![]() |
How Do You Handle Traffic from Restricted States?
How do you handle traffic from states where age verification is required?
The states in question are Louisiana, Utah, Mississippi, Virginia, Arkansas, Texas, Montana, North Carolina, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, Indiana, Alabama, Oklahoma, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Wyoming, and South Dakota. Are there any affiliate programs that handle traffic from these states without requiring age verification? |
Right now my clients are just blocking traffic, and putting up a landing page that explains why the traffic is blocked and hinting at contacting their representatives for more information.
We're also simultaneously working on some passive and active age verification methods, and trying to figure out the flow that would be the most profitable. My login software has implemented one such flow that was requested, but it uses age verification. I am not sure, anymore, that avoiding age verification will be a reasonable solution for the future. |
Quote:
What I mean is that there may be affiliate programs registered outside the U.S., and maybe they are not required to follow U.S. laws. I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know. |
most my customers are redirecting
|
Quote:
My thinking is, if you take USD or cater to US citizens, then you probably also need to comply with those laws. The same would probably be true for EU citizens too. |
Quote:
|
If the client wants your content he can get it via VPN. We get clients in Saudi and even a few from Iran... :thumbsup So fuck the " moralists" :error
|
How about putting up a landing page in those States with just links to VPNs and instructions on how to use them?
Wink wink? And what happened to the strategy of putting SFW landing pages for those States? |
Interesting Topic for discussion! :thumbsup
|
Using SFW landers that link direct to the join page.
WG |
The land of the "free" lol
|
Look at that list of States 🤣
Anyway, in America we do this cool thing where we handle it by just simply denying the reality that this all is actually happening, while simultaneously celebrating the fact that da libz are being pwnd in the process of it all. |
Quote:
|
It is legal to send them to clothed images and a join page link?
|
Quote:
|
If I start building user sites again, I will use a non-US host - I would then send them to affiliate programs and from there it is their responsibility to deal with the legal side...
As always it will be the sponsor that pays me the most that will get my traffic - To be honest I don't care what they do - Within reason of course!.... |
How can I restrict access to those locations? Do I ask my web hosting?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Code:
|
Most of my clients are creating SFW pages and when the surfer hits the join button, they go through the age verification first and then onto the join page.
I don't represent any tube sites, so I have no comment on those types of sites, except good-luck. We still have to see what the Fifth Circuit is going to do now they have the FSC v. Texas case back, and I think that will go back to SCOTUS again though. I havent seen anymore lawsuits filed other than the ones out of Texas that started the appeal process. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hi Everyone,
We have a cool solution to this: https://www.2much.net/images/ai-verify.webp https://www.2much.net/ai-verify.php Here's how it works. It will look at your traffic, and when it detects a user coming from a restricted state, it can either do any of the following: 1. Do nothing (Just collect analytics) 2. Redirect them to another URL of your choice 3. Performer AI Age detection before allowing them through or blocking them. The analytics will tell you where your users are coming from, how many are redirected or Age-verified or or failed the age verification plus other data too. There is a link to a demo that you can try now, but if you would like a demo setup for your site for a free trial please PM me here or shoot an email to [email protected] Our page is listing only yearly pricing but stand by as we are rolling out monthly pricing starting Monday. |
Quote:
Any sponsors for SFW ASMR that kind of thing? |
It’s kind of funny when you think about it. At 17, you’re biologically capable of becoming a parent (and in many cases, people do), but you’re not allowed to watch how it happens.
And what about just setting up a home router and blocking adult sites? That’s not an option? I just don’t see how this kind of ban is supposed to “protect” a 16- or 17-year-old, especially when, just as an example, that same teenager could pick up a hammer and beat an annoying neighbor to death. By that logic, should we ban the sale of hammers too? It’s just odd to me that the U.S. is going down this road. These kinds of laws are usually something you’d expect from, well… let’s just say, places that have a few issues with democracy. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123