Why don't they just bomb the weapons depots to the north, south, east and west.

It is almost like everyone has totally forgotten the fact that you were lied to to get into Iraq. Ever play a game of Risk? Here is a clue to what the real agenda there is.

http://www.phibetaiota.net/wp-conten...bases-iran.jpg

We have them surrounded!

Sometimes I wonder if this was our intention. However, the logic behind this is pretty fucked up - You don't attack, invade, and overthrow one country just to get another country. We don't need to go through Iraq to get through Iran; We can go through Turkey or the Gulf, or Kuwait - Or through the Saudis.

Sorry, the goal is to own everything over there. you cant go directly into Iran because it will then force the sleeping giants to do something. In another twenty years you will have it done.

This is obvious to me. It is economics. Oil is too important to the economy for it to be left to chance.

:thumbsup

US aims to overthrow all independent govts in the Middle East

http://rt.com/op-edge/us-overthrow-middle-east-328/

"The US is not ?the cop of the world? and cannot ?attack any country,? but it follows its key agenda of removing all independent governments in the Middle East, Richard Becker from ANSWER Coalition told RT.

The real aim of the US "is to remove all the independent governments in the Middle East, to destroy the popular movements in order to secure the domination of this key strategic and oil rich region,? Becker said.

US President Barack Obama on Saturday formally requested Congressional authorization for military strikes on Syria in a bid to prevent more chemical attacks.

?Syria has not threatened and cannot threaten the US. So such a war would be a crime against peace,? Becker acknowledged.

RT: We are waiting to find out what Congress decides - but do you think Obama really would go it alone?

Richard Becker: Well he could go it alone. What we?ve seen is that there is an opposition around the world and in the US, and yesterday in the US there were demonstrations in dozens of cities opposing a new war against Syria. And that opposition is what forced Obama to pull back and say that he was going to Congress. It wasn?t a matter of change of sentiment or that he started to rethink things, except on the basis that there was such a great opposition and it presents great dangers. If they launch a war, it would not only be reckless, it would also be lawless and would have unforeseeable consequences as all wars do before they begin.

RT: No matter what Congress says shouldn't the President be more concerned about what the American people think?

RB: I think that they are going to try in the next week is to wage a campaign using the corporate media in the US which really functions as the fourth branch of government in times of crisis, particularly war crisis. They will try to convince the people in the US that there is justification, but there is no justification. First of all it defies logic that the Assad government would have used chemical weapons at exactly the moment they were winning and the UN inspectors were there. But secondly if that had happened the US do not have the authority, it is not the ?cop of the world?, to attack any country. And Syria has not threatened and cannot threaten the US. So such a war would be a crime against peace.

RT: With Secretary of State Kerry saying the US has proof - is Washington guilty of riding roughshod over the UN inspectors who are working to determine IF there was indeed a chemical attack?

RB: What the US is really convinced of is not the so much the accuracy of their information as of their objective. Their objective has been for a long time to remove, to overthrow the government in Syria. The day after the fall of Baghdad on April 10 2003, a State Department official John Bolton said that Syria, Iran and North Korea should learn the lesson of Iraq. What is it, if not a terrorist threat? But it also indicates to us what the real aim is, and that is to remove all the independent governments in the Middle East, to destroy the popular movements in order to secure the domination of this key strategic and oil rich region.

RT: Iraq's just voted against intervention at the Arab League - is this not ironic given the fact the country has supposedly been liberated by US forces?

RB: We can see the tragedy of Iraq. The horrible tragedy that everyday people are dying there: over a million people were killed, five million were made refugees, and over a quarter of the population was killed, wounded or made refugees by the US intervention and occupation. I can certainly understand why any government in Iraq that was loyal to the interest of the Iraqi people would want to vote ?no? in another such intervention."

sorry, iran is not the be all end game for usa in the middle east.

The middle east is the game. Iran is just a player in it.

It's going to approach a 9/11 conspiracy theory before long. The Syrian Red Crescent says that the Syrian government banned them from going in to help the victims. Government official said "they're big liars" in an interview when asked about it. How many people in positions to know things are we going to have to say are in on a lie? We're getting there, yes we are.

well sure, i do have a general understanding of the middle east and usa relations.

but i'm still not seeing this iran is surrounded to get iran plan. maybe i am not sure what you are saying.

i have no idea what you are alluding to here.

It was in a rebel-held area so their safety couldn't be guaranteed :2 cents:

yeah, i acutally did google that name and it came back with that ad agency.

are you suggesting this was a scheme that included an ad agency tasked with doing the actual hack and they messed up and used their own name as the registar?

i'm not seeing the relation between that and my comment that you quoted.

So, I have to group you with wehateporn? That sucks, a new low for GFY

Please commit suicide . . . today.

Thanks in advance

That's because you have a simple mind :2 cents:

In fact, does any evidence exist showing that you're not a TrollBot?

oh, i see. wasn't getting that.

With the comments you make. why would anyone care what you think?
Commit suicide is the best you can come up with?

The fact that your children will be paying for needless wars, and that you don't give a shit.
You also don't give a shit about radiation because you don't care about future generations speaks volumes about you. Your kids and your neighbours kids will be paying for land grabs in the middle east for their whole life.

But hey, lets throw out insults and meaningless comments like go kill yourself as a rebuttal. Your IQ is really showing lately.

It is a fact that the US has been meddling in the middle east for the last 50 years. They even admitted recently to overthrowing Iran back in the 50's.

Your comment the other day. Allow me to paraphrase...something akin to, What are we waiting for? Lets get in there and bomb syria. Kudos. brilliance.

I am trying to have a rational discussion about a possible war involving young kids on both sides dying for what appears to be nothing more then land grabs. What are you doing exactly? I mean besides pounding your war drum.

I am guessing it is just cheaper to let an ad agency run the website. Nothing of importance is stored there. It isn't like they could hack marines.com and get access to classified reports.

So the ad agency runs it and gets to sell ad spots to corporations and pays money to the marines for it.
no conspiracy here.

#1. The commit suicide was to WHP, not you
#2. When have I suggested we should go in and bomb Syria? I don't want us to do anything there but leave it alone. Let them kill themselves.

From your thread.
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1119748

Sorry was Have we attacked Syria yet?
Wtf is taking so long? Was that supposed to mean something else?

Some clever metaphor that sailed over my stupid Canadian head?

I know fully well your suicide comment was directed at WHP. It doesn't excuse that fact that it is a lousy retort to someone who puts a lot of thought into his responses.
Don't like what he has to say?? Refute it with science and facts. Try not to stoop to grade 3 and sling shit.

Otherwise your opinion is shit.

If you had been paying attention to the other threads on page 1 of GFY when I put that up you might have noticed that everyone was preparing for WWIII. I will attempt to remember to put </sarcasm> by every sarcastic comment I make . . . for the Canadians </sarcasm>

As far as WHP is concerned, he is a waste of resources, resources that would be better used for your son and my grandson. But as long as his theory agrees with yours (the evil US is attempting to take over the Middle East, Putin is the good guy out there), then you will never see anything wrong with it.

yeha, the dumbshit remark makes even more sense now, if they could only knock the site out for a moment and all it is is a bullshit marketing site, well. i think we're ok.

:1orglaugh

Absolutely. I'm not necessarily opposed to supporting a group of people or a country - I'm opposed to not thinking it through. If you say you're going to help for 10 years, then help for 10 years. Don't stop at 5 because of a policy change.

That's when people get mad.

Two words: Halliburton Pipeline

My question was about same meme. There was no disagreement between Taliban/Al Qaeda and the USA. Furthermore, Taliban and Al Qaeda were created and supported by the USA (training, money, weapons etc). You have raised a monster and get paid back with the good in 2001. Now your government is going to repeat it in Syria.

You have too many skyscrapers? Or maybe you have too many ambassadors (yes, I'm talking about that "thank you" from "grateful Libyan rebels")? Why does your country always support terrorists?

i have no idea what you are droning on about here, you obviously do not either

i didn't create jackshit, certainly not al qaeda. you think the american people have some sort of say in what the cia does? what fucking grade are you in?

you think we got paid back "good" in 2001?

fuck you you coward shit ass punk mother fucker.

you truly have no fucking idea what you are dealing with here because anybody that thinks like you, thinking an average american has anything to do with choosing covert cia operations, is really and truly a class a fucking idiot.

jtfc.

Don't play stupid please. When I said "you", I clearly meant your government. The government that you (I mean the American people, not you personally) have voted for and pay taxes to.

You think you weren't? If you (again not you personally) support terrorism, be ready to get stabbed in the back by the monster, you have created :2 cents:



"Nice" video, isn't it? Please tell me it's not true.

let's at least get 1 thing very fucking straight here.

the cia is not representative of the governement at all and it is certainly not representative of the american people.

YOU can't expect me to think you know the fucking difference when you make bullshit comments like it was "good" 3000 innocent people were killed on 9/11.

you said that shit, not me, i've never said anybody's (middle eastern or otherwise) death/murder is good and i will never agree with someone that thinks it was good thing to kill those people on 9/11 and *we* got what we deserve.

And one more thing. Zbigniew Brzezinski is not a covert CIA agent. According to the video above he is one of those men behind the Al Qaeda, so he is responsible for 9/11. Why he is not in the jail then? Your army has killed thousands of civilians in Afghanistan in "pursuit" of Osama, while one of the most important co-participant is free and living in your country. How could this happen?

i remember this dyna mo being normal, the past couple of weeks he's posting his ass off with all kinds of weird shit... probably hit his head or something

another retarded gem of baddogs horrible oneliners :thumbsup

again, you are completely and absolutely fucked in the head.

yes, i get it, you believe in some sort of primitive eye for an eye, but with a twist, any eye will do, even civilians working in a high rise are a fair target for you, because, hey, the cia started it.


you are a fucking coward piece of shit.

Man you are an idiot. I never said that it's "good" to kill 3000 or even 1 man or woman. I said the terrorists have "paid back with the good". Don't you see the difference? Educate yourself :2 cents:

You have some serious mental problems, man :2 cents:

i've never even noticed your posts. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Who is responsible for the CIA actions then if not the american government?