![]()  | 
	
		
 Why are paid subscription sites considered high risk by processors? 
		
		
		I would think that people who signup for a monthly subscription are less likely to chargeback than someone purchasing one-time digital content. 
	 | 
		
 It is the product, not the length of membership that makes it "high risk." 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 I guess it doesn't matter which type of transactions you handle. If you're in adult, then you're automatically high risk.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 They would say "Enter credit card info for age verification only, this site is free", and then bang the credit card for $60-$120; but the password never worked because they never built a members area. :1orglaugh And then came "Pre-checked cross sales". That exploded the chargebacks on sites that actually had a members area. :2 cents:  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 I remember someone 'verified their age' and then came complaining to me about it when they got charged! I asked what exactly 'I' was supposed to do about it, and they said 'Get me my money back - YOU do internet sites don't you? Tell them to give me it back!' :1orglaugh That's why I remember the URL.  | 
		
 The "age verification" for "free" trick is still happening in a big way, usually with 2 cross sales, for a total of 3 random charges going off.  I'm surprised they still get away with that shit lol. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 :1orglaugh  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 People have all the porn they want for free, why would they pay ?  | 
		
 I guess it is because the websites/producers are willing to pay that premium. 
	My chargeback ratios were always below 0.5% - a lot lower than mainstream. Go figure.  | 
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
	
	©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123