Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17831598)

the same way you debate politics never having been a politician?:helpme

Originally Posted by Bryan G aka FUCK WAD (Post 17831576)

Lol right because I've never used/seen a gun I don't know what I'm talking about. God I'm loving your posts lately man, comic relief. I do know they kill people and I do know I'll never feel the need to have one. Like I said before you yanks are living in a state of paranoia caused by your own obsession with guns.

Originally Posted by Rangermoore (Post 17831622)

You have no idea of the situation under which I have killed... All in the line of duty.. While I take no pride in it or wish to get anything from it, I do it with no regard for the target whatsoever.. :thumbsup

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17831641)

Real soldiers don't come back and brag about killing and that in doing so they almost had an orgasm. You are a disgrace to the uniform.

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17831641)

Real soldiers don't come back and brag about killing and that in doing so they almost had an orgasm. You are a disgrace to the uniform.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831647)

You would be wrong on that count, I have some vet friends that talk about what they did all the time.
But there you go again, commenting on something you know nothing about.

So what do you do in this business?

Originally Posted by Rangermoore (Post 17831653)

Your funny.. and a Moron.. (in case you didn't get the memo) ..LMFAO

Originally Posted by Rangermoore (Post 17831656)

Thanks,

To answer your question.. I think slutboat is just one of those morons that hang around and try know people...:thumbsup

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17831668)

Think what you want John but I'm sure your superior officers would not look kindly on your comments either.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831637)

I'm loving what a fucking retard you are, just dropped your program, if they hire someone thats going to go around pissing people off, well then fuck that program

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 17831683)

Shit I'm really going to miss those 5 clicks you sent me last month. Fuck off like I need you pos ass promoting us. You should take your own advice about pissing folks off you fuck. Oh where will I make up that massive traffic you sent lmfao.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831697)

Yeah, launching next week, I'm sure everyone that promotes you will love the fact you call affiliates names and shit on what ever they send, you truly are a fucking moron.

BTW, thanx for making my traffic public, I'm sure that instill trust with your affiliates

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 17831704)

Just cunts like yourself. Shit you launch next week so those 5 clicks might go to 10 what will I ever do. Why not just quit now. You will fail. I treat my affiliates with respect just not you cause you're a cunt.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831716)

Lieing again, proof, see statement, LMAO

You are one fucked up person, hope you get some meds for that

I never start imprecations against someone, they start with me, then it's a free for all, you started in on me, you ignorant fuck. You don't know what respect is, you put down my country on a regular bassis and beliefs other than your own, your a fucking retarded narrow minded shit for brains that just went on ignore, one of only two now.
Until today, I was an affiliate, I dont deal with ignorant fucks like you

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17831736)

This thread is getting away from it's intent:

does anyone have anything to say pro-gun with regards to this statistic:

American children are more at risk from firearms than the children of any other industrialized nation. In one year, firearms killed no children in Japan, 19 in Great Britain, 57 in Germany, 109 in France, 153 in Canada, and 5,285 in the United States. (Centers for Disease Control)

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17831736)

This thread is getting away from it's intent:

does anyone have anything to say pro-gun with regards to this statistic:

American children are more at risk from firearms than the children of any other industrialized nation. In one year, firearms killed no children in Japan, 19 in Great Britain, 57 in Germany, 109 in France, 153 in Canada, and 5,285 in the United States. (Centers for Disease Control)

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831765)

were they murdered with firearms or was it an accident caused by parents that know nothing about firearms? I ask that because I raised my daughter in a house with several firearms and it was never an issue.

http://www.justfacts.com/images/gunc...ents_fatal.jpg

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17831789)

Does the difference even matter?

The NRA fights tooth and nail against ANY sort of registration/training requirements to purchase firearms.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831801)

What would you change? there are over 20,000 laws on the books right now in the US about guns
After 20,000 laws, it becomes just another expence that the government wants to impose

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 17831750)

You've lost the plot (I'm sure you won't understand what that means). Not once have I made fun of america I just expose the fucking idiots like yourself. You've made many remarks about not caring about us even though you fuel you redneck pickup truck with oil we sell you. You're an idiot and nor do I give a fuck what you think about me. Ill enjoy my peaceful life up here while you continue to be scared, must suck.

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17831809)

For starters, I would change the law that allows anyone in AZ 21 years or older to legally carry a concealed firearm without a permit. I would also like a psychological background check for all gun purchasers...not this instant background check crap.

"When Jared Lee Loughner went to the Sportsman's Warehouse outlet on Nov. 30, he faced few obstacles to walking away with a Glock 19 semiautomatic handgun. Loughner was making the purchase in Arizona, a state with an Old West culture where gun laws are among the most lenient in the United States.

The 22-year-old passed an instant background check required under federal law for all gun buyers, said Reese Widmer, manager of the Tucson store. A law enacted last year allowed Loughner to conceal and carry the pistol without a permit. "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831827)

Over 4 million firearms sold every year in the US, where do you think we would get the money for said psychological background checks?

Our constitution would prevent such a thing.

I only know the gun laws in California and Oregon and Washington. I had a FFL for a couple years. Gave it up because it was a pain in the ass.
But in California, there is a 2 week cool down period and a course you have to take before you can buy a firearm unless you can provide a dd214.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17831569)

Learn to use proper comparisons.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17831839)

The consumer. If one can afford to buy a gun, one can afford to pay for his/her own psychological test to prove he/she is sane enough to own a gun.

And background checks are 100% Constitutional. I am saying these checks need to be expanded to include psychological assessment...

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 17831847)

so nukes are not inanimate objects?

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 17831847)

so nukes are not inanimate objects?

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17831873)

not when they are in motion.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831872)

It will never happen.
Background checks would be the best you can get. Because to get a good read on a patient takes more than one visit. Ted Bundy would have passed a psychological assessment. Therefore, it would never get passed.

And if they did pass it, who's to say they would stay sane? People go thru shit in there life and do stupid things. I've been married, I know, LMAO

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17831809)

A law enacted last year allowed Loughner to conceal and carry the pistol without a permit. [/i]"

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17831912)

No law is 100% guaranteed to work all the time. Sure there will be psychopaths who would still be able to legally purchase a gun regardless of any type of check. Doesn't mean such a gun law psychological check is totally useless...it would still help to catch at least some insane people.

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 17831352)

I'm the chick eh, I don't need a gun to defend myself, classic. I'd kick the fuck out of you on any given day that I'm sure of. Here we learn how defend ourselves. Enjoy being scared day to day and feeling the need to defend yourself with a gun you cunt.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17831954)

slutboat's premises are hilariously retarded.

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17831967)

hahaha Venzilla finds some graphs from a Pro-Gun right wing bullshit site called "Just Facts" - and your silly graphs do nothing to address the point I made.

Here is the slant from the bogus "Just Facts" on gun control:

Does increased government control of firearms lead to a more civilized, less violent society; or does it leave law abiding citizens at the mercy of violent criminals?

(the obvious answer being YES it leads to a more civilized, less violent society)

hahaa you are such a fucking sucker for right wing propaganda Venzilla - that site is probably OWNED by the NRA

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17831872)

It will never happen.
Background checks would be the best you can get. Because to get a good read on a patient takes more than one visit. Ted Bundy would have passed a psychological assessment. Therefore, it would never get passed.

And if they did pass it, who's to say they would stay sane? People go thru shit in there life and do stupid things. I've been married, I know, LMAO

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17829701)

* Here's the obvious: If you're a criminal - do you break into a house where a little old lady will shoot you or where a helpless victim is easy prey?

* If you're a criminal - do you care anything about the law? Obviously not! Isn't it naive to believe criminals will follow gun control laws?

* Why have we let our government legislate us into becoming potential victims? Criminals have guns while law-abiding citizens are left helpless.

* Why should criminals carry guns while law-abiding citizens are prohibited?

* Why add more gun control laws when criminals clearly ignore existing gun control laws?

* Any gun control that restricts law-abiding citizens is ridiculous - we're not the people who commit crimes.

* One more quick point: If gun control works - why is crime so high in Washington D.C.? After all, guns are barely allowed in D.C.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17831282)

It's better than the logic of you anti gun/severe gun control morons. "OH LOOK IF HE DIDNT HAVE A GUN THIS WOULDNT HAVE HAPPENED SO WE NEED TO BAN OR HEAVILY REGULATE GUNS!!!" Only you morons would blame inanimate objects instead of people.