|
50 Reasons Rand Paul will Never be President...
Obama and Romney addressed the Benghazi issue during the Presidential debates prior to the election: As I recall, Obama won the election... :upsidedow Not sure if anyone happened to read about the 29 proposals put forth by the independent task force that the State Department commissioned to report on how to better defend against other such future attacks: Quote:
I know that I am not alone in hoping that Hillary Clinton will become the first female US President in 2016. :stoned ADG |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It means nothing. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1571789.html He wasn't arguing that women shouldn't be paid the same as men. He was arguing AGAINST allowing judges to decide wages paid instead of performance. I saw that picture you posted and decided to google it up for myself. As usual, these political pictures are full of lies on the part of the people who create them to fit their agenda. |
Clinton is a piece of work. She knows damn well what went down. She knows full well those people were there tracking weapons we sold to the "rebels" aka Al Qaeda. And she knows full well the reason for the attack was because they got pissed because of that. Once again our two-faced policies bit us in the ass. She's a piece of shit liar and a bad actor pounding her hands on the table claiming it doesn't matter now and we just need to figure out why. "Some guys walking down the street decided they were going to kill them" my ass.. That bitch makes me sick.. I hope she dies a slow painful death.. Too bad she didn't weeks ago. She probably knew the ambassador personally, allowed him to be killed with no remorse whatsoever. In her mind it was "doing his country a service." She should see the same fate. Yesterday wouldn't be soon enough.
|
Great find and good job posting. We need to hold those in power accountable. Hillary Clinton got an earful there.
|
Quote:
|
uhhh...totally roasted...
|
Quote:
This is the same reason idiots keep on reelecting the same fucking senators who have been in office for decades. Some idiot in California gets their ballot and sees Diane Feinstein's name on there compared to a bunch of no-names and figures "Oh, Feinstein, I know that name... she's been there for years, she must be doing a good job.. I'll vote for her." lol |
Quote:
|
Biden is probably more clueless than Bush was. At least Bush's dad was President and head of CIA and his grandfather was bankroller of Hitler.. Not to give that little fuckin weasel any credit. Biden.. A nobody. SO less than a weasel. Obama would be somewhere below less than a weasel. It seems we keep electing the lowest of the low. The biggest piece of shit you are the highest the rank.
|
GOP the party of NO. Only way they will win next time is if they redraw districts and cheat. Oh wait....
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh The US is not a democracy, it's a Republic. State houses can give their college votes to however they want and also draw House boundaries |
Total douche move by Paul. Mentioning this event and 9/11 in the same sentence? Cracka please:disgust
There were eleven diplomatic attacks in the Bush years, a number of which included US fatalities. Where was the right-wing outrage at the Administration then? Wait, there wasn't any. From either side. Why? Because grownups know you can't prevent every attack. In other words, sometimes shit just happens. But somehow, this was 'the worst security breach since 9/11'? Yeah okay, i guess those 11 'security breaches' under Bush don't count. I mean the willful amnesia and utter hypocrisy is just...wow. Listen, grandstanding is a staple of political life, but this was fucking pathetic. |
|
|
Rand Paul thinks that civil rights were good for government based jobs ONLY and he would abolish them in the private sector. When asked what if a diner puts up a sign the next day saying "No Blacks Allowed" he answered that he would hope that the most important color to the business owner would be green and that they wouldn't do that because it would hurt their bottom line.
So yeah.. I take him VERY seriously.. as a threat. To intelligent discussion. |
Quote:
He's against the Americans with Disabilities Act He thinks Restaurants should be allowed to refuse service to black people He thought Obama was un American for hitting BP for the oil spill. but mostly he was out of line with his comment to Hillary Clinton. He didn't even come close to being nominated by the republicans to run for President, but he used the hearing with Clinton to say "If I were president I would have fired you", clearly to be quoted and used later when he tries to run for president again in 2016. It was pointless, weak grandstanding in my view. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
How is that considered "restaurants should be allowed to refuse service to black people?" I would hope that the most important color is green to for any business restaurant or not. Quote:
He didn't run for President. His dad did. |
Quote:
I watched most of the republican convention, and one of the key things i noticed was how fractured the party seemed. The support for Romney was tepid at best. Like i said, there were like a half dozen leading lights of the party in prime-time speaking slots. I watched every single one basically say "here's why i'm so great, here's my vision, talk talk talk. oh and by the way, vote for mitt romney. thank you, good night" |
Quote:
IMO, it's because he's a totally honest man who'd do things like go after the big banks for the massive fraud they perpetrated, which caused the financial crisis. But anyhow, here's Ron's own words on that: Mr. Paul, in an interview, said convention planners had offered him an opportunity to speak under two conditions: that he deliver remarks vetted by the Romney campaign, and that he give a full-fledged endorsement of Mr. Romney. He declined. “It wouldn’t be my speech,” Mr. Paul said. “That would undo everything I’ve done in the last 30 years. I don’t fully endorse him for president.” |
You know Rand Paul is pandering to the idiots of the nation when he calls Benghazi the biggest tragedy since 9/11.
|
Quote:
|
It's the coverup guys. THAT is the outrage.
Remember Pres. Nixon left office to avoid impeachment for trying to cover up a botched burglary that he didn't even know about at the time. It's always the stupid coverups that undo people. Since it was in the homestretch of the election, the Obama team decided to cover it up with the stupid "video" story. If there's one thing I have learned it is to just go ahead and admit when you fuck up and move on. Covering it up always comes back to bite you in the ass. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The area outside the compound before the assault was quiet; one Libyan guard who was wounded in the attack was quoted as saying ?there wasn?t a single ant outside.?[25] There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam's Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film." |
Quote:
1) msnbc has a liberal bent 24/7 As i've said a zillion times, see sig 2) in terms of your comparison w/Faux As i've said a zillion times, see sig and then continue As someone who believes both the Dem & Rep parties are utterly worthless and corrupt to their cores,,,,, At this point in time, the dem talking heads etc have the luxury of being able to deal in facts far more than the reps. That said, 98% (or more) of elected officials - regardless of party - are nothing more than whores to their big money paymasters. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hilary has four years to prepare for her presidency. And you can believe she plans on doing even less to protect Americans when she "wins" that election....
|
1. There was no consulate in Benghazi, it was a CIA base.
2. DTK is 100% right, there were 11 attacks under Bush and nobody cared that much. 3. Robbie is right about the cover up but this isn't even that bad compared to the attack in Jeddah that is still blamed on Al Queda when there are numerous reports it was done by groups linked to an influential Saudi Prince. 4. Rand Paul has no credibility at all, he claims to be a libertarian but sold out his dad, his "beliefs", and most of his supporters by backing Romney. He has no shot at being president because his "personal freedoms" message is in direct conflict with the Christian base of the republican party Imagine if the US government had spent as much time on investigating the 9/11 attacks, but there were no political points to score off doing that. They should be grilling Clinton about covering up the drone network and the civillian casulties caused from "targeted" bombings. |
Quote:
she wasn't being grilled about preparation, she was being grilled about how the story was 'there was a huge protest, and the embassy got attacked' there was no protest, the embassy was 'randomly' attacked by 'a large group of heavily armed' individuals, and during the 7 hour firefight at the capital of a nation those people just worked to create, they requested military assistance 3 times. All of which were denied. Furthermore, this marks the first terrorist attack on september 11th, since september 11th, 2001. which is really just a little too rich. |
It's so obvious this is a Republican witch hunt. They're transparent.
Rand Paul is fucking nutcase and Hillary Clinton is one of the most well respected politicians in the last few decades. Do the math. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you're a fan of Rand Paul, then it speaks to your own values. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I mean, fucking seriously....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack Quote:
This is a fucking witch hunt, nothing more, nothing less. |
Quote:
Why do you think 100-150 militants attacked this small little embassy? Especially militants we armed? That's the real problem here. They are covering up the fact that we armed these militants and they were pissed at this particular base of operations actions of meddling in their affairs. IE. one of the dead soldiers stated publicly he was there tracking the weapons we armed them with. Quote:
|
Quote:
I saw an article that said (in 2011) 100,000 more people moved out of CA than moved in. In a state with 37,000,000 people, does that count as a drove? Droves? The tax thing is a red herring. It's cost of living. The 3 states seeing the greatest number of CA transplants (TX, AZ, NV) all have dramatically lower costs of living. Check this out: http://money.cnn.com/calculator/pf/cost-of-living/ example: Cost of living in Houston is nearly half that of San Francisco. That's because of taxes? Yeah right. Try housing cost, for starts. |
did anyone take the time to listen to her responses? :1orglaugh she slammed all of them. The State Dept's requests for allocation more funding for security at embassy's was granted by the senate but has been consistently help up by the house.
Leave it to Comedy Central to show the biased OP's little charade. |
Quote:
Not to mention the hypocritical Rand Paul wanted to cut the State Dept funding by 71%. http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/...ghazi-hearing/ |
Quote:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/videos/...-her-cool.html |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123