No one stands a chance against Trump in 2020
 

Well, it's been a year since Donald Trump won in a landslide against Clinton. The establishment and media were 100% behind Clinton and she spent billions on ads and the campaign vs. not much by Trump (of his own money too). Even the GOP establishment was against Trump. If the media was fair, Trump would have won 48 states.

I don't see the media and establishment being behind the Democrat candidate like they were in 2016. They certainly will be against Trump but as someone said, if they play the identity politics, then he'll win in a landslide again. If they don't play identity politics, then who are they?

3 posts lol

landslide with less votes

7 more years of greatness!!!

Landslide electoral win.

You never know

To get himself a shoe-in for re-election, all he has to do is start a war.

There have been 56 presidential elections. Trump's margin of victory ranks him 46th, hardly a landslide, hell, he barely won.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...College_margin

ride on cowboys :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

If I beat you 304 to 227, that is barely winning???

open your eyes man - the reps can´t win any votes since trump is their chief donkey.
if they don´t get rid of him since the middle elections the dems will be able to impeach him with a single rep vote.

you are praising the security of the titatinc while it is already at sink.

Congratz to him, I don't care who's president, I still live my life the same. :)

Comedy 10/10

I am amused...

great job with moderation around here. just signed up and posting same tired political rhetoric.

^^^^ this

GFY must be advertising for new members in the 'Mindless For Trump' forums again.

If you say so ...

In this particular case, yes, that is barely winning. As I said, he ranks 46th out of 56 in margin of victory. He barely won Michigan and Pennsylvania which put him over the top. This was no landslide.

Barely won...lol...delusional

They have the senate and House and Presidency...

and were 6 for 6 in special elections...

?

If two NFL teams are playing and one beats the other 14-7 is that a landslide win?

More like 40-22 in this case, yes thats a landslide...it wasn't even close why cant you admit it?

23-8? You're clueless about the NFL, arent ya. What country are you from?

What????

23-8 is not a typical football score. Neither is the 40-22 you changed it to after I posted.

What country do you live in?

:1orglaugh

You edited what I posted

I can't admit it because it isn't the truth. It's fine. In the end, it doesn't really matter. Clearly, I'm not going to convince you it wasn't a landslide.

It wasn't even close...I guess we can all agree on that...Gore Bush was close...this was a landslide...

Clinton! 2020!

What would be the point? 40-22 sounds as retarded as 23-8.

Congratulations to president Donald Trump, and a heart-felt shake of the hand to everyone who voted for him! Can I get a high-Five?

I guess youre missing the point

Which country again?


http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-conten...ot-girls-1.jpg

OMG........... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :helpme

All he has to do is start construction on the wall and it's game over.

true .. it is unpatriotic for americans not to re-elect a president in time of war .

fun fact:
15,873 nfl games:
23-8 happened 3 times
40-22 happened 1 time

And both were landslides

Why do you keep refusing to reveal what country you're from?

United States

I agree with you on 56% thing, but completely disagree on separating states. In that case even 538:0 would not be landslide if every state would be won 51:49.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Sure buddy, that's why you don't know what a normal football score is.

It was a landslide and a historic win

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-rm8QPzXb-...4pXAAAnNg7.jpg
https://ametia.files.wordpress.com/2...rump.jpg?w=900

7 more years!

If someone won 538:0 I would consider that a landslide :)


I just don't consider a margin of victory of two states won by around 55K votes in an election where 136 million votes were cast to be a landslide. He barely won.

I can not respect your view because it is double standard.
If bigger electoral vote margin - you ignore separate states even if all of them are barely won.
If smaller electoral vote margin - you take into consideration separate states that were barely won.

It is one or another. Either just pure electoral numbers or both. Not one in one case, another in another.

In this particular case, I don't consider it a landslide no matter how you count it. Want to keep actual vote count out of it? Cool. Winning by two states is not a landslide.

Want to factor in the actual votes? Fine. Winning by two states by a combined total of about 55K votes is not a landslide.

What he did was win. It was a close race, but in the end, he won. It just wasn't a landslide.

Had he lost Michigan and won 288 to 243 would you still consider that a landslide? What is your number? A person needs 50.1% of the EVS to win. Trump got 56.6% of the EVs. So where does the number fall. If 56.6% is a landslide is 55%? 53%?

you should think at what point in such a world where states vote against states the individual got lost.

hillary got 3 million individual votes more than trump.
this election system is a piece of bullshit if it is able to the opposite of what the MAJORITY OF INDIVUDUALS wants.

so go and get democrathy first and discuss after you have a human and fair election system.

A new troll is born. Lucky us.

Mob rule is not what the USA was founded upon. Think about how many illegals and people on welfare voted. Why are they allowed to vote? Thank god for the electoral system

Trump played by the rules of the system...he didnt campaign at all in NY or CA during the presidential election because it wasn't how you win

He didn't win by two states rofl...

Trump won 30 states, Hillary won 20 states

Trump won 3,084 counties, Hillary won 57...holy cow!