GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   If the election was held today. Paul or Obama (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1051034)

porno jew 12-29-2011 04:39 AM

this thread proves america is doomed.

Bill8 12-29-2011 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18657719)
this thread proves america is doomed.

Many things prove america faces problems on a scale we've never seen or imagined before. We are well and truly fucked.

But your comment is unhelpful. You should demonstrate the courage of your convictions and say why you think this thread in particular proves anything.

nico-t 12-29-2011 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 18649833)
as opposed to Obama who is intentionally weakening the country to serve his hard left agenda.

obama being hard left? He is just another puppet, just like bush was. What really changed aside from some ignorable small things the people don't even notice in everyday life? Nothing, this administration is exactly the same as the administration when bush was their puppet. They keep on pushing the war -> power agenda and keep making personal freedoms for their own people smaller and smaller, doesn't really sound hard left to me. Don't forget, all of a sudden ghadaffi was an enemy, and had to be removed to have another country under control of US administration: this all happened under the so called 'left' obama. It's all the same.

Bill8 12-29-2011 05:22 AM

This is funny - republican girl cries after reading lines about israel in a ron paul book.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/watch...for-christmas/

Apparently she gets really mad and sad reading that paul considers israel an 'apartheid state".

Crazy that there are such people, that reading such a thing is so offensive.

nico-t 12-29-2011 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18657763)
This is funny - republican girl cries after reading lines about israel in a ron paul book.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/watch...for-christmas/

Apparently she gets really mad and sad reading that paul considers israel an 'apartheid state".

Crazy that there are such people, that reading such a thing is so offensive.

succesful brainwashing at work, exactly like the north koreans crying in rows when kim jong il died. This is exactly the same.

Bill8 12-29-2011 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 18657773)
succesful brainwashing at work, exactly like the north koreans crying in rows when kim jong il died. This is exactly the same.

I wasn't sure I really got the point of it as propaganda, tho it does have that feel.

Is it supposed to show that republicans cry a lot? Or that girls cry a lot? That republicans are like girls?

Or, that republicans love israel? Some of my old military/militia buddies will get a chuckle out of that.

glamourmodels 01-01-2012 01:50 PM

porno_jew has no courage, or convictions :upsidedow

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18657745)

But your comment is unhelpful. You should demonstrate the courage of your convictions and say why you think this thread in particular proves anything.


Bill8 01-01-2012 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18663112)
porno_jew has no courage, or convictions :upsidedow

It's common for people to say such things about other people with who they disagree politically or socially.

We've already figured out you and pj disagree about ron paul.

Just like safetynet/bignusines dems outnumber hard progressive dems on my side, leaving hard progressives like me out in the cold; on your side anti-safety/bigbusiness republicans outnumber libertarian-influenced paulian republicans. Sorry, you also are going to be left out in the cold.

glamourmodels 01-02-2012 02:29 AM

For starters, I am not a Republican. Secondly I don't say that about porno_jew simply because he disagrees with me. I said it because he is a disgusting excuse for a human being. Lastly, it's not me that's going to be left out in the cold. I have eyes and can see, unlike the majority of ill informed people on GFY and America in general, so I have already left the US. You guys are the ones getting yourself and your wives and kids molested at airports by pedo's, now at NFL games, shopping malls, etc. so have fun with that. Actually, I see cuckolding is becoming to be a bigger and bigger fetish niche these days so maybe you guys actually do get off on it, who knows- :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18663235)
It's common for people to say such things about other people with who they disagree politically or socially.

We've already figured out you and pj disagree about ron paul.

Just like safetynet/bignusines dems outnumber hard progressive dems on my side, leaving hard progressives like me out in the cold; on your side anti-safety/bigbusiness republicans outnumber libertarian-influenced paulian republicans. Sorry, you also are going to be left out in the cold.


Bill8 01-02-2012 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18663712)
For starters, I am not a Republican. Secondly I don't say that about porno_jew simply because he disagrees with me. I said it because he is a disgusting excuse for a human being. Lastly, it's not me that's going to be left out in the cold. I have eyes and can see, unlike the majority of ill informed people on GFY and America in general, so I have already left the US. You guys are the ones getting yourself and your wives and kids molested at airports by pedo's, now at NFL games, shopping malls, etc. so have fun with that. Actually, I see cuckolding is becoming to be a bigger and bigger fetish niche these days so maybe you guys actually do get off on it, who knows- :1orglaugh

Well, I dont fly or go to big public events, so all this security theatre has little effect on my life. It sucks to be them, american normals, but, they seem to like that kind of thing, they were all scared, now they pay the price, it's no skin off my nose.

Thing is, you are debating with the wrong people, the people you need to convince aren't the pornojews, who doesn't seem immediately like a republican type, altho who knows - you need to be talking to the hardcore republicans, and be effective at convincing them.

I was reading an article about santorum's sudden jump - all the evangelicals and american taliban are suddenly flocking to him - reading why they support him was just jawdropping, it amazes me that the republican party embraces that kind of hatred for faggots - but it sure is funny to see santorum start to seize center stage with his anti-anal-sex message.

glamourmodels 01-02-2012 02:59 PM

Good luck with that...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18663846)
Well, I dont fly or go to big public events, so all this security theatre has little effect on my life.


glamourmodels 01-02-2012 03:48 PM

keep telling yourself that...

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 18657151)
Democrats also voted in favor of the things that you have mentioned...he had little choice in the matters.


Bill8 01-02-2012 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18666819)
Good luck with that...

You pick an odd subject to respond to and emphasize.

Like I said, you need to be talking to the republicans, and refining your message to them. Bitching at people like me is a waste of your time.

http://www.truth-out.org/if-ron-paul...ory/1325514942

Quote:

A key fact about this development - largely missed by most media - is the extent to which it is driven by Democratic and independent voters planning to vote for Paul as a means of opposing endless war. While media may miss this story now, if election-night exit polls show antiwar Democrats and independents gave Paul the margin of victory, that story will appear in media around the world.

A survey published by Public Policy Polling on Sunday gave the following numbers:


Ron Paul: 23 percent
Mitt Romney: 20 percent
Newt Gingrich: 14 percent

But what was more interesting about the Public Policy Polling survey is what it revealed about who was planning to vote in the caucus for Paul:


Paul's base of support continues to rely on some unusual groups for a Republican contest. Among voters under 45 he's at 33 percent to 16 percent for Romney and 11 percent for Gingrich. Paul is also cleaning up 35-14 with the 24 percent of voters who identify as either Democrats or independents. Romney is actually ahead 22-19 with GOP voters.

So, according to this poll, if the Iowa caucus were restricted to "GOP voters," Romney would be narrowly ahead. But since Democrats and independents can vote, Paul is narrowly ahead.

If the election were held today, and this poll were predictive of the result, then exit polling would show that the margin of victory for Paul was provided by antiwar Democrats and independents. And that would be a key election-night story, on the front page and TV across the nation and around the world.

Note that if this result occurs, then it will be driven by the actions of roughly 8,400 people. Chris Cillizza at The Washington Post gives 100,000 as a rough expert consensus guesstimate of turnout. If 24 percent of those are Democrats and independents, that's 24,000 people. If 35 percent of those Democrats and independents support Paul at the caucus, that's 8,400 people.

glamourmodels 01-02-2012 05:01 PM

I was not bitching at you, I was simply saying good luck with your perceived isolation from the system

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18666912)
Bitching at people like me is a waste of your time.


brassmonkey 01-02-2012 05:04 PM

http://greatwonder.files.wordpress.c...7/misscleo.jpg

miss cleo :pimp

Robbie 01-02-2012 05:14 PM

Damn, this thread is full of super genius guys who sit back on a mountain top and are unaffected by the events in the lives of us poor normal folk who are just sheep.

It's kinda like sitting at the feet of the wise old masters like a bad episode of "Kung Fu" heh-heh

Bill8 01-02-2012 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18666980)
Damn, this thread is full of super genius guys who sit back on a mountain top and are unaffected by the events in the lives of us normal folk

Yeah, that actually does describe me pretty well, except for the super-genius part. I'm at best smarter than average. I do live in the hills. I'm not normal.

If getting patted down and molested at the airport bothers you, I hope you take action about it. If you go to nfl games, well dude, I got nothin, I figure you are just fucked.

So, would you vote for Paul, if he pulls off a republican miracle and wins the nod?

Robbie 01-02-2012 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18667011)
Yeah, that actually does describe me pretty well, except for the super-genius part. I'm at best smarter than average. I do live in the hills. I'm not normal.

If getting patted down and molested at the airport bothers you, I hope you take action about it. If you go to nfl games, well dude, I got nothin, I figure you are just fucked.

So, would you vote for Paul, if he pulls off a republican miracle and wins the nod?

Hell yeah I'd vote for Paul.

As far as airport TSA goes...it's a miracle I haven't been thrown in prison already. My wife DREADS going on a flight with me because I give them HELL. Same when a cop pulls me over and starts ordering me about like a child.

It just sets my temper off badly.

Bill8 01-02-2012 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18667014)
Hell yeah I'd vote for Paul.

As far as airport TSA goes...it's a miracle I haven't been thrown in prison already. My wife DREADS going on a flight with me because I give them HELL. Same when a cop pulls me over and starts ordering me about like a child.

It just sets my temper off badly.

My wife has had to get used to the idea that I don't want to fly. Luckily, there's plenty to do without flying.

Like I said, I'd vote for paul too. Sadly, I don't think the paul supporters are effectively organized and messaged, and, well, the corporations won't allow it, your mainstream bigbusiness republicans and the professional republican class won't allow it, so that's pretty much that.

My side is stuck with that buttlicker obama, so you can take some comfort in that.

Bill8 01-02-2012 06:16 PM

lol, gadfly greenwald comments on the irony...

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/prog...gleton/?mid=56

Quote:

But the point that she?s making is important, if not too subtle for the with-us-or-against-us ethos that dominates the protracted presidential campaign: even though I don?t support him for President, Ron Paul is the only major candidate from either party advocating crucial views on vital issues that need to be heard, and so his candidacy generates important benefits.

Whatever else one wants to say, it is indisputably true that Ron Paul is the only political figure with any sort of a national platform ? certainly the only major presidential candidate in either party ? who advocates policy views on issues that liberals and progressives have long flamboyantly claimed are both compelling and crucial. The converse is equally true: the candidate supported by liberals and progressives and for whom most will vote ? Barack Obama ? advocates views on these issues (indeed, has taken action on these issues) that liberals and progressives have long claimed to find repellent, even evil.

As Matt Stoller argued in a genuinely brilliant essay on the history of progressivism and the Democratic Party which I cannot recommend highly enough: ?the anger [Paul] inspires comes not from his positions, but from the tensions that modern American liberals bear within their own worldview.? Ron Paul?s candidacy is a mirror held up in front of the face of America?s Democratic Party and its progressive wing, and the image that is reflected is an ugly one; more to the point, it?s one they do not want to see because it so violently conflicts with their desired self-perception.

The thing I loathe most about election season is reflected in the central fallacy that drives progressive discussion the minute ?Ron Paul? is mentioned. As soon as his candidacy is discussed, progressives will reflexively point to a slew of positions he holds that are anathema to liberalism and odious in their own right and then say: how can you support someone who holds this awful, destructive position? The premise here ? the game that?s being played ? is that if you can identify some heinous views that a certain candidate holds, then it means they are beyond the pale, that no Decent Person should even consider praising any part of their candidacy.

The fallacy in this reasoning is glaring. The candidate supported by progressives ? President Obama ? himself holds heinous views on a slew of critical issues and himself has done heinous things with the power he has been vested. He has slaughtered civilians ? Muslim children by the dozens ? not once or twice, but continuously in numerous nations with drones, cluster bombs and other forms of attack. He has sought to overturn a global ban on cluster bombs. He has institutionalized the power of Presidents ? in secret and with no checks ? to target American citizens for assassination-by-CIA, far from any battlefield. He has waged an unprecedented war against whistleblowers, the protection of which was once a liberal shibboleth. He rendered permanently irrelevant the War Powers Resolution, a crown jewel in the list of post-Vietnam liberal accomplishments, and thus enshrined the power of Presidents to wage war even in the face of a Congressional vote against it. His obsession with secrecy is so extreme that it has become darkly laughable in its manifestations, and he even worked to amend the Freedom of Information Act (another crown jewel of liberal legislative successes) when compliance became inconvenient.

He has entrenched for a generation the once-reviled, once-radical Bush/Cheney Terrorism powers of indefinite detention, military commissions, and the state secret privilege as a weapon to immunize political leaders from the rule of law. He has shielded Bush era criminals from every last form of accountability. He has vigorously prosecuted the cruel and supremely racist War on Drugs, including those parts he vowed during the campaign to relinquish ? a war which devastates minority communities and encages and converts into felons huge numbers of minority youth for no good reason. He has empowered thieving bankers through the Wall Street bailout, Fed secrecy, efforts to shield mortgage defrauders from prosecution, and the appointment of an endless roster of former Goldman, Sachs executives and lobbyists. He?s brought the nation to a full-on Cold War and a covert hot war with Iran, on the brink of far greater hostilities. He has made the U.S. as subservient as ever to the destructive agenda of the right-wing Israeli government. His support for some of the Arab world?s most repressive regimes is as strong as ever.

Most of all, America?s National Security State, its Surveillance State, and its posture of endless war is more robust than ever before. The nation suffers from what National Journal?s Michael Hirsh just christened ?Obama?s Romance with the CIA.? He has created what The Washington Post just dubbed ?a vast drone/killing operation,? all behind an impenetrable wall of secrecy and without a shred of oversight. Obama?s steadfast devotion to what Dana Priest and William Arkin called ?Top Secret America? has severe domestic repercussions as well, building up vast debt and deficits in the name of militarism that create the pretext for the ?austerity? measures which the Washington class (including Obama) is plotting to impose on America?s middle and lower classes.

The simple fact is that progressives are supporting a candidate for President who has done all of that ? things liberalism has long held to be pernicious. I know it?s annoying and miserable to hear. Progressives like to think of themselves as the faction that stands for peace, opposes wars, believes in due process and civil liberties, distrusts the military-industrial complex, supports candidates who are devoted to individual rights, transparency and economic equality. All of these facts ? like the history laid out by Stoller in that essay ? negate that desired self-perception. These facts demonstrate that the leader progressives have empowered and will empower again has worked in direct opposition to those values and engaged in conduct that is nothing short of horrific. So there is an eagerness to avoid hearing about them, to pretend they don?t exist. And there?s a corresponding hostility toward those who point them out, who insist that they not be ignored.

The parallel reality ? the undeniable fact ? is that all of these listed heinous views and actions from Barack Obama have been vehemently opposed and condemned by Ron Paul: and among the major GOP candidates, only by Ron Paul.

The Porn Nerd 01-02-2012 06:38 PM

Bunch of fucking RACISTS in this thread.
Won't vote for Ron Paul because he's white.
You people disgust me.

Coup 01-02-2012 06:42 PM

fuck whitey

glamourmodels 01-03-2012 10:09 AM

I find it fascinating that with 150 votes cast and Ron Paul beating Obama 2 to 1 that virtually no one has even commented on it. The silence speaks volumes-

INever 01-03-2012 12:23 PM

So are we gonna start a "pornographers for Paul" site?

INever 01-03-2012 01:55 PM

Drudge is having a poll and Ron Paul is winning. I just voted.

http://drudgereport.com/

porno jew 01-03-2012 01:57 PM

this is a more enlightening read.

http://ww4report.com/node/10685

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18667072)
lol, gadfly greenwald comments on the irony...

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/prog...gleton/?mid=56


pornguy 01-03-2012 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 18648500)
Uh let me see...

Vote for a guy who wants to keep digging the debt hole and maintain a massive overseas military presence the US can't afford. Plus, he wants to keep up the racist drug wars that are just making the CO unions fat...

OR vote for a guy who actually wants to cut government down to size, treat people like grownups, and break the Entitlement Mentality that is destroying the US' fiscal health...

Such a tough decision...

(NOT REALLY)

http://i.imgur.com/N62bp.gif


Interesting way to put it as I think that is basically the same thing Obama preached.

Then he like all the others and most likely like Paul will do allowed the politician in him to get out and get paid.

Bill8 01-03-2012 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18668930)
this is a more enlightening read.

http://ww4report.com/node/10685

Really? I didn't see anything in your piece that particularly interested or impressed me. In fact, it embarrassed me - why are supposed progressives writing like hysterical women about something that doesn't matter?

It ignores greenwalds point, which is that it's embarrassing that a rightwinger is the only one propounding an end to the drug wars and an end to the empire.

I could care less if paul is racist, hates pussy, and has his tongue so far up corporate ass he can taste the filet mignon - it's silly to worry about that, the professional republicans can't allow him the nomination, he can't become president, and if he did, he couldn't actually do anything he says he would do.

It's childish to believe otherwise.

It's the philosophical and moral dimensions of his presence in the race that are interesting.

You are wasting your time worrying about his candidacy, but it wouldn't be a waste of your time to wonder what would happen to a liberal candidate that also said we should end the wars.

And who meant it, unlike that corporate rimmer obama, who lied like the fucking sack of corporate buttboy shit he is.

Bill8 01-03-2012 05:14 PM

In case you are confused about this, PJ, paul is a republican, which means, by definition, he's racist, sexist, and never met a corporation or a billionaire whose dick he didn't want to suck.

This is a given, an absolute. Wether or not paul is a racist sexist corporate buttboy is NOT IN DEBATE.

He is, we all know he is, everyone knows he is, especially the republican voters know he is. That's what makes him a republican, and eligible to be a republican candidate. Thats why republicans like him, allow him to exist, and dont want to kick him to death.

None of this debate is about wether paul is a decent guy, he wants to be president, he's a fucking monster.

INever 01-03-2012 09:12 PM

Ron Paul would rather be drinking a beer on the back porch than doing this. He's 76.

baddog 01-03-2012 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18663712)
For starters, I am not a Republican.

So you have zero say in the Republican voting process. Actually, reading on, it seems you have no say. You officially do not matter. Seriously, you don't. :2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18667098)
Bunch of fucking RACISTS in this thread.
Won't vote for Ron Paul because he's white.
You people disgust me.

No way am I voting for another Texan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18668384)
I find it fascinating that with 150 votes cast and Ron Paul beating Obama 2 to 1 that virtually no one has even commented on it. The silence speaks volumes-

Because it does not matter . . . kind of like you. Paul will never be the nominee against Obama. What do the results say? GFY is not the USA. It has people like you, that do not matter, voting. Sorry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by INever (Post 18669542)
Ron Paul would rather be drinking a beer on the back porch than doing this. He's 76.

Age only mattered when it was McCain. Besides, Sticky Green said he would be dead and that it did not matter if he won, it was the message that was important. Whatever that is.

GregE 01-03-2012 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18669555)
Age only mattered when it was McCain. Besides, Sticky Green said he would be dead and that it did not matter if he won, it was the message that was important. Whatever that is.

If Ron Paul picked a batshit crazy buffoon for a running mate I think you'd see a lot more people start worrying about his age :2 cents:

INever 01-03-2012 09:50 PM

Liked this poster.

:thumbsup

http://www.chrisroubis.com/wp-conten...a_ron-paul.jpg

baddog 01-03-2012 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE (Post 18669559)
If Ron Paul picked a batshit crazy buffoon for a running mate I think you'd see a lot more people start worrying about his age :2 cents:

Well, that brings up the question I have been asking for a few weeks now. Who should he choose that people would not be concerned and would follow his platform?

And GFY worried about his age long before Palin. :2 cents:

Jakez 01-03-2012 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18669583)
Well, that brings up the question I have been asking for a few weeks now. Who should he choose that people would not be concerned and would follow his platform?

And GFY worried about his age long before Palin. :2 cents:

He needs to choose someone that has similar beliefs but also is more in tune with the people who refuse to consider Ron Paul. For the win.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18667108)
fuck whitey

kill whitey


GregE 01-03-2012 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18669583)
Well, that brings up the question I have been asking for a few weeks now. Who should he choose that people would not be concerned and would follow his platform?

That's a damn good question and I haven't studied this enough to offer any suggestions.

I do remember how Ross Perot hurt himself immensely with his selection of Stockdale and I can see this as a huge challenge for Paul.

My guess is it'll end up being some squeaky clean CEO who most of us have never heard of.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 01-03-2012 10:23 PM

Ron Paul came in 3rd in Iowa among the Republicans, so it looks like Obama's safe... :upsidedow

ADG

baddog 01-03-2012 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 18669593)
He needs to choose someone that has similar beliefs but also is more in tune with the people who refuse to consider Ron Paul. For the win.

ya think? :upsidedow so who would that be?

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE (Post 18669602)
That's a damn good question and I haven't studied this enough to offer any suggestions.

I do remember how Ross Perot hurt himself immensely with his selection of Stockdale and I can see this as a huge challenge for Paul.

My guess is it'll end up being some squeaky clean CEO who most of us have never heard of.

I liked Stockdale. I think he got a bad rap. The only suggestion I recall hearing is Jesse Ventura. The scary thing is that I think these people are serious. The only reason he won the election to be governor in the first place was that he promised to split the state's excess monies among the citizens, so they all got a couple hundred dollars instead of using the money for something that would help everyone.


Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 18669604)
Ron Paul came in 3rd in Iowa among the Republicans, so it looks like Obama's safe... :upsidedow

ADG

Obama has been safe ever since I failed to seek the nomination. The Republicans have no one that can beat him.

Jakez 01-03-2012 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18669628)
ya think? :upsidedow so who would that be?

I have no idea. But it makes sense to me heh. There are a lot of topics that he's vaguely discussed and people get the wrong impression from the little he's said about it and think he's totally for something that is against their views and it's all just a misunderstanding. I'm sure there is someone he could choose that these people are more familiar with and would make him more understanding to people opposing him.

Mr Pheer 01-03-2012 11:01 PM

If Paul wins the nomination and then pick Ventura for his running mate, then I will have no one to vote for with confidence. I would simply be voting against Obama and all other incumbents. I really hope he would make a better selection.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123