GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hentai CP, what the hell? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=931279)

czarina 10-02-2009 02:13 PM

Hentai CP, what the hell?
 
I was browsing thru hentai sites today and I came across an otherwise legal looking hentai TGP site that in one of the sample thumbs had a drawing of a little girl (I'm talking like 6 or 7 years old) being molested by an adult.
Does this quality as CP? Should I report it?

DefaultMan 10-02-2009 02:21 PM

As someone who enjoys hentai (NOT the CP kind) you tend to come across that alot :disgust

candyflip 10-02-2009 02:24 PM

That's actually protected free speech. Upheld by the Supreme Court.

czarina 10-02-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 16383923)
That's actually protected free speech. Upheld by the Supreme Court.

that's so messed up. I'm very open about adult stuff and it's hard to shock me, but as the mom of a 4-year old, I'm outraged. How can that be legal? And then they mess with regular pornographers, unbelievable! This world is upside down.

pornpf69 10-02-2009 02:30 PM

how can a cartoon be CP?
I don't get that...

czarina 10-02-2009 04:16 PM

I'm not going to post the image here, but it depicts an adult molesting a very young kid. Isn't that the whole concept of CP? Granted, no actual children were molested in it since it's a toon, but the idea is actually disturbing.

Pleasurepays 10-02-2009 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 16384419)
I'm not going to post the image here, but it depicts an adult molesting a very young kid. Isn't that the whole concept of CP? Granted, no actual children were molested in it since it's a toon, but the idea is actually disturbing.

if you draw a cartoonish pic of someone getting killed, does that make someone a murderer?

Loch 10-02-2009 04:51 PM

This has always been a very talked about subject.
Its not real "really its not?", im imho what it does is feed sick peoples fantasies and THAT alone should be punishable by law

People who make toons like this have a very clear focus, target the pedophiles....thereby feeding into their sick twisted fantasies
Why else make this? Its not like normal people would watch it let alone BUY it.

BUT, this does go under the touchy subject of freedom of speech etc etc

brassmonkey 10-02-2009 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 16383885)
I was browsing thru hentai sites today and I came across an otherwise legal looking hentai TGP site that in one of the sample thumbs had a drawing of a little girl (I'm talking like 6 or 7 years old) being molested by an adult.
Does this quality as CP? Should I report it?

your avatar is distracting me :mad:

Fletch XXX 10-02-2009 04:55 PM

the same was said about britney spears photos of her face (underage) photoshopped on adult models nude bodies.

its legal, legit, and not CP, itsd not much different from a story, and incest stories are legal too

After Shock Media 10-02-2009 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 16383932)
that's so messed up. I'm very open about adult stuff and it's hard to shock me, but as the mom of a 4-year old, I'm outraged. How can that be legal? And then they mess with regular pornographers, unbelievable! This world is upside down.

You see in just about every law there needs to be a victim. Typically the accused also gets to address such. It falls under habeas corpus.

I am more shocked that this is new to you. Just about all hentai is underage girls/boys having sex, getting molested, or being raped by tentacles.

It also was why it was a shock when an author got busted for CP for writting about it. Again pure bullshit.
Back you trolls, this does not mean I am pro cp. I am just anti thought crimes.

Libertine 10-02-2009 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 16383932)
that's so messed up. I'm very open about adult stuff and it's hard to shock me, but as the mom of a 4-year old, I'm outraged. How can that be legal? And then they mess with regular pornographers, unbelievable! This world is upside down.

What exactly are you outraged about? The exploitation of imaginary children? The right of people to imagine things that you find disturbing? The right of people to turn those imaginations into drawings?

Tens if not hundreds of thousands of actual children are being abused worldwide, and you decide to focus on what truly matters: drawings. Great job there, genius.

Iron Fist 10-02-2009 07:48 PM

Don't think about killing someone either... that might be illegal too soon.

DVTimes 10-02-2009 07:57 PM

in the uk I belive its illigall.

moeloubani 10-02-2009 08:10 PM

in canada it's illegal, alongside of any picture of a girl that is meant to make the girl look underage (even if she isn't), so are stories with underage stuff in them, i agree completely the only problem is how that is interpreted by different people

here is a dude who (i didnt read the whole thing so I'm not sure if there was more to it than this one picture) was charged and was at trial for a picture from chloe18.com

http://canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.d...008oncj97.html

he was found not guilty because they couldn't be sure that she was under 18 but they used things like her wearing a pink ring or bracelet against the guy. kind of shitty in that regards that the dude was being fucked for something that was obviously consenting adults doing something consenting and in the corner it said chloe18 (emphasis on 18) and they still went after him.

gives the police leeway to say this or that constitutes child pornography based just on a qualitative observation even if the girl is 18+ so thats kind of shitty, ever since i read that ive tried to steer clear of those sites and once in a while ill run across a picture or video and be like fuck, could i get in shit for this? even though its from a reputable site/production company

alias 10-02-2009 08:13 PM

CP is bad mmmmmk.

http://dailydish.typepad.com/the_dai...uth_park_1.jpg

Deej 10-03-2009 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16384523)
What exactly are you outraged about? The exploitation of imaginary children? The right of people to imagine things that you find disturbing? The right of people to turn those imaginations into drawings?

Tens if not hundreds of thousands of actual children are being abused worldwide, and you decide to focus on what truly matters: drawings. Great job there, genius.

No child was hurt but soe people are disgusted by the thought and perpetuation of child molestation...

Her thought to report it is unsubstantiated, but her thought to be repulsed by the imagery does not make her a retard...

Take your horse shit outside...

Libertine 10-03-2009 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 16385144)
No child was hurt but soe people are disgusted by the thought and perpetuation of child molestation...

Her thought to report it is unsubstantiated, but her thought to be repulsed by the imagery does not make her a retard...

Take your horse shit outside...

I didn't call her a retard, you idiot. (for the record: I did just call you an idiot)

The question of "how can that be legal?", however, is pretty dumb. Even if you are disgusted at seeing certain drawings, it should be quite obvious why they can be legal simply because they're drawings.

Fletch XXX 10-03-2009 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani (Post 16384782)

he was found not guilty because they couldn't be sure that she was under 18 but they used things like her wearing a pink ring or bracelet against the guy. kind of shitty in that regards that the dude was being fucked for something that was obviously consenting adults doing something consenting and in the corner it said chloe18 (emphasis on 18) and they still went after him.

only in america,.... wait... :error

Davy 10-03-2009 09:25 AM

Even the Bart Simpsons porn was discussed to be illegal not long ago.
So yes, that stuff is illegal.

After Shock Media 10-03-2009 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davy (Post 16386224)
Even the Bart Simpsons porn was discussed to be illegal not long ago.
So yes, that stuff is illegal.

Provide proof.

Glenn Beck 10-03-2009 07:06 PM

http://totallylegaldownloads.com/lol...icknipples.jpg

Glenn Beck 10-03-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davy (Post 16386224)
Even the Bart Simpsons porn was discussed to be illegal not long ago.
So yes, that stuff is illegal.

Never let a silly thing like "knowing what the hell you are talking about" get in the way of opening your big fat dumb mouth I say.
Quote:

Originally Posted by the supreme court
cartoon drawings that formed the basis for the charges . . . because cartoon figures are not depictions of actual people. He argues that § 1466A(a)(1) necessarily requires that the visual depictions be of actual minors and that if the depiction of an actual minor is not required, then [it] would be unconstitutional on its face under . . . Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).


After Shock Media 10-03-2009 07:16 PM

Not sure which fake nick troll, glen beck is, hell even a tube sig for surfers; but didnt eirc sort of make a new rules about certain images and shit?

hmm lets see.

Glenn Beck 10-03-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 16387987)
Not sure which fake nick troll, glen beck is, hell even a tube sig for surfers; but didnt eirc sort of make a new rules about certain images and shit?

hmm lets see.

shitting dick nipples are well within the image rules as they are currently posted

Quote:

5) Posting images of death, dismemberment, or animal cruelty will not be permitted and will be removed.
Besides, only a Socialist would ban a good, honest, hardworking America such as myself.

After Shock Media 10-03-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn Beck (Post 16388012)
shitting dick nipples are well within the image rules as they are currently posted



Besides, only a Socialist would ban a good, honest, hardworking America such as myself.

Do not really super care. Your posting for shock value. Your obviously a fake nick and know the rules well. You even went out of your way to direct link to a tube site for sufer access.

I am sorry your life has to suck so bad to feel the need to troll this place under a fake name. I hope it turns around for you.

Glenn Beck 10-03-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 16388019)
Do not really super care. Your posting for shock value. Your obviously a fake nick and know the rules well. You even went out of your way to direct link to a tube site for sufer access.

I am sorry your life has to suck so bad to feel the need to troll this place under a fake name. I hope it turns around for you.

You, sir, are the only one trolling in this topic. I would appreciate greatly if you could allow me to express my god given first amendment rights in this topic without your undue and uncalled for harassment.

Mind your own business Mr. "After Shock Media". Which I can only assume is your real full name.

SomeCreep 10-03-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn Beck (Post 16387951)

:1orglaugh

NickB. 10-03-2009 10:51 PM

I did read they are putting a smack down on it in Canada
Makes total sense to me

Deej 10-05-2009 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16386020)
I didn't call her a retard, you idiot. (for the record: I did just call you an idiot)

The question of "how can that be legal?", however, is pretty dumb. Even if you are disgusted at seeing certain drawings, it should be quite obvious why they can be legal simply because they're drawings.

What a technical douche nozzle you are.

Sometimes you come off with some good intellect, but most times your crass dickhead nature comes out.

obviously you didnt call her a retard... but you tried to down her simply for being offended by CP drawings.

Now most people know that being that they are drawings that they are not deemed CP, but still, it depicts the act of molesting/raping/harming a child.

As a person with a child she has every right to be offended.

Is it illegal... no... should it be out there... no...

Not surprised though coming from you. Werent you here boasting several times about banging pretty young asian girls?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123