GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Militias ?mobilizing? to support embattled Clark County rancher in clash with federal rangers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1138132)

Best-In-BC 04-11-2014 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20046267)
I don't know who is wrong or right -- but I do know it's getting harder for cops be dicks when an entire crowd is taking smartphone video. Just imagine if there was no video of the incident. There would be some tazed people laying all over the place.

Every law enforcement org should be videotaping every interaction they make with the public. It would probably keep cops in line more, and show exactly how something went down.

Yeah, every cop needs a camera on him at all times while on duty, if that's a problem, they should all be fired on the spot.

SilentKnight 04-11-2014 03:52 PM

After readin' all this thread...still not sure which side to take.

I'll wait for the skirmish clips on YT.

baddog 04-11-2014 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20046504)
Did you even read any of the shitty articles? Hell I even posted it here. He has almost one thousand cows and he stopped paying fees 20 years ago. :error:error:error:error

as I was saying . . .

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20046538)
that's a pretty extreme claim. Besides, fracking can take place with cattle around. those 2 things can mutually exist. Hell, companies are fracking in neighborhoods elsewhere, there's no reason to clear out the cattle so the blm can do fracking leases.

I always loved his news sources

And if they let Bundy stay, why can't everyone else bring their cattle there?

crockett 04-11-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 20046983)
After readin' all this thread...still not sure which side to take.

I'll wait for the skirmish clips on YT.

Yea it's kind of a odd case. I was leaning toward siding with the govt on this, but now it seems not quite 100% cut and dry. I still think it's questionable if he has any rights if he didn't keep paying, but seems to be some uncertainty about that as well.

At this point I'll just wait and see what plays out.

crockett 04-11-2014 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 20047029)
as I was saying . . .



I always loved his news sources

And if they let Bundy stay, why can't everyone else bring their cattle there?

It seems ranchers did have their cattle there and it was completely legal, but the govt changed the rules and set a limit of 150 head of cattle per lease. This is what it seems started the issues in the past they could have several thousand head if they wanted.

Matt 26z 04-11-2014 07:00 PM

If something about this story doesn't add up, read this:

http://www.infowars.com/breaking-sen...f-bundy-ranch/

Sen. Harry Reid and his son set up a deal with the Chinese government for one of their power companies to use area land for a solar farm, so this rancher had to go.

Yes, it was technically illegal for the rancher to continue using the land, but the state of Nevada and locals did not care. This was entirely a federal government action that was unwanted by the state and locals.

Bump this thread in several years. Harry Reid and/or his son will have profited big money from this. More importantly, they should have given this project to an American company. Apparently there is more money for them in selling out to the Chinese.

tony286 04-12-2014 04:05 AM

The guy said fuck you I'm not paying because of some Mormon bullshit. He said they had no rights to be the landlord. When consider he stopped paying in 93, they gave him lots of rope. Also info wars is fiction.people are posting opinion sites and op pages. Read the Las Vegas review article sums it all up without the hyper partisan bullshit. And vend if i posted daily kos or mother Jones links you would be bitching how they are bullshit.

EddyTheDog 04-12-2014 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 20047107)
...Yes, it was technically illegal for the rancher to continue using the land...

So if it's only 'technically' illegal it's OK?..

It's you conspiracy nuts that use these minor technicalities to screw your pet targets day in day out - Sorry, it works both ways.....

AaronM 04-12-2014 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20046284)
It seems ranchers are allowed to use the BLM land for cattle grazing, but they have to pay a fee. This guy seems to be the only guy whom refuses to pay the fee as all the other ranchers in the area do pay it....


All of what other ranchers are paying these fees? There are ZERO other ranchers as the BLM ran them all out. Bundy is literally the last man standing.

This thread is overflowing with misinformation and ignorant opinions...Even for GFY standards. :2 cents:

potter 04-12-2014 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20046284)
Well after digging through a bunch of shitty articles...


It seems ranchers are allowed to use the BLM land for cattle grazing, but they have to pay a fee. This guy seems to be the only guy whom refuses to pay the fee as all the other ranchers in the area do pay it. Added to this this Cliven Bundy guy used to pay the fee but he stopped paying in 1993 claiming he had the right to use the land for free because of his Mormon ancestors.

He claims he owes 300k in fees the fed govt says it's closer to 1.1 mil in fees from 1993 to now and it's just short of 1k cows.

So it's a case of some guy thinks he can use public land for free to make money with out paying a dime because his ancestors did, but they don't own the land nor does he. On the flip side regardless if it's $300k or 1 mil that's a lot of money to pay in fees, but I guess we are taking over 20 years meaning 300k probably isn't bad if he had on average a thousand cows each of those 20 years. 1 mil is likely pretty excessive..

Exactly, guy is a crazy one and tried to freeload and cheat the system.

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 20046384)
this is hitting banoosh and OWS as of yesterday

tazering pregnant women is bad mojo

Survival of the fittest, if you're pregnant and go obstructing justice and get yourself tazered - hopefully that baby isn't born and those genetics aren't passed on to another generation.

dyna mo 04-12-2014 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20047297)
The guy said fuck you I'm not paying because of some Mormon bullshit. He said they had no rights to be the landlord. When consider he stopped paying in 93, they gave him lots of rope. Also info wars is fiction.people are posting opinion sites and op pages. Read the Las Vegas review article sums it all up without the hyper partisan bullshit. And vend if i posted daily kos or mother Jones links you would be bitching how they are bullshit.

which lvr article?

http://www.reviewjournal.com/search/...type%3Aarticle

I just read all 11 articles in that search and none of them had any better non-partisan explanation of events than the one I posted on page 1 here.

particularly, which lvr article are you claiming clearly reveals bundy is motivated purely by his religion?

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20047297)
The guy said fuck you I'm not paying because of some Mormon bullshit. He said they had no rights to be the landlord. When consider he stopped paying in 93, they gave him lots of rope. Also info wars is fiction.people are posting opinion sites and op pages. Read the Las Vegas review article sums it all up without the hyper partisan bullshit. And vend if i posted daily kos or mother Jones links you would be bitching how they are bullshit.

Please tell me just once where I blew off something because of the source and only the source, that has been a tool of the liberal leaning on this forum of which you are one of.

Because I'm against our present administration, everyone calls me a republican, I'm a registered Libertarian.

It would probably shock you to know I read Mother Jones, but they have nothing on the Bundy Ranch.

And the Daily Kos is blaming right wing news sources for the problems.

I read several of the liberal news sites, I'm going to buying advertising from them soon for something I'm working on

trevesty 04-12-2014 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20046243)
Not sure what to think about this so far, but I do think the BLM sending all those idiot officers with tasers out and dogs barking is not the right way to deal with protesters.

We have a right to protest, no matter what the cause, people on this forum bash the Tea party because they have a different view, but they have the right to protest. I hope this doesn't turn into another WACO, because believe it or not, there wasn't any illegal guns found there and that's why they "Said" They raided them for.

The rancher threatened violence if they did anything. That's pretty easy to find out by reading the reuters article. He's pretty much said "I don't have to obey the law, come try and make me assholes lol!! i'm so tough!!"

Now they're making him their bitch rightfully so.

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047465)
He's pretty much said "I don't have to obey the law, come try and make me assholes lol!! i'm so tough!!"

Now they're making him their bitch rightfully so.

You putting words in someones mouth makes you look like a real asshole.

If he had threatened the officials, they would have arrested him, you're not very smart are you?

I've actually read a lot of this and I have yet to see where he has made any threats other than he has a gun. Stay out of these threads till you can muster an opinion based on fact and not hype!

trevesty 04-12-2014 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 20047369)
All of what other ranchers are paying these fees? There are ZERO other ranchers as the BLM ran them all out. Bundy is literally the last man standing.

This thread is overflowing with misinformation and ignorant opinions...Even for GFY standards. :2 cents:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A390QI20140410

"Thousands of other ranchers".

trevesty 04-12-2014 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047468)
You putting words in someones mouth makes you look like a real asshole.

If he had threatened the officials, they would have arrested him, you're not very smart are you?

I've actually read a lot of this and I have yet to see where he has made any threats other than he has a gun. Stay out of these threads till you can muster an opinion based on fact and not hype!

Oh ok, well go have fun on infowars reading a bunch of bullshit by looney tune dorks off of their medication. :thumbsup

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047472)
Oh ok, well go have fun on infowars reading a bunch of bullshit by looney tune dorks off of their medication. :thumbsup

And you declare some defense of your stance defaming one of the sources used in this thread in defense of your ignorance, FAIL!

Look again dip shit, many sources have come up. Fuck, must be early in the morning for you!

trevesty 04-12-2014 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047476)
And you declare some defense of your stance defaming one of the sources used in this thread in defense of your ignorance, FAIL!

Look again dip shit, many sources have come up. Fuck, must be early in the morning for you!

Stop projecting old man. :winkwink:

dyna mo 04-12-2014 10:41 AM

quote of the week!

Quote:

No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047478)
Stop projecting old man. :winkwink:

I guess you are the one off his meds, what the fuck does my age have to do with it?

At least my mind still works, more than you can say!

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20047480)
quote of the week!




:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yeah, glad to see state officials are at least commenting.

trevesty 04-12-2014 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20047480)
quote of the week!




:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I laughed pretty hard at that also. :1orglaugh

trevesty 04-12-2014 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047481)
I guess you are the one off his meds, what the fuck does my age have to do with it?

At least my mind still works, more than you can say!

Whatever you've gotta tell yourself. :thumbsup

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047485)
Whatever you've gotta tell yourself. :thumbsup

What I have to tell myself, it seems you have voices in your head!

You put words into the mouth of people that clearly said nothing like that, you then blame one of many news sources mentioned in this thread as some kind of reason for your ignorance, then you make it about my age, are you the new GFY idiot?

dyna mo 04-12-2014 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047482)
Yeah, glad to see state officials are at least commenting.


i neglected to include the sources

it's from this link

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047471)

and it's Republican Governor Brian Sandoval

Here's more of what he said:

"Due to the roundup by the BLM, my office has received numerous complaints of BLM conduct, road closures and other disturbances. I have recently met with state legislators, county officials and concerned citizens to listen to their concerns.

I have expressed those concerns directly to the BLM. Most disturbing to me is the BLM's establishment of a 'First Amendment Area' that tramples upon Nevadans' fundamental rights under the U.S. Constitution.

To that end, I have advised the BLM that such conduct is offensive to me and countless others and that the 'First Amendment Area' should be dismantled immediately.

No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans.

The BLM needs to reconsider its approach to this matter and act accordingly."

dyna mo 04-12-2014 11:01 AM

the dilemma just keeps getting more intriguing to me! for 1 thing, it seems blm claims publically thta they are confiscating cattle and kiccking out bundy due to fees he owes but in court they filed documents claiming the reason they are evicting is due to the desert tortoise.

Another thing, apparently that's not federal land, it's state own land, so technically not blm's jurisdiction, from what I've read. But even more importantly, apparently Bundy's family has been ranching that land since before Nevada was even a state and their right to ranch that land is grand-fathered in.

trevesty 04-12-2014 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047487)
What I have to tell myself, it seems you have voices in your head!

You put words into the mouth of people that clearly said nothing like that, you then blame one of many news sources mentioned in this thread as some kind of reason for your ignorance, then you make it about my age, are you the new GFY idiot?

infowars is only a "news source" to a mental midget. it's an extreme right wing cesspool of foolery, but the fact that you call it a source demonstrates a lot about you.

Ignorance? Oh, ok. Well, if I'm ignorant because I don't fall for hyperbolic bullshit by the far-right, then so be it. I'm gladly "ignorant" then. Better than being an old, senile mental midget for sure.

trevesty 04-12-2014 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20047492)
the dilemma just keeps getting more intriguing to me! for 1 thing, it seems blm claims publically thta they are confiscating cattle and kiccking out bundy due to fees he owes but in court they filed documents claiming the reason they are evicting is due to the desert tortoise.

Another thing, apparently that's not federal land, it's state own land, so technically not blm's jurisdiction, from what I've read. But even more importantly, apparently Bundy's family has been ranching that land since before Nevada was even a state and their right to ranch that land is grand-fathered in.

My understanding is that the land in question(as well as other remote areas of Nevada) were in dispute amongst claimants(ranchers, miners, etc) at the time right before statehood, thus the federal government took over the titles to these properties to expedite the process of making Nevada a state. The idea was to sell the land back to the state and/or an auction of sorts amongst those claimants. This last part never happened, so the BLM has been in control since that agency was created.

That also doesn't sound as good in a blog article meant to stir up fervor of "lol government bad".

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047494)
infowars is only a "news source" to a mental midget. it's an extreme right wing cesspool of foolery, but the fact that you call it a source demonstrates a lot about you.

Ignorance? Oh, ok. Well, if I'm ignorant because I don't fall for hyperbolic bullshit by the far-right, then so be it. I'm gladly "ignorant" then. Better than being an old, senile mental midget for sure.

Offering your 2 cents but being a penny short?

You defended your putting words in the mouth of others with infowars and posted a link saying the same things from a different source. I'm glad you are ignorant too!

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047499)
My understanding is that the land in question(as well as other remote areas of Nevada) were in dispute amongst claimants(ranchers, miners, etc) at the time right before statehood, thus the federal government took over the titles to these properties to expedite the process of making Nevada a state. The idea was to sell the land back to the state and/or an auction of sorts amongst those claimants. This last part never happened, so the BLM has been in control since that agency was created.

That also doesn't sound as good in a blog article meant to stir up fervor of "lol government bad".

Hard to believe you have any understanding at all!

trevesty 04-12-2014 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047500)
Offering your 2 cents but being a penny short?

You defended your putting words in the mouth of others with infowars and posted a link saying the same things from a different source. I'm glad you are ignorant too!

Oh, ok. I just tend to mock far-right mouth breathers. :thumbsup

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20047492)
the dilemma just keeps getting more intriguing to me! for 1 thing, it seems blm claims publically thta they are confiscating cattle and kiccking out bundy due to fees he owes but in court they filed documents claiming the reason they are evicting is due to the desert tortoise.

Another thing, apparently that's not federal land, it's state own land, so technically not blm's jurisdiction, from what I've read. But even more importantly, apparently Bundy's family has been ranching that land since before Nevada was even a state and their right to ranch that land is grand-fathered in.

Looks like the Sheriff and BLM came to an agreement and BLM is stopping what they were doing and they are going to share the sale money from Bundy's cattle with him.

http://www.8newsnow.com/story/252303...-bundy-and-blm

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047504)
Oh, ok. I just tend to mock far-right mouth breathers. :thumbsup

There you go again, talking out your ass.

Where is this a political thing? Ignorant to the end I see!

dyna mo 04-12-2014 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047499)
My understanding is that the land in question(as well as other remote areas of Nevada) were in dispute amongst claimants(ranchers, miners, etc) at the time right before statehood, thus the federal government took over the titles to these properties to expedite the process of making Nevada a state. The idea was to sell the land back to the state and/or an auction of sorts amongst those claimants. This last part never happened, so the BLM has been in control since that agency was created.

That also doesn't sound as good in a blog article meant to stir up fervor of "lol government bad".

myunderstanding of this was the right to graze cattle would remain, land ownership regardless.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047509)
Looks like the Sheriff and BLM came to an agreement and BLM is stopping what they were doing and they are going to share the sale money from Bundy's cattle with him.

http://www.8newsnow.com/story/252303...-bundy-and-blm


cooler heads prevail.

trevesty 04-12-2014 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20047521)
myunderstanding of this was the right to graze cattle would remain, land ownership regardless.


As long as dues are paid, yes.

trevesty 04-12-2014 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20047510)
There you go again, talking out your ass.

Where is this a political thing? Ignorant to the end I see!

Yay! You like to say words like ignorant and stuff a whole lot, but that's about it. If you're unable to distinguish between a bunch of far-right blogs calling for arms to a rancher who doesn't want to pay dues and the thousands of other ranchers who happily pay dues(really cheap ones, mind you) for access to this land and others across the west, then... who's the ignorant one?

It's absolutely a political thing. The far-right wants another thing to cry about as far as the big, bad government. That's it.

dyna mo 04-12-2014 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047529)
As long as dues are paid, yes.

I haven't read anything about grazing dues when Nevada formed as a state back in the 1800s

Vendzilla 04-12-2014 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 20047534)
Yay! You like to say words like ignorant and stuff a whole lot, but that's about it. If you're unable to distinguish between a bunch of far-right blogs calling for arms to a rancher who doesn't want to pay dues and the thousands of other ranchers who happily pay dues(really cheap ones, mind you) for access to this land and others across the west, then... who's the ignorant one?

It's absolutely a political thing. The far-right wants another thing to cry about as far as the big, bad government. That's it.

Where did I post anything about a calling to arms?

https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/n...dup-decelerate

1.1 million in fees, so they spend close to a million to round up the cattle?

The BLM and Park Service have not released any cost projections for the operation, but almost $1 million will be paid to a Utah-based livestock contractor hired to collect Bundy’s cattle.

That makes you the ignorant one! If it were about dues, how can they justify spending a million dollars to collect a million dollars?

MaDalton 04-12-2014 12:09 PM

guns and cows - i had to check my calendar if i didnt accidentally traveled back in time...

Robbie 04-12-2014 12:23 PM

I heard the rancher himself in a radio interview here in Vegas yesterday.

He brought up some good points:

1. His family have grazed their cattle there since 1887.

2. The land is NOT federal land. It is "owned" by Clark County.

3. He has paid his "grazing fees" to Clark County every year.

4. The BLM is using a tortoise as the excuse for this land grab.

5. The tortoise in question has lived in harmony with cattle for hundreds of years

6. The BLM themselves euthanized 1000 of these "endangered" tortoises because their population growth is out of control.

I found all of this to be very interesting. And also very interesting that our senator Harry Reid has his hands all in it for his cronies.

Not only is he pushing this...but the new head of the BLM worked for Harry Reid.

Just follow the money and you'll see quickly why the feds have sent in an army to drive cattle ranchers off of land that belongs to Nevada.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123