Porn Tube Site Operators Deny $29M Claim Waged by 3 Studios
 

Go gayboys, it's your birthday.

http://www.xbiz.com/news/124263

Funny, I have never seen a gay person crying like a little girl on boards about piracy. Seems like they just go handle business.

This is an interesting case for sure.

Yeah Titan leads the way. Most gay tubes know you don't fuck with the studios.

why aren't straight studios suing the tubes

I think in most cases straight website owners are more the problem than straight studios. You don't see Digital Playground stuff on too many tubes.

they were sick of getting it up the ass.

Your wit could shave my face.


:disgust




At least they don't bend over.

Its funny that as I read that article, the Xbiz site has a porn-related ad with a ripped-off picture of Victoria Secret model Miranda Kerr.

piracy has made people loony. that private guy will be suing himself soon. he can't even find a stance on piracy. he should get counseling from titan.

I don't think people have enough understanding of what they are up against so their opinion changes by the minute while they are learning.

didnt the google/viacom case kind of already solve this issue?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I dont understand why didnt the Gay Tube Site owner just didnt work with this studio to avoid all this? It seems like the studio had its hand forced into filing lawsuit. The Tube guys refused to block, remove and encouraged the uploaders to remove the watermarks.

I think any company Gay or Straight would be forced to sue if the tubesite refuses to remove or work with the company in some kind efforts right?

Gay or no gay, that's the (29) million dollar question: why didn't other companies do shit? but well, crying and even get out of biz is a lot more hip and fun :helpme

I don't understand it either.

Just a guess. Because most of them can't afford to. Mostly they talk big and that's all.