GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   got obama'ed today (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1161926)

Barry-xlovecam 02-27-2015 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20405694)
That sounds nice. A great excuse to price gouge Americans like they always have.

A "fair market price" is what the market will bear. But since the United States Federal Govt. makes SURE that it's very difficult for the average person to buy their prescriptions in other countries...that kind of changes things doesn't it?

There is a reason that "medical tourism" has gotten so big.

Robbie, it gets worse.

Prescription drug prices are less for some in the two tiered healthcare system in the USA, Medicaid/Medicare and private paid insurance

Quote:

Medicaid and Medicare receive discounts in the form of rebates, which are paid by drug manufacturers when their products are dispensed to people enrolled in the programs.

The inspector general, Daniel R. Levinson, found that rebates reduced spending on 100 widely used brand name drugs by 19 percent in Medicare and by 45 percent in Medicaid.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/16/us/16drug.html?_r=0
So there is nationalized healthcare (for some) in the USA -- Medicaid/Medicare.

Guess who gets the bill?

kane 02-27-2015 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 20405663)
No. There wasn't. But there should have been.

So please answer my question.

What makes you think the president we elected wanted to do the right thing?

What legislative votes would he have lost if he had tried to put single-payer through?

Corporate welfare for the insurance industry is not a stepping stone in the direction of universal healthcare.

I actually think he would have lost a lot of votes had he tried to force through a single-payer system. Sure, those on the far left would have supported him, but man democrats get big donations from insurance companies, pharm companies ect. Those companies would have been all over them to vote no.

Here is a quote from Obama about why he didn't do a single-payer option. "Given that a lot of people work for insurance companies, a lot of people work for HMOs. You?ve got a whole system of institutions that have been set up."

He knew a single-payer system would have caused a sea change in the healthcare world with a lot of people losing their jobs. I'm sure there are plenty of democrats who would not want to be associated with such a radical change.

I, along with others, think single-payer is the end result of all of this, but I don't think Obama could have gotten it through even if he wanted it.

kane 02-27-2015 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20405713)
Robbie, it gets worse.

Prescription drug prices are less for some in the two tiered healthcare system in the USA, Medicaid/Medicare and private paid insurance



So there is nationalized healthcare (for some) in the USA -- Medicaid/Medicare.

Guess who gets the bill?

As someone who for years paid cash for my medication I can tell you first hand that there are different prices for medicines for different people. Many pharmacies have one price they charge insurance companies, another that they charge medicare/medicaid and another that they charge cash paying customers. Many of them mark up the cash price to make up for the lower amount they might get by medicare or insurance.

onwebcam 02-27-2015 07:32 PM

That article is bullshit. The hospitals and dr's know the insurance companies are going to come along and "negotiate" later so they increase the "cost" to compensate. A uninsured person using my GF as an example was billed at 20% of the inflated cost. Yes it may appear as though the insured is paying less but were the monthly premiums factored in? Also who says you can't negotiate as well? I know someone who about a year or so ago severed 4 fingers and he was uninsured. His cost to have them reattached he said negotiated a settlement was around $18k out of pocket. The inflated bill was originally $80+k.

Try the discount dental card on for size. See how much it costs you for a crown with your insurance and then see how much it costs with cash + "discount dental." Nearly 100% of the time it costs more out of pocket being insured.

onwebcam 02-27-2015 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ezgirl (Post 20405581)
What is a "dental discount card"? Where/how do you get them?

Dental Plans | Dental Insurance Alternatives | 40+ Plans

Another problem with dental insurance is waiting periods. So if you were just recently insured with a new company or whatever and you all of a sudden broke a tooth being insured you will pay the "non-discounted" price because your insurance doesn't cover it until after a year or whatever. No waiting periods on "discount dental" and in most cases you end up paying less than you would have being "insured."

arock10 02-28-2015 12:06 PM

Dental insurance is more or less a scam and is different then health instance. They all have upper limit caps (which aren't that high) and it defeats the point of having insurance

jscott 03-01-2015 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 20404481)
Ignorance is bliss I guess. Out of the top 20 hospitals in the world what flag do you see the most?

http://i.imgur.com/DCYYEpP.png

That means absolutely nothing, those are the best, or top hospitals in the world? based on what? on fairness of treatment to patients, best hospital restaurants, cleanest? showing a list of hospitals rankings and not even telling us what those rankings are based on? now that my friend = ignorance LOL

Nice try tho :thumbsup

Robbie 03-01-2015 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20405672)
The president isnt king, they got thru what they could get thru. Governing isnt ez as pundits and useless congressman state, everything done has a ripple effect. And the way our gov is setup, one senator can locked everything up.

Unless it was George Bush.
The Democrat Party pretty much has painted it that he WAS a King with ALL the power. Matter of fact, anything bad happening now is still Bush's fault.
And Bush was able to get anything and everything passed.
Apparently during the Bush Administration...NONE of the Democrat Senators had the power to "lock everything up".

AmeliaG 03-01-2015 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20406175)
Dental insurance is more or less a scam and is different then health instance. They all have upper limit caps (which aren't that high) and it defeats the point of having insurance

ALL insurance plans are based on the idea that the overall amount paid in by everyone will be much more than the cost of everyone's actual needs. Health, dental, car insurance, they are all for profit.

Horatio Caine 03-01-2015 02:07 PM

Paid $35 for prescription medication. Cash price tag said $475. WTF is going on?

Joshua G 03-01-2015 03:11 PM

lots of dumbass in this thread.

obamacare is not what it was supposed to be. it was supposed to require all states to set up exchanges. one reason insurance rates are screwed up is that a republican supreme court gave states the power to opt out of setting up exchanges/extending medicaid. remember that wasnt supposed to happen?

the law was also supposed to have a public option, a non-profit plan run by the govt to give private insurance some competition! that was scuttled by democrats in the senate. max baucus got a big check from big insurance to make sure private insurers can maintain their monopolies.

so yeah, some insurance policies are messed up. just wait until the supreme court doubles down on the chaos it created, when it forbids the feds from extending subsidies to states that were not supposed to be allowed to opt out to begin with.

as far as single payer, dems never brought it to the floor cause they knew it had no chance. They woulda been better off just extending medicare to everyone & letting those with means opt for better coverage. But creating a big new federal bureaucracy is far more attractive to the party whose primary income is public-employee-union revenue.

bottom line, dems are running healthcare badly. but thats better than anything republicans propose, which is to return to letting people die because they got cancer & didnt have a job. meanwhile insurance execs still can buy a second yacht, regardless which party runs things.

:)

PornoMonster 03-01-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20403732)
I've never seen a bigger rip-off in my life.

I was talking to the head pharmacist at The Walgreens where we get prescriptions and he was telling me that he has never seen prices rise at this rate in his entire career. :(



I wish someone would go back and look and CHART the % over the last 10 years of how much things have went up...
Premiums
scripts
so on

PornoMonster 03-01-2015 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20403750)
Is this a result of the insurance no longer covering this medication or is it that you have a co-pay and the medication has just gone up in price that much?

If it is the price of the medication it isn't Obamacare so much as it is pharmaceutical companies wanting to rape you and reap their 1000% profit margins.

As I said when it Obamacare first passed, the problem with it is that it does nothing to actually lower the cost of healthcare. It is just a health insurance bill.

That said, I am the opposite side of the coin. Having a pre-existing condition (asthma) I was never able to buy decent health insurance. Now I can and I can get my prescriptions filled at local pharmacies instead of having to order them online. I have much better coverage and convenience and am spending about the same as I was before when I was paying for most of my care out of pocket.

There are some good things given that.

I have Asthma and have never had a problem with insurance.

A DJ I work with is a diabetic and has had lots of problems finding insurance.
He check out several Obama care places and it was NOT cheaper for him.
The monthly went down about $100, but the deductibles doubled, so he kept his own insurance...

There is a story for either side or in the middle, the question is what is the MAJORITY?

PornoMonster 03-01-2015 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 20406628)
That means absolutely nothing, those are the best, or top hospitals in the world? based on what? on fairness of treatment to patients, best hospital restaurants, cleanest? showing a list of hospitals rankings and not even telling us what those rankings are based on? now that my friend = ignorance LOL

Nice try tho :thumbsup

Well when people "usually rich and or famous" fly from their country to USA to get something done that is Major... Ummm that says it all....

PornoMonster 03-01-2015 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20405716)
As someone who for years paid cash for my medication I can tell you first hand that there are different prices for medicines for different people. Many pharmacies have one price they charge insurance companies, another that they charge medicare/medicaid and another that they charge cash paying customers. Many of them mark up the cash price to make up for the lower amount they might get by medicare or insurance.

Exactly, and some companies if you write them will give you free meds... Without Obama care, ha...

Everything is marked up to pay for the people who don't pay or now I guess the Obama care prices...

Companies and Stock holders are not going to take the hit, if they can help it.

PornoMonster 03-01-2015 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 20405597)
You're naive or disingenuous Robbie, even with the Democrats in control of Congress and the White House there was no way Obama and the Democrats would in one fell swoop dismantle the healthcare system and completely socialize/nationalize it. You know how powerful and rich the lobbies are who control the 2 parties, both of them get paid by the same groups - the political fallout would be humongous. I'm not even sure how these countries like Canada, the UK, France etc got to universal healthcare, a bit before my time, it couldn't have been overnight. The US system is extremely complex, many different interests, so even with Democrats being for universal healthcare they know it's going to be a gradual process.

I am in favor of a dual system, I believe every person deserves access to good healthcare, paid for by everybody who pays taxes no different than paying for schools and roads - the upper middle class and rich can pay for the best of the best healthcare/hospitals/doctors. In Canada, incredibly that's not allowed, everybody rich and poor gets the same treatment and services. If you want the best medicine can offer you have to leave the country, many of the rich do rather than wait their turn in long waiting lines. People are deluded by the government into believing that their healthcare isn't rationed, it absolutely is. In 95% of cases. and I'm just pulling that number out of my ass, the treatment they receive is very good, it's the same treatment they'd be recommended if they went to the Mayo Clinic for an opinion. The wait times, the overcrowding, suck but people just accept it.

The province of British Columbia, containing the city of Vancouver, a city the world thinks of as wealthy and world class, has TWO PET scanners to cover the entire large province - PET scanners are not that new, they are very expensive and very helpful in diagnosing and treating serious diseases like cancer. I will guarantee you that even the poorest US states have more than 2 PET scanners.

NICE..........Post......

kane 03-01-2015 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster (Post 20407004)
I wish someone would go back and look and CHART the % over the last 10 years of how much things have went up...
Premiums
scripts
so on


Here is some info on premium increases.

National Trends in the Cost of Employer Health Insurance Coverage, 2003?2013 - The Commonwealth Fund

This one shows that on average from 2003-2010 when Obamacare was passed the average policy went up in price 5.1% per year and the average deductible went up 10.2%. Since Obamacare the annual increase is 4.1% per year and 7.5% deductible increase per year.

http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/...-premiums.aspx

This link has a ton of info. In one area it says from 2004-2006 the average family premium went up 8.8% per year.

The reality is that premiums and deductibles have been on the rise for a decade.

Robbie 03-01-2015 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20407073)
Here is some info on premium increases.
This link has a ton of info. In one area it says from 2004-2006 the average family premium went up 8.8% per year.

The reality is that premiums and deductibles have been on the rise for a decade.

What's the "one area"?

I have had Blue Cross/Blue Shield since 2002. My deductible is $3,000

In 2002 my premium was $476 a month for a family of four. In 2009 my premium was around $550 (same policy) for a family of four.
Since Obamcare was enacted my premiums have risen like crazy.
My current premium (same policy I have had since 2002) has went up from $550 a month for a family of four in 2009 all the way up to over $1,000 a month for a family of 3 (one less person).

My policy is through Blue Cross/Blue Shield of South Carolina. I moved to Vegas in 2008 but my policy is still written in South Carolina.

I went on the "exchange" last year because in 2014 my premium had already risen to over $900...and some wise ass on GFY told me that I should go to the exchange.

I could have gotten a policy for around $50 a month cheaper than the one I already have...but with a $5,000 deductible.

This SUCKS.

kane 03-01-2015 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20407166)
What's the "one area"?

I have had Blue Cross/Blue Shield since 2002. My deductible is $3,000

In 2002 my premium was $476 a month for a family of four. In 2009 my premium was around $550 (same policy) for a family of four.
Since Obamcare was enacted my premiums have risen like crazy.
My current premium (same policy I have had since 2002) has went up from $550 a month for a family of four in 2009 all the way up to over $1,000 a month for a family of 3 (one less person).

My policy is through Blue Cross/Blue Shield of South Carolina. I moved to Vegas in 2008 but my policy is still written in South Carolina.

I went on the "exchange" last year because in 2014 my premium had already risen to over $900...and some wise ass on GFY told me that I should go to the exchange.

I could have gotten a policy for around $50 a month cheaper than the one I already have...but with a $5,000 deductible.

This SUCKS.

The area I was referring to just meant an area on the page. There is a graph in the middle of the page.

You got hose. There is no question about it. I am just saying on average the average person has seen their premiums rise about the same under Obamacare as they did in the 10 years before it.

The thing is most people don't realize it because they get their insurance through their employer who pays all or most of it.

Robbie 03-01-2015 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20407169)
The thing is most people don't realize it because they get their insurance through their employer who pays all or most of it.

Yeah, people who work for other people in jobs that have health insurance probably don't notice it at all.

But everyone that I'm talking about are people who pay their own insurance. And maybe I'm wrong...but I haven't heard of any big companies that pay for employee insurance all happy over lower premiums.

Am I wrong about that? Or have the vast majority of people actually seen a decrease in their "health care" costs like we were told that this was needed so badly for in the first place.

His promise of lowering premiums was supposed to happen right off the bat. And it was supposed to be only the beginning of all the good news...
But instead of me or you or some of the guys on here who think I'm crazy talking about it, let's hear from the man himself:


Grapesoda 03-01-2015 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20407258)
Yeah, people who work for other people in jobs that have health insurance probably don't notice it at all.

But everyone that I'm talking about are people who pay their own insurance. And maybe I'm wrong...but I haven't heard of any big companies that pay for employee insurance all happy over lower premiums.

Am I wrong about that? Or have the vast majority of people actually seen a decrease in their "health care" costs like we were told that this was needed so badly for in the first place.

His promise of lowering premiums was supposed to happen right off the bat. And it was supposed to be only the beginning of all the good news...
But instead of me or you or some of the guys on here who think I'm crazy talking about it, let's hear from the man himself:


honestly Robbie many of the people I know have employees and they are VERY unhappy with affordable health care, cost are going through the roof to cover their employees.. .and like you my monthly was $329 I think in 2013 with a $2500 deductible... my ins was canceled due to Obama care... the new policy is $517 per month with a $5000 deductible with prescriptions going up 600%% .. I do know people that are getting coverage at reduced rates however they all make about 25K-30K a year if that :2 cents:

kane 03-01-2015 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20407258)
Yeah, people who work for other people in jobs that have health insurance probably don't notice it at all.

But everyone that I'm talking about are people who pay their own insurance. And maybe I'm wrong...but I haven't heard of any big companies that pay for employee insurance all happy over lower premiums.

Am I wrong about that? Or have the vast majority of people actually seen a decrease in their "health care" costs like we were told that this was needed so badly for in the first place.

His promise of lowering premiums was supposed to happen right off the bat. And it was supposed to be only the beginning of all the good news...
But instead of me or you or some of the guys on here who think I'm crazy talking about it, let's hear from the man himself:


This is from one of the articles I linked. I looks like rates are still on the rise, but as an average across the entire spectrum the rise has slowed. However people are now spending more of their income on insurance premiums and deductibles than ever before. Here is a quote:

"Looking at trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2013, this issue brief finds that premiums for family coverage increased 73 percent over the past decade?faster than median family income. Employees? contributions to their premiums climbed by 93 percent over that time frame. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in both large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less protective benefits. However, the study also finds that while premiums continued to rise through 2013, the rate of growth slowed between 2010 and 2013, following implementation of the Affordable Care Act. While families experienced slower growth in premium contributions and deductibles over this period, sluggish growth in median family income means families are paying more in premiums and deductibles as a share of their income than ever before.:

kane 03-01-2015 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 20407268)
honestly Robbie many of the people I know have employees and they are VERY unhappy with affordable health care, cost are going through the roof to cover their employees.. .and like you my monthly was $329 I think in 2013 with a $2500 deductible... my ins was canceled due to Obama care... the new policy is $517 per month with a $5000 deductible with prescriptions going up 600%% .. I do know people that are getting coverage at reduced rates however they all make about 25K-30K a year if that :2 cents:

Therein is the rub of Obamacare.

Before Obamacare there was a group of people who worked, but didn't get health insurance through their work yet they didn't make enough money to buy insurance so they went without. Those people now get cheap or free medicaid. However, there is now a group of people that work for themselves or own businesses and they make too much money to get any kind of subsidies on their insurance so they have seen their rates go up. In some cases by quite a bit.

AmeliaG 03-02-2015 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20407272)
Therein is the rub of Obamacare.

Before Obamacare there was a group of people who worked, but didn't get health insurance through their work yet they didn't make enough money to buy insurance so they went without. Those people now get cheap or free medicaid. However, there is now a group of people that work for themselves or own businesses and they make too much money to get any kind of subsidies on their insurance so they have seen their rates go up. In some cases by quite a bit.

Or they get fined for not wanting to go on welfare.

How uncompassionate is a system which literally punishes people for not wanting to be a burden on society?

kane 03-02-2015 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 20407298)
Or they get fined for not wanting to go on welfare.

How uncompassionate is a system which literally punishes people for not wanting to be a burden on society?

If I am being 100% honest, someone who doesn't didn't make enough money to buy health insurance (and didn't get it through their job) pre-Obamacare who doesn't then take free healthcare once it is available is just dumb. There is nothing noble about them not wanting to be a burden on the system because what is likely going to happen is that at some point they are going to get sick or injured and end up in a hospital where they will rack up some nice medical bills and then other people are going to pay for them.

If they don't want to be a burden on the system, I understand that. But the way to do it is to take the health insurance and work harder to get a better job and make more money so you can get employer provided insurance or pay for you insurance. Don't risk it and potentially end up costing society even more.

Grapesoda 03-02-2015 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20407272)
Therein is the rub of Obamacare.

Before Obamacare there was a group of people who worked, but didn't get health insurance through their work yet they didn't make enough money to buy insurance so they went without. Those people now get cheap or free medicaid. However, there is now a group of people that work for themselves or own businesses and they make too much money to get any kind of subsidies on their insurance so they have seen their rates go up. In some cases by quite a bit.

just think of it as a 15% penalty tax for working hard :2 cents:

Vendzilla 03-02-2015 11:27 AM

You guys think it's bad now? Wait till the employer mandate is allowed to go thru, it's going to get worse.

Since day one I have been against this law, it was the government regulating the insurance companies, not about health coverage. The Insurance companies give money to politicians to make them BILLIONS of our money.

The prices of more than 1,200 generic medications increased an average of 448 percent between July 2013 and July 2014, Sanders said during the hearing, citing federal records.
Generic Drug Price Sticker Shock Prompts Probe by Congress - ABC News

Robbie 03-02-2015 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20407839)
The prices of more than 1,200 generic medications increased an average of 448 percent between July 2013 and July 2014, Sanders said during the hearing, citing federal records.
Generic Drug Price Sticker Shock Prompts Probe by Congress - ABC News

Don't you understand? We are subsidizing the rest of the world...because that's what I'm supposed to do with the money I earn.

You need to stop being a Fox News zombie Vendzilla. You sound like one of the lost Koch Brothers or maybe a cousin of George Bush.

Don't you understand that when Pres. Obama said prices would come down...that's actually politician-speak for "go up".
And don't you know this is nothing new?
Why...insurance premiums rise greatly every year. And drug prices go up over 400% every year. It's just normal.

What? You never saw that before?
That's because you are too busy listening to Fox News.

Goddamnit Vendzilla...fall in line. The ruling class in Washington has pronounced the way things are and that's the way it is.

Pay no attention to the same politicians saying the exact opposite thing back when they passed the law.
That doesn't matter anymore.

ALL that matters is that we've taken a "first step" to "fixing" "health care".
Now people won't DIE from cancer anymore (once you have ObamaCare, cancer no longer can kill you).

Yes, for a few years we are going to all get fucked hard on insurance. But maybe this will lead to "single pay" and then we can all get fucked harder on our income taxes (well, those of us that actually pay them).

Now get your head out of your ass and get with the program!

Repeat after me:
"I pledge allegiance to the lifetime/career politicians in Washington D.C."

arock10 03-02-2015 11:58 AM

just remember, corporations are people, money is speech... and now corporations can be religious too!

merica fuck yea


you wanna change america... change the supreme court to 5 liberals and 4 conservatives. Then campaign finance can be reformed.

Robbie 03-02-2015 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20407892)
you wanna change america... change the supreme court to 5 liberals and 4 conservatives. Then campaign finance can be reformed.

So you think Democrats aren't in the pockets of corporations and that if there was just one more "liberal" judge that something would actually happen?

The world doesn't work that way anymore. "Liberal", "Conservative", "Republican" and "Democrat" are words that change in their meaning all the time.

The ONLY thing we can trust from The Supreme Court is that they take their vows to heart and interpret the meaning of the Constitution without adding their own political views to it.

Other than that? It's a crapshoot.

AmeliaG 03-02-2015 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20407321)
If I am being 100% honest, someone who doesn't didn't make enough money to buy health insurance (and didn't get it through their job) pre-Obamacare who doesn't then take free healthcare once it is available is just dumb. There is nothing noble about them not wanting to be a burden on the system because what is likely going to happen is that at some point they are going to get sick or injured and end up in a hospital where they will rack up some nice medical bills and then other people are going to pay for them.

If they don't want to be a burden on the system, I understand that. But the way to do it is to take the health insurance and work harder to get a better job and make more money so you can get employer provided insurance or pay for you insurance. Don't risk it and potentially end up costing society even more.

So it is better for people to be a burden all the time, including catastrophe, and not just in extreme circumstances and everyone who works hard and has some luck should pay for this to make insurance companies richer?

How is your basic math telling you that paying all the time + catastrophe < just catastrophe alone?

kane 03-02-2015 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 20408130)
So it is better for people to be a burden all the time, including catastrophe, and not just in extreme circumstances and everyone who works hard and has some luck should pay for this to make insurance companies richer?

How is your basic math telling you that paying all the time + catastrophe < just catastrophe alone?

My point is that we are going to pay for it one way or another. Are there people that will stay on it forever? Sure, I don't doubt that there will be. Those are people who likely would have been in the system anyway and there is little we can do about it. However, I think there are a decent number of people who are young, or just had some bad luck etc and are working at improving themselves and helping them with health insurance isn't a bad thing.

Robbie 03-02-2015 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20408180)
However, I think there are a decent number of people who are young, or just had some bad luck etc and are working at improving themselves and helping them with health insurance isn't a bad thing.

I'll bet there are lots of people working to improve themselves that could also use some help paying the rest of their bills. Maybe a little spending money for the weekend. How about vacations? A little help with a new car?

Look, I know what you are saying...but I'll say this again...I wasn't put on this Earth to be a slave. My work should pay for MY needs and MY family.

Not yours or a bunch of "young people" who just need some "help".

Throughout mankind's history people have gotten by and did what they had to do.
Now, all of a sudden...people just can't make it without other people taking care of them?

Amelia is right. The prevailing attitude that it's okay to take other people's money to pay the bills because a person just can't do it themselves...is fucking up our society.

If I CHOOSE to help someone not in my immediate family, I will do so through charitable acts.
Instead I am being FORCED.

That's not "helping". That's getting robbed.

kane 03-02-2015 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20408321)
I'll bet there are lots of people working to improve themselves that could also use some help paying the rest of their bills. Maybe a little spending money for the weekend. How about vacations? A little help with a new car?

Look, I know what you are saying...but I'll say this again...I wasn't put on this Earth to be a slave. My work should pay for MY needs and MY family.

Not yours or a bunch of "young people" who just need some "help".

Throughout mankind's history people have gotten by and did what they had to do.
Now, all of a sudden...people just can't make it without other people taking care of them?

Amelia is right. The prevailing attitude that it's okay to take other people's money to pay the bills because a person just can't do it themselves...is fucking up our society.

If I CHOOSE to help someone not in my immediate family, I will do so through charitable acts.
Instead I am being FORCED.

That's not "helping". That's getting robbed.

In theory one way to solve the problem is to just eliminate any kind of safety net or welfare type programs. Just get rid of all of them and people can take care of their own just like they did in the past.

To me one of the problems with all of these safety net things is that they have now begun subsidizing businesses. If there was no food stamps or welfare or housing assistance etc people would demand better wages because they wouldn't have any other option. They couldn't go to work and make very little then get a bunch of welfare help and actually live a decent life and they have little motivation to improve themselves.

tony286 03-02-2015 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20408325)

To me one of the problems with all of these safety net things is that they have now begun subsidizing businesses. If there was no food stamps or welfare or housing assistance etc people would demand better wages because they wouldn't have any other option. They couldn't go to work and make very little then get a bunch of welfare help and actually live a decent life .

Bingo !!!!!

Robbie 03-02-2015 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20408325)
In theory one way to solve the problem is to just eliminate any kind of safety net or welfare type programs. Just get rid of all of them and people can take care of their own just like they did in the past.

To me one of the problems with all of these safety net things is that they have now begun subsidizing businesses. If there was no food stamps or welfare or housing assistance etc people would demand better wages because they wouldn't have any other option. They couldn't go to work and make very little then get a bunch of welfare help and actually live a decent life and they have little motivation to improve themselves.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20408338)
Bingo !!!!!

Great point.

I'm not for seeing people suffer...but it's just human nature to need to be motivated. That's why they call it "motivation".

People will work harder, try harder. And the people that mentally or physically can't take care of themselves...we should have programs to take care of them.

But for every able-bodied man and woman? They need to get their asses to work.

And the ONLY way to truly "demand" higher wages from your employer is to EARN that ability to say "I DESERVE a raise". Which is the age old motivation to better yourself.

If our society would get back to that way of thinking, I believe that we would move forward.

AmeliaG 03-03-2015 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20408325)
In theory one way to solve the problem is to just eliminate any kind of safety net or welfare type programs. Just get rid of all of them and people can take care of their own just like they did in the past.

To me one of the problems with all of these safety net things is that they have now begun subsidizing businesses. If there was no food stamps or welfare or housing assistance etc people would demand better wages because they wouldn't have any other option. They couldn't go to work and make very little then get a bunch of welfare help and actually live a decent life and they have little motivation to improve themselves.

You are exactly right that many businesses, not just insurance companies, look to constant welfare to line their own pockets.

My personal belief is that the larger society should provide a safety trampoline, not a net.

If someone falls on hard times or catastrophe and they need help getting a roof over their head or paying for surgery or education, I am all for it. But the idea should be that everyone should have both hope and motivation to make a better life.

Insurance offers peace of mind for those who have it, but it costs more than healthcare because it is an additional service on top of healthcare. That is not a luxury the average 24-year-old requires.

Do I think society should step up for someone in serious temporary need? Yes.

Do I think society should divert trillions of dollars to specific private industries on a constant basis? No.

One of the problems with ACA is that it aggressively destigmatizes welfare as a lifestyle choice. In fact, the ACA attitude is that anyone who wants to earn his or her keep is a dumbass chump. Whether someone is rich or poor, that is a very upsetting view to people who have a work ethic.

tony286 03-03-2015 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20408355)
Great point.

I'm not for seeing people suffer...but it's just human nature to need to be motivated. That's why they call it "motivation".

People will work harder, try harder. And the people that mentally or physically can't take care of themselves...we should have programs to take care of them.

But for every able-bodied man and woman? They need to get their asses to work.

And the ONLY way to truly "demand" higher wages from your employer is to EARN that ability to say "I DESERVE a raise". Which is the age old motivation to better yourself.

If our society would get back to that way of thinking, I believe that we would move forward.

For the avg person, its a myth if you work hard you will get raises. Those days are over, the main thing that matters now is share holder value. Employment is just an expense to keep as low as possible. Look at the guy who walked 20 miles a day to go to work. Hard worker,never missed a day of work in 10 yrs. He worked at that factory for 10 yrs and was making $10.55 an hour.
I made 5 cents more an hour the first time I walked on a factory floor in 1984. The game has changed.

tony286 03-03-2015 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 20408444)
You are exactly right that many businesses, not just insurance companies, look to constant welfare to line their own pockets.

My personal belief is that the larger society should provide a safety trampoline, not a net.

If someone falls on hard times or catastrophe and they need help getting a roof over their head or paying for surgery or education, I am all for it. But the idea should be that everyone should have both hope and motivation to make a better life.

Insurance offers peace of mind for those who have it, but it costs more than healthcare because it is an additional service on top of healthcare. That is not a luxury the average 24-year-old requires.

Do I think society should step up for someone in serious temporary need? Yes.

Do I think society should divert trillions of dollars to specific private industries on a constant basis? No.

One of the problems with ACA is that it aggressively destigmatizes welfare as a lifestyle choice. In fact, the ACA attitude is that anyone who wants to earn his or her keep is a dumbass chump. Whether someone is rich or poor, that is a very upsetting view to people who have a work ethic.

ACA doesnt do that. Sorry its just about health insurance. Are you saying all the other countries like canada, japan, europe are all just welfare babies?

arock10 03-03-2015 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 20408130)
So it is better for people to be a burden all the time, including catastrophe, and not just in extreme circumstances and everyone who works hard and has some luck should pay for this to make insurance companies richer?

How is your basic math telling you that paying all the time + catastrophe < just catastrophe alone?

with insurance you can get preventative healthcare versus just waiting until you are half dead and going to the ER

so yes the basic math is easy


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123