GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is this a viable plan if Trump is removed from office? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1271827)

Matt 26z 07-17-2017 04:41 PM

Is this a viable plan if Trump is removed from office?
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DC2nIoEWAAERsTq.jpg

Sunny Day 07-17-2017 04:46 PM

Can't happen
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21895675)

25th Amendment
Section 2

Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

No way would both houses put TRUMP back in.

pimpmaster9000 07-17-2017 04:56 PM

troll fail...

Steve Rupe 07-17-2017 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunny Day (Post 21895681)
25th Amendment
Section 2

Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

No way would both houses put TRUMP back in.

In addition historically speaking the odds against the House and the Senate remaining GOP controlled in the midterms is very slim to none.

Bladewire 07-17-2017 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21895675)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

mineistaken 07-17-2017 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21895753)
In addition historically speaking the odds against the House and the Senate remaining GOP controlled in the midterms is very slim to none.

As for senate:

libby la times:

"The Democrats regaining control of the Senate, which they lost in 2014, is almost impossible to fathom."

libby vox.com:

"The Senate map is so mind-bogglingly awful for them that retaking the chamber in 2018 seems out of reach"

As for house I also do not seem to find anyone predicting a sure overtaking of control.

So remaining GOP control in both houses is most probable and not slim to none.

directfiesta 07-17-2017 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21895675)

nothing would surprise me anymore ....:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

NatalieK 07-17-2017 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunny Day (Post 21895681)
25th Amendment
Section 2

Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

No way would both houses put TRUMP back in.

:thumbsup


and who cares anyway, another 3 years and Trumpīs history anyway :winkwink:

mineistaken 07-17-2017 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21895891)
:thumbsup


and who cares anyway, another 3 years and Trumpīs history anyway :winkwink:

7 more great years :thumbsup

Bladewire 07-17-2017 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21895933)
7 more great years :thumbsup

A Slovakian, in Slovakia, licking American POTUS Trump's wrinkly stinky hairy crinkly little balls here everyday

Steve Rupe 07-18-2017 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21895819)
As for senate:

libby la times:

"The Democrats regaining control of the Senate, which they lost in 2014, is almost impossible to fathom."

libby vox.com:

"The Senate map is so mind-bogglingly awful for them that retaking the chamber in 2018 seems out of reach"

As for house I also do not seem to find anyone predicting a sure overtaking of control.

So remaining GOP control in both houses is most probable and not slim to none.

I repeat what I said. Historically the party in power loses seats during mid term elections.

Sarn 07-18-2017 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21895933)
7 more great years :thumbsup

And Ivanka after, in next 8 years:1orglaugh

mineistaken 07-18-2017 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21896404)
I repeat what I said. Historically the party in power loses seats during mid term elections.

So what?

Lets say you have some losing basketball team. Then it gets new sponsors, huge players etc. They become contenders. And then you would come and say "historically this team proved to show bad results"? Or would you disregard that "historical" component knowing that it will be most likely broken?

Paul Markham 07-18-2017 05:28 AM

Both sides want Trump out. So not going to happen.

CoolMikey 07-18-2017 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21896404)
I repeat what I said. Historically the party in power loses seats during mid term elections.

source?

Last couple of elections 95+% (Reelection Rates Over the Years | OpenSecrets) of house of representatives got re-elected, and currently they hold a significant 246-194 majority, so they might lose a few seats, but chances that they will lose majority are actually pretty remote.

That's especially considering that the democratic party has nothing going for them, no plan, no new ideas, etc, just blabbing 24/7 about "Trump", "Russia" and other nonsense that in no way makes average voter's life any better.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc