![]() |
I don't get it.
Not just from my wife, but I don't get how Bush got so many fucking votes?
|
He cheated
|
because nobody wants a pussy like kerry leading the country at a time of war?
|
brainwashed the stupid, he seems pretty good at it.
|
|
Pussy like Kerry? The man who went to war or like Bush who ran from war? Get your facts straight...
|
Quote:
|
yeah, we really need to look at the definition of war....
I don't consider a unilateral attack to take over a country a war. That would be like jerking off and telling people you just had sex. |
well i guess it simply means, majority of the US citizens still like him.
|
its because he is up agains kerry, everyone could win over him.
:2 cents: |
|
Hahahahaha, the wal-mart pic explains it all!
|
Now that is a question we all don't know the answers.
|
Quote:
|
because people believe what they are told. most people i know still believe iraq had something to do with 9/11. most people have no idea where our economy is - they only know bush told them it's good.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Take -over thatmust be really it.
|
by doing a better job at scaring the crap out of the people. Anyone I heard that voted for bush did so out of fear, either of terrorist or john kerry's inconsistent record.
|
Ignorance reign. :2 cents:
|
I just don't know who to favor with. All I need is a clean and honest election. Can't wait for the returns.
|
How, you ask? It's a rather simple explanation. There were more smarter people than you. Ever think about that?
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
40% of the US public still believe that Saddam Hussein was directly connected to events of 911 even though Bush and his cronies never did more than imply that and later, when pressed, confirmed there was no such connection. Over 25% believe that weapons of mass destruction were actually found in Iraq.
And if ignorance isn't enough, just throw intolerance into the mix. According to exit polls, almost a quarter of those who voted said that "moral values" - read being anti-abortion and anti-gay - mattered most in how they voted. Four out of five of these voters went with Bush. Another 20% cited terrorism as most important and voted similarly. Apparently all you need do to protect us from terrorism is attack the Constitution. In comparison, only 20% said the economy mattered most and voted four to one in favor of Kerry. 15% cared most about Iraq and three-quarters of them voted Kerry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
jayeff: if you have source / link, could you please post it? thanks
|
blows my fuckin mind.
|
Quote:
|
How can anyone consider a cowardly attack by the most powerful nation in the world on a defenceless country like Iraq a war? Get it straight people, Iraq had NOTHING to do with the terrorist attacks on the US, the ONLY reason why Iraq is involved is because it has oil, which now belongs to Halliburton, so don`t expect your petrol prices to fall any time soon either... :2 cents:
|
do not get me started chris i will go fucking nuts
|
Quote:
References to Newsweek poll in September http://www.editorandpublisher.com/ea...d=10006283 67 Harris poll from Oct 22 http://www.harrisinteractive.com/har...ex.asp?PID=508 |
Quote:
Plus didnt Bush declare victory .. so isn't the war over? |
good thread Chris :thumbsup
I don't understand it either.. I do know my son came home and said he was glad Bush won that he was rooting for him.. I'm going to ask him why when he comes home from school.. he sure didn't get this idea from me.. btw.. he's 14 |
I get it, too many people did not trust Kerry nor did they know who he was. I guess it was too risky for them to turn the wheels over to a stranger.:2 cents:
|
Maybe bush just tampered with all of the electronic voting machines, that could explain it.
|
Ignorance reign, I couldn't agree more....
:( |
Pretty simple.
First, Kerry was an uninspiring candidate. No one was truly excited about Kerry... plenty of people avidly supported him but simply because he wasn't Bush rather than who Kerry actually is. That's a pretty big difference. It didn't turn out well. Lot easier for the Republican's to mobilize churches and far right to turnout for election based on a strong belief in their candidate then it was for the Dem's to mobilize a turnout based on a strong belief against the opponent. That's basic psychology and the Dems took a beating off it. Second, not a lot of ideas or plans came out of the Kerry camp, relative to past campaigns at least. No one was saying "Kerry got a great plan for (health care/Iraq/economy/etc.). Kerry's camp was all about vague notions and "Bush was awful with regard to so-and-so. We'll be better!!". But no meat to the arguments. Libs seemed to rely more on venom from the Moore's and MoveOn's of the country to sway voters and the mythical youth vote to surface rather than Kerry's merits. That approach failed miserably. People can whine and complain about the stupidity of the American voters but bottom line is the Kerry the candidate and Kerry campaign itself was really, really poor. Bush was likely the weakest incumbant President in decades and the Dems still failed miserably. Contrast Clinton the candidate and campaign message versus the much more liked Bush I with this past campaign. You'll find your answer there. |
I am still in mourning over our loss to civil liberties to this asshole.
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh thanks for the good laugh :thumbsup |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123