Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions (Post 18645797)

An affiliate's role is to promote programs. So why is this one special that he was "going out of his way?"





As for the rest of this, those of us showing understand of the program's side regarding the performer's persona and previously used ones, as well as the nature of her current content versus past content....I know I don't, and I don't think any of the others are agreeing with the way the program handled the issue. No one here is defending the "threatening legal address" tactic, nor any of the other things the sponsor did (contacting 200 other webmasters, etc.). We're just saying there's logical reason for the sponsor not wanting the model's new persona (which is softcore) being promoted using anything that might reference her past personas and content (obviously hardcore).

Again, I don't think anyone is defending the unprofessional way the sponsor handled the issue. We're merely addressing the core issue itself.

Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions (Post 18645620)

So..... what does a bunch of obsessed stalker-like fanboys sharing all of her personas and pictures have to do with how an affiliate markets her current site and persona? Those fans will figure it out and find her pics regardless of if an affiliate acknowledges her past personas or not. And for all those "porn guys" who know all the different names she's been under and trading her pics, there's a bunch of new fans just being exposed to her for the first time through the affiliate's marketing. Those new fans may not even want to know that Bryci once did hardcore as Tia. Yet you feel that since some people know about it, we should just consider it that everyone does. So since some 8 year olds know Santa doesn't exist, we might as well just assume all 8 year olds know he's made-up. Fuck any fantasy or illusion they may have preferred to hold on to (either by choice or ignorance---that's irrelevant).

On top of that, you seem to feel that since "everyone" knows she once worked as "alias A" and now is "alias B," it should be perfectly acceptable to reference "alias A" and even its content when promoting "alias B." So a girl performs for Company A as Slut. She performs for Company B as Whore. So you think that its ok to promote Whore using Slut's content? So we should feel no qualms in using the content that Company A owns to send traffic and revenue to Company B?

Seems to me like you're the one living in a mental bubble. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18645057)

Never, ever, ever, never, EVER date a nude model, pornstar, escort, stripper or cam girl.

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18646325)

Like I said "metal bubble"... The "persona"

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18646325)

some new bf decides to give

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18646325)

tie the hands of affiliates

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18646325)

to market to THEIR traffic and to cater to what THEIR traffic is looking for and thus results in lost sales for everyone. When it comes to marketing porn chicks, you market her.. Not the site. She could be on 10 different sites. You promote all of them under her "name".. Freeones for example is not a directory of porn sites. It's forum is not filled with porn site threads.. It's a directory of the girls. The vast majority of the threads are about a specific model.

As for the entire content drivel... If I have a site or section on a site that has content from a particular girl, it includes content from lots of sites... Some of the content will get the surfer interested in her.. Some other site (having "used" that other content indirectly) might end up closing the deal and getting the sale.. It's simply the way it is and if you think differently then you really don't understand porn marketing.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 18646542)

no one agrees with me that she is kinda cute?

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 18646624)

she's more than kinda cute, she's ranked in the top 5 girls on FreeOnes consistently.

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 18646624)

she's more than kinda cute, she's ranked in the top 5 girls on FreeOnes consistently.

Originally Posted by alias (Post 18644728)

If my GF was oozing white cream when I fucked her, I'd have her checked out. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 19177617)

Where's this top 5 girls list?

Originally Posted by alias (Post 18643508)

NaughtyVisions we were not promoting hardcore, it was a feelgood post but the images had been cropped which removed their watermark.

Word on the street is that the webmaster is in a relationship with the model so any obscure reference to bryci doing hardcore porn [with another dick, previously] agitates him.

The thing is we didn't describe it as watch this girl get gangbanged or anything, I think it is a touchy subject.

No worries, posts deleted. I only posted this thread because of an email that referenced alerting 200 webmasters.

Originally Posted by edgeprod (Post 18643565)

PimpRoll is on the list for the second phase. Love everyone over there. I plan to do PimpRoll's stuff about 3x bigger than everyone else's, because I know how well they've done for me in the past.

I'm testing with PrideBucks now, and the conversions are ridiculous. I can't believe how well they're converting.

Originally Posted by Pseudonymous (Post 19178042)

http://www.freeones.ca/baberank/?t=l...&hc=0&cs=&ec=0 (past year)

http://www.freeones.ca/new/links/adultmodels.shtml for yesterdays top searches (on the right)

Another list

doesn't contain bryci as she is not in the category but figured i would give it to you guys to look for models to promote

http://www.freeones.ca/baberank/?t=l...&hc=0&cs=&ec=0 (centerfold category)

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger (Post 19178322)

I had a similar problem with one shitty sponsor. (not this bella shit, another one)

The sponsors closed my account because the photographer didn't like how I was promoting the women.

The women in the paysite were all nude, but the photographer of the content FORCED the sponsor to close my account because I was putting words like masturbating or slut in my blogs, and the shitty photographer didn't like the idea)...

So, the shitty sponsor closed my account, and he STILL OWES me money...

Seriously, these last 2 years, some sponsors act like fucking idiots, no wonder some are realy going out of business, with that attitude, nobody will promote them.

PIRIOD.

Originally Posted by Qbert (Post 18644957)

That he's in a relationship with the model concerns me more than the unprofessional demeanor alone. It tells me that when the relationship goes south, so does the web site. :helpme

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 19177617)

Where's this top 5 girls list?