![]() |
To Vendzilla
As I've told you about two years ago, Russia will enforce its much smaller submarine fleet to make it equal or even superior to the US one very quickly. And I was right: Here Are All the Submarines of the Russian Navy in One Infographic
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry I couldn't resist you know I'm just joking I'll stop :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
|
Quote:
Aircraft carriers are dinosaurs from 1940's and they can be used against countries like Zimbabwe only. Today a 4 billion aircraft carrier can be easily destroyed by a single cruise missile with a tactical nuke, or a few non-nuke ones just like this: The nuclear missile submarine carriers are the major weapon of 21st century. Ask Vendzilla, because he knows. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
https://www.ridus.ru/_ah/img/HjBHBtTG_dF4OnIcElTQOg A graveyard of obsolete aircrafts: https://swalker.org/uploads/posts/20...ker.ru_001.jpg https://swalker.org/uploads/posts/20...ker.ru_002.jpg https://swalker.org/uploads/posts/20...ker.ru_005.jpg etc. So what? Don't tell me you have no such graveyards in the usa. |
"We don't even like aircraft carriers, so we will build the worst one ever"
Makes no sense. |
Quote:
https://liveinmsk.ru/up/photos/album/kremlin/0161.jpg Does it make a sense to you? Man, the elders have to die, the youth takes their place. Course you can build an aircraft carrier group for billions of dollars and put there many thousands of personnel. On the other hand, you can made a cheap ass ultrasonic cruse missile, which is undetectable and can't be intercepted because it flies much lower the ship's deck. The missile which can sink the whole group with ease. Which way will you go in 21st century? Course if you care of your GDP (you want it big, right?), you will choose the 1st way. If you care about the efficiency and don't care about GDP or other shit like that, you will choose the second one. The submarines are the other thing. They are quite, hidden and can release the blast power of all bombs used in WWII + Hiroshima and Nagasaki within a minute. This is the weapon of 21st century. Not aircraft carriers, archer squads and horse cavalry. Submarines and aviation. Not some drones, those can easily be jammed or taken under control by anyone, but the real aviation with real men aboard. |
The same but in English and in video:
That exactly the same words I've said to Vendz two years ago. That took only two years to create a submarine fleet greater than the USA one. Only two years... |
Quote:
|
I just read Russia is cutting it's military budget for the first time in twenty years..... They are cutting it by 20%, which is a huge amount.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.dae395091b89 |
Quote:
As I said above, in the USA you call them veterans. In Russia we call them... nobody... They are just males maybe, because everybody has to do it. The army in Russia is a duty but not a job. Every man have to do it. If you denied, you'll get a prison time. |
|
Quote:
http://www.dumpaday.com/wp-content/u...pool-party.jpg Unfortunately in Army you won't get such a car. You will do this and you won't be paid for it. Otherwise you'll get a jail time and that's not a joke. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You've told me that "Top Gun" is your favorite movie. Enjoy ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.aviationcv.com/aviation-...ets-world-2017 Itīs a fighter & a bomber, the huge arsenal & ability to dog fight, itīs a win win for the number1 aircraft :2 cents: |
Quote:
The result of the Gorbachev's good will: https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.c...ality=85&w=805 https://www.the-star.co.ke/sites/def...?itok=o-N1oiJo Yes, after that it took about two years to set a chaos in Afghanistan again, reinforce the Taliban, destroy the NYC twins etc. "Thanks" to America and CIA spy Osama bin Laden personally, the guy did it for the money of the US tax payers. As we say here: "don't feed a snake", but Americans are so stupid to get this simple thing. They think it's like this (idiots): https://fabiusmaximus.files.wordpres...nd-1.png?w=625 Quote:
BTW, please remind me how many wars that magical eurofighter was used in and how many real dog fights it has won? The Americans were so proud of their Phantoms, equipped with cool super-duper missiles, but those were easily destroyed by the outdated Soviet MIG jet fighters in countless dogfights during a Vietnam war. How come? |
Quote:
|
Sort of interesting that countries that have little or no military are better to live in.
|
Quote:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...4914749117.jpg Don't you see a difference? Don't you really understand who have lost the Afghan war? The "brave mujahedin fighters of Afghanistan" have wiped out their dirty asses by American mouths and ass-raped them in the most humiliating form. http://wafflesatnoon.com/wp-content/...iban-quote.jpg And after all of that humiliation you can say they are not idiots? Ok, maybe the right word is masochists... |
It may sound strange or even weird, but Soviet Army in Afghanistan was the best protection for the USA. Gorbachev has said "ok, we go out" and the Americans got 9/11 terrorist attacks made by the guys who were fed right from the Uncle Sam's hands. Checkmate.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't know how to say it in Spanish by keep an eye on the attack angle and the speed. Any other jetfighter will split into pieces during these maneuvers. |
Quote:
|
most of those rooskie subs are diesel-powered clunkers and half of that rooskie fleet is broken down in rooskie submarine garages at any one time.
you also have a fleet of rooskie space shuttles! yay rooskie! |
Quote:
I drive a small ladies car to compensate for my huge dick...it does not help... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Fukushima reactor is not something that a quite sub should have on the board... I'll tell you some simple thing. The US Navy is the mostly attacking one. It's created to reach the Russian coast. So Russia has enough of subs that are designed to intercept those. They are quite hunters on the noisy attacking ones. Ok, let me speak in your noob language. Let's imagine that some Los Angeles class submarine has entered the Russian waters. It's a big an noisy thing with a nuclear engine and nuclear warheads aboard. And what will happen to it? I'll tell ya... A "small" diesel-powered clunker of Kilo class will sink it down in a few seconds. And all the crew of that Los Angeles class will never know where their death has come from, because these rooskie subs are quiet as hell and they are classified by NATO as "black holes". These submarines are not attackers. They are hunters. They don't have to be in water for years. They have to hit and run. Idiot :2 cents: P.S. If you google for the biggest submarine ever, the result will say "Russians". If you will google for the quietest submarines, the result will say "Russians". If you will google for the fastest submarines, the result will say "Russians". The country which has launched 16 ICBM-s from a sub at once? Not some light cruise misses, but heavy ICBM-s that can wipe out the whole your country. Surprised? ;) |
Why have all of Russia's missions to Mars since the 1970's failed?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Я б вдул. Но ты же пидарас. Зачм запостил?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
@ a norwy fag. The country which was first in the space was Russia. The country which has sent a first human to the Earth's orbit was Russia. The country which has built a first space station was Russia. The country which made a first soft landing to the Moon? Yes, that was Russia again, clown. The country which is the only one on planet Earth which can land to Venus? Even Curiosity was sent to Mars by the Russian rocket (yes, мудила, двигатели были наши). So shut up your useless shitty month. The norway did noting good but sucked Hitler's cock. Every time when you say "losers" you mean pierced homo-fags of norway, because cowards and gays means norway - the "homo-soldiers of odin" LOL ))))
|
Quote:
https://coub.com/view/136fun |
Quote:
@ dyna mo, have you ever been to the army? Do you understand that your education literally sucks? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123