Of course it won't.

Been doing great, I hope you have as well. Happy holidays to you and yours.

No doubt.

Obama will get a second term. :2 cents:

This scenario would be repeated around the country.

Kettle, meet pot.

You can guarantee Paul would screw the pooch with his VP choice. There is no way he could pick someone that would please Paul fan bois and Republicans alike.

I mentioned it once several months ago and it was received with the sound of crickets. Amazing what a difference three years makes. :1orglaugh

Sad but true.

Why would they be concerned with that unless they felt McCain was too old to last 4 years in office?

Consistency.

If you liked McCain but thought there might be some legitimate health concerns, his choice of VP is an important consideration. It would be much less concerning for example if McCain's choice was Huckabee, than it was that he chose Palin.

I wonder who Ron Paul would have chosen for a running mate. Rand? Jesse? lol.

Whoever picks Sara Palin as their VP.

On GFY, the health concern was always age. I think the true concern was his obvious inability to make intelligent decisions.

As far as a running mate for Paul, I have been asking that question a lot lately and Ventura's name keeps popping up. Paul's fan bois don't realize he would be Paul's Palin if he ever made it that far.

He obviously can't pick his son, Not sure how his fans feel about that.

True dat!

blow me old man :thumbsup

And Romney and Obama would have the same policies so what's the difference? Flip a coin.

Truth hurt?

I think if Paul wins, the Republicans will give him the Reagan treatment... fear the VP...

I could ask you the same thing. You clearly are divorced from reality. Why would I be angry?? This is your poll in case you forgot and Ron Paul is winning 2 to 1 so let me ask you...

Truth hurt?

50 Official Polls

I would not have asked the question if the answer might bother me.

So what is your problem then? I did not even say anything to you in this thread. You are the one attacking me, not the other way around. Grow up brother. Seriously. Go take a bong hit or go chill out on the beach there. LOL

Nice. I hadn't seen that one before.

Probably the primary reason why the CIA (and their military protectors) will NEVER leave Afghanistan. Too much money to be made running all that heroin up the veins of young people the World over.

Looks like GFY proved me wrong so far...

Good thing to be wrong about.

These people also said Obama was a good president!~

Afghanistan is also a major mining effort for lithium, that stuff that batteries in cell phones run on

Given this set of options I would have to go with Paul who is well meaning but misguided....... as opposed to Obama who is intentionally weakening the country to serve his hard left agenda. Not much of a choice........ but I will have to with misguided over evil in this case.

How is he "misguided?" By following the constitution and the ideals that this country was founded on?

Perhaps his local auto mechanic?

Jesse "the VP" Ventura sounds like a super badass WWE name.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh @ you calling someone else divorced from reality.

Why bother? They have over a trillion dollars+ in regional mining and other natural resource exploitation that's been disovered over the past few years.

Can you name me 3 examples of his 'hard left agenda'? Because I haven't seen any of that yet.

Because the drug money is off the books... aka unofficial.

I know more about reality and the true nature of it than you ever will brother, in this lifetime anyway.

Merry Christmas-

You are right about that, if anything Obama is supporting a "hard right agenda".

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Sure you do. Sure.

The Congress and the Executive branch are required to follow the Constitution as interpreted by the Federal Courts and ultimately the Supreme Court. Ron Paul does not have the authority to interpret the constitution now nor would he have the authority to do so as President.

The Constitution is a living document that can be amended and more than ten thousand amendments have been presented in our history with twenty seven amendments actually passed. In a typical congressional year around one to two hundred amendments are proposed.

The truly funny thing for me is that I know in your little brain you actually believe that LOL. Thats called subjective reality. The objective reality is far different. But anytime you think you can hang talking quantum mechanics or quantum physics you just let me know.

That's technically incorrect. Presidents have the authority to interpret the constitutionality of a bill by simply not signing it. Also, the limitations you place on the executive branch as laid forth in your argument in a more broad fashion are certainly not followed by past presidents e.g. E.O.'s and P.D.D's

In other words, I am not saying you are wholly incorrect, except to say that he would not abuse PDD's and EO's which is itself constraining himself to the constitution, whereas others have not, and furthermore he can simply not sign something he feels does not pass constitutional muster. That in and of itself is far superior of a result than past administrations and the country would be better off as a result just based on those two things alone.

Moreover you are totally leaving out the bully pulpit and him being able to focus attention on issues and getting the people to lobby their representatives which is not inconsequential.

for you to talk about objective reality is high comedy. thanks for the holiday laugh. :1orglaugh

Ron Paul, hands down.

The only objective reality I see on this thread is that #1, you are a douchebag and #2 that Ron paul is kicking Obama's ass 2 to 1 so I have my holiday laugh on you, I know it kills you to see hahaha :thumbsup

Ron Paul Published Racist Newsletters

Paul is not going to get the nomination. It will be Romney which you would know if you had any sense. Ron Paul is about as viable as Ralph Nader. Paul is Gingrich's spoiler. This Republican circus is embarassing which is great for Democrats. With that fool in NY and the other fool in Alaska, I imagine true conservatives are gringing in disbelief that they will ever field any candidate that might be worth a flying fuck.

Any candidacy involving Paul would most certainly create a huge interest in his vice-president select, because it would be him/her most likely to complete the term since Paul has one foot in the grave already.

Running mate matters, especially when the candidate is already quite old.

Paul/Bloomberg I'd vote Paul
Paul/Hillary I'd vote Paul

Paul/any of the people likely to actually be his running mate, I'd vote Obama.

Anyone but Paul please. You should run :)

You are right. The only way Obama does not win is if I get the nomination. :2 cents:

I'd vote for you, Lloyd. :thumbsup

Gingrich cant even get 10,000 sigs to get on the ballot in VA. lol, he's a joke. Romney is a plastic bobblehead. If I need a used car I will hit up Romney. Moreover, Ron Paul goes jogging every day. I would be willing to bet he could run circles around half of the fat asses on GFY-