GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   World War Z (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1109759)

CDSmith 05-26-2013 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19639475)
Zombies have been getting less scary over the years, whether they do the fast or slow ones. But I have to admit, its freaky to see them organically massing into a giant pile of flailing zombies that moves as one.

I'm kind of down on this movie because it looks like they only took the name of the book. It should have been a TV series or mini series, because that's the only thing that could do justice to such a deep, expansive novel.

You guys have got me curious now, I must read this book.


Fifty shades of zombie!

dehash 05-26-2013 08:18 AM

By the way I read the book after I Am Legend. Book is better.

AllAboutCams 05-26-2013 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dehash (Post 19641282)
By the way I read the book after I Am Legend. Book is better.

is there a 2 and 3 of i am legend?

dehash 05-26-2013 06:47 PM

Book or movie? I only aware of one movie and one book. Movie makers completely changed everything.

slapass 05-26-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TracyCam (Post 19630601)
I read they missed the 2012 doomsday date and called back the actors re-shoot many scenes because the movie really sucks and already way over budget.

Always a good sign.

decayy 05-27-2013 08:22 AM

it will be great to see that movie in cinema... ^^

cthulhu_waves 06-04-2013 04:07 AM

Reviews have started to come in.

http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/...asp?FID=137228

So I guess the submarine scene won't be happening in this movie. :(

Big fan of the Book and the full cast audio version. I know seeing the trailer this film IS NOT the book. I will still be going to see the film as I like zombie films.

Just really do NOT understand why they did not take the full cast audio and use that format with epic flash backs showing the plight around the world.

I wonder if De Caprio (if he had won when going for this franchise) would have been more faithful.

Just such a shame the author Max Brooke's, has distanced himself from this film. That says a LOT right there.

CDSmith 06-04-2013 07:05 AM

The pre-buzz on this film is awesome and hilarious. Makes me look forward to seeing it that much more.

"It's going to rock!"
"It's going to suck!"
"The author doesn't support it"
"Fuck the author!"

I predict this film, which is thus far a money pitt, (pun intended, ha) will pass the $400 mil invested and actually end up making money, and then they'll absolutely clean up with the subsequent vid game sales. I further predict there will be a sequel.

webgurl 06-04-2013 07:43 AM

Yes! I like this type of genre of movies....

cthulhu_waves 06-04-2013 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19654126)
I further predict there will be a sequel.

Well based on the Empire online review, it appears that the first movie is set up to have sequels.

CDSmith 06-05-2013 07:44 AM

The critics, well many of them, mostly glorified movie bloggers, are panning it so far.

I reserve judgement.

CDSmith 06-24-2013 10:43 AM

So what's the verdict? Anyone here see it yet?

Although I'm pretty sure that even a hundred people could say they hated it and I'd still watch it and judge for myself. There hasn't been an action/sci-fi/horror movie that has piqued my pre-interest this much in a long time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cthulhu_waves (Post 19654273)
Well based on the Empire online review, it appears that the first movie is set up to have sequels.

Hopefully that proves true. You can never have too much zombie content.

AllAboutCams 06-24-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19684370)
So what's the verdict? Anyone here see it yet?

Although I'm pretty sure that even a hundred people could say they hated it and I'd still watch it and judge for myself. There hasn't been an action/sci-fi/horror movie that has piqued my pre-interest this much in a long time.



Hopefully that proves true. You can never have too much zombie content.

I really liked it was better than i was expecting good story line

I see a few people say its setup for more but what makes you think that?

Phoenix 06-24-2013 10:56 AM

i just bought the book...will read it first then see the movie :)

CDSmith 06-24-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19684385)
i just bought the book...will read it first then see the movie :)

I'm quite interested to know if the movie followed the book at all, or how close or far apart are they, and which was better. (It's usually the book that is far better, but you never know)

Do share once you know. :thumbsup

Freax 06-24-2013 01:57 PM

Cool movie! I like it...its nothing you have to think about after the movie is finished. Pure entertainment.

Maybe we need a Hardcore Porn Version of that?!!

georgeyw 06-24-2013 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 19629275)


I'm looking forward to seeing this movie too but something in first part of the trailer really bugs me.

At 0:17 the bike seems to be going really fast despite the fact that it has a short time to get to that speed and that it is driving between cars. Ok, the bike can easily get up to speed and drive that way, but it "feels" funny.

At 0:19 the establishing shot shows they are on a very long road but the shot at 0:25 clearly shows he is on a short road. There is a building right behind brad pit that is 4 to maybe 6 car lengths away.

Then at 0:37 the cop gets hit by a garbage truck which could never have got up to speed in that short distance, and never makes a sound, and should have been seen in the shot at 0:34. The continuity established by the cop yelling "Get back in your car right now" makes the garbage truck "appear out of nowhere".

Edited this way as a trailer-only is really sloppy and cheap. I hope the movie isn't done like this and I hope this scene is much better.

I am done nit-picking for today.

Better trailer here:


I liked how they were in the middle of a traffic jam and a truck hit the bike cop out of no where. Kinda retarded :2 cents:

MrBottomTooth 06-24-2013 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dehash (Post 19641876)
Book or movie? I only aware of one movie and one book. Movie makers completely changed everything.

Wasnt it just a remake of the omega man with charlton heston?

nexcom28 06-24-2013 02:53 PM

Watched this movie on the weekend and really enjoyed it, yes it's a bit stupid but I thought it was worth watching.

crockett 06-24-2013 05:03 PM

Saw it last night.. It was OK but the ending was predictable. Not to mention that the zeds could smash any door except the one when the chick and scientist retreated back to the who building.

bronco67 06-24-2013 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19655833)
The critics, well many of them, mostly glorified movie bloggers, are panning it so far.

I reserve judgement.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/world-war-z/

CDSmith 06-24-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19685108)

Just a link, no comment from you? What gives? :winkwink:

Several pans there, but nice to see plenty of positive comments as well. I rarely read reviews from critics, largely because so many of them come off as idiots in my opinion, that it just ends up annoying me.

'Movie critic' --- that has to be the suckiest job ever. Pay is probably good for some, but would you really tell a chick you're dating "I'm a critic"? You'd probably never get laid, ha ha... but I digress...


Anyway they could have given this film a complete ass-raping of a rating and I'd still see it. The apocalyptic/post-apocalyptia/zombo genres fascinate me to no end.

CDSmith 06-25-2013 11:31 AM

Best price I could find in the book so far: $7.74

http://www.bookdepository.com/book/9... 1cMgodX1oAuA


In that same search result I found this: World War Z - Movie vs Book - Four Major Differences
Quote:

Carnahan's pass scrapped the book's "oral history" structure of a collection of first-person interviews and focused on a single former United Nations field specialist and family man named Gerry Lane, who is not a character in Brooks's novel (well, he kind of is, but we'll get to that later). The movie became an action adventure about a man fighting off zombie hordes as he tries to reunite with his wife and kids.

J. Falcon 06-25-2013 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19684969)
Saw it last night.. It was OK but the ending was predictable. Not to mention that the zeds could smash any door except the one when the chick and scientist retreated back to the who building.

Nice thanks for giving away important parts of the movie.

bronco67 06-25-2013 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19685216)
Just a link, no comment from you? What gives? :winkwink:

Several pans there, but nice to see plenty of positive comments as well. I rarely read reviews from critics, largely because so many of them come off as idiots in my opinion, that it just ends up annoying me.

'Movie critic' --- that has to be the suckiest job ever. Pay is probably good for some, but would you really tell a chick you're dating "I'm a critic"? You'd probably never get laid, ha ha... but I digress...


Anyway they could have given this film a complete ass-raping of a rating and I'd still see it. The apocalyptic/post-apocalyptia/zombo genres fascinate me to no end.

The thing with rotten tomatoes is, it doesn't matter really what any one individual critic says. You're looking at the meta data. I look at that meter as a general consensus of a random group of people, not nitpicky critics.

bronco67 06-25-2013 06:29 PM

I saw it today. Not the best movie, but I found some of the parts really intense. I like the "slow" part at the lab, even though it made the movie feel like it fizzled at the end considering how frantic the first 2/3 was.

I bit one of my fingernails too far during that plane scene. Ouch that shit hurts now.

Phoenix 06-25-2013 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19684418)
I'm quite interested to know if the movie followed the book at all, or how close or far apart are they, and which was better. (It's usually the book that is far better, but you never know)

Do share once you know. :thumbsup

I am well into the book right now...it is awesome.
I will finish it shortly sadly, but i doubt the movie could cover all this.

I think it will end up being a few movies

bronco67 06-25-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19686987)
I am well into the book right now...it is awesome.
I will finish it shortly sadly, but i doubt the movie could cover all this.

I think it will end up being a few movies

The movie has almost nothing to do with the book. Maybe in the vaguest of spirits it resembles it, but they just took the title and did their own thing.

I think each needs to be looked at as their own separate piece of unrelated zombie works.

While reading the book, but I remember thinking "this would make a great HBO mini series."

JockoHomo 06-25-2013 08:19 PM

Zombies bore the fuck out of me. All one has to do is to look at the physics of movement of the human body to understand that rotting muscle is not capable of the mechanics necessary for moving the skeletal framework...not even in the slow lumbering manner zombies are typically portrayed.

Not only that but the sensory organs such as the ability to see to target prey (living humans) is dependent on working eyes which work in conjunction with a working brain...neither of these zombies have.

Simply ruins the entire concept of the zombie movie for me I am afraid.

Far-L 06-25-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JockoHomo (Post 19687046)
Zombies bore the fuck out of me. All one has to do is to look at the physics of movement of the human body to understand that rotting muscle is not capable of the mechanics necessary for moving the skeletal framework...not even in the slow lumbering manner zombies are typically portrayed.

Not only that but the sensory organs such as the ability to see to target prey (living humans) is dependent on working eyes which work in conjunction with a working brain...neither of these zombies have.

Simply ruins the entire concept of the zombie movie for me I am afraid.

Thanks. Now you gotta go and ruin it for everyone else.

Bet you like telling kids there is no Santa and the tooth fairy looks exactly like Mom.

Nudnick.

xNetworx 06-26-2013 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JockoHomo (Post 19687046)
Zombies bore the fuck out of me. All one has to do is to look at the physics of movement of the human body to understand that rotting muscle is not capable of the mechanics necessary for moving the skeletal framework...not even in the slow lumbering manner zombies are typically portrayed.

Not only that but the sensory organs such as the ability to see to target prey (living humans) is dependent on working eyes which work in conjunction with a working brain...neither of these zombies have.

Simply ruins the entire concept of the zombie movie for me I am afraid.

I bet you are tons of fun to party with

nikki99 06-26-2013 07:32 AM

looks good :)

cthulhu_waves 06-26-2013 07:52 AM

I agreed with the critics, the movie was action-packed but it was pretty hollow. The book truly is superior. I read somewhere that from the start, the movie wasn't going to be an adaptation but they kept that part from the public, and Max Brooks allegedly wasn't closely involved with the production.

TROLLENSTEIN 06-26-2013 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JockoHomo (Post 19687046)
Zombies bore the fuck out of me. All one has to do is to look at the physics of movement of the human body to understand that rotting muscle is not capable of the mechanics necessary for moving the skeletal framework...not even in the slow lumbering manner zombies are typically portrayed.

Not only that but the sensory organs such as the ability to see to target prey (living humans) is dependent on working eyes which work in conjunction with a working brain...neither of these zombies have.

Simply ruins the entire concept of the zombie movie for me I am afraid.

I like to think that Zombies have their body-state "frozen" when they become infected and it's over a period of time that their body becomes damaged by the elements, disease, bumping into stuff etc, until the "virus", or whatever agent is used to turn them into the Zombie, itself dies/fades and rapid decomposition starts to take place.

If you look at the "Zombies" in 28 Days Later (ja, I know some don't think of them as Zombies) for example they are infected with a virus that causes them to go berserk, so they could last a pretty long time with full motor functions and be able to sprint etc. If you then look at Romero's idea of Zombies from Dawn of the Dead they get infected and over a period of time their bodies start to degenerate into the typical "zombie" look.

Having said all that, it's a Zombie movie, best not to over-think it and just enjoy the action :)

Slappin Fish 06-26-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JockoHomo (Post 19687046)
Zombies bore the fuck out of me. All one has to do is to look at the physics of movement of the human body to understand that rotting muscle is not capable of the mechanics necessary for moving the skeletal framework...not even in the slow lumbering manner zombies are typically portrayed.

Not only that but the sensory organs such as the ability to see to target prey (living humans) is dependent on working eyes which work in conjunction with a working brain...neither of these zombies have.

Simply ruins the entire concept of the zombie movie for me I am afraid.

They are far from slow in World War Z, their muscles don't have time to rot and they have barely functioning eyes. So you should love this one.

CDSmith 06-27-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JockoHomo (Post 19687046)
Zombies bore the fuck out of me. All one has to do is to look at the physics of movement of the human body to understand that rotting muscle is not capable of the mechanics necessary for moving the skeletal framework...not even in the slow lumbering manner zombies are typically portrayed.

Not only that but the sensory organs such as the ability to see to target prey (living humans) is dependent on working eyes which work in conjunction with a working brain...neither of these zombies have.

Simply ruins the entire concept of the zombie movie for me I am afraid.

No, what's ruining it for you is all that overthinking you're doing. You need to put all that physiological bullshit out of your mind and just enjoy it for what it is. That being fantasy entertainment.


Fantasy.

adultchatpay 06-28-2013 04:24 AM

I need to see this movie.

CDSmith 06-30-2013 10:25 PM

Opening weekend World War Z tops $250 million.

http://www.boxoffice.com/latest-news

I can remember when a big movie's opening w/e took in over $25 mill and it was a big deal.

bronco67 06-30-2013 10:30 PM

The more I think about the last third of the movie, the more I like it. They solved the problem in a smart way, not with endless shooting hordes of zombies -- like any other summer blockbuster would do.

lagcam 07-01-2013 08:39 AM

I have seen it and there are some incredible scenes. No spoilers from me, (if there are any left) but you shouldn't be in a thread talking about a movie if you haven't seen it and don't want spoliers.

All I can say is I can see where the $400 million was spent. Amazing special effects.

CDSmith 07-02-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagcam (Post 19694715)
All I can say is I can see where the $400 million was spent. Amazing special effects.

Yes, but I hear that much of the overbudget stems from callbacks, rewrites and reshooting several parts. Without all that weighing it down the cost of this movie could have possibly been at least half of what it ultimately ended up costing.

It'll still turn a sizeable profit I'm sure.

stephane76 07-02-2013 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19699288)
Yes, but I hear that much of the overbudget stems from callbacks, rewrites and reshooting several parts. Without all that weighing it down the cost of this movie could have possibly been at least half of what it ultimately ended up costing.

It'll still turn a sizeable profit I'm sure.

Granted, the film still has a long way to go before it reaches profitability. Vanity Fair's article about the production estimates the final budget at $225 million, and that would be before whatever the studio spent on marketing and distribution.

Current Box Office:$123.7M :helpme

CDSmith 07-02-2013 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephane76 (Post 19699368)
Granted, the film still has a long way to go before it reaches profitability. Vanity Fair's article about the production estimates the final budget at $225 million, and that would be before whatever the studio spent on marketing and distribution.

Current Box Office:$123.7M :helpme

Is that the USA or N American-only figure?

Because as I've already posted, boxoffice.com has reported that the total revenue on this movie world-wide was just over $250 mill their opening weekend.

They'll be profitable in no time I'm sure. Plus once they launch the video game the sky's the limit.

Some of those damn vid games earn more than blockbuster movies these days.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123