FCC shuts down Alex Jones
 

His flagship radio station was shut down by the FCC for operating with out a licence since 2013..


https://apnews.com/6581e53d64bb41ee8...-radio-station


#winning

If Alex Jones screams into the mic, but no one can hear him, did he scream at all?
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Talk about a losin' streak . . .

Wendy's is hiring.

They have frosty's at 0.99 !!!!!!

Meanwhile

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...?itok=0qMrV5BN

That's a good barometer for the intelligence level of the average American. And it's an intelligence level that's nothing to proud of.

The fact you posted that stat like it's some kind of victory puts you in an intelligence class even lower. The only person involved with Infowars with any brains is Alex Jones. The people who listen to him are suckers and mongoloids. Just like you. A water-brained inbred mongoloid.

Its not new fan base, its just you morons having nowhere else to get your nutter fix.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

It's funny how the haters are crying because people don't want to host their hating.

They can't stand on their own two feet and create their own hate platform so they cry and bitch and moan and whine because others won't do it for them :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Ciao Broski.

who is Alex Jones ? :))

He posts solid vaccine information on his site so hopefully more people are getting to see that :2 cents:

what a coincidence!

LOL

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_l-JdDqn_MZ...aghdadBob2.jpg
"This is not censorship in any way"

keep cheering on the killing of freedom of speech by fascists, traitors :thumbsup

You have the full rights given to you in the constitution "until" you infringe on the rights of others. That is what makes it a special document.

If you yell "fire" in a crowded theater when there is none, is that free speech ?
The courts have had to deal with this issue many times and that example follows those decisions.

The FCC is not charged with defending your bill of rights under the law, but to ensure/execute the public communications domain is run in accordance with the laws "Congress" sets forth.

The last I looked at those controlling Congress, they seemed to be a scared bunch of puppies that will not speak against Trump. So, I'm wondering who are those fascists, traitors?

Funny you have nothing better to do. Try learning how your government works.

HAHAHAHA Just L@@K at all the dumbass commie libtards celebrating censorship :1orglaugh

You morons believe any lies that the fake news spews about Mr. Jones

My challenge to YOU: Post the clip. SHOW us the clip of Jones using hate-speech or inciting violence.

I'll be waiting ... a long time i'm guessing :1orglaugh

Yep... a long time since it was pulled/removed !

The only thing that ever surprised me about Jones and many others is just how many were so weak of mind to that extent to actually believe most of what he was saying without much question except to things purposely planted on the internet for citation. I had no idea there were so many.
It's kinda like a 'functional alcoholic'.

Everybody wants to feel "better than others" and it is a easy thing to tell someone 'they are' and point fingers and twist facts. Hitler was quite good at it but today's mind control has more science to it and takes a longer term approach.
And it's all about MONEY.

Those weak of mind folks would believe in something. They are just waiting for someone to excite their senses.
Say something they feel and probably don't understand and you have their attention. Then focus that anger on targets with blame.
History is full of it.

So, the question becomes, do you want to be lead by a group of folks that probably believe that our trips to the moon were a Hollywood stunt ? Yes it is that simple.

But don't think the current political situation has not been helped by the free flow of drugs from the pharmaceuticals to the streets.

Who is more at fault... the poorly educated OR those responsible for that lack of education ?

Show us a tape where he's not hating or crying

Good! I'm glad traffic to his site has gone up. I hate the dude for what he said about Sandy Hook and I think it is fine that he was thrown off YouTube. I have said all along that he can just post stuff on his own website. Clearly, his fans know how to find him. Everyone wins here. He gets to spew his horseshit and YouTube doesn't have deal with the backlash and complaints about said horseshit.

The kicker is now he has to pay money to host his own bullshit..

I actually think people who are major conspiracy theorists have a specific type of mental illness. I'm not talking about people who might think there is something in Area 51 or that there could have been a UFO crash in Roswell, I'm talking about the people who think Sandy Hook was a false flag with actors or that Pizzagate was a real etc. These people have something wrong with them where they must feel superior to others yet they can't do it in other more traditional means so they seek out a "truth" and knowing these things that they feel other's don't know or can't understand gives them that superior feeling. In a way, it feels like it is a form of an inferiority complex. So, to me, it is less about intelligence level and more about mental health.

Which should be great for him because he is also not having to share revenue with YouTube.

Except no one wants to buy advertising on his website, meaning his only source of income is selling his dumb base snake oil.

And that is his issue. Freedom of speech means he gets to say it without getting arrested but nobody is required to pay him for it. :)

Don't you have a tiki torch to light or something?

Tis the reason compny's do not want you to know where their political money is going. They fear "boycott" ! Youtube, Facebook and others were about to face that in their advertising and that is the only reason they took the action they did. Even pension plans were threatening to dump their stock.

And it would happen if you knew where most are spending their money on 'issues' through non-profit org's so you don't know they are behind it.

I don't mind them spending the money in support of what benefits them, I just want to know it. To know who has a interest in this 'issue' explains a lot of fact twisting.
It does not break the $$ = free speech decision in the court.
As I have said all along, how would you know if they money was coming from a foreign entity. And we just seen the result of that.
If those non-profits want to get into political activism, they should have to open their books to the money supporting it.

It would surprise many that in 2008 Wall-Mart had min wage legislation on the ballot in many/not all states. I could not figure out why. After a lot of thought, it came down to the fact that they were paying higher than min wage in just those states but their competitors were not.
So it was a way to run up the expenses on the competition. Of course this was made moot by a federal min wage increase after the election. But the left was getting slammed for it in those states.
But nobody would ever know that if you could not figure out who was paying for/promoting the initiative. And even though the info was out there, nobody was reporting it. And that make it easy for someone else to blame those on the left.

So if you don't know who has a interest in 'making-up/changing your mind' how do you make good informed decisions.
My example may not be the best but it is easily seen. Hundreds just like it every year in all states in the US.

As they say... follow the money (if you can).