GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ukrainian Collusion (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1308996)

onwebcam 02-06-2019 07:18 PM

Ukrainian Collusion
 
NELLIE OHR: UKRAINIAN LAWMAKER WAS FUSION GPS SOURCE

"Nellie Ohr told lawmakers in October that one of Fusion GPS’s sources was a Ukrainian parliamentarian whose government has accused him of illegally meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
Ohr, a former Fusion GPS contractor, testified that Serhiy Leshchenko was a source for the Democrat-funded opposition research firm.
Leshchenko was the leading force behind the release of the so-called “black ledger,” which accused Paul Manafort of receiving illicit payments from the Ukrainian government. The ledger led to Manafort’s firing from the Trump campaign, but its validity remains in dispute."

https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/06/n...henko-ukraine/

ghjghj 02-06-2019 07:21 PM

https://i.imgur.com/tPhjmIh.jpg

Bladewire 02-06-2019 07:22 PM

Alt-right hate fake nic troll squirming in its cold moist MAGAt grave

ghjghj 02-06-2019 07:25 PM

It's an awakening shill.

astronaut x 02-06-2019 07:50 PM

Collusion is only bad when its being done by Democrats apparently.

directfiesta 02-06-2019 07:56 PM

Collusion is not a crime ...... :)

Rochard 02-06-2019 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22411722)
Collusion is not a crime ...... :)

Collusion is a vague term.

It's like saying "doing drugs is not a crime". No, it's a crime. Did drugs this morning when I took two ibuprofen. However, if I was shooting heroin that would be a different story. The term "doing drugs" is not illegal, but that's a very broad term.

However, there is a long list of crimes that Trump could be charged with.

We can start with "18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses". This "is bribery, which requires a showing that something of value was corruptly given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver) or corruptly demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient) with intent, inter alia, 'to influence any official act' (giver) or in return for 'being influenced in the performance of any official act".

There are multiple crimes in that area he can be charged with. Dozens of them, all very similar.

Next up is.... 923. 18 U.S.C. § 371—CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES.... "The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of government . . . (A)ny conspiracy which is calculated to obstruct or impair its efficiency and destroy the value of its operation and reports as fair, impartial and reasonably accurate, would be to defraud the United States by depriving it of its lawful right and duty of promulgating or diffusing the information so officially acquired in the way and at the time required by law or departmental regulation."

Then we can toss in election fraud, campaign fiance violations, lying under oath (Trump did answer questions, under oath, in writing), obstruction of justice, and treason....

Oh, what's that you say? You can only be tried under treason at times of war? Seems to me we have Russian forces in Syria firing on American forces. We haven't declared war, but we sure do have troops in multiple combat zones.... That's war isn't it?

I keep saying this time and time again... This is just starting. This is going to go on for the next decade. The Democrats will keep on investigating anything they believe they can legally investigate, and there is a lot to look at. One investigation opens up another investigation. Republicans need to took a good look back at Watergate, because it's happening all over again.

onwebcam 02-06-2019 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22411761)

We can start with "18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses". This "is bribery, which requires a showing that something of value was corruptly given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver) or corruptly demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient) with intent, inter alia, 'to influence any official act' (giver) or in return for 'being influenced in the performance of any official act".

Sortof like donating $150 million to that person's foundation?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


In other news

Dick Morris: How the Clintons Made Money from Huawei
https://www.westernjournal.com/dick-...-money-huawei/


I bet we're going to find out that Tony was laundering the Clinton's dirty money. And that a lot of that dirty money was in Huawei

Who else was involved with Huawei? Alexander Downer

astronaut x 02-06-2019 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22411765)
Sortof like donation $150 million to that person's foundation?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


In other news

Dick Morris: How the Clintons Made Money from Huawei
https://www.westernjournal.com/dick-...-money-huawei/


I bet we're going to find out that Tony was laundering the Clinton's dirty money. And that a lot of that dirty money was in Huawei

Sounds like a witch hunt to me :winkwink:

onwebcam 02-06-2019 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x (Post 22411766)
Sounds like a witch hunt to me :winkwink:

The real witch is done. You just don't know it yet.

King Mark 02-06-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22411768)
The real witch is done. You just don't know it yet.

It's been how long now?

Lol...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123