GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ron Paul Supports al-Qaida Leader (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1039991)

Jakez 09-30-2011 09:53 PM

Even if he did support him, I'm sure he'd have a good reason. Supporting terrorists is clearly not his shtick so titles like this are laughable.

TheDoc 09-30-2011 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ******* (Post 18462246)
Your masters love this, they now know that they can murder an American citizen and 90% of you will rationalize it as being ok. Next time it will be a "real American" and the same turds will rationalize it as being ok. Of course they already knew they could get away with it since they murdered children in Waco in the early 90's and the turds rationalized it was ok because the the victims were part of a "cult". And they did in fact murder all those children because there was video going around on VHS that clearly showed a tank with flame thrower blasting the Branch Davidian compount. Of course the controlled mainstream media did not show that video so the turds just ignored it.

You can find a large amount of history where the US Gov or Police have killed citizens, it's not new, it's happened a lot.

I bet you would be hard pressed to find a country where that hasn't happened.

Zoxxa 09-30-2011 11:08 PM

So all the Nazi solders that Americans killed in WW2 were assassinations?

nation-x 10-01-2011 07:39 AM

Here is where you see common ground among Libertarians and hardcore left wingers... if you go to dailykos.com you will find a lot of posts saying the same thing as Ron Paul.

My personal opinion is that providing material and physical support to Al Qaeda firmly placed al-Awlaki in the "enemy combatant" role. He was killed in a bomb raid in a foreign country known to harbor our enemies. I have no sympathy for him or anyone like him...

Rochard 10-01-2011 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 18462214)
He is not a 'so called' Ameican. He is an ACTUAL American.
Nobody doubts his US Citizenship.

He is alleged to have been a bad person. There allegedly is evidence he was a bad person.
Nobody has seen that evidence. He was not given due process to refute any of that evidence.

If the police are 100% sure you killed children... They must arrest you and put you on trial.
They can not 'just shoot you' no matter how sure they are...because your citizenship guarantees you due process.

This incident erodes YOUR rights and quietly confers the right to kill you without any due process on anyone in the white house who claims to have secret evidence against you.

That precedent is much more dangerous than ANY terrorist will ever be...

There some vast differences here.

There is a staggering difference between arresting someone in the United States and a military force taking out a military target. In the United States we have the infrastructure to local, arrest, accuse, and bring someone to trial. In a military combat situation, there is not of this. When we have a combatant in foreign country who has taken action against the United States, there is no due process - be it an American or not.

And I have doubts that he was still an American. He pretty much declared war on the United States dozens of times and was very public about it.

This doesn't erode my rights at all. I'll never be accused of going to a foreign country and supporting the enemy.

campimp 10-01-2011 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronzo (Post 18462218)
For Ron Paul. it would be better to put US boots on the ground to capture this terrorist flake and have US Special Ops guys risk their lives to get him live. Then, bring him back so more halfwits could argue about where and how he should be tried.


i dont think you know too much about Ron Paul if you think he would ever consider putting Us boots on foreign ground for this guy

Rochard 10-01-2011 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18462328)
I didn't say that, but in part you're also way wrong. Of course he's not going to be protected by the US, but can be (see below) extradited/charged. But will suffer the same "penalties". Meaning, here is a case of an American gun dealer who forgot to take his ammunition out of his truck and caught a Mexican felony that went on his record in the US. He's not allowed to own a firearm for a crime he did not commit in the US. He went all the way to the Supreme Court and lost. Also, if you care to look, many American drug dealers, especially in Thailand who've been caught, catch the same felony conviction penalties on their record when they get State side.

This case is interesting but proves my point. He was never arrested in the US, and was never charged in the US. He was transferred to a US prison because of a US / Mexican treaty that allows US citizens to serve out their Mexican prison terms in the US. He lost his firearms permit because the government decided his actions were careless. But he was never arrested and was never charged in the US.

And by the way, he did in fact violate US law when he brought firearms and weapons across the border.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18462328)
You're absolutely wrong on this. If you have sex with a minor in a foreign country you broke the law and will be catch the same penalties if it was intentional, or not.

He was not charged with molesting a child. He was charged with one count of "traveling overseas to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor". What he did outside of the US the US cannot charge him for, but the act of leaving the country with the intention of committing a sex crime is a crime that took place in the US.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18462328)
tional/08MOLE.html?hp=&pagewanted=2"]
You are totally wrong on this one, you fail to understand "US" international laws. Like John Walker who never fired a shot at an American soldier, but was there fighting against the Afghan Northern Alliance and caught a 20 year sentence in the states because of it.

He was charged with 'Conspiracy to murder US citizens or US nationals" - which was a crime committed on US soil when he left the country with the intention of joining a terrorist organization with the intention of killing Americans.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18462328)
Just because a Government brands you anything, should be irrelevant unless it's proven in a court of law. What they just proved, for me anyway, constitutional laws mean nothing. We are not citizens, but mere subjects that have only a facade of true liberty.

Your confusing the American right to due process with a military operation. On American soil, United States citizens have certain rights. Outside of the United States, these rights do not exist.

Outside of the United States, the US military operates under it's own rules and guidelines. For example, in the US it's illegal to shoot and kill someone. However, the US military does this on a daily basis in foreign countries.

The CIA operates under no laws at all, just by the nature of what the CIA is. When the CIA operates in France, US law doesn't apply, and clearly the CIA is not concerned about breaking French law. If your an American citizen in France, the CIA can tap your phone and read your mail all they want - no warrants needed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18462328)
I'll paint a possible scenario for you. $14.5 trillion dollars are owed as we know our senate and congress are corrupted by lobbyists, as our President proves to be almost useless. As we go deeper into debt, our debt holders are going to want their money because we're all in one big symbiotic economy that's taking a giant shit right now.

This will cause a rise in taxes, especially State taxes due to lack of Federal funding, like what Greece is going through right now. More homes or property will be foreclosed on as the weak hope things get better as the true American wake up and finally see it's all corruption and lies and go proactive.

There will be mass protest in the streets as the cops beat the shit out of us and arrest us for exercising our rights to a deaf court/prisons system not wanting to lose their funding/jobs as they increase jail time/fines causing more unemployment and property liquidation.

True core Americans will have enough and raise up, and at that very moment, you've just been branded a "terrorist" and legally allowed to be killed regardless if you're a citizen or not.

Yes, if you rise up against the government you are branded a terrorist. But here in the United States, the laws will still apply and you will go to trial. If you are arrested for being a terrorist in the United States, you would still have rights. But if your arrested in a foreign country for being a terrorist, you have no rights under American law.

Shotsie 10-01-2011 09:29 AM

Looks like this was another victory for the terrorist groups.

porno jew 10-01-2011 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 18462240)
At least one person gets it here.

As posted above, this guy dined at the pentagon after 911 and noone seems to really put 2 and 2 together.

2+2 = ron paul giving support to a black ops false flag operative. who is ron paul REALLY working for.

Relentless 10-01-2011 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18462770)
This doesn't erode my rights at all. I'll never be accused of going to a foreign country and supporting the enemy.

That statement shows you have absolutely zero understandng of your legal rights or why they are important. It is a major problem in our country that so few people understand what rights they have and why those rights matter.

The entire point of our system of justice is that nobody ever needs to fear being ACCUSED of anything... Because you have to be convicted BEFORE anything can be done to you as a punishment. You are innocently waiving your right to the most important legal protection you have and instead relying on 'not being accused.' When all it takes are accusations, you get the Salem witch trials,McCarthyism, internment camps and people using our criminal justice system to their own gain by accusing innocent people they disagree with...

Rochard 10-01-2011 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 18463410)
That statement shows you have absolutely zero understandng of your legal rights or why they are important. It is a major problem in our country that so few people understand what rights they have and why those rights matter.

The entire point of our system of justice is that nobody ever needs to fear being ACCUSED of anything... Because you have to be convicted BEFORE anything can be done to you as a punishment. You are innocently waiving your right to the most important legal protection you have and instead relying on 'not being accused.' When all it takes are accusations, you get the Salem witch trials,McCarthyism, internment camps and people using our criminal justice system to their own gain by accusing innocent people they disagree with...

Do you not understand that "our system of justice" does not apply in Yemen?

I understand my legal rights perfectly. I understand that when I leave the United States and enter a foreign country, American law does not apply.

An American citizen in a foreign country facing off the US military as an enemy combatant is not protected by the US Constitution. There is no trial, no attorneys, and no due process.

xholly 10-01-2011 11:48 PM

this ron paul guy sounds like a typical politican trying to score points. argument makes no sense tho. fucking pussies.. hopefully more get bumped off soon.

GregE 10-02-2011 01:15 AM

You know, it's not like this dead guy, American citizen or not, represents any great loss to civilization.

Moreover, dragging his sorry ass back here would have involved a million or more in legal costs (which the baggers would have then insisted be deducted from entitlements or some such), plus the likelihood of a few suicide bombers blowing themselves up here or there.

The really funny thing here is that I can remember when the online Republicans assumed that (then) President elect Obama would be "soft" on terrorism and they were all ready to pounce on his ass for that.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123