OnlyFans Chatter Lawsuit Thrown Out of Court
 

It’s not exactly a secret that some creators on OnlyFans use “chatters” (people who help manage and respond to messages). But a lawsuit claiming this practice was a massive fraud just had a very bad day in court.

A federal judge has dismissed a closely watched lawsuit accusing OnlyFans and several creator-management companies of running a so-called “chatter scam.” The judge ruled that the claims didn’t even meet basic legal standards.

For anyone unfamiliar:
👉 An OnlyFans chatter is someone authorized by a creator to manage DMs, engage subscribers, and help with fan interaction. This is a common and openly discussed practice in the industry.

The lawsuit was brought by subscribers who claimed they believed they were always chatting directly with creators and argued that using chatters amounted to fraud, privacy violations, and even racketeering (RICO).

The judge wasn’t buying it.

⚖️ Key takeaways from the ruling:

• The court found no evidence of fraud or a coordinated scheme
• Routine account management ≠ criminal activity
• No illegal wiretapping or unauthorized data access was plausibly alleged
• OnlyFans’ Terms of Service explicitly disclose that creators may use third-party managers or agents
• Because of those disclosures, subscribers couldn’t reasonably claim deception

The ruling was a significant legal win for Elite Creators (Creators Inc) and other agencies named in the case.

💥 And here’s the twist:
The plaintiffs’ law firm was sanctioned $13,000 after the judge discovered that court filings included AI-generated, completely fake legal citations. One attorney admitted to using ChatGPT and failing to verify the sources before submitting them to the court.

The judge refused to let the lawyers quietly fix the errors, noting that defendants had already spent time and money responding to the flawed filings.

While plaintiffs were given one last chance to amend their complaint, the message from the court was clear:

➡️ Using chatters is not hidden, not illegal, and not fraud when it’s disclosed — and OnlyFans does exactly that in its terms.

📖 Read the full story at 👉 https://fleshbot.com/9318068/court-t...ver-ai-errors/

This ruling is a major setback for claims that the OnlyFans ecosystem is built on deception — and a cautionary tale about relying on AI without doing basic legal homework.

...as long as the creators or managers don't lie to their potential customers that they can chat directly with the model i.e. using a lie as a selling point. :2 cents:

I can't believe people pay to simp... it makes me feel mentally ill to live in a world so detached from the culture I grew up in...

Will the adult industry recover from the slump of simp slaves captured by the models directly?

There was phone sex lines back in your sprouting days . . .

There's the rub . . . the middleman is out.

I guess they don't remember the chatbot nightmares of previous chat networks such as MSN, AOL, And Yahoo.
Every single "female" there was a shill for webcams or adult dating.

This Mindi remembers :winkwink:

Yes? This shit happens all the fucking time. Simp is just another medium. I even say it every 5 years and people in adult ignore it for their own myopic bullshit.

low quality 35 mm pics are gonna kill porn, shit tier stag films are gonna kill porn, VHS is gonna kill porn, DVDs filmed in a shitty house in Sherman Oaks is gonna kill porn, DivX videos are gonna kill porn, high quality 1200x1800 photos are gonna kill porn, shitty 480p videos are gonna kill porn, live webcams are gonna kill porn, onlyfans are gonna kill porn.

So fucking boring man.

Everyone with more than three brain cells knows chatters are used the rest is retarded or loves the illusion, as no hot girl chats with you non-stop for $9 monthly...

OF is the middleman


During phone sex you at least had a women with a sexy voice, now it's a fat dude from Bangladesh ghost writing

But you're wrong. The law simply states that if the platform discloses that it may be a chatter, then it's perfectly legal. The user is required to read the terms they agree to.

** To clarify I'm not saying it is or isn't right, ethical or moral. Just stating the facts of the case.

They do way worse stuff then that lmfao. I never even heard words like milking someone, or bleeding someone out until OF marketing lol

You have clearly never met a stripper. Them girls are the true hustlers :P

Looks 👓 like chatgpt 🙈 i wonder why 🙄

NO different then the dating sites :2 cents::1orglaugh

just reading the gfy job market section of chatters, the ability to milk simps dry is the must have qualification. But actually if they are so naive they deserve it.

OnlyFans or OF or the site that starts with Only killed the word porn in the lexicon.