GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Europeans: What is your take on the migration crisis ?? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1173318)

mineistaken 09-04-2015 05:53 PM

200 illegal economical immigrants, puppet spineless EU governments and blind not grasping the whole picture libtards.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570837)
Still not Thursday 5 July 2012 is it? :)

again, you are free to blame America, your view is your's and truly has no impact or bearing on anything, including what actually happened.


i provided some credible links with some good information for those interested in learning more.

NYRangers 09-04-2015 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 20570588)
Than... I am happy for them. And I welcome them. I believe in this whole situation can have a good outcome.

You, the gypsies and the immigrants can all live together in your happy little commune. Just do me a favor and don't be in my neighborhood in Hungary.

I don't like Orban but in this case I agree with him.

Take my opinion how you may and criticize me for not being a Hungarian citizen. But I own property and a business in Hungary and pay taxes so I have a vested interest. Probably pay more taxes than most Hungarians because I don't do it the Hungarian way.

j3rkules 09-04-2015 05:59 PM

I see them as migrants not refugees. It's almost an invasion and they're fleeing from their duty to fight isis. It's scary. Our press/politic campaigns are way too orchestrated here in the Europe. Europe is fucked if they continue this but no, everyone is encouraging this mess. Follow the trail of garbage and shitty diapers.

This is not the year to quit drinking.

It's a tragedy of course. But don't let yourself get tricked by those pictures. Medias are orchestrated it in a more awful way.

mineistaken 09-04-2015 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYRangers (Post 20570842)
You, the gypsies and the immigrants can all live together in your happy little commune. Just do me a favor and don't be in my neighborhood in Hungary.

I don't like Orban but in this case I agree with him.

Take my opinion how you may and criticize me for not being a Hungarian citizen. But I own property and a business in Hungary and pay taxes so I have a vested interest. Probably pay more taxes than most Hungarians because I don't do it the Hungarian way.

Nice to have at least one government in Eu standing up to this plague. Hungary :thumbsup

RazorSharpe 09-04-2015 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20570839)
again, you are free to blame America, your view is your's and truly has no impact or bearing on anything, including what actually happened.


i provided some credible links with some good information for those interested in learning more.

No one is refuting your links. You stated categorically that the Syrian Arab Spring was a direct result of the wikileaks Syria Files. I am merely pointing out that is not the case. Your very own links prove this.

I have no idea where you got the idea that I am blaming America. I live in Europe, the refugee issue is a European problem. I have no idea why you would think I am blaming America. Was America involved in the conflicts I mentioned? Yes they were but so was the UK and other EU states.

I'm sorry I didn't agree with everything you said. I didn't know it was a prerequisite to having a conversation with you that didn't end with you being annoyed with me.

mineistaken 09-04-2015 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerkules (Post 20570845)
I see them as migrants not refugees.

Everybody sees them that way, because that is what they are. There is not even a debate. Except with some dumbfucks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerkules (Post 20570845)
But don't let yourself get tricked by those pictures. Medias are orchestrated it in a more awful way.

Only morons get tricked by that.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerkules (Post 20570845)
This is not the year to quit drinking.



:winkwink:

dyna mo 09-04-2015 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570849)
No one is refuting your links. You stated categorically that the Syrian Arab Spring was a direct result of the wikileaks Syria Files. I am merely pointing out that is not the case. Your very own links prove this.

I have no idea where you got the idea that I am blaming America. I live in Europe, the refugee issue is a European problem. I have no idea why you would think I am blaming America. Was America involved in the conflicts I mentioned? Yes they were but so was the UK and other EU states.

I'm sorry I didn't agree with everything you said. I didn't know it was a prerequisite to having a conversation with you that didn't end with you being annoyed with me.

no, what you are pointing out is your not understanding.

arab spring was a consequence of wikileaks

the syrian spring was a part of that arab spring.

the syrian spring spilled over into greater and greater violence as time went on.

that violence was propelled by the syrian files release.

civil war.


all of the arab spring violence resulted from the original wikileaks release, including the advent of protests in syria.

those protests in syria, that began from the original wikileak, were further fueled by the next wikileak release, the syrian file


that's it. it's not hard to see that the original uprising started on account of wikileaks and was further fueled by the next release.



the weird part of your argument is while you are trying to poke holes in that timeline, you've yet to counter my point with any links or proof supporting your claim that's it's America's fault.

either way, you are free to blame America. no biggie really.

RazorSharpe 09-04-2015 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20570857)
no, what you are pointing out is your not understanding.

arab spring was a consequence of wikileaks

the syrian spring was a part of that arab spring.

the syrian spring spilled over into greater and greater violence as time went on.

that violence was propelled by the syrian files release.


all of the spring violence resulted from the original wikileaks release, including the advent of protests in syria.

those protests in syria, that began from the original wikileak, were further fueled by the next wikileak release, the syrian file


that's it. it's not hard to see that the original uprising started on account of wikileaks and was further fueled by the next release.



the weird part of your argument is while you are trying to poke holes in that timeline, you've yet to counter my point with any links or proof supporting your claim that's it's America's fault.

either way, you are free to blame America. no biggie really.

Trying to poke holes? Hell I think I drove a truck through that timeline.

You can think I was blaming America all you like, but not once have I said "this is America's fault". I said the West and I meant the West - more so Europe because that's were the refugee problem is. But yeah, spin it any way you like.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570863)
Trying to poke holes? Hell I think I drove a truck through that timeline.

again, it's not my timeline, it's histories timeline, for you to drive a truck through history would require some links backing up your claims, not simply you exclaiming you drove a truck through history.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570863)
You can think I was blaming America all you like, but not once have I said "this is America's fault".

so what was all the Operation Freedom stuff then? you know, where you exclaimed that USA forced Democracy on the Syrians with an invasion duped on the American public?

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570787)
Savages? LOL! Get over yourself mini Hitler!

You can't go around dropping buzzwords like Operation Freedom, telling your country's constituents that you're invading another country to bring them democracy (that they never asked for) and then leave those countries worse off than they were and except no blowback from the "savages".

You romance them with the ideas of democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of expression, etc. and when they come to your country and try and do exactly these things, you throw a fucking hissy fit?

either way, you are free to blame America.

RazorSharpe 09-04-2015 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20570864)
again, it's not my timeline, it's histories timeline, for you to drive a truck through history would require some links backing up your claims, not simply you exclaiming you drove a truck through history.



so what was all the Operation Freedom stuff then? you know, where you exclaimed that USA forced Democracy on the Syrians with an invasion duped on the American public?



either way, you are free to blame America.

The only one claiming Arab Spring was a direct result of wikileaks is you so far. You posted a link to the Syria Files as your proof. These files may have caused the uprising to escalate but it didn't "start" them as you claim.

Operation Iraqi Freedom wasn't just a US operation. The UK, Poland, Spain (European countries) were also involved. And I meant European countries duped the public. But I get how you were confused. That's fine, I accept your apology.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570867)
The only one claiming Arab Spring was a direct result of wikileaks is you so far. You posted a link to the Syria Files as your proof. These files may have caused the uprising to escalate but it didn't "start" them as you claim.

Operation Iraqi Freedom wasn't just a US operation. The UK, Poland, Spain (European countries) were also involved. And I meant European countries duped the public. But I get how you were confused. That's fine, I accept your apology.

Umm, no. I posted a link (outof many) to amnesty international stating the wikileaks as catalyst to arab spring and then referenced it again.

Wait, you think people that you think are confused by you owe you an apology?


Either way, you are free to blame America.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 06:49 PM

Quoted for truth.

RazorSharpe 09-04-2015 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20570871)
Umm, no. I posted a link (outof many) to amnesty international stating the wikileaks as catalyst to arab spring and then referenced it again.

Wait, you think people that you think are confused by you owe you an apology?


Either way, you are free to blame America.

So we're calling Amnesty International historians now? Ok.

You're ultimately free to believe any thing you want but striving for dignity is one of mankinds most fundamental attributes and the struggles against abuse and degradation has been fought for centuries in the Middle East. The concept of freedom did not spring forth from the loins of wikileaks.

But hey, what do I know, I'm just an Arab who was born in one of the Arab Spring countries and actually traveled there shortly after it happened.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 07:37 PM

Either way, you are free to blame America. No biggie.

You're the one who thinks people owe you an apology if you think you've confused them.

RazorSharpe 09-04-2015 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20570900)
Either way, you are free to blame America. No biggie.

You're the one who thinks people owe you an apology if you think you've confused them.

Either way? You quote a wiileaks publication partner and called them historians dude!

Here's another article referencing what you're talking about:

Amnesty International hails WikiLeaks and media partners as Arab spring ?catalysts?

Quote:

The Guardian published an article on the report, noting the emphasis that Amnesty International placed on the WikiLeaks releases and their collaboration with news agencies for advancing human rights causes.
Maybe I didn't search hard enough but I find it strange that no other news service, bar The Guardian, reported on this hailing and cataclysmic effort in SPECIFICALLY the Syrian uprising.

But yeah, either way.

You talk about MaDalton's drivebys but at least him and I can have discussions AND disagree without either of us throwing our dummy out the pram.

Phoenix 09-04-2015 08:06 PM

I think a lot of people in here do not know the meaning of racism.

dyna mo 09-04-2015 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe (Post 20570909)
Either way? You quote a wiileaks publication partner and called them historians dude!

Here's another article referencing what you're talking about:

Amnesty International hails WikiLeaks and media partners as Arab spring ?catalysts?



Maybe I didn't search hard enough but I find it strange that no other news service, bar The Guardian, reported on this hailing and cataclysmic effort in SPECIFICALLY the Syrian uprising.

But yeah, either way.

You talk about MaDalton's drivebys but at least him and I can have discussions AND disagree without either of us throwing our dummy out the pram.


I've treated you with the utmost respect, regardless of madalton.

You think im trying to claim a spark in 2010 that ignited current events has nothing to do with 1000s of years of Arabs fighting. I don't think that, I fully realize Arabs have slaughtered each other for eons, that's why europeans are concerned.

Either way, you are free to blame America.

Kolargol 09-04-2015 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20569546)
maybe europe should stop taking security welfare from us military & defend themselves for a change. i know europe & everyone else has been begging for the USA to invade syria, & bring peace. do it yourselves. or else take in those people, who are getting slaughtered by ISIS just like "special" germans did a while back, & what did france do with those refugees? Lulz.

or are you dumbasses gonna repeat history?

:)

I don't suppose you think that American military interventions, especially in Iraq neighboring Syria had anything to do with the crisis?

k0nr4d 09-04-2015 11:22 PM



More women and children. I really don't know how anyone can call this anything OTHER then an Invasion...

twitchie 09-05-2015 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d (Post 20570979)


More women and children. I really don't know how anyone can call this anything OTHER then an Invasion...

lol
Europe get ready to get culturally enriched!!!!

k0nr4d 09-05-2015 01:37 AM

Somaliërs kunnen geen baan vinden, Polen juist wel

Percentage of people on Social welfare in the netherlands grouped by country of origin:
https://scontent.fwaw3-1.fna.fbcdn.n...6b&oe=56736F81

nico-t 09-05-2015 02:10 AM

a girl i know had a new iraqi boyfriend who seemed more "integrated" than other muslims here on the surface, but i knew he put on an act, it was obvious.

i remember she said "Iraq isn't that bad like other muslims treat their women right?"
i said "i have no idea, they did run from an actual war there so maybe they are not as bad."

Eventually she got beaten the fuck up every week.

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20570173)
no knucklehead. the answer is integration, & putting sweethart memories of a once pure local population to rest. the people who are leaving syria et al are the smart ones. they are facing hostile situation, but are braving it for survival. those are the types of people i want coming to my country. i would take a syrian refugee with big tits over a lot of our local lollygagging youths any day of the week.

sending them back, camps, trains, never worked, never will. most will either go back when syria get it together, or they will become european muslims, just like the USA is full of latinos & its not going to be reversed no matter how much a spoiled billionaire wants it otherwise.:2 cents:

With what evidence do you base the idea of integration? You can add the rest of your post to that comment.

The financial cost of this is what will crush the liberal agenda. Most of Europe is unable to house them with present housing stock. In the UK they can't house the present population, the new arrivals and now these migrants. It can cost around $1,000 per worker to pay for the migrants.

In fact the average cost of UK home is £195,000, this includes places where there are no jobs. 5 people per home £20,000. There are not enough jobs, unemployment costs £61 billion a year, that's £4,379 per claimant per year. Average cost of healthcare, £2,000 per year.

You taking one and giving her a bed, is the last of the problems.

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornSEO (Post 20570266)
I respect and agree with your opinion. West has plundered and ruined the homes of these people. Refuge is the least they can give.

They had refuge in Hungary, they walked through safe countries to get to Hungary. They refused to go to the camps. They will leave any camp they are put in. They want jobs and benefits.

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 02:28 AM

European Governments are gambling with their future. In 3 years or less most will have to face the electorate. To be judged on how they handled this situation. If everything is fine, no worries. Back in the real world the problems will have doubled or trebled.

Then parties with real solutions will pick up huge numbers of votes. The right will sweep into power.

Already growing, this is a boost for them.

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 20570307)
the problem with refugees is that they are merely the losing side of the same culture. They bring their problems, hatred, religion, etc. with them. Eventually their new home looks like their old home.

If Americans want to enjoy traveling through europe, they need to do it within the next 10 years.

Sweden: Rape Capital of the West

Scott McD 09-05-2015 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d (Post 20570979)


More women and children. I really don't know how anyone can call this anything OTHER then an Invasion...

Bring them all here Mr Cameron.

Britain has a duty after all...

L-Pink 09-05-2015 04:00 AM

Each one of these muslims will take more than they will ever give to their new host country. As they settle they will not acclimate themselves into their new society but expect their new country to change for them.

Goodbye Europe.

MetaMan 09-05-2015 04:46 AM

The world sees the west as weak. Weak policies with a current strong economic base. Ripe for the picking.

What will happen is the same idea of a trojan horse. Let the doors open and be invaded from the inside.

If people have never met someone from these cultures dont fool yourself. They are demanding and violent to the core. The exact reason there has been problems in the region forever. If a stance is not taken europe will be finished.

Scott McD 09-05-2015 05:44 AM

With everything German chancellor Angela Merkel is saying ("we will set no limits to the number of people who want to come to our country"), i'd like someone to interview her in 10 or 20 years time and ask if Germany has any regrets...

Mutt 09-05-2015 06:09 AM

Single adult males should absolutely be prohibited entry, look at the photos and videos, that's who's in them.

MetaMan 09-05-2015 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 20571101)
Single adult males should absolutely be prohibited entry, look at the photos and videos, that's who's in them.

But according to MaDaltons cherry picked photos they are women and children?

nico-t 09-05-2015 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 20571092)
With everything German chancellor Angela Merkel is saying ("we will set no limits to the number of people who want to come to our country"), i'd like someone to interview her in 10 or 20 years time and ask if Germany has any regrets...

that's the thing, it's a vicious cycle for idiots who cry that the people need to be let in etc. They ignore the reality of ghettos full of them here and the constant crime. Here the people in the media sit safely in their huge houses at the canals in amsterdam, surrounded by others who do not know the reality in the rest of the country. They live in a dream world.

I saw a popular show here in NL talking about the pic of the dead kid, and they introduced this acress with the words "she is already redecorating her attic to place a shower and room for some refugees" and i instantly changed the channel. This naive dreamworld crap really turns my stomach around, a woman like that has no fucking clue. And ofcourse she's the first to go on TV to announce to the world she is doing this. That behaviour completely away from reality with the aim to brainwash is sickening.

j3rkules 09-05-2015 07:26 AM

According to you, my friend, not wanting the whole of Europe to become a crazy social experiment like Sweden is bigotry. Sure thing m8. Oh, I forgot, Sweden is a model country. Taking in hordes of people from third world countries with third world ''values'' is so progressive. Ignoring the fact that rape has skyrocketed because of these people and that they are leeching off the welfare state is progressive. Heck, they can even start some riots and nobody will touch them because hey, that would be racist. And no, I am obviously not referring to the Syrians but keep twisting things, it is amusing.

https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...f9&oe=5662B7B8

j3rkules 09-05-2015 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20571039)
Each one of these muslims will take more than they will ever give to their new host country. As they settle they will not acclimate themselves into their new society but expect their new country to change for them.

Goodbye Europe.

As you can see, europeans don't hate muslims, they just dislike them. But as I said, there are factual arguments to support that feeling. No one likes a group who demand a lot, doesn't integrate, does more crime, lives on welfare, is often religious fanatics, and is increasing rapidely. I don't know a single country in the world, who would love people like that.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/uploads/0/...s_and_Jews.png

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20570504)
Could something like this fracture the European Union?

It will bring in right wing politicians who object to the liberal views of many now in control. In the countries that produce the wealth the EU relies on. Then the EU gets changed for the better of those countries or it breaks up.

MetaMan 09-05-2015 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerkules (Post 20571130)
According to you, my friend, not wanting the whole of Europe to become a crazy social experiment like Sweden is bigotry. Sure thing m8. Oh, I forgot, Sweden is a model country. Taking in hordes of people from third world countries with third world ''values'' is so progressive. Ignoring the fact that rape has skyrocketed because of these people and that they are leeching off the welfare state is progressive. Heck, they can even start some riots and nobody will touch them because hey, that would be racist. And no, I am obviously not referring to the Syrians but keep twisting things, it is amusing.

https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...f9&oe=5662B7B8

Great pic. If that doesnt show whats going on i dont know what to tell people.

Happens in canada refugees come in. Free school. Free langauge courses. Free healthcare. On and on. And these refugees arent stupid. They come in educated on what programs they can take advantage of and expect nothing less.

A muslim immigrant at my mothers work complained that the business owners need to build her a private room to pray. She also gets special breaks in order to do so. It's fucking sick.

They do not and will not integrate.

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 07:49 AM

Read this and think how pouring money into these countries helps.

Quote:

The most effective and least expensive approach would be to help Third World countries solve their basic environmental and public health problems before they cripple societies. The cost of a global program to combat AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis -- the world's three most costly infectious diseases -- is estimated by public health organizations at about $25 billion, or one- quarter the cost of a single military intervention.

Attacking problems before crises is a policy that differs in motivation (though not in policies pursued) from a traditional humanitarian response that comes out of a moral commitment to address crises. Its motive is selfish. Preventing chaos abroad benefits the United States. President Bush would be on the right track with his policy of preemption if he were aiming at preempting crises, rather than at preempting military aggression.

In today's globalized world, any country can pose a threat: Just look at Somalia and Afghanistan, which rank among the poorest, weakest, most isolated countries on Earth. We can't take on the whole world militarily. Keeping weak countries from getting into the kind of trouble Iraq found itself in would ultimately save the U.S. money -- and generate global political capital.
The article already admits money is available.

Quote:

As the end product of this history, the former world center of wealth, power and civilization is now poor in everything except oil. Iraq's leaders ensured that few benefits of that oil reached their people.
Even sitting on the world biggest reserves of oil, and enough money to solve all their problems. They can't. And did they allow the ordinary people to have Western schools and hospitals? No, those ordinary people join terrorists groups to destroy them.

Sly 09-05-2015 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerkules (Post 20571130)

Greece is not far away.

People are not stupid when it comes to survival. They will take the best deal available to them.

Going to be a hell of a time when the families that have been there contributing to society and paying taxes for centuries decide they have had enough.

Paul Markham 09-05-2015 07:52 AM

https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...f9&oe=5662B7B8

They are breaking out of camps to get to the money, when Austria says no more, they move to Germany, when Germany says no more, someone might try to deals with the problem. Just don't count on it.

Sly 09-05-2015 07:52 AM

Sly
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20571141)
Even sitting on the world biggest reserves of oil, and enough money to solve all their problems. They can't. And did they allow the ordinary people to have Western schools and hospitals? No, those ordinary people join terrorists groups to destroy them.

People like to blame the West for all problems. They seem to be forgetting that the Middle East has been on fire for millennia. This is not the result of any one single actor. It's the result of many. Placing blame is pointless. Taking on all responsibility for the problem is naive.

Scott McD 09-05-2015 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 20571109)
that's the thing, it's a vicious cycle for idiots who cry that the people need to be let in etc. They ignore the reality of ghettos full of them here and the constant crime. Here the people in the media sit safely in their huge houses at the canals in amsterdam, surrounded by others who do not know the reality in the rest of the country. They live in a dream world.

I saw a popular show here in NL talking about the pic of the dead kid, and they introduced this acress with the words "she is already redecorating her attic to place a shower and room for some refugees" and i instantly changed the channel. This naive dreamworld crap really turns my stomach around, a woman like that has no fucking clue. And ofcourse she's the first to go on TV to announce to the world she is doing this. That behaviour completely away from reality with the aim to brainwash is sickening.

That fucking idiot Bob Geldof said something similar a few days ago. He was planning to allow some "refugees" a place to stay at some of his many properties.

Nice one Bob. You attention seeking fuck...

dyna mo 09-05-2015 07:53 AM

the Arab Gulf States have yet to take in a single refugee.

Zero migrants taken in by the fabulously wealthy autocratic monarchies of the Persian Gulf.

Washington Post:

Some European countries have been criticized for offering sanctuary only to a small number of refugees, or for discriminating between Muslims and Christians. There's also been a good deal of continental hand-wringing over the general dysfunction of Europe's systems for migration and asylum.

Less ire, though, has been directed at another set of stakeholders who almost certainly should be doing more: Saudi Arabia and the wealthy Arab states along the Persian Gulf.

As Amnesty International recently pointed out, the "six Gulf countries -- Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain -- have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees."

What makes their reluctance to take in any refugees so maddening is that several of those states - Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UEA - are bankrolling Islamist rebels in Syria that are the cause of this mass migration of people.

Sly 09-05-2015 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20571149)
the Arab Gulf States have yet to take in a single refugee.

Zero migrants taken in by the fabulously wealthy autocratic monarchies of the Persian Gulf.

Washington Post:

Some European countries have been criticized for offering sanctuary only to a small number of refugees, or for discriminating between Muslims and Christians. There's also been a good deal of continental hand-wringing over the general dysfunction of Europe's systems for migration and asylum.

Less ire, though, has been directed at another set of stakeholders who almost certainly should be doing more: Saudi Arabia and the wealthy Arab states along the Persian Gulf.

As Amnesty International recently pointed out, the "six Gulf countries -- Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain -- have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees."

What makes their reluctance to take in any refugees so maddening is that several of those states - Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UEA - are bankrolling Islamist rebels in Syria that are the cause of this mass migration of people.

The King of Saudi Arabia has a 1000 strong party entourage. United Arab Emirates builds islands in the shape of the globe.

Sly 09-05-2015 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 20571148)
That fucking idiot Bob Geldof said something similar a few days ago. He was planning to allow some "refugees" a place to stay at some of his many properties.

Nice one Bob. You attention seeking fuck...

Him and Bono should get together and throw a new charity event, Live Now. Free concert for refugees only. Rent a large park. Free food, free bands. Thousands in attendance.

Curious how that would go.

MetaMan 09-05-2015 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20571147)
People like to blame the West for all problems. They seem to be forgetting that the Middle East has been on fire for millennia. This is not the result of any one single actor. It's the result of many. Placing blame is pointless. Taking on all responsibility for the problem is naive.

The fact is if these refugees religious sect were the ones in power. They would be pillaging their counter parts.

It has 0 to do with the west. It's always easier to point the finger on the west.

I mean it couldnt be the fact these people come from different fanatical religious sects and indoctrinate their children from birth to hate eachother? But nope.... wests fault.

dyna mo 09-05-2015 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20571150)
The King of Saudi Arabia has a 1000 strong party entourage. United Arab Emirates builds islands in the shape of the globe.

:warning

dubai police cars and headquarters

http://cdn2.autoexpress.co.uk/sites/...he_156_2-8.jpg

:warning

Tasty1 09-05-2015 08:04 AM

You can see already that the immigrant problems splits the people in all countries. That means that more extreme politicians will be elected. That means more problems in Europe cause most of them want out of the influence of the EU.

The tensions between migrants and p[eople from countries will grow. And in the end IS destabilized Europe and than everything can happen. You can see that every country already musthave some jihadist in their country.

You must help the real refugees, but Europe can take care of all the people that want to go to Europe. Espacially not when some countries want 0 refugees, while other must take 100.000...

Every time IS start attacking new areas, more people will come and destabilize Europe in many ways. A lot of people are already angry about the help for Greece while in their own countries things aren't as well as it was either.

I have the feeling we will found out soon what happens, i expect more terror attacks in Europe to destabilize Europe.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123