Katy Perry: The New No Talent Singing Superstar.
 

Why do we stack these no talent bimbos so high on the pole?

Katy Perry has NO natural singing ability. Saw her on Saturdy Night Live yesterday, and she has no natural pitch, sings very high in her throat and dances like she has a stick up her ass.

Yes, she has a beautiful body, great breasts, long legs, big off set eyes that are perfect for the camera. But are people listening to her sing or just masturbating to her image?

And on top of that, she STOLE Britney Spears' highschool uniform bit.

Why can't singers actually SING?

When she did the "boogerman" soundtrack bit, it wasn't even her voice. She was lipsyncing to another track and she even missed a few cues doing that.

There must be 1000's of real singers out there in the world and we allow these no talent wanna be artists that have no original ideas of their own to dominate the market place.

Give her a reality show already and get her off the market. "Karing for Katy" on the E Channel this fall. She's not a singer, so let's see if she can act.

I hope one day real singers will be back in style. Kids don't know what they are missing worshippng long legged big breasted women that simply can not sing.

Is it too much to ask for, a singer that can ACTUALLY SING IN PITCH?

Agree. She is uniquely awful.

A pic would help me know if I have any idea who she is

Here's one. No fuckin Autotune needed here. I don't think she's necessarily the best ever in the history of female artists but right now she's one of the best performers around.



And she's worth a million Katy Perrys.

perfect example of... it's not about the product but how you sell it...

she's sexy like hell

I don't care...

the real question is why you even give a fuck about some chick that sells records to 15 year old girls????

Blame the retards like Paris Hilton and all the other no talent ass clowns who are the catalyst for creating all these idiots.

The scariest thing is kids love these douche bags.

Katy Perry or The Apple Twins?

:upsidedow

You're kidding right ? She's been singing since she was 9 and has grown up singing gospel in church and moved to country then opera then pop.

Read and get informed so you won't embarrass yourself in the future. She is a talented remarkable girl who has her hands in everything from writing her songs to post production.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Perry

Really without that last name, how far in life do you think Paris would have gone? When did actual talent get taken out of the equation. I half blame the media for keeping the radar on their every move.

It is like meeting a girl on the internet and trying to do whatever you can to get her nude pictures. They figure, fuck it. Let her sing. Sooner or later she is going to take off her clothes. Then they will shut her singing down.

There are too many like here and sadly doing great. She was fun at first but now...come on!

the thing i don't get though, is why people are so obsessed with her image. she's not even that hot in terms of bimbo pop stars...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


You obviously are not talking about the same Katy Perry that we are, because the one we are discussing cannot sing.

She has boobs, yes.

Vocal talent, no.

I want to eat the corn from her poopie!!!!!!!!! she's hot!!!!!

If I don't see some sexy pics of Katy Perry to prove it, I'll call this thread FAIL !!!
.

popular music is just big business. it doesn't matter much beyond doing what sells.

She sells records whether others fail. Kudos to her

Of course everything being produced today is total crap, but when you were a kid they made "real music" and had "real talent". Our parents said the same thing about our music while singing "We all live in a yellow submarine" - you know, because songs by druggies who sang about living in yellow submarines was clearly much better than what we had when we were teens.

Someone in another thread said something about a lack of talent in today's music, and posted up a video of someone playing a guitar and singing solo. I though it was crap and is hardly entertaining by today's standards. Even concerts I went to in the 1980s were lame compared to what I saw a few weeks ago - pyrotechnics out the ass, the entire band being raised into the air on a platform, and dozens of fifty feet tall movie screens constantly in rotation. The stuff we had thirty years ago was pretty crappy when compared to today's entertainment dollar.

No one said that everything produced today is total crap. Or if they did, I missed that in the thread. :)


This isn't about liking a particular talent's body of work. It is whether or not they can actually carry a tune and sing.

The question you have to wonder is; if she (as an unknown) went on American Idol and went before Simon Cowell,

...would she make it to the top 10?

I like some of her stuff, especially this one:



ADG

dude, that has nothing to do with music. one of the best shows i've seen recently had none of that. just damn good music and a good time. thats all thats needed. the rest is just a distraction.

I agree.

She just a pair of boobs and blue eyes. She's another manufactured star created in a corporate meeting, while talented people like Florence Welch go mostly unnoticed.

California Girls and Teenage Dream was on our play list for the summer. Hey, what an I say, they are catchy

But it has nothing to do with talent. It's Kudos to the suits that push her mediocrity, and create the illusion of value. She's just shoved down a certain demographic's throat, and they eat it up like the idiots they are. There's chicks with their own YouTube channel that have 10 times the singing talent of a Katy Perry, or Taylor Swift or Justin Bieber.

At least Lady Gaga can belt one out at the piano and send shivers down your spine.

video killed the radio star...

yes, another star where the studio equipment does all the work...
she wont get my money!

Actuality think she writes her own music and how many have the suits put resources behind some hot chick and went nowhere or were a one hit wonder. They can push someonehard once.this girl it's her second outting so it's talent. To make people keep coming back is talent especially when the public has a very short attention span.

That's exactly what I was thinking--who gives a fuck?

Not sure if SHE's the one selling her albums to 15 year olds. Lots of indications otherwise.

The cover of her first album "One of the Boys" is a take on "Lolita"

http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/i...e516d266ca.jpg

http://www.archiviokubrick.it/opere/...i/lolita06.jpg

It was pretty funny when she tried to explain that on her myspace and nobody understood her until she posted a pic from the movie.

Also, she wanted to name her new album "Teenage Wet Dream," but the record company wouldn't allow it.

If SHE was marketing that to 15 year old girls, she has worse morals than many in this industry. :2 cents:

Nice review btw...

Just got finished watching SNL.

Bitch is unbelievably bad. I am pretty sure sea lions could be trained to sing and dance better than that.

But I do hope Justin Timberlake hit that. Body like that shouldn't go to waste.

Blah, blah. All hype. It doesn't take a genious OR research to simply HEAR the fact that SHE CAN'T SING, and doesn't have any natural pitch or decent vocal range.

Maybe she could sing when she was 10, in church, but now, I'm sorry, but if she was on American Idol she would've easily been cut.

Singing live is singing. There is no excuse. Real singers can sing on the drop of a dime. She was pitchy, out of tune, had no control, sang out of her throat. Even Madonna in her early years sang better and Madonna was more of a "Mick Jagger" type of singer.. ie; performance artist w/vocals tossed in. Katy Perry can't sing, can't dance and just struts around the stage like she did when she was 10 years old in front of a mirror when her daddy walked in and said "you are so talented!!!" Now, we have the adult version of that horrific childhood scene.

Why the fuck do people keep using American Idol as a reference point as to whether someone can sing or not? The majority of the finalists on that show suck ass. And think of the winners, how many went on to true, long term success? Very fucking few.


Stop using a pop game show as the basis for someone's singing ability!

Katy Perry arrives in the USA (a few years after already being in the spot light in UK/Europe) and gets the popularity dosage of gossip and bashing. Typical :)

you as a adult webmaster should know by now, SEX SELLS!

Dont hate the player, hate the game.

tl;dr

but it can be summed up in 1 word:

Boobies!

i totally agree with the op and the majority in this thread.

we should all be listening to susan boyle, she can sing in tune and carry a note- which is the ONLY criteria that counts.

http://www.atech.org/maverickmesseng...susanboyle.jpg

she got boobs ...
youtube.com/watch?v=s27aVEkzJYY

Usually I'd jump on the bandwagon about pop-polished pretty kids doing dance routines with music playing in the background and being mislabeled and accepted as singers. But I didnt think she was bad on SNL when she actually sang.

she hot= $$$$

I'd rather look, or listen to Katy Perry than Lady Fucking Gaga !!!! :mad:

Lol you people are fucking idiots. Do you know how many artists out there there are to listen to?

But instead you talk about the same pop stars haha. What kind of jr high pop kids crowd do you hang out with lol?

You dont like it turn it off, and maybe instead of starting threads further promoting the people you "hate" spend your time promoting real artists. <<<i love how you people who only know pop stars are supposed to know real artists in the first place. lol lol.

I havent listened to a radio or turned the tv channel to find music in like.. 20 years. But I watched Letterman when he had her on, and I watched SNL and saw her. Thats the only time I've heard or seen her sing.

This thread needs more pictures.