Wikileaks refused to publish Russian Interior Ministry leak
 

More proof that wikileaks was just a Russian tool..


68 gigs of leaked data from the Russian Interior Ministry and wikileaks refused to publish it. This was at the same time wikileaks was actively publishing DNC hacked emails.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17...tial-campaign/

In 2014, the BBC and other news outlets reported on the cache, which revealed details about Russian military and intelligence involvement in Ukraine. However, the information from that hack was less than half the data that later became available in 2016, when Assange turned it down.

“We had several leaks sent to Wikileaks, including the Russian hack. It would have exposed Russian activities and shown WikiLeaks was not controlled by Russian security services,” the source who provided the messages wrote to FP. “Many Wikileaks staff and volunteers or their families suffered at the hands of Russian corruption and cruelty, we were sure Wikileaks would release it. Assange gave excuse after excuse.”

Wikiliars never publishes negative info on Russia or China

From the Muller report..


https://www.thedailybeast.com/muelle...r-for-russians


“After the U.S. intelligence community publicly announced its assessment that Russia was behind the hacking operation, Assange continued to deny that the Clinton materials released by WikiLeaks had come from Russian hacking,” the report reads. “According to media reports, Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”


.....


But rather than refuse to comment on his sources, as he’s done in other cases, Assange used his platform to deny that he got the material from Russians, and make statements at an alternative theory. On August 9, 2016, WikiLeaks’ Twitter feed announced a $20,000 reward for “information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.”

...


Assange fanned the flames even higher on August 25, 2016, when he was asked in a television interview, "Why are you so interested in Seth Rich's killer?"

"We're very interested in anything that might be a threat to alleged Wikileaks sources,” Assange answered. “If there's someone who's potentially connected to our publication, and that person has been murdered in suspicious circumstances, it doesn't necessarily mean that the two are connected. But it is a very serious matter .. that type of allegation is very serious, as it's taken very seriously by us."



Assange tried to cover for the Russians and then tried to frame a dead man by pushing a known false conspiracy. What a piece of shit. I hope he becomes someone's bitch in prison..


No wonder US intelligence has been calling wiki leaks a Russian propaganda machine, it is. I mean it was kinda obvious over time, but now we see the proof.

Remember when onwebcam and the other GFY Putinbots were pushing the conspiracy about Seth Rich.. I sure as hell do..

yes you do not mess with the poot!...he is not some "no wall" pussy ass, tiny hand, drink like a bitch, potus...nope...he is pooty...you guys think assange is stupid? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

back to your weak ass politics :thumbsup

Dude.. We stole your Sputnik satellite in the 50's and we stole your sunk sub in the 60's the US is light years ahead of you dumb Russian trolls when it comes to intel. The only reason you guys were successful with internet trolling is because of dumb Republicans.. They are stupid fucks that believe anything.

You do love Putin no matter how much he lies or takes away the freedom of his people you just like a trump supporter.

You mean like Mike Moore, who went to an anti-Trump rally that was organized by the Russian troll farms?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh