scheme.

Do you really think that it made any difference if the Towers were not completely destroyed ?

Do you really think that the conspiracy fails in its aims if the Towers dont collapse completely and they thought "better fill them with exposives as well as fly planes into them".

Fucking idiots. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

wehateporn 07-17-2017 05:17 AM

WTC7 was meant to be hit by a plane, but the plane got delayed in airport congestion. Difficulty then is that the building was already rigged for demolition like the other two, they took it down as we know, but it was a big mistake as it's blown the whole scam wide open

NewNick 07-17-2017 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21894424)
WTC7 was meant to be hit by a plane, but the plane got delayed in airport congestion. Difficulty then is that the building was already rigged for demolition like the other two, they took it down as we know, but it was a big mistake as it's blown the whole scam wide open

Ah right.

And you know about the extra plane and the airport congestion how exactly ?

Yes - you made it up didn't you ?

wehateporn 07-17-2017 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21894520)
Ah right.

And you know about the extra plane and the airport congestion how exactly ?

Yes - you made it up didn't you ?

"It remained delayed on the ground and did not take off until 08:42 because of heavy airport congestion"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93

NewNick 07-17-2017 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21894538)
"It remained delayed on the ground and did not take off until 08:42 because of heavy airport congestion"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93


And the evidence that this plane was supposed to fly into WT7 ?

Let me guess - there is none.

:1orglaugh

Steve Rupe 07-17-2017 10:20 AM

Only the ignorant insist that the building could not have come down with out the use of explosives. It is completely explained, with proof, why the building came down. It was not fire that brought the building down although it may have contributed to further weakening of the building. It was the giant gash running almost the entire height of the building that ultimately brought it down and it is the reason the firefighters were "pulled" from the building. All of this is evidenced via video, pictures, and recorded conversations by the fireman inside the building as well as the order to "pull" them from the building when they were ordered to leave the building. There is not any mystery involved about building WTC 7.

wehateporn 07-17-2017 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21894817)
And the evidence that this plane was supposed to fly into WT7 ?

Let me guess - there is none.

:1orglaugh

It turned towards New York then got shot down, the demo of WTC7 was delayed on the day, messing up the script, the BBC read for the script that it had collapsed before it actually did.

There's no way they would have been dumb enough to plan to demo WTC7 without a plane in it, it's now got 1000's of architects and engineers on their case and the 9/11 Truth movement is going exponential, causing around 40% of the population to have no trust in the mainstream media and TPTB

PR_Glen 07-17-2017 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21894817)
And the evidence that this plane was supposed to fly into WT7 ?

Let me guess - there is none.

:1orglaugh

don't even bother. He has been immersed within his delusions for so long that he couldn't see reality if it was shown to him directly. He'd believe one of his fellow unshowered, uneducated 'experts' from a youtube video than accept an actual explanation from an otherwise competent person who displays actual evidence to the contrary.

NewNick 07-18-2017 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21895027)
It turned towards New York then got shot down, the demo of WTC7 was delayed on the day, messing up the script, the BBC read for the script that it had collapsed before it actually did.

There's no way they would have been dumb enough to plan to demo WTC7 without a plane in it, it's now got 1000's of architects and engineers on their case and the 9/11 Truth movement is going exponential, causing around 40% of the population to have no trust in the mainstream media and TPTB

So why did they need 3 towers ?

wehateporn 07-18-2017 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21896527)
So why did they need 3 towers ?

They'd been trying to get the Twin Towers taken down for some time, but the Port Authority declined the controlled demolitions. Inside WTC7 was held lots of incriminating evidence, so they took advantage and got rid of it at the same time :2 cents:

NewNick 07-18-2017 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21896815)
They'd been trying to get the Twin Towers taken down for some time, but the Port Authority declined the controlled demolitions. Inside WTC7 was held lots of incriminating evidence, so they took advantage and got rid of it at the same time :2 cents:


The Port Authority declined the controlled demolitions ?

You have evidence of this ? Documents or witness statements ?

And our conspirators were so brilliant they filled a building with incriminating evidence ?

So they were able to carry out a conspiracy involving years of planning and hundreds of people, and part of the plan was to place every single piece of evidence regarding their dastardly deeds into WT7 and cunningly dispose of it during their crime ???

Fuck me thats amazing.

You couldn't make it up !

:thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc